Pim J. de Feyter

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) to detect or rule out significant coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND CTCA is emerging as a noninvasive technique to detect coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS We conducted a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study involving 360 symptomatic patients with acute and stable anginal syndromes who were between 50 and 70 years of age and were referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography (CCA) from September 2004 through June 2006. All patients underwent a nonenhanced calcium scan and a CTCA, which was compared with CCA. No patients or segments were excluded because of impaired image quality attributable to either coronary motion or calcifications. Patient-, vessel-, and segment-based sensitivities and specificities were calculated to detect or rule out significant CAD, defined as >or=50% lumen diameter reduction. RESULTS The prevalence among patients of having at least 1 significant stenosis was 68%. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity for detecting patients with significant CAD was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98% to 100%), specificity was 64% (95% CI: 55% to 73%), positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI: 82% to 90%), and negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 94% to 100%). In a segment-based analysis, the sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 85% to 91%), specificity was 90% (95% CI: 89% to 92%), positive predictive value was 47% (95% CI: 44% to 51%), and negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98% to 99%). CONCLUSIONS Among patients in whom a decision had already been made to obtain CCA, 64-slice CTCA was reliable for ruling out significant CAD in patients with stable and unstable anginal syndromes. A positive 64-slice CTCA scan often overestimates the severity of atherosclerotic obstructions and requires further testing to guide patient management.

Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses: Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography and Correlation With Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina

OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive visual (computed tomography coronary angiography [CTCA]) and quantitative computed tomography coronary angiography (QCT) to predict the hemodynamic significance of a coronary stenosis, using intracoronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard. BACKGROUND It has been demonstrated that CTCA provides excellent diagnostic sensitivity for identifying coronary stenoses, but may lack accurate delineation of the hemodynamic significance. METHODS We investigated 79 patients with stable angina pectoris who underwent both 64-slice or dual-source CTCA and FFR measurement of discrete coronary stenoses. CTCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA), and QCT and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), were performed to determine the severity of a stenosis that was compared with FFR measurements. A significant anatomical or functional stenosis was defined as >/=50% diameter stenosis or an FFR <0.75. Stented segments and bypass grafts were not included in the analysis. RESULTS A total of 89 stenoses were evaluated of which 18% (16 of 89) had an FFR <0.75. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA, QCT, CCA, and QCA to detect a hemodynamically significant coronary lesion was 49%, 71%, 61%, and 67%, respectively. Correlation between QCT and QCA with FFR measurement was weak (R values of -0.32 and -0.30, respectively). Correlation between QCT and QCA was significant, but only moderate (R = 0.53; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The anatomical assessment of the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses determined by visual CTCA, CCA, or QCT or QCA does not correlate well with the functional assessment of FFR. Determining the hemodynamic significance of an angiographically intermediate stenosis remains relevant before referral for revascularization treatment.

A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension

AIMS The aim was to validate, update, and extend the Diamond-Forrester model for estimating the probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a contemporary cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS Prospectively collected data from 14 hospitals on patients with chest pain without a history of CAD and referred for conventional coronary angiography (CCA) were used. Primary outcome was obstructive CAD, defined as ≥ 50% stenosis in one or more vessels on CCA. The validity of the Diamond-Forrester model was assessed using calibration plots, calibration-in-the-large, and recalibration in logistic regression. The model was subsequently updated and extended by revising the predictive value of age, sex, and type of chest pain. Diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (c-statistic) and reclassification was determined. We included 2260 patients, of whom 1319 had obstructive CAD on CCA. Validation demonstrated an overestimation of the CAD probability, especially in women. The updated and extended models demonstrated a c-statistic of 0.79 (95% CI 0.77-0.81) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.84), respectively. Sixteen per cent of men and 64% of women were correctly reclassified. The predicted probability of obstructive CAD ranged from 10% for 50-year-old females with non-specific chest pain to 91% for 80-year-old males with typical chest pain. Predictions varied across hospitals due to differences in disease prevalence. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the Diamond-Forrester model overestimates the probability of CAD especially in women. We updated the predictive effects of age, sex, type of chest pain, and hospital setting which improved model performance and we extended it to include patients of 70 years and older.

Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease

The latest generation of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) scanners is capable of noninvasive coronary angiography. We evaluated its diagnostic accuracy to detect stenotic coronary artery disease (CAD). In 53 patients with suspected CAD, contrast-enhanced MSCT and conventional angiography were performed. The CT data were acquired within a single breathhold, and isocardiophasic slices were reconstructed by means of retrospective electrocardiographic gating. Coronary segments of > or = 2 mm in diameter, measured by quantitative angiography, were evaluated. In 70% of the 358 available segments, image quality was regarded as adequate for assessment. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values to detect > or = 50% stenotic lesions in the assessable segments were 82% (42 of 51 lesions), 93% (285 of 307 nonstenotic segments), and 66% and 97%, respectively, regarding conventional quantitative angiography as the gold standard. Proximal segments were assessable in 92%, and distal segments and side branches in 71% and 50%, respectively. Including the undetected lesions in non-assessable segments, overall sensitivity decreased to 61% but remained 82% for lesions in proximal coronary segments. MSCT correctly predicted absent, single, or multiple lesions in 55% of patients. Thus, despite potentially high image quality, current MSCT protocols offer only reasonable diagnostic accuracy in an unselected patient group with a high prevalence of CAD.

Natural history of coronary atherosclerosis by multislice computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to analyze the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis by multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and assess the serial changes in coronary plaque burden, lumen dimensions, and arterial remodeling. BACKGROUND MSCT can comprehensively assess coronary atherosclerosis by combining lumen and plaque size parameters. METHODS Thirty-two patients with acute coronary syndromes underwent 64-slice computed tomography angiography after percutaneous coronary intervention at baseline and after a median of 39 months. All patients received contemporary medical treatment. All available coronary segments in every subject were analyzed. The progression of atherosclerosis per segment and per patient was assessed by means of change in percent atheroma volume (PAV), change in normalized total atheroma volume (TAVnorm), and percent change in TAV (% change in TAV). Serial coronary remodeling was also assessed. Measures of lumen stenosis included percent diameter stenosis (%DS), minimum lumen diameter (MLD), percent area stenosis (%AS), and minimum lumen area (MLA). For each patient, the mean of all matched segments was calculated at the 2 time points. Clinical events at follow-up were documented. RESULTS The PAV did not change significantly (-0.15 ± 3.64%, p = 0.72). The mean change in TAVnorm was 47.36 ± 143.24 mm(3) (p = 0.071), and the % change in TAV was 6.7% (p = 0.029). The MLD and MLA increased by 0.15 mm (-0.09 to 0.24, p = 0.039) and 0.52 mm(2) (-0.38 to 1.04, p = 0.034) respectively, which was accompanied by vessel enlargement, with 53% of the patients showing expansive positive remodeling. Patients with clinical events had a larger TAVnorm at baseline (969.72 mm(3) vs. 810.77 mm(3), p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS MSCT can assess the progression of coronary atherosclerosis and may be used for noninvasive monitoring of pharmacological interventions in coronary artery disease. ( PROSPECT An Imaging Study in Patients With Unstable Atherosclerotic Lesions; NCT00180466).

Clinical outcomes for sirolimus‐eluting stent implantation and vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of in‐stent restenosis

The purpose of this study was to compare the mid‐term clinical outcome of sirolimus‐eluting stent (SES) implantation and vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for in‐stent restenosis (ISR). We assessed the 9‐month occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in 44 consecutive patients with ISR treated with SES implantation and 43 consecutive patients treated with VBT in the period immediately prior. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. During follow‐up, three patients (7%) died in the VBT group and none in the SES group. The incidence of myocardial infarction was 2.3% in both groups. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 11.6% of the VBT patients and 16.3% of the SES patients (P = NS). The 9‐month MACE‐free survival was similar in both groups (79.1% VBT vs. 81.5% SES; P = 0.8 by log rank). The result of this nonrandomized study suggests that sirolimus‐eluting stent implantation is at least as effective as vascular brachytherapy in the treatment of in‐stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;62:283–288.

Detection and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by 64-slice multidetector CT: a systematic head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE We evaluated the ability of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)-derived plaque parameters to detect and quantify coronary atherosclerosis, using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as the reference standard. METHODS In 32 patients, IVUS and 64-MDCT was performed. The MDCT and IVUS datasets of 44 coronary arteries were co-registered using a newly developed fusion technique and quantitative parameters were derived from both imaging modalities. The threshold of >0.5 mm of maximum wall thickness was used to establish plaque presence on MDCT and IVUS. RESULTS We analyzed 1364 coregistered 1-mm coronary cross-sections and 255 segments of 5-mm length. Compared with IVUS, 64-MDCT enabled correct detection in 957 of 1109 cross-sections containing plaque (sensitivity 86%). In 180 of 255 cross-sections atherosclerosis was correctly excluded (specificity 71%). On the segmental level, MDCT detected 213 of 220 segments with any atherosclerotic plaque (sensitivity 96%), whereas the presence of any plaque was correctly ruled out in 28 of 32 segments (specificity 88%). Interobserver agreement for the detection of atherosclerotic cross-sections was moderate (Cohens kappa coefficient K=0.51), but excellent for the atherosclerotic segments (K=1.0). Pearsons correlation coefficient for vessel plaque volumes measured by MDCT and IVUS was r=0.91 (p<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a slight non-significant underestimation of any plaque volume by MDCT (p=0.5), with a trend to underestimate noncalcified and overestimate mixed/calcified plaque volumes (p=0.22 and p=0.87 respectively). CONCLUSION MDCT is able to detect and quantify atherosclerotic plaque. Further improvement in CT resolution is necessary for more reliable assessment of very small and distal coronary plaques.

Quantification of myocardial blood flow by adenosine-stress CT perfusion imaging in pigs during various degrees of stenosis correlates well with coronary artery blood flow and fractional flow reserve

AIMS Only few preliminary experimental studies demonstrated the feasibility of adenosine stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging to calculate the absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF), thereby providing information whether a coronary stenosis is flow limiting. Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine whether adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging by Dual Source CT (DSCT) enables non-invasive quantification of regional MBF in an animal model with various degrees of coronary flow reduction. METHODS AND RESULTS In seven pigs, a coronary flow probe and an adjustable hydraulic occluder were placed around the left anterior descending coronary artery to monitor the distal coronary artery blood flow (CBF) while several degrees of coronary flow reduction were induced. CT perfusion (CT-MBF) was acquired during adenosine stress with no CBF reduction, an intermediate (15-39%) and a severe (40-95%) CBF reduction. Reference standards were CBF and fractional flow reserve measurements (FFR). FFR was simultaneously derived from distal coronary artery pressure and aortic pressure measurements. CT-MBF decreased progressively with increasing CBF reduction severity from 2.68 (2.31-2.81)mL/g/min (normal CBF) to 1.96 (1.83-2.33) mL/g/min (intermediate CBF-reduction) and to 1.55 (1.14-2.06)mL/g/min (severe CBF-reduction) (both P < 0.001). We observed very good correlations between CT-MBF and CBF (r = 0.85, P < 0.001) and CT-MBF and FFR (r = 0.85, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Adenosine stress DSCT myocardial perfusion imaging allows quantification of regional MBF under various degrees of CBF reduction.

Combining magnetic resonance viability variables better predicts improvement of myocardial function prior to percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE To optimize the predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for improvement of myocardial dysfunction prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS We performed cardiac MRI in 72 patients (male 87%, age 60 years) before and 6 months after successful PCI (43/72) or unsuccessful PCI (29/72) of a chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO). Before PCI, 5 viability parameters were evaluated: transmural extent of infarction (TEI), contractile reserve during dobutamine, end diastolic wall thickness, unenhanced rim thickness and segmental wall thickening of the unenhanced rim (SWTur). Multivariate analysis was performed and based on the regression coefficient (RC) a predictive score was constructed. Diagnostic performance to predict improvement in myocardial function for each parameter and for the viability score was determined. RESULTS The predictive value of a combination of contractile reserve, SWTur and TEI was incremental to TEI alone (AUROC 0.91 vs. 0.77; p<0.001). A viability score of ≥ 5 based on contractile reserve (RC=4), SWTur (RC=1) and TEI (RC=2) was 91% sensitive and 84% specific in predicting improvement of myocardial function. CONCLUSION Combining viability parameters results in a better prediction of improvement of dysfunctional myocardial segments after a successful PCI.

Coronary computed tomography versus exercise testing in patients with stable chest pain: comparative effectiveness and costs

BACKGROUND To determine the comparative effectiveness and costs of a CT-strategy and a stress-electrocardiography-based strategy (standard-of-care; SOC-strategy) for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS A decision analysis was performed based on a well-documented prospective cohort of 471 outpatients with stable chest pain with follow-up combined with best-available evidence from the literature. Outcomes were correct classification of patients as CAD- (no obstructive CAD), CAD+ (obstructive CAD without revascularization) and indication for Revascularization (using a combination reference standard), diagnostic costs, lifetime health care costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Parameter uncertainty was analyzed using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS For men (and women), diagnostic cost savings were €245 (€252) for the CT-strategy as compared to the SOC-strategy. The CT-strategy classified 82% (88%) of simulated men (women) in the appropriate disease category, whereas 83% (85%) were correctly classified by the SOC-strategy. The long-term cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the SOC-strategy was dominated by the CT-strategy, which was less expensive (-€229 in men, -€444 in women) and more effective (+0.002 QALY in men, +0.005 in women). The CT-strategy was cost-saving (-€231) but also less effective compared to SOC (-0.003 QALY) in men with a pre-test probability of ≥ 70%. The CT-strategy was cost-effective in 100% of simulations, except for men with a pre-test probability ≥ 70% in which case it was 59%. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that a CT-based strategy is less expensive and equally effective compared to SOC in all women and in men with a pre-test probability <70%.