Marcela Romero-Reyes

Orofacial pain management: current perspectives

Some of the most prevalent and debilitating pain conditions arise from the structures innervated by the trigeminal system (head, face, masticatory musculature, temporomandibular joint and associated structures). Orofacial pain (OFP) can arise from different regions and etiologies. Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are the most prevalent orofacial pain conditions for which patients seek treatment. Temporomandibular disorders include a number of clinical problems that involve the masticatory musculature, the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) or both. Trigeminal neuropathic pain conditions can arise from injury secondary to dental procedures, infection, neoplasias, or disease or dysfunction of the peripheral and/or central nervous system. Neurovascular disorders, such as primary headaches, can present as chronic orofacial pain, such as in the case of facial migraine, where the pain is localized in the second and third division of the trigeminal nerve. Together, these disorders of the trigeminal system impact the quality of life of the sufferer dramatically. A multidisciplinary pain management approach should be considered for the optimal treatment of orofacial pain disorders including both non-pharmacological and pharmacological modalities.

Spontaneous behavioral responses in the orofacial region: A model of trigeminal pain in mouse

Objectives.— To develop a translational mouse model for the study and measurement of non‐evoked pain in the orofacial region by establishing markers of nociceptive‐specific grooming behaviors in the mouse.

Current and novel insights into the neurophysiology of migraine and its implications for therapeutics

ABSTRACT Migraine headache and its associated symptoms have plagued humans for two millennia. It is manifest throughout the world, and affects more than 1/6 of the global population. It is the most common brain disorder, and is characterized by moderate to severe unilateral headache that is accompanied by vomiting, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, and other hypersensitive symptoms of the senses. While there is still a clear lack of understanding of its neurophysiology, it is beginning to be understood, and it seems to suggest migraine is a disorder of brain sensory processing, characterized by a generalized neuronal hyperexcitability. The complex symptomatology of migraine indicates that multiple neuronal systems are involved, including brainstem and diencephalic systems, which function abnormally, resulting in premonitory symptoms, ultimately evolving to affect the dural trigeminovascular system, and the pain phase of migraine. The migraineur also seems to be particularly sensitive to fluctuations in homeostasis, such as sleep, feeding and stress, reflecting the abnormality of functioning in these brainstem and diencephalic systems. Implications for therapeutic development have grown out of our understanding of migraine neurophysiology, leading to major drug classes, such as triptans, calcitonin gene‐related peptide receptor antagonists, and 5‐HT1F receptor agonists, as well as neuromodulatory approaches, with the promise of more to come. The present review will discuss the current understanding of the neurophysiology of migraine, particularly migraine headache, and novel insights into the complex neural networks responsible for associated neurological symptoms, and how interaction of these networks with migraine pain pathways has implications for the development of novel therapeutics.

Pearls and pitfalls in experimental in vivo models of headache: Conscious behavioral research

Background Physiological studies have been determinant for the understanding of migraine pathophysiology and the screening of novel therapeutics. At present, there is no animal model that translates fully the clinical symptoms of migraine, and generally these studies are conducted on anesthetized animals. Methodology Pain as well as non-painful symptoms such as photophobia, need to have a conscious individual to be experienced; therefore, the new development and adaptation of behavioral assays assessing pain and other non-painful symptomatology in conscious animals represents a great opportunity for headache research and it is exciting that more and more researchers are using behavioral paradigms. Summary This review will describe the different behavioral models for the study of headache that are performed in non-anesthetized conscious animals. The pearls and challenges for measuring hypersensitivity in rodents such as the common tests for measuring mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia have been the landmark for the development of assays that measure hypersensitivity in the craniofacial region. Here we describe the different behavioral assays that measure hypersensitivity in the craniofacial region as well as the established behavioral models of trigeminovascular nociception and non-nociceptive migrainous symptoms.

Vagus nerve stimulation suppresses acute noxious activation of trigeminocervical neurons in animal models of primary headache

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been reported to be effective in the abortive treatment of both migraine and cluster headache. Using validated animal models of acute dural-intracranial (migraine-like) and trigeminal-autonomic (cluster-like) head pain we tested whether VNS suppresses ongoing and nociceptive-evoked firing of trigeminocervical neurons to explain its abortive effects in migraine and cluster headache. Unilateral VNS was applied invasively via hook electrodes placed on the vagus nerve. A single dose of ipsilateral or contralateral VNS, to trigeminal recording and dural-stimulating side, suppressed ongoing spontaneous and noxious dural-evoked trigeminocervical neuronal firing. This effect was dose-dependent, with two doses of ipsilateral VNS prolonging suppression of ongoing spontaneous firing (maximally by ~60%) for up to three hours, and dural-evoked (Aδ-fiber; by ~22%, C-fiber: by ~55%) responses for at least two hours. Statistically, there was no difference between ipsilateral and contralateral groups. Two doses of VNS also suppressed superior salivatory nucleus-evoked trigeminocervical neuronal responses (maximally by ~22%) for 2.5h, to model nociceptive activation of the trigeminal-autonomic pathway. VNS had no effect on normal somatosensory cutaneous facial responses throughout. These studies provide a mechanistic rationale for the observed benefits of VNS in the abortive treatment of migraine and cluster headache. In addition, they further validate these preclinical models as suitable approaches to optimize therapeutic efficacy, and provide an opportunity to hypothesize and dissect the neurobiological mechanisms of VNS in the treatment of primary headaches.

A potent and selective calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, MK-8825, inhibits responses to nociceptive trigeminal activation: Role of CGRP in orofacial pain

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are orofacial pains within the trigeminal distribution, which involve the masticatory musculature, the temporomandibular joint or both. Their pathophysiology remains unclear, as inflammatory mediators are thought to be involved, and clinically TMD presents pain and sometimes limitation of function, but often appears without gross indications of local inflammation, such as visible edema, redness and increase in temperature. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been implicated in other pain disorders with trigeminal distribution, such as migraine, of which TMD shares a significant co-morbidity. CGRP causes activation and sensitization of trigeminal primary afferent neurons, independent of any inflammatory mechanisms, and thus may also be involved in TMD. Here we used a small molecule, selective CGRP receptor antagonist, MK-8825, to dissect the role of CGRP in inducing spontaneous nociceptive facial grooming behaviors, neuronal activation in the trigeminal nucleus, and systemic release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, in a mouse model of acute orofacial masseteric muscle pain that we have developed, as a surrogate of acute TMD. We show that CFA masseteric injection causes significant spontaneous orofacial pain behaviors, neuronal activation in the trigeminal nucleus, and release of interleukin-6 (IL-6). In mice pre-treated with MK-8825 there is a significant reduction in these spontaneous orofacial pain behaviors. Also, at 2 and 24h after CFA injection the level of Fos immunoreactivity in the trigeminal nucleus, used as a marker of neuronal activation, was much lower on both ipsilateral and contralateral sides after pre-treatment with MK-8825. There was no effect of MK-8825 on the release of IL-6. These data suggest that CGRP may be involved in TMD pathophysiology, but not via inflammatory mechanisms, at least in the acute stage. Furthermore, CGRP receptor antagonists may have therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of TMD, as they do with migraine.

Potent induction of TNF-α during interaction of immune effectors with oral tumors as a potential mechanism for the loss of NK cell viability and function

The inhibitory role of TNF-α on survival of naïve and IL-2 treated NK cells has been demonstrated in the past. However, its effect on the function of these cells against tumor cells, in particular against oral tumors has not been established. We investigated the significance of secreted TNF-α in death and functional loss of splenocytes and NK cells in ex-vivo cultures with oral tumors. Oral tumors trigger potent secretion of TNF-α by human and murine immune effectors. Absence of TNF-α increases the cytotoxic activity and secretion of IFN-γ by IL-2 treated splenocytes and NK cells in co-cultures with MOK L2D1+/p53−/− oral tumor cells. IL-2 treated splenocytes and NK cells from TNF-α −/− mice survive and proliferate more when compared to cells from TNF-α +/+ mice. Cell death induced by F. nucleatum, an oral bacteria, in TNF-α −/− splenocytes are considerably lower than that induced in TNF-α +/+ splenocytes where potent release of TNF-α is reproducibly observed. Addition of exogenous rTNF-α to IL-2 treated splenocytes and NK cells decreased survival and function of splenocytes and NK cells obtained from TNF-α −/− mice against oral tumors. These findings suggest that potent induction of TNF-α during interaction of immune effectors with oral tumors and/or oral bacteria is an important factor in decreasing the function and survival of cytotoxic immune effectors. Strategies to neutralize TNF-α may be beneficial in the treatment of oral cancers.

Update on Animal Models of Migraine

Migraine is a severe and debilitating disorder of the brain that involves a constellation of neurological symptoms alongside head pain. Its pathophysiology is only beginning to be understood, and is thought to involve activation and sensitization of trigeminovascular nociceptive pathways that innervate the cranial vasculature, and activation of brain stem nuclei. Much of our understanding of migraine pathophysiology stems from research conducted in animal models over the last 30 years, and the development of unique assays in animals that try to model specific aspects of migraine pathophysiology related to particular symptoms. This review will highlight some of the latest findings from these established animal models, as well as discuss the latest in the development of novel approaches in animals to study migraine

Insights into the pharmacological targeting of the trigeminocervical complex in the context of treatments of migraine

Migraine is one of the most severe and debilitating brain disorders. Most scientists accept that it involves activation and sensitization of the trigeminovascular system, which includes the sensory peripheral projections to the pain-producing dura mater, and a central projection to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and its cervical extension, the trigeminocervical complex (TCC). The development of the anti-migraine therapeutics, triptans-5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, had originally targeted the craniovasculature to exert therapeutic effects, and this locus of action seemed to predict efficacy in the clinic. However, subsequent development of novel targets, using the same strategy failed to replicate this early success and as a consequence central mechanisms of action away from the dural vasculature were thought to be responsible for these therapeutic effects. Coupled to this, migraine has been hypothesized to involve a dysfunction of areas of the brainstem and diencephalon, which seem to mediate the activation, or perception of activation, of the trigeminovascular system as well as sensitization of neuronal pathways that drive trigeminovascular activation. Therefore, drug targets that act in the brain, specifically on the central component of the trigeminovascular system, the TCC, would seem to be ideally placed to modulate this nociceptive pathway and relieve migraine, but particularly the headache phase. This review will discuss how the TCC, rather than other more craniovascular sites, may be the anatomical target of some of the current and emerging therapies to relieve migraine symptoms, and why this should prove to be a fruitful area for drug development for the treatment of migraine.

Is there hope for chronic pain and headache

Currently the clinical needs for pain and headache management are not met. Despite the numerous and exciting recent advances in understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms that originate pain, we cannot yet fully explain the mechanism underlying the biology of chronic pain. Pain is a natural mechanism preserving our species survival; however, when the protective quality is lost, physiologic changes to the peripheral and central nervous systems result in the formation of chronic pain states. Once we understand how this chronic pain state is created, either through genetic, environmental, therapeutic, or other triggers we may be able to enhance our species existence, limiting maladaptive pain and suffering. The future therapeutic targets will need to address the genetics, neurophysiologic changes of the neurons and brain as well as help control immune systems including the glia. The key to successful headache and pain therapy is research aimed at prevention and minimizing the plastic changes triggering chronic pain.