Marcin Czerwinski

Major morbidity and mortality rates in craniofacial surgery: an analysis of 8101 major procedures.

Background: The first combined evaluation of morbidity and mortality rates in craniofacial surgery was published 30 years ago; many surgeons believe these procedures have since become safer. The authors performed a contemporary evaluation of craniofacial morbidity and mortality rates to help surgeons more accurately counsel families about current risks, and to gain insight into reducing future incidences. Methods: This study used two methodologies to capture all serious morbidities and mortalities associated with major craniofacial procedures between 1990 and 2008: a comprehensive two-center retrospective review (Dallas and Seattle), and an Internet-based survey sent to all North American craniofacial centers. Results: Combining the two-center data with the survey results yielded a database of 7328 intracranial and 773 subcranial procedures, for a total of 8101 major craniofacial procedures. The combined intracranial major morbidity rate was less than 0.1 percent, and the combined mortality rate was 0.1 percent. Of the eight perioperative deaths following intracranial procedures, four (50 percent) intracranial mortalities were directly attributed to blood loss. The combined subcranial procedure major morbidity rate was 0.1 percent and the mortality rate was 0.3 percent (airway related). Comparing the earliest published intracranial mortality rate to our current review revealed a statistically significant reduction in incidence (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The incidence rates for serious morbidities and mortalities among major craniofacial procedures have significantly fallen since first published. On the basis of these analyses, the authors believe that a greater focus on protocols for airway management, blood salvage and replacement, age-appropriate deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, and timing of subcranial midfacial advancements might result in further reductions in craniofacial mortality rates.

Effect of treatment delay on mandibular fracture infection rate.

Background: The incidence of infection secondary to mandibular fractures ranges from 0 to 30 percent, resulting in significant sequelae. Unlike other variables that may influence infection, delayed repair is often unavoidable. The objective of this study was to accurately identify the effect of treatment delay on mandibular fracture infection rate by adjusting for confounders, thus providing strong evidence for preoperative management of these patients. Methods: A retrospective review of mandibular fracture patients treated at the Montreal General Hospital was performed. Length of time delay between injury and operative intervention (≤72 hours and >72 hours) and presence of infection were noted. Logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of treatment delay on infection, after adjustment for covariates. Results: One hundred seventy-seven patients fulfilled the selection criteria and had complete records. The overall incidence of infection was 14 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 8.8 to 18.8 percent). Multiple logistic regression showed no evidence (odds ratio, 2.96; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 10.1) (p = 0.08) that treatment delay of more than 72 hours is a significant predictor of infection. The incidence of nonunion was 36 percent in the infection group (95 percent confidence interval, 17.2 to 54.8 percent) and 0 percent in the no-infection group. Conclusions: Infections following mandibular fractures frequently require extended treatment and significantly increase costs. These results show that delay of mandibular fracture treatment greater than 72 hours does not significantly increase infection risk. Repair should occur promptly after the injury. If that is not possible, the standard patient management should not be altered, as the benefits of doing so are unproven.

Objective interpretation of surgical outcomes: is there a need for standardizing digital images in the plastic surgery literature?

Background: Subjective interpretation of preoperative and postoperative photographs is heavily relied on for evaluating standards of care. For preoperative and postoperative digital images to accurately reflect surgical outcomes, image characteristics, other than acquisition, must be rigidly standardized. The authors investigated, using objective methodology, the consistency of published images within the plastic surgery literature. Methods: A panel reviewed four plastic surgery journals (Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and the British Journal of Plastic Surgery), with 100 consecutive, color, digital, paired preoperative and postoperative images per journal compared. Image characteristics, including color, brightness, contrast, resolution, view, zoom, size, image labeling, background, patient clothing, accessories, makeup/tan, facial expression, and hairstyle, were objectively assessed using a five-point Likert scale; mean values were tabulated and compared among journals; and statistical significance was determined (p < 0.05). Results: The most consistent characteristics among journals included labeling (4.782) and size (4.867), in contrast to clothing (3.097) and hairstyle (3.724) (p < 0.001). Much variability was also present in color, brightness, and view. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and American Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were the two most consistent journals when all image characteristics were combined, scoring 4.6 and 4.5, respectively (p ≤ 0.01). Conclusions: Standardization of photographic images is essential in plastic surgery for validity of results. Overall, the authors have demonstrated that much variability exists for all image characteristics between preoperative and postoperative images. Many are crucial to the evaluation of the surgical outcome depicted. In a specialty with a dramatically increasing trend toward communication by means of digital imaging, an effort toward standardization is essential.

First carpal-metacarpal joint dislocation and trapezial fracture treated with external fixation in an adolescent.

The intrinsic joint stability of the first carpal-metacarpal joint (CMC) makes dislocation a rare injury with fewer than 40 cases described. The degree to which supporting ligaments have been disrupted is reflected clinically by a spectrum of joint stability. Close review of radiographs and an attentive physical examination are necessary to make the diagnosis. Acute treatment has consisted of closed or open reduction with K-wires for stabilization or casting with failures leading to chronic joint instability and the need for soft tissue tendon suspension to maintain joint alignment. We present the case of a 12-year-old boy with a complete first CMC dislocation and trapezial fracture treated with closed reduction and external fixation. At a 3-year follow-up, our patient demonstrates excellent range of motion, strength, and no joint instability without functional limitations. We suggest that external fixation be added to the armamentarium for managing these difficult injuries especially in the pediatric population where interference with growth plates is not ideal.

The Incidence of Ocular Injuries in Isolated Orbital Fractures.

Background Prompt identification of significant ocular injuries in patients who sustain an orbital fracture is important to prevent any potential long-term visual sequelae. The true incidence of these injuries has not been determined, however. As a consequence, most surgeons choose to have all patients evaluated by an ophthalmologist. The objective of this study was to conclusively identify the incidence of significant ocular injuries in patients with isolated orbital fractures and to determine their predictors to guide more efficient patient care. Methods A prospective cohort study powered to detect a 15% incidence of ocular injuries was designed. All patients presenting to our center with computed tomography findings of an isolated orbital fracture were included and evaluated by plastic surgery and ophthalmology services. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 week to identify any delayed injuries. Results Eighty patients were enrolled from 2012 to 2014. There were 46 men and 34 women with a mean age of 42.8 years. Assault was the most common mechanism of injury. There were 8 ocular injuries (10%): ruptured globe (1), uveal prolapse (1), retrobulbar hemorrhage (2), hyphema (2), hemorrhagic glaucoma with hyphema (1), and scleral tear (1). Predictors for significant ocular injuries were grossly abnormal visual acuity and abnormal pupillary reactivity of the affected eye. Conclusions The incidence of significant ocular injuries in isolated orbital fractures is lower than previously reported. Patients presenting with grossly abnormal visual acuity or abnormal pupillary reactivity are at high risk and should receive prompt ophthalmology service evaluation.

Normocephalic Pancraniosynostosis: A Report of a Surgical Technique

Normocephalic pancraniosynostosis is defined as the premature fusion of 3 or, more major sutures in the absence of another primary etiology, including primary, microcephaly, ventriculoperitoneal shunting, hypothyroidism, rickets, mucopolysaccharidoses, or other lysosomal storage diseases. It is very rare, thus far only 6 patients have been reported in the literature. Patients tend to present much later than those with single sutural, synostoses, and up to half have evidence of elevated intracranial pressure. The authors wish to present another patient, with emphasis on a unique treatment approach.

Management of Zygomatic Fractures: A National Survey.

Introduction:Repair of zygomatic fractures can be classified into the early closed reduction or the more recent open reduction and rigid internal fixation (ORIF) methods. Surgical training and literature advocate ORIF, but the actual frequency of the different techniques in clinical practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the current trends in the management of zygomatic fractures among US surgeons and elucidate their influences. Methods:A 10-question survey was developed and distributed to over 16,000 practicing US facial trauma surgeons, including plastic surgeons (PS), oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS), and otorhinolaryngologists (ENT). The survey queried training background, zygoma fracture treatment preferences, and rationale. Responses were tabulated and both univariate and bivariate statistical analyses completed. Results:One thousand six hundred eleven (10%) total responses were received. Zygomatic fractures are treated most commonly by OMFS (61%), then PS (20%) and ENT (19%), with 71% of repairs being performed in private practice. Open reduction and rigid internal fixation is the most common treatment modality (81%), with most surgeons using 2 to 3 sites for exposure, reduction, and fixation with titanium miniplates (70%). Thirty-five percent of surgeons perform routine orbital floor exploration. Forty-three percent quoted training and 32% reported accuracy of repair as the primary reason for choosing ORIF. Conclusions:This is the largest reported survey on the repair of zygoma fractures. The response rate suggests dominance of OMFS in zygoma fracture care, an area pioneered by PS. Evolution of technique is also evident by predominance of ORIF with emphasis of multiple points of exposure, reduction, and fixation with rigid hardware.

Safety of Outpatient Isolated Orbital Floor Fracture Repair

AbstractOrbital fractures are common, accounting for nearly 40% of all facial fractures. Open repair is required to restore preinjury orbital volume and relieve any extra-ocular muscle entrapment. Monitoring for postoperative intraorbital hemorrhage, and its consequent potential for visual impairment, has triggered most surgeons to observe their patients in the hospital overnight postoperatively. The real risk of postoperative hemorrhage in this patient group, however, is uncertain and the need to contain healthcare costs clear. The objective of this study was thus to determine the incidence of emergent postoperative complications in patients undergoing orbital fracture repair to determine the feasibility of performing this operation on an outpatient basis. Patients who sustained isolated orbital fractures and underwent open repair at this level-1 trauma center between January 2002 and January 2012 using International Classification of Disease-9 and Current Procedural Terminology 2012 coding were identified. Demographic data and postoperative complications were identified by reviewing the electronic medical record. Furthermore, critical analysis of available published evidence was performed. Ninety-three patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were selected. There were no patients of an intraorbital hematoma or other immediate postoperative complications that required operative intervention. Average hospital length of stay was 0.85 days. Repair of orbital fractures on an outpatient basis appears to be safe. The theoretical risk of a complicating intraorbital hematoma seems to be between 0 and 3.2%. This can be minimized through: the use of open surgical access site and perforated floor replacement materials, careful early monitoring, education of patients, and admission of those at potentially elevated risk.

Contralateral Dorsally Based Septal Mucoperichondrial Page Flap, for Nasal Lining Reconstruction.

Background:Although excellent techniques for reconstruction of nasal cover and support have been described, reconstruction of large nasal lining defects remains a challenge. Currently available methods have several shortcomings including limited size, airway obstruction, need for multiple procedures, and creation of septal fistulae. Methods:We present 2 cases of nasal lining reconstruction for the lower and mid nasal vaults using a contralateral dorsally based septal mucoperichondrial page flap transposed dorsal to nasal septum and superficial to the ipsilateral upper lateral cartilage. Appropriate, uncomplicated, reconstruction of nasal lining was confirmed in both cases. Discussion:In the lower vault, the flap permits a single-stage reconstruction, without obstruction of the external nasal valve or compromise of caudal septal support. In the mid-vault, the flap allows for reconstruction without creation of a septal fistula or narrowing of the internal nasal valve. In both locations, the size of the flap may be increased by extending it onto nasal floor, and support may be added by combining the flap with septal cartilage. Conclusion:The contralateral dorsally based septal mucoperichondrial flap is a useful option for reconstruction of lower and mid nasal vault lining defects.

Use of a Titanium Microplate to Anchor Subunit Reconstruction at the Nasal-Cheek Junction.

Reconstruction of combined nose, cheek, and/or inferior eyelid defects is facilitated by stable anchorage at the nasal-cheek junction. The previously reported techniques of drill holes and Mitek anchors are not without disadvantages. The authors present a simple means of anchoring soft tissue flaps at the nasal-cheek junction: a titanium miniplate secured with a screw at each end. Our case report describes successful, lasting, and complication-free anchorage of cheek, forehead, and eyelid flaps to a single miniplate placed along the piriform aperture.