Márcio Soares

Prognosis of Critically Ill Patients With Cancer and Acute Renal Dysfunction

PURPOSEnTo evaluate the outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer and acute renal dysfunction.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnProspective cohort study conducted at a 10-bed oncologic medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) over a 56-month period.nnnRESULTSnOf 975 patients, 309 (32%) had renal dysfunction and were studied. Their mean age was 60.9 +/- 15.9 years; 233 patients (75%) had solid tumors and 76 (25%) had hematologic malignancies. During the ICU stay, 98 patients (32%) received dialysis. Renal dysfunction was multifactorial in 56% of the patients, and the main associated factors were shock/ischemia (72%) and sepsis (63%). Overall hospital and 6-month mortality rates were 64% and 73%, respectively. Among patients who required dialysis, mortality rates were lower in patients who received dialysis on the first day of ICU in comparison with those who required it thereafter. In a multivariable Cox model, age more than 60 years, uncontrolled cancer, impaired performance status, and more than two associated organ failures were associated with increased 6-month mortality. Renal function was completely re-established in 82% and partially re-established in 12%, and only 6% of survivors required chronic dialysis.nnnCONCLUSIONnAcute renal dysfunction is frequent in critically ill patients with cancer. Although mortality rates are high, selected patients can benefit from ICU care and advanced organ support. When evaluating prognosis and the appropriateness of dialysis in these patients, older age, functional capacity, cancer status and the severity of associated organ failures are important variables to take into consideration.

Understanding international differences in terminology for delirium and other types of acute brain dysfunction in critically ill patients

BackgroundDelirium (acute brain dysfunction) is a potentially life threatening disturbance in brain function that frequently occurs in critically ill patients. While this area of brain dysfunction in critical care is rapidly advancing, striking limitations in use of terminology related to delirium internationally are hindering cross-talk and collaborative research. In the English literature, synonyms of delirium such as the Intensive Care Unit syndrome, acute brain dysfunction, acute brain failure, psychosis, confusion, and encephalopathy are widely used. This often leads to scientific confusion regarding published data and methodology within studies, which is further exacerbated by organizational, cultural and language barriers.ObjectiveWe undertook this multinational effort to identify conflicts in terminology and phenomenology of delirium to facilitate communication across medical disciplines and languages.MethodsThe evaluation of the terminology used for acute brain dysfunction was determined conducting communications with 24 authors from academic communities throughout countries/regions that speak the 13 variants of the Romanic languages included into this manuscript.ResultsIn the 13 languages utilizing Romanic characters, included in this report, we identified the following terms used to define major types of acute brain dysfunction: coma, delirium, delirio, delirium tremens, délire, confusion mentale, delir, delier, Durchgangs-Syndrom, acute verwardheid, intensiv-psykose, IVA-psykos, IVA-syndrom, akutt konfusion/forvirring. Interestingly two terms are very consistent: 100 % of the selected languages use the term coma or koma to describe patients unresponsive to verbal and/or physical stimuli, and 100% use delirium tremens to define delirium due to alcohol withdrawal. Conversely, only 54% use the term delirium to indicate the disorder as defined by the DSM-IV as an acute change in mental status, inattention, disorganized thinking and altered level of consciousness.ConclusionsAttempts towards standardization in terminology, or at least awareness of differences across languages and specialties, will help cross-talk among clinicians and researchers.

Performance of six severity-of-illness scores in cancer patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of five general severity-of-illness scores (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and III-J, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and the Mortality Probability Models at admission and at 24 hours of intensive care unit [ICU] stay), and to validate a specific score – the ICU Cancer Mortality Model (CMM) – in cancer patients requiring admission to the ICU.MethodsA prospective observational cohort study was performed in an oncological medical/surgical ICU in a Brazilian cancer centre. Data were collected over the first 24 hours of ICU stay. Discrimination was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration was done using Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit H-tests.ResultsA total of 1257 consecutive patients were included over a 39-month period, and 715 (56.9%) were scheduled surgical patients. The observed hospital mortality was 28.6%. Two performance analyses were carried out: in the first analysis all patients were studied; and in the second, scheduled surgical patients were excluded in order to better compare CMM and general prognostic scores. The results of the two analyses were similar. Discrimination was good for all of the six studied models and best for Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III-J. However, calibration was uniformly insufficient (P < 0.001). General scores significantly underestimated mortality (in comparison with the observed mortality); this was in contrast to the CMM, which tended to overestimate mortality.ConclusionNone of the model scores accurately predicted outcome in the present group of critically ill cancer patients. In addition, there was no advantage of CMM over the other general models.

The role of corticosteroids in severe community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review

IntroductionThe purpose of this review was to evaluate the impact of corticosteroids on the outcomes of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).MethodsWe performed a systematic MEDLINE, Cochrane database, and CINAHL search (1966 to November 2007) to identify full-text publications that evaluated the use of corticosteroids in CAP.ResultsAn initial literature search yielded 109 articles, and 105 studies were excluded after the first analysis. We found four studies eligible for analysis. On the basis of their results, the use of corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy in severe CAP should be categorized as a weak recommendation (two studies) and a strong recommendation (two studies) with either low- or moderate-quality evidence. However, no evidence of adverse outcomes or harm is present in the evaluated studies.ConclusionAccording to the GRADE system, available studies do not support the recommendation of corticosteroids as a standard of care for patients with severe CAP. Further randomized controlled trials with this aim should enroll a larger number of severely ill patients. However, in patients needing corticosteroids, it may be reasonable to conclude that corticosteroid administration is safe in patients with severe infections receiving antimicrobial therapy.

Impact of two different comorbidity measures on the 6-month mortality of critically ill cancer patients

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of two different comorbidity measures on the 6-month mortality of severely ill cancer patients.Design and settingProspective cohort study in a ten-bed oncological medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU).PatientsA total of 772 consecutive patients were included over a 45-month period. The mean age was 57.6±16.4xa0years, and 642 (83%) patients had solid tumors.Measurements and resultsData were collected on admission and during ICU stay. Comorbidities were evaluated using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation (ACE-27). The ICU, hospital, and 6-month mortality rates were 34%, 47%, and 58%, respectively. The most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (33%), diabetes mellitus (8%), and chronic pulmonary disease (7%). There were important differences between the two indices regarding the comorbidity evaluation. Using the ACE-27, 389 patients (50%) had comorbid ailments that were classified as mild (31%), moderate (14%), and severe (5%) according to the comorbidity severity. According to the CCI, 212 patients (27%) had a comorbidity, and their median score was 1 (1–2). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard models only the presence of a severe comorbidity by the ACE-27 was associated with increased mortality. The CCI was not independently associated with the outcome. Other outcome predictors were older age, poor performance status, active cancer, need of mechanical ventilation, and severity of acute organ failures.ConclusionsSevere comorbidities must be considered in the outcome evaluation of ICU cancer patients. The ACE-27 seems to be a useful instrument for prognostic assessment in this population.

Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients With Cancer and Prolonged ICU Length of Stay

BACKGROUNDnData on patients with cancer who have a prolonged length of stay (LOS) in the ICU are scarce. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the characteristics and the outcomes of cancer patients with life-threatening complications with an ICU stay > or = 21 days.nnnMETHODSnA cohort study performed at a 10-bed oncology medical-surgical ICU from May 2000 to December 2005. Prolonged ICU LOS was defined as an ICU stay > or = 21 days.nnnRESULTSnDuring the period, 1,090 patients were admitted to the ICU and 163 patients (15%) had a prolonged ICU LOS. These patients, however, accounted for 48% (5,828/12,224) of the total ICU bed-days. The hospital and 6-month mortality rates were 50% and 60%, respectively, and similar to patients with ICU LOS < 21 days (51% and 61%, respectively). ICU-acquired events and complications were common, and the most frequent were infections (90%), mechanical ventilation (99%), and need for vasopressors (88%). The number of organ failures, older age, and poor performance status were the main outcome predictors. The median long-term follow-up after hospital discharge was 537 days (range, 193 to 1,119 days), and 29 patients (18%) were alive.nnnCONCLUSIONSnFifteen percent of critically ill patients with cancer had a prolonged ICU LOS. Short- and long-term survival rates were reasonable, and the prognosis was better than expected a priori. In our opinion, the length of ICU admission per se should not be used in the clinical decisions regarding the continuation of treatment in these patients.

Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study

IntroductionContemporary information on mechanical ventilation (MV) use in emerging countries is limited. Moreover, most epidemiological studies on ventilatory support were carried out before significant developments, such as lung protective ventilation or broader application of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors for hospital mortality and failure of NIV in patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units (ICU).MethodsIn a multicenter, prospective, cohort study, a total of 773 adult patients admitted to 45 ICUs over a two-month period requiring invasive ventilation or NIV for more than 24 hours were evaluated. Causes of ventilatory support, prior chronic health status and physiological data were assessed. Multivariate analysis was used to identifiy variables associated with hospital mortality and NIV failure.ResultsInvasive MV and NIV were used as initial ventilatory support in 622 (80%) and 151 (20%) patients. Failure with subsequent intubation occurred in 54% of NIV patients. The main reasons for ventilatory support were pneumonia (27%), neurologic disorders (19%) and non-pulmonary sepsis (12%). ICU and hospital mortality rates were 34% and 42%. Using the Berlin definition, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was diagnosed in 31% of the patients with a hospital mortality of 52%. In the multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio (OR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01 to 1.03), comorbidities (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.17), associated organ failures (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.20), moderate (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10 to 3.35) to severe ARDS (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.41), cumulative fluid balance over the first 72 h of ICU (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.39 to 4.28), higher lactate (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.50), invasive MV (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.32 to 5.39) and NIV failure (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.74 to 8.99) were independently associated with hospital mortality. The predictors of NIV failure were the severity of associated organ dysfunctions (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.34), ARDS (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.82) and positive fluid balance (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.30).ConclusionsCurrent mortality of ventilated patients in Brazil is elevated. Implementation of judicious fluid therapy and a watchful use and monitoring of NIV patients are potential targets to improve outcomes in this setting.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01268410.

Patterns of c-reactive protein RATIO response in severe community-acquired pneumonia: a cohort study

IntroductionCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission remains a severe medical condition, presenting ICU mortality rates reaching 30%. The aim of this study was to assess the value of different patterns of C-reactive protein (CRP)-ratio response to antibiotic therapy in patients with severe CAP requiring ICU admission as an early maker of outcome.MethodsIn total, 191 patients with severe CAP were prospectively included and CRP was sampled every other day from D1 to D7 of antibiotic prescription. CRP-ratio was calculated in relation to D1 CRP concentration. Patients were classified according to an individual pattern of CRP-ratio response with the following criteria: fast response - when D5 CRP was less than or equal to 0.4 of D1 CRP concentration; slow response - when D5 CRP was > 0.4 and D7 less than or equal to 0.8 of D1 CRP concentration; nonresponse - when D7 CRP was > 0.8 of D1 CRP concentration. Comparison between ICU survivors and non-survivors was performed.ResultsCRP-ratio from D1 to D7 decreased faster in survivors than in non-survivors (p = 0.01). The ability of CRP-ratio by D5 to predict ICU outcome assessed by the area under the ROC curve was 0.73 (95% Confidence Interval, 0.64 - 0.82). By D5, a CRP concentration above 0.5 of the initial level was a marker of poor outcome (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.58, positive likelihood ratio 1.93, negative likelihood ratio 0.33). The time-dependent analysis of CRP-ratio of the three patterns (fast response n = 66; slow response n = 81; nonresponse n = 44) was significantly different between groups (p < 0.001). The ICU mortality rate was considerably different according to the patterns of CRP-ratio response: fast response 4.8%, slow response 17.3% and nonresponse 36.4% (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIn severe CAP, sequential evaluation of CRP-ratio was useful in the early identification of patients with poor outcome. The evaluation of CRP-ratio pattern of response to antibiotics during the first week of therapy was useful in the recognition of the individual clinical evolution.

Pharmacologic prevention and treatment of delirium in intensive care patients: A systematic review

PURPOSEnThe purpose of the study is to determine if pharmacologic approaches are effective in prevention and treatment of delirium in critically ill patients.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnWe performed a systematic search to identify publications (from January 1980 to September 2014) that evaluated the pharmacologic interventions to treat or prevent delirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.nnnRESULTSnFrom 2646 citations, 15 studies on prevention (6729 patients) and 7 studies on treatment (1784 patients) were selected and analyzed. Among studies that evaluated surgical patients, the pharmacologic interventions were associated with a reduction in delirium prevalence, ICU length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation, but with high heterogeneity (respectively, I(2) = 81%, P = .0013; I(2) = 97%, P < .001; and I(2) = 97%). Considering treatment studies, only 1 demonstrated a significant decrease in ICU length of stay using dexmedetomidine compared to haloperidol (Relative Risk, 0.62 [1.29-0.06]; I(2) = 97%), and only 1 found a shorter time to resolution of delirium using quetiapine (1.0 [confidence interval, 0.5-3.0] vs 4.5 [confidence interval, 2.0-7.0] days; P = .001).nnnCONCLUSIONnThe use of antipsychotics for surgical ICU patients and dexmedetomidine for mechanically ventilated patients as a preventive strategy may reduce the prevalence of delirium in the ICU. None of the studied agents that were used for delirium treatment improved major clinical outcome, including mortality.

Impact of systemic corticosteroids on the clinical course and outcomes of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTIONnOur aim was to evaluate the impact of corticosteroids on clinical course and outcomes of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.nnnMETHODSnThis was a cohort study of patients with severe CAP from 2 intensive care units in tertiary hospitals in Brazil and Portugal.nnnRESULTSnA total of 111 patients were included (median age, 69 years; 56% men; 34% hospital mortality). Corticosteroids were prescribed in 61 (55%) patients. Main indications for their use were bronchospasm (52.5%) and septic shock (36%). Mortality rate of patients treated with and without corticosteroids was comparable (29.5% vs 32%, P = .837). No significant differences were observed on clinical course from day 1 to day 7 as assessed by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (P = .95). Furthermore, C-reactive protein declined similarly in both groups (P = .147). In a multivariate analysis, mortality was associated with older age and higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn patients with severe CAP requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, adjunctive therapy with corticosteroids did not influence intensive care unit and hospital mortality. In addition, no changes were observed on weaning from vasopressors, on recovery from organ failure/dysfunction as assessed by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, as well as on C-reactive protein course.