Marcos J. Marín

Postprandial hypotension detected through home blood pressure monitoring: a frequent phenomenon in elderly hypertensive patients

Postprandial hypotension (PPH) is a frequently under-recognized entity associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of PPH detected through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is unknown. To determine the prevalence and clinical predictors of PPH in hypertensive patients assessed through HBPM. Hypertensive patients of 18 years or older underwent home blood pressure (BP) measurements (duplicate measurements for 4 days: in the morning, 1 h before and 1 h after their usual lunch, and in the evening; OMRON 705 CP). PPH was defined as a meal-induced systolic BP decrease of ⩾20 mm Hg. Variables identified as relevant predictors of PPH were entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis. In total, 230 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 73.6 (interquartile range 16.9) years, and 65.2% were female. The prevalence of PPH (at least one episode) was 27.4%. Four variables were independently associated with PPH: age of 80 years or older (odds ratio (OR) 3.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35–8.82), body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.81–0.96), office systolic BP (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01–1.05) and a history of cerebrovascular disease (OR 3.29, 95%CI 1.03–10.53). PPH after a typical meal is a frequent phenomenon that can be detected through HBPM. Easily measurable parameters in the office such as older age, higher systolic BP, lower BMI and a history of cerebrovascular disease may help to detect patients at risk of PPH who would benefit from HBPM.

Home blood pressure profile in very elderly hypertensives: should we use the same thresholds as in younger patients?

We aimed to determine the characteristics of home blood pressure (BP) in very elderly hypertensives. A total of 485 treated hypertensive patients ≥18 years (median age, 70.8 [interquartile range, 18]; 67.2% women) underwent home BP measurements. Characteristics of patients ≥80 and <80 years of age and prevalence of office and home uncontrolled hypertension, isolated morning (IMH), isolated evening, isolated office, and masked hypertension were compared. Very elderly subjects had higher levels of systolic and lower levels of diastolic BP at home, a higher prevalence of home uncontrolled hypertension (68.5% vs. 37.7%; P < .001), masked hypertension (30.6% vs. 14.9%; P = .02), and IMH (19.4% vs. 10.9%; P = .02), and a lower prevalence of isolated office hypertension (8.3% vs. 18.8%; P = .01). When using differential home BP thresholds in the very elderly, determined through the percentile method, statistical differences disappeared, except for IMH. The very elderly depict a particular home BP profile. Benefit from using differential home BP thresholds should be determined in prospective studies.

Meal-induced blood pressure fall in patients with isolated morning hypertension

Abstract We aimed to determine a possible association between isolated morning hypertension (IMH) and meal-induced blood pressure (BP) fall in adult treated hypertensive patients who underwent home BP measurements. A total of 230 patients were included, median age 73.6, 65.2% women. After adjusting for age, sex, number of antihypertensive drugs, office and home BP levels, the association between IMH and meal-induced BP fall was statistically significant. In conclusion, meal-induced BP fall and IMH detected through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) are independently associated in hypertensive patients. The therapeutic implications of such observation need to be clarified in large-scale prospective studies.

Determinants of the Morning-Evening Home Blood Pressure Difference in Treated Hypertensives: The HIBA-Home Study

Background. The morning home blood pressure (BP) rise is a significant asymptomatic target organ damage predictor in hypertensives. Our aim was to evaluate determinants of home-based morning-evening difference (MEdiff) in Argentine patients. Methods. Treated hypertensive patients aged ≥18 years participated in a cross-sectional study, after performing home morning and evening BP measurement. MEdiff was morning minus evening home average results. Variables identified as relevant predictors were entered into a multivariable linear regression analysis model. Results. Three hundred sixty-seven medicated hypertensives were included. Mean age was 66.2 (14.5), BMI 28.1 (4.5), total cholesterol 4.89 (1.0) mmol/L, 65.9% women, 11.7% smokers, and 10.6% diabetics. Mean MEdiff was 1.1 (12.5) mmHg systolic and 2.3 (6.1) mmHg diastolic, respectively. Mean self-recorded BP was 131.5 (14.1) mmHg systolic and 73.8 (7.6) mmHg diastolic, respectively. Mean morning and evening home BPs were 133.1 (16.5) versus 132 (15.7) systolic and 75.8 (8.4) versus 73.5 (8.2) diastolic, respectively. Significant beta-coefficient values were found in systolic MEdiff for age and smoking and in diastolic MEdiff for age, smoking, total cholesterol, and calcium-channel blockers. Conclusions. In a cohort of Argentine medicated patients, older age, smoking, total cholesterol, and use of calcium channel blockers were independent determinants of home-based MEdiff.

Hemodynamic characterization of hypertensive patients with an exaggerated orthostatic blood pressure variation

ABSTRACT Exaggerated orthostatic blood pressure variation (EOV) is a poorly understood phenomenon related to high cardiovascular risk. We aimed to determine whether hypertensive patients with EOV have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, assessed through impedance cardiography. Methods: In treated hypertensive patients, we measured the cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) in the supine and standing (after 3 minutes) positions, defining three groups according to BP variation: 1) Normal orthostatic BP variation (NOV): standing systolic BP (stSBP)-supine systolic BP (suSBP) between −20 and 20 mmHg and standing diastolic BP (stDBP)-supine diastolic BP (suDBP) between −10 and 10 mmHg; 2) orthostatic hypotension (OHypo): stSBP-suSBP≤-20 or stDBP-suDBP≤-10 mmHg; 3) orthostatic hypertension (OHyper): stSBP-suSBP≥20 or stDBP-suDBP≥10 mmHg. We performed multivariable analyses to determine the association of hemodynamic variables with EOV. Results: We included 186 patients. Those with OHyper had lower suDBP and higher orthostatic SVRI variation compared to NOV. In multivariable analyses, orthostatic HR variation (OR = 1.06 (95%CI 1.01–1.13), p = 0.03) and orthostatic SVRI variation (OR = 1.16 (95%CI 1.06–1.28), p = 0.002) were independently related to OHyper. No variables were independently associated with OHypo. Conclusion: Patients with OHyper have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, with an exaggerated increase in SVRI and HR when standing.

Arterial Stiffness in Treated Hypertensive Patients With White-Coat Hypertension

Arterial stiffness, assessed through pulse wave velocity (PWV), independently predicts cardiovascular outcomes. In untreated persons, white‐coat hypertension (WCH) has been related to arterial stiffness, but data in treated patients with WCH are scarce. The authors aimed to determine a possible association between WCH and arterial stiffness in this population. Adult treated hypertensive patients underwent home blood pressure monitoring and PWV assessment. Variables associated with PWV in univariable analyses were entered into a multivariable linear regression model. The study included 121 patients, 33.9% men, median age 67.9 (interquartile range 18.4) years, 5.8% with diabetes, and 3.3% with a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. In multivariable analysis, WCH in treated hypertensive patients remained a determinant of PWV: β=1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.1–2.1 [P=.037]; adjusted R2 0.49). In conclusion, WCH is independently associated with arterial stiffness in treated hypertensive patients. Whether this high‐risk association is offset by antihypertensive treatment should be further investigated.

Dependence of thoracic fluid content with anthropometric-geometric factors in impedance cardiography

Volume expansion 1,2 is frequent among hypertensives.3 Impedance Cardiography (ICG) measures hemodynamic disturbances,3,4 and apparently estimates volume excess 5 through the thoracic fluid content (TFC), an inverse of thoracic impedance(Z0). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Alerting Reaction in Office Blood Pressure and Target Organ Damage: An Innocent Phenomenon?

BACKGROUND An alerting reaction is a physician-induced phenomenon which produces a transient blood pressure rise in the office. OBJECTIVE To determine its relationship with target organ damage in treated hypertensives. METHOD We used three different indexes for calculating alerting reaction depending on the first, second or third office blood pressure measurement. We correlated these indexes with glomerular filtration rate, left ventricular mass index and pulse wave velocity. Thereafter, for multivariate analysis, we selected the index which better correlated with each target organ damage subtype. RESULTS We included 174 adults, mean age 67(±13.7) years. 75% of the patients had some degree of blood pressure fall between measurements 1-3. In multivariate linear regression models, after adjusting for classic risk factors, two out of the three systolic alerting reaction indexes showed an independent association with target organ damage. After further adjusting for office blood pressure and white coat effect (calculated with standardized home blood pressure monitoring), left ventricular mass index maintained a statistically significant association. CONCLUSION A higher alerting reaction in the office seems to be related to increased target organ damage in treated hypertensives and should not be considered an innocent phenomenon.

Validation of a new piezoelectric device for noninvasive measurement of central aortic systolic blood pressure

Objective The objective of this study was to compare the aortic piezoelectric device for noninvasive measurement of central aortic systolic blood pressure (cSBP) with the SphygmoCor. Participants and methods A total of 85 participants from both sexes, aged 18–80 years, were stratified into three age groups (<30, 30–60, >60 years), with an equal number of healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients. We performed three cSBP measurements with each device, in an alternate manner, using the Bland–Altman method to determine the level of agreement. The standard of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation for brachial blood pressure evaluation was used for the comparison. Results The mean cSBPs were 109.3±12.05 and 109.0±12.2 mmHg with the SphygmoCor and the Aortic device, respectively, showing a strong correlation (r=0.98, P<0.001). A mean difference of 0.35±2.43 mmHg (95% confidence interval: 0.17–0.87, P=NS) was obtained with the Bland–Altman method. The 95% limits of agreement was −4.4 to +5.1 mmHg. Conclusion Complying with the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criteria, cSBP measurements obtained with the Aortic and the SphygmoCor devices are equivalent.