Margaret A Maglione

Nonmedical Interventions for Children With ASD: Recommended Guidelines and Further Research Needs

OBJECTIVE To use the findings of a systematic review of scientific evidence to develop consensus guidelines on nonmedical interventions that address cognitive function and core deficits in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and to recommend priorities for future research. METHODS The guidelines were developed by a Technical Expert Panel (TEP) consisting of practitioners, researchers, and parents. A systematic overview of research findings was presented to the TEP; guideline statements were drafted, discussed, debated, edited, reassessed, and presented for formal voting. RESULTS The strength of evidence of efficacy varied by intervention type from insufficient to moderate. There was some evidence that greater intensity of treatment (hours per week) and greater duration (in months) led to better outcomes. The TEP agreed that children with ASD should have access to at least 25 hours per week of comprehensive intervention to address social communication, language, play skills, and maladaptive behavior. They agreed that applied behavioral analysis, integrated behavioral/developmental programs, the Picture Exchange Communication System, and various social skills interventions have shown efficacy. Based on identified gaps, they recommend that future research focus on assessment and monitoring of outcomes, addressing the needs of pre/nonverbal children and adolescents, and identifying the most effective strategies, dose, and duration to improve specific core deficits. CONCLUSIONS The creation of treatment guidelines and recommendations for future research represents an effort by leading experts to improve access to services for children with ASDs while acknowledging that the research evidence has many gaps.

TRICARE Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Benefit: Comparison with Medicaid and Commercial Benefits

This study compared the Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) benefit provided by TRICARE as an early intervention for autism spectrum disorder with similar benefits in Medicaid and commercial health insurance plans. The sponsor, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, was particularly interested in how a proposed TRICARE reimbursement rate decrease from

Mindfulness Meditation for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review

125 per hour to

End-of-Life Care and Outcomes

68 per hour for ABA services performed by a Board Certified Behavior Analyst compared with reimbursement rates (defined as third-party payment to the service provider) in Medicaid and commercial health insurance plans. Information on ABA coverage in state Medicaid programs was collected from Medicaid state waiver databases; subsequently, Medicaid provider reimbursement data were collected from state Medicaid fee schedules. Applied Behavior Analysis provider reimbursement in the commercial health insurance system was estimated using Truven Health MarketScan® data. A weighted mean U.S. reimbursement rate was calculated for several services using cross-state information on the number of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Locations of potential provider shortages were also identified. Medicaid and commercial insurance reimbursement rates varied considerably across the United States. This project concluded that the proposed

Methodological Approaches for a Systematic Review of End-of-Life Care

68-per-hour reimbursement rate for services provided by a board certified analyst was more than 25 percent below the U.S. mean.

Systematic Review for Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Severe Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD) of the Knee

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RANDs publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. iii Preface The Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury is interested in determining the efficacy and comparative effectiveness of integrative medicine approaches for several health conditions. This systematic review assesses the safety and efficacy of mindfulness meditation as an intervention to alleviate chronic pain. The review will be of interest to military health policymakers and practitioners, civilian health care providers, and policymakers, payers, and patients. None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare. Abstract This systematic review synthesized evidence on mindfulness meditation interventions for the treatment of chronic pain (PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015025052). In June 2015, we searched four electronic databases, as well as bibliographies of existing systematic reviews, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the efficacy and safety of mindfulness to treat adults with chronic pain. Two independent reviewers screened identified literature using predetermined eligibility criteria, abstracted study-level information, and assessed the quality of included studies. Outcomes of interest included changes in pain symptoms, use of analgesics, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. Efficacy meta-analyses used the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random-effects models. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. In total, 28 RCTs met inclusion criteria; three of these RCTs reported on safety. Interventions ranged in length from three to 12 weeks, and the median duration was eight weeks. We found low quality evidence (due to substantial unexplained heterogeneity among studies) that mindfulness meditation is associated with a small decrease in pain compared with control in 24