Margaret Aboud

Factor V inhibitors: rare or not so uncommon? A multi-laboratory investigation

Acquired deficiencies of, or inhibitors to, factor V are considered rare events. We report a series of 14 acquired factor V deficiencies, 10 of which were confirmed to have inhibitors to factor V, as identified within Australia in the past 5 years following a multi-laboratory investigation. The initial index case seen by one laboratory was followed within 4 months by a separate similar case. This prompted local contact with colleagues (n = 20) working in other haemostasis referral laboratories to identify the current case series. In total, nearly one-half of all haemostasis referral laboratories contacted had seen a case within the past 5 years. Clinical features and the apparent associated risk of bleeding complications generally varied, as did laboratory findings and the likely causal event. There were three females and 11 males. Age ranged from 44 to 95 years (median, 81 years). The level of inhibitor ranged from undetectable to over 250 Bethesda units. The probable cause leading to development of the inhibitors ranged from exposure to bovine thrombin, exposure to antibiotics, surgery and malignancy. Of additional interest was the apparent association of anti-phospholipid antibodies in many of the cases. For example, in the two similar index cases, with factor V inhibitor titres > 200 Bethesda units, high levels of anti-cardiolipin antibodies (> 70 GPL units) were also detected. Although less clear because of inhibitor interference, many of the cases also showed evident co-associated lupus anticoagulant activity. In conclusion, we report a series of factor V inhibitors recently identified within our geographic region that would represent an annual incidence of around 0.29 cases per million Australians. Although considered a rare finding, there is a high likelihood that most haemostasis referral laboratories will see a case every five or so years.

Reduced fibrinolysis and increased fibrin generation can be detected in hypercoagulable patients using the overall hemostatic potential assay

Background: Routinely available coagulation assays are not capable of detecting clinically defined hypercoagulable states. A number of global coagulation assays have been developed with the potential to evaluate hypercoagulability, which predisposes to the common clinical events of arterial and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objectives: We hypothesized that the overall hemostatic potential (OHP) assay would show abnormal fibrin generation and lysis in patients with clinically defined hypercoagulable states. Methods: We used the OHP assay as described by Blombäck and colleagues [ 1,2 ] in 161 clinically hypercoagulable patients with arterial or VTE, pregnancy complications or autoimmune disease. Eighty patients had associated antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA). Ninety‐eight normal plasma donors were tested for comparison. Results: We derived three new assay parameters for correlation with hypercoagulable states: the maximum optical density, maximum slope, and delay in onset of fibrin generation. We found significantly different assay results for all patients’ parameters examined when compared with controls, indicating both increased fibrin generation and reduced fibrinolysis in hypercoagulable patients. The findings were similar whether samples were collected in association with an acute thrombotic event or not. Estimated assay sensitivity for detection of a clinically defined hypercoagulable state was 96%. Conclusions: The OHP assay is a simple, inexpensive global test that is useful for assessing patients with hypercoagulable states including APLA. OHP results are significantly abnormal in hypercoagulable groups compared with controls, indicating that both increased fibrin generation and reduced fibrinolysis contribute to hypercoagulable states. The assay may ultimately assist in tailoring clinical management to patients’ individual requirements.

Identification of factor inhibitors by diagnostic haemostasis laboratories. A large multi-centre evaluation

We have assessed the proficiency of diagnostic haemostasis facilities to correctly identify coagulation factor abnormalities and inhibitors. Forty-two laboratories participating in the external Quality Assurance Program (QAP) conducted by the RCPA agreed to participate and were each sent a set of eight samples (each 3 x 1 ml) for evaluation. They were asked to blind test these samples for the presence or absence of inhibitors, and where identified, to perform further analysis (including specific inhibitor analysis). In order to make the exercise more challenging, in addition to true factor inhibitors, samples were provided that reflected potential pre-analytical variables that might arise and complicate inhibitor detection or lead to false inhibitor identification. In brief, the sample set comprised a true high level factor (F) V inhibitor, a true moderate level FVIII inhibitor (but sample was defibrinogenated), a true lupus anticoagulant (LA), a normal (but slightly aged) plasma sample, a normal serum sample, a normal EDTA sample, an oral anticoagulant/vitamin K deficiency sample, and a gross heparin ( approximately 10 U/ml) contaminated sample. Sixty-three percent of participants correctly identified the true FV inhibitor as such, although the reported range varied greatly [10 to >250 Bethesda units (BU/ml)] and 46% correctly identified the true FVIII inhibitor, despite the complication of the sample presentation, although the reported range also varied (7 to 64 BU/ml). Some laboratories either failed to identify the inhibitor present, or misidentified the inhibitor type. The LA, the oral anticoagulant/vitamin K deficiency, the normal serum sample, and the normal (aged) sample were also correctly identified by most laboratories, as was the absence of specific factor inhibitors in these samples. However, a small subset of laboratories incorrectly identified the presence of specific factor inhibitors in some of these samples. The heparin sample was also correctly identified by most (68%) laboratories. In contrast, the normal EDTA sample was misidentified as a FV and/or FVIII inhibitor by most (68%) laboratories, and only one laboratory correctly identified this as an EDTA sample. Thus, we conclude that although laboratories are able, in most cases, to identify the presence of true factor inhibitors, there is a large variation in identified inhibitor levels and there are also some significant errors in identification (i.e. false negatives and misidentifications). In addition, there is a significant false positive error rate where some laboratories will identify the presence of specific factor inhibitors where no such inhibitor exists (i.e. false positives).

Possibility of potential VWD misdiagnosis or misclassification using LIA technology and due to presence of rheumatoid factor

von Willebrands disease (VWD) is now recognised to be the most common inherited bleeding disorder and is due to defects and/or deficiencies in von Willebrand factor (VWF). The latex immuno‐assay (LIA) procedure has become a popular VWF:Ag detection methodology because of the ability to automate testing. In this report, we present findings which urge caution when normal LIA results are obtained co‐incident to striking clinical findings strongly suggestive of VWD, or previous laboratory findings consistent with VWD. As illustrated by a relevant case study, normal LIA results may lead to an “incorrect diagnosis” of “not VWD” or to a potential subtype misdiagnosis, should they be accepted without cross‐confirmation using alternative VWF methodologies. Am. J. Hematol. 66:53–56, 2001.

Low Circulating Protein C Levels Are Associated with Lower Leg Ulcers in Patients with Diabetes

Activated protein C (APC) promotes angiogenesis and reepithelialisation and accelerates healing of diabetic ulcers. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the incidence of lower leg ulcers and plasma levels of APCs precursor, protein C (PC), in diabetic patients. Patients with diabetes who had a lower leg ulcer(s) for >6 months (n = 36) were compared with age-, type of diabetes-, and sex-matched subjects with diabetes but without an ulcer (n = 36, controls). Total PC was assessed using a routine PC colorimetric assay. There was a significantly (P < 0.001) lower level of plasma PC in patients with ulcers (103.3 ± 22.7, mean ± SD) compared with control (127.1 ± 34.0) subjects, when corrected for age and matched for gender and type of diabetes. Ulcer type (neuropathic, ischaemic, or mixed) was not a significant covariate for plasma PC levels (P = 0.35). There was no correlation between PC levels and gender, type of diabetes, HbA1c, or C-reactive protein in either group. In summary, decreased circulating PC levels are associated with, and may predispose to, lower leg ulceration in patients with diabetes.

Use of a functional assay to diagnose protein S deficiency; inappropriate testing yields equivocal results

Inherited deficiency of protein S (PS) is a rare but accepted risk factor for venous thromboembolism. There is accumulating evidence that inherited PS deficiency may be associated with a variety of adverse obstetric events. Acquired PS deficiency may be caused by a variety of clinical states including normal pregnancy. We conducted a retrospective audit of the results of screening for PS deficiency through our reference laboratory. The majority of patients in this audit with significantly reduced (<50%) free functional PS levels had a major confounding factor likely to cause acquired PS deficiency, most frequently pregnancy. Recommendations for PS testing for the diagnosis of hereditary PS deficiency include deferring testing until at least 40 days post‐partum. It appears that these recommendations are not being adhered to leading to difficulty in the interpretation of results.

A survey of heparin monitoring in australasia

&NA; Full dose heparin therapy is monitored by a variety of laboratory methods, of which the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is the most popular. A large number of APTT reagents are currently available, with different sensitivities to heparin evident in many. Within the literature it is apparent that there is a lack of consensus, and indeed some confusion, regarding the therapeutic ranges for the APTT for standard heparin therapy in the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease. Accordingly we conducted an Australasian survey to evaluate current laboratory and clinical practices in monitoring heparin therapy, to determine the extent of variation in the approach and to stimulate the process of standardisation of acceptable procedures and methodology. Results of the survey demonstrate that currently there is no uniform practice used to establish therapeutic ranges for monitoring standard heparin therapy. Furthermore, results suggest that current practice may lead to subtherapeutic anticoagulation in many laboratories.