Margot D. Bogaard

Baseline left ventricular dP/dtmax rather than the acute improvement in dP/dtmax predicts clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

The maximum rate of left ventricular (LV) pressure rise (dP/dtmax) has been used to assess the acute haemodynamic effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We tested the hypothesis that LV dP/dtmax predicts long‐term clinical outcome after initiation of CRT.

Can optimization of pacing settings compensate for a non-optimal left ventricular pacing site?

AIMS Optimal left ventricular (LV) lead position improves the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, in some patients it is not possible to position the LV lead at an optimal pacing site. The aim of this study was to determine whether optimization of the pacing settings atrioventricular delay (AVD) and interventricular delay (VVD) can compensate for a non-optimal LV pacing site. METHODS AND RESULTS In 16 patients with heart failure [New York Heart Association class III (13) or IV (3), median QRS duration of 172 ms and median LV ejection fraction of 20%] the acute haemodynamic effect of biventricular pacing was assessed at > or =2 pacing sites by the increase in maximum rate of LV pressure rise (%dP/dt(max)). At each site the AVD and VVD were optimized. Biventricular pacing with nominal settings at a non-optimal LV pacing site improved dP/dt(max) by 12.8% (-0.5 to 23.2%). This could be further improved by 6.5 percentage points (1.2-13.9) by optimization of pacing settings (P = 0.001) and by 9.9 percentage points (3.7-13.3, P = 0.004) by optimization of pacing site. Optimization of the LV pacing site and pacing settings together improved %dP/dt(max) by 16.2 per cent points (10.0-21.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Optimization of the AVD and VVD can partly compensate for a non-optimal LV pacing site. However, a combination of an optimal LV pacing site and optimized pacing settings gives the best acute haemodynamic response.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy beyond nominal settings: who needs individual programming of the atrioventricular and interventricular delay?

AIMS This study aimed to determine the additional acute haemodynamic effect of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delay optimization compared with current nominal cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device settings, and to explore whether clinical characteristics correlate to the effect of optimization. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty CRT patients were prospectively enrolled. The optimal AV and VV delays were guided by relative improvement in maximum rate of left ventricular (LV) pressure rise (%dP/dt(max)). A significant improvement in %dP/dt(max) was obtained by optimization in 23-33% (sensed AV delay), 32-57% (paced AV delay), and 45% of patients (VV delay). Adjustment of the device nominal VV delay from 0 to 40 ms LV pre-activation would diminish the proportion of patients with additional effect of individual optimization from 45 to 15%. Heart failure aetiology [ischaemic 2 ± 2 vs. non-ischaemic 1 ± 1 percentage points (PP) %dP/dt(max), P= 0.013], gender (men 2 ± 2 vs. women 1 ± 1 PP %dP/dt(max), P= 0.012) and intrinsic PR interval (R= 0.49, P= 0.002) correlated to the degree of effect of AV delay optimization. Women yielded more effect of VV delay optimization (4 ± 3 vs. 2 ± 1 PP %dP/dt(max), P= 0.026). CONCLUSION Compared with the best of the currently available device nominal AV and VV delays, 23-45% of CRT patients can yield additional acute haemodynamic effect by individual optimization of the delays. A new nominal VV delay of 40 ms LV pre-activation is recommended. Male gender, ischaemic aetiology, and longer PR interval are associated with a larger effect of individual optimization.

Echocardiographic prediction of outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy: conventional methods and recent developments.

Echocardiography plays an important role in patient assessment before cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and can monitor many of its mechanical effects in heart failure patients. Encouraged by the highly variable individual response observed in the major CRT trials, echocardiography-based measurements of mechanical dyssynchrony have been extensively investigated with the aim of improving response prediction and CRT delivery. Despite recent setbacks, these techniques have continued to develop in order to overcome some of their initial flaws and limitations. This review discusses the concepts and rationale of the available echocardiographic techniques, highlighting newer quantification methods and discussing some of the unsolved issues that need to be addressed.

Should We Optimize Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy During Exercise

Should We Optimize CRT During Exercise? Cardiac resynchronization therapy aims at diminishing cardiac dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure. The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy can be improved by optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays. Currently, optimization of these pacing settings is mainly performed during resting conditions. This paper aims to objectively review the current literature about a rate‐adaptive AV and VV delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. The current evidence for a rate‐adaptive AV and VV delay comprises only small nonrandomized studies on acute effects. The effect of exercise on the optimal AV delay was heterogeneous between studies. The optimal VV delay was influenced by exercise conditions in some, but not all patients. Possible explanations lie in the heterogeneous electrical and mechanical responses to exercise in patients with a complex disease such as heart failure with asynchronous contraction. Current evidence is insufficient to show the superiority of a rate‐adaptive AV or VV delay in all CRT patients. Individualized exercise programming may be warranted in selected patients. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1307‐1316, November 2010)

The ECG in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Influence of Left and Right Ventricular Preactivation and Relation to Acute Response

Influence of Preactivation on the ECG in CRT. Introduction: The aims of this study were to compare ECG signs of biventricular electrical resynchronization during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with various interventricular (VV) delays and to correlate these and other ECG characteristics with the acute hemodynamic benefit of CRT.

The concept of triple wavefront fusion during biventricular pacing : Using the EGM to produce the best acute hemodynamic improvement in CRT

Previous reports suggest that biventricular pacing (BiVp) fused with intrinsic conduction (BiVp‐fusion, triple wavefront fusion) is associated with improved resynchronization compared to pure‐BiVp in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to assess the association between acute hemodynamic benefit of CRT and signs of BiVp‐fusion by using a novel electrogram (EGM)‐based method.

Is acute hemodynamic response a predictor of long-term outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy?

In a recent issue of the Journal, Duckett et al. ([1][1]) published a study indicating that the acute hemodynamic response ([AHR], assessed by LVdP/dtmax, the maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure) predicts reverse remodeling ([RR], which is the decrease in left ventricular end-systolic

Haemodynamic Benefit of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Requires Left Bundle Branch Block: A Case Report.

A 55-year-old woman with dilated cardiomyopathy and rate-dependent left bundle branch block had a cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) device implanted. During implantation, the maximum rate of left ventricular pressure rise (dP/dtmax) was measured invasively. This case presents a description of the acute negative effect of a left bundle branch block on dP/dtmax, and the different effect of CRT on left ventricular haemodynamic function in the presence and absence of a left bundle branch block.