Margriet J. G. Löwik

Vaccination against HPV-16 Oncoproteins for Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia

BACKGROUND Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia is a chronic disorder caused by high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV), most commonly HPV type 16 (HPV-16). Spontaneous regression occurs in less than 1.5% of patients, and the rate of recurrence after treatment is high. METHODS We investigated the immunogenicity and efficacy of a synthetic long-peptide vaccine in women with HPV-16-positive, high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Twenty women with HPV-16-positive, grade 3 vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia were vaccinated three or four times with a mix of long peptides from the HPV-16 viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 in incomplete Freunds adjuvant. The end points were clinical and HPV-16-specific T-cell responses. RESULTS The most common adverse events were local swelling in 100% of the patients and fever in 64% of the patients; none of these events exceeded grade 2 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events of the National Cancer Institute. At 3 months after the last vaccination, 12 of 20 patients (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 81) had clinical responses and reported relief of symptoms. Five women had complete regression of the lesions, and HPV-16 was no longer detectable in four of them. At 12 months of follow-up, 15 of 19 patients had clinical responses (79%; 95% CI, 54 to 94), with a complete response in 9 of 19 patients (47%; 95% CI, 24 to 71). The complete-response rate was maintained at 24 months of follow-up. All patients had vaccine-induced T-cell responses, and post hoc analyses suggested that patients with a complete response at 3 months had a significantly stronger interferon-gamma-associated proliferative CD4+ T-cell response and a broad response of CD8+ interferon-gamma T cells than did patients without a complete response. CONCLUSIONS Clinical responses in women with HPV-16-positive, grade 3 vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia can be achieved by vaccination with a synthetic long-peptide vaccine against the HPV-16 oncoproteins E6 and E7. Complete responses appear to be correlated with induction of HPV-16-specific immunity.

Induction of Tumor-Specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Immunity in Cervical Cancer Patients by a Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6 and E7 Long Peptides Vaccine

Purpose: The study aims to evaluate the effect of a human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E6 and E7 synthetic long peptides vaccine on the antigen-specific T-cell response in cervical cancer patients. Experimental Design: Patients with resected HPV16-positive cervical cancer were vaccinated with an overlapping set of long peptides comprising the sequences of the HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins emulsified in Montanide ISA-51. HPV16-specific T-cell immune responses were analyzed by evaluating the magnitude, breadth, type, and polarization by proliferation assays, IFNγ-ELISPOT, and cytokine production and phenotyped by the T-cell markers CD4, CD8, CD25, and Foxp3. Results: Vaccine-induced T-cell responses against HPV16 E6 and E7 were detected in six of six and five of six patients, respectively. These responses were broad, involved both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and could be detected up to 12 months after the last vaccination. The vaccine-induced responses were dominated by effector type CD4+CD25+Foxp3− type 1 cytokine IFNγ-producing T cells but also included the expansion of T cells with a CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ phenotype. Conclusions: The HPV16 E6 and E7 synthetic long peptides vaccine is highly immunogenic, in that it increases the number and activity of HPV16-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to a broad array of epitopes in all patients. The expansion of CD4+ and CD8+ tumor-specific T cells, both considered to be important in the antitumor response, indicates the immunotherapeutic potential of this vaccine. Notably, part of the vaccine-induced T cells display a CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ phenotype that is frequently associated with regulatory T-cell function, suggesting that strategies to disarm this subset of T cells should be considered as components of immunotherapeutic modalities against HPV-induced cancers.

Phase I Immunotherapeutic Trial with Long Peptides Spanning the E6 and E7 Sequences of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus 16 in End-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients Shows Low Toxicity and Robust Immunogenicity

Purpose: To determine the toxicity, safety, and immunogenicity of a human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) E6 and E7 long peptide vaccine administered to end-stage cervical cancer patients. Experimental Design: Three groups of end-stage cervical cancer patients (in total n = 35) were s.c. vaccinated with HPV16 E6 combined with or separated from HPV16 E7 overlapping long peptides in Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant, four times at 3-week intervals. Group 1 received 300 μg/peptide at a single site and group 2 received 100 μg/peptide of the E6 peptides in one limb and 300 μg/peptide of the E7 peptides in a second limb. Group 3 received separate injections of E6 and E7 peptides, each at a dose of 50 μg/peptide. The primary end point was to determine safety and toxicity of the HPV16 long peptides vaccine. In addition, the vaccine-induced T-cell response was assessed by IFNγ enzyme-linked immunospot. Results: No toxicity beyond grade 2 was observed during and after four vaccinations. In a few patients, transient flu-like symptoms were observed. Enzyme-linked immunospot analysis of the vaccine-induced immune response revealed that coinjection of the E6 and E7 peptides resulted in a strong and broad T-cell response dominated by immunity against E6. Injection of the E6 and E7 peptides at two different sites increased the E7 response but did not affect the magnitude of the E6-induced immune response. Conclusions: The HPV16 E6 and E7 long peptide-based vaccine is well tolerated and capable of inducing a broad IFNγ-associated T-cell response even in end-stage cervical cancer patients.

Success or failure of vaccination for HPV16-positive vulvar lesions correlates with kinetics and phenotype of induced T-cell responses

One half of a group of 20 patients with human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16)-induced vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 displayed a complete regression (CR) after therapeutic vaccination with HPV16 E6/E7 synthetic long peptides. Patients with relatively larger lesions generally did not display a CR. To investigate immune correlates of treatment failure, patients were grouped according to median lesion size at study entry, and HPV16-specific immunity was analyzed at different time points by complementary immunological assays. The group of patients with smaller lesions displayed stronger and broader vaccine-prompted HPV16-specific proliferative responses with higher IFNγ (P = 0.0003) and IL-5 (P < 0.0001) levels than patients with large lesions. Characteristically, this response was accompanied by a distinct peak in cytokine levels after the first vaccination. In contrast, the patient group with larger lesions mounted higher frequencies of HPV16-specific CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells (P = 0.005) and displayed a lower HPV16-specific IFNγ/IL-10 ratio after vaccination (P < 0.01). No disparity in T memory immunity to control antigens was found, indicating that the differences in HPV-specific immunity did not reflect general immune failure. We observed a strong correlation between a defined set of vaccine-prompted specific immune responses and the clinical efficacy of therapeutic vaccination. Notably, a high ratio of HPV16-specific vaccine-prompted effector T cells to HPV16-specific CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells was predictive of clinical success. Foxp3+ T cells have been associated previously with impaired immunity in malignancies. Here we demonstrate that the vaccine-prompted level of this population is associated with early treatment failure.

HPV16 synthetic long peptide (HPV16-SLP) vaccination therapy of patients with advanced or recurrent HPV16-induced gynecological carcinoma, a phase II trial.

BackgroundHuman papilloma virus type 16 (HPV16)-induced gynecological cancers, in particular cervical cancers, are found in many women worldwide. The HPV16 encoded oncoproteins E6 and E7 are tumor-specific targets for the adaptive immune system permitting the development of an HPV16-synthetic long peptide (SLP) vaccine with an excellent treatment profile in animal models. Here, we determined the toxicity, safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of the HPV16 SLP vaccine in patients with advanced or recurrent HPV16-induced gynecological carcinoma.MethodsPatients with HPV16-positive advanced or recurrent gynecological carcinoma (n = 20) were subcutaneously vaccinated with an HPV16-SLP vaccine consisting of a mix of 13 HPV16 E6 and HPV16 E7 overlapping long peptides in Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant. The primary endpoints were safety, toxicity and tumor regression as determined by RECIST. In addition, the vaccine-induced T-cell response was assessed by proliferation and associated cytokine production as well as IFNγ-ELISPOT.ResultsNo systemic toxicity beyond CTCAE grade II was observed. In a few patients transient flu-like symptoms were observed. In 9 out of 16 tested patients vaccine-induced HPV16-specific proliferative responses were detected which were associated with the production of IFNγ, TNFα, IL-5 and/or IL-10. ELISPOT analysis revealed a vaccine-induced immune response in 11 of the 13 tested patients. The capacity to respond to the vaccine was positively correlated to the patient’s immune status as reflected by their response to common recall antigens at the start of the trial. Median survival was 12.6 ± 9.1 months. No regression of tumors was observed among the 12 evaluable patients. Nineteen patients died of progressive disease.ConclusionsThe HPV16-SLP vaccine was well tolerated and induced a broad IFNγ-associated T-cell response in patients with advanced or recurrent HPV16-induced gynecological carcinoma but neither induced tumor regression nor prevented progressive disease. We, therefore, plan to use this vaccine in combination with chemotherapy and immunomodulation.

A placebo-controlled randomized HPV16 synthetic long-peptide vaccination study in women with high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions

The aim of this study was to investigate the capacity of an HPV16 E6/E7 synthetic overlapping long-peptide vaccine to stimulate the HPV16-specific T-cell response, to enhance the infiltration of HPV16-specific type 1 T cells into the lesions of patients with HPV16+ high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and HPV clearance. This was a placebo-controlled randomized phase II study in patients with HPV16-positive HSIL. HPV16-specific T-cell responses were determined pre- and post-vaccination by ELISPOT, proliferation assay and cytokine assays in PBMC and HSIL-infiltrating lymphocytes, and delayed-type hypersensitivity skin tests. Motivational problems of this patient group to postpone treatment of their premalignant lesions affected the inclusion rates and caused the study to stop prematurely. Of the accrued patients, 4 received a placebo and 5 received 1–2 vaccinations. Side effects mainly were flu-like symptoms and injection site reactions. A strong HPV-specific IFNγ-associated T-cell response was detected by ELISPOT in all vaccinated patients. The outcome of the skin tests correlated well with the ELISPOT analysis. The cytokine profile associated with HPV16-specific proliferation varied from robust type 1 to dominant type 2 responses. No conclusions could be drawn on vaccine-enhanced T-cell infiltration of the lesion, and there was no HPV clearance at the time of LEEP excision. Thus, vaccination of HSIL patients results in increased HPV16-specific T-cell immunity. Further development of this type of treatment relies on the ability to motivate patients and in the reduction in the side effects.

An Unexpectedly Large Polyclonal Repertoire of HPV-Specific T Cells Is Poised for Action in Patients with Cervical Cancer

The diversity and extent of the local tumor-specific T-cell response in a given individual is largely unknown. We have performed an in-depth study of the local T-cell repertoire in a selected group of patients with cervical cancer, by systematic analyses of the proportion, breadth, and polarization of human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7-specific T cells within the total population of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and tumor-draining lymph node cells (TDLNC). Isolated T cells were stimulated with sets of overlapping E6 and E7 peptides and analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry with respect to activation, cytokine production, and T-cell receptor Vbeta usage. HPV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were detected in TIL and TDLNC and their relative contribution varied between <1% and 66% of all T cells. In general, these HPV-specific responses were surprisingly broad, aimed at multiple E6 and E7 epitopes and involved multiple dominant and subdominant T-cell receptor Vbetas per single peptide-epitope. In most patients, only few IFNgamma-producing T cells were found and the amount of IFNgamma produced was low, suggesting that these are poised T cells, rendered functionally inactive within the tumor environment. Importantly, stimulation of the TIL and TDLNC with cognate antigen in the presence of commonly used Toll-like receptor ligands significantly enhanced the effector T-cell function. In conclusion, our study suggests that within a given patient with HPV-specific immunity many different tumor-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are locally present and poised for action. This vast existing local T-cell population is awaiting proper stimulation and can be exploited for the immunotherapy of cancer.

Vaccination against Oncoproteins of HPV16 for Noninvasive Vulvar/Vaginal Lesions: Lesion Clearance Is Related to the Strength of the T-Cell Response

Purpose: Therapeutic vaccination with human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E6 and E7 synthetic long peptides (SLP) is effective against HPV16-induced high-grade vulvar and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN/VaIN). However, clinical nonresponders displayed weak CD8+ T-cell reactivity. Here, we studied if imiquimod applied at the vaccine site could improve CD8+ T-cell reactivity, clinical efficacy, and safety of HPV16-SLP (ISA101). Experimental Design: A multicenter open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with HPV16+ high-grade VIN/VaIN. Patients received ISA101 vaccination with or without application of 5% imiquimod at the vaccine site. The primary objective was the induction of a directly ex vivo detectable HPV16-specific CD8+ T-cell response. The secondary objectives were clinical responses (lesion size, histology, and virology) and their relation with the strength of vaccination-induced immune responses. Results: Forty-three patients were assigned to either ISA101 with imiquimod (n = 21) or ISA101 only (n = 22). Imiquimod did not improve the outcomes of vaccination. However, vaccine-induced clinical responses were observed in 18 of 34 (53%; 95% CI, 35.1–70.2) patients at 3 months and in 15 of 29 (52%; 95% CI, 32.5–70.6) patients, 8 of whom displayed a complete histologic response, at 12 months after the last vaccination. All patients displayed vaccine-induced T-cell responses, which were significantly stronger in patients with complete responses. Importantly, viral clearance occurred in all but one of the patients with complete histologic clearance. Conclusions: This new study confirms that clinical efficacy of ISA101 vaccination is related to the strength of vaccine-induced HPV16-specific T-cell immunity and is an effective therapy for HPV16-induced high-grade VIN/VaIN. Clin Cancer Res; 22(10); 2342–50. ©2016 AACR. See related commentary by Karaki et al., p. 2317

Abstract PL4-1: Immunotherapy of established lesions caused by high-risk HPV

Therapeutic vaccination with a synthetic long peptide (SLP®) vaccine mediated the eradication of established human papilloma virus type 16 (HPV16)-positive tumors in mice and controlled wart growth and latent virus infection in rabbits persistently infected with cottontail rabbit papilloma virus. Subsequent phase I/II studies with an HPV16 SLP® vaccine, consisting of 13 long peptides covering the HPV16 E6 and E7 antigens, in patients with advanced HPV16-positive cervical cancer, revealed that this vaccine was safe and highly immunogenic. The purpose of the current study was to test the clinical efficacy of this HPV16 SLP® vaccine in HPV16-induced high grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN3), a premalignant epithelial disorder, spontaneous regression of which occurs in less than 2% of patients and in which recurrence after standard treatment is high. In a phase 2 trial, 20 women with VIN3 were vaccinated three times sc in the limbs with a mix of the HPV16 E6 and E7 synthetic long peptides formulated in Montanide ISA-51. The endpoints were objective clinical responses, defined as reduction of at least 50% in lesion size (partial response) or complete regressions, and HPV16-specific T-cell responses, determined before and after vaccination. The vaccine was safe, as no side effects exceeding CTC grade 2 were observed. At 3 and 12 months after the last vaccination an objective response was observed in 12/20 (60%) and 15/19 (79%) patients respectively. Nine of them showed a complete and durable regression of the lesions at 12 months and at 24 months. The strength of the vaccine-induced HPV16-specific T-cell response was significantly higher in the group of patients with a complete regression of their lesions as compared to non-responders. This study shows that in women with VIN3 objective clinical responses can be achieved by therapeutic vaccination with synthetic long peptides that is able to induce effective HVP16-specific T-cell responses. Citation Information: Clin Cancer Res 2010;16(7 Suppl):PL4-1

Abstract CN01-03: Immunotherapy of established lesions caused by high-risk HPV

Therapeutic vaccination with a synthetic long peptide (SLP@) vaccine mediated the eradication of established human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16)-positive tumors in mice and controlled wart growth and latent virus infection in rabbits persistently infected with cottontail rabbit papillomavirus. Subsequent phase I/II studies with an HPV16 SLP@ vaccine, consisting of 13 long peptides covering the HPV16 E6 and E7 antigens, in patients with advanced HPV16-positive cervical cancer, revealed that this vaccine was safe and highly immunogenic. The purpose of the current study was to test the clinical efficacy of this HPV16 SLP@ vaccine in HPV16-induced high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN3), a premalignant epithelial disorder, spontaneous regression of which occurs in less than 2% of patients and in which recurrence after standard treatment is high. In a phase 2 trial, 20 women with VIN3 were vaccinated three times sc in the limbs with a mix of the HPV16 E6 and E7 synthetic long peptides formulated in Montanide ISA-51. The endpoints were objective clinical responses, defined as reduction of at least 50% in lesion size (partial response) or complete regressions, and HPV16-specific T-cell responses, determined before and after vaccination. The vaccine was safe, as no side effects exceeding CTC grade 2 were observed. At 3 and 12 months after the last vaccination an objective response was observed in 12/20 (60%) and 15/19 (79%) patients respectively. Nine of them showed a complete and durable regression of the lesions at 12 months and at 24 months. The strength of the vaccine-induced HPV16-specific T-cell response was significantly higher in the group of patients with a complete regression of their lesions as compared to nonresponders. This study shows that in women with VIN3 objective clinical responses can be achieved by therapeutic vaccination with synthetic long peptides that is able to induce effective HVP16-specific T-cell responses. Literature: 1. Kenter GG, Welters MJ, Valentijn AR, Lowik MJ, Berends-van der Meer DM, Vloon AP, Essahsah F, Fathers LM, Drijfhout JW, Offringa R,Wafelman AR, Oostendorp J, Fleuren GJ, Burg van der SH, Melief CJ. Vaccination against Human Papillomavirus 16 oncoproteins for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1838-47. 2. Melief CJ, van der Burg SH. Immunotherapy of established (pre)malignant disease by synthetic long peptide vaccines. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 May;8(5):351-60. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2010;3(12 Suppl):CN01-03.