Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Maria A. Woodruff is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Maria A. Woodruff.


Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A | 2009

Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo

Christopher X. F. Lam; Dietmar W. Hutmacher; Jan-Thorsten Schantz; Maria A. Woodruff; Swee Hin Teoh

The use of polycaprolactone (PCL) as a biomaterial, especially in the fields of drug delivery and tissue engineering, has enjoyed significant growth. Understanding how such a device or scaffold eventually degrades in vivo is paramount as the defect site regenerates and remodels. Degradation studies of three-dimensional PCL and PCL-based composite scaffolds were conducted in vitro (in phosphate buffered saline) and in vivo (rabbit model). Results up to 6 months are reported. All samples recorded virtually no molecular weight changes after 6 months, with a maximum mass loss of only about 7% from the PCL-composite scaffolds degraded in vivo, and a minimum of 1% from PCL scaffolds. Overall, crystallinity increased slightly because of the effects of polymer recrystallization. This was also a contributory factor for the observed stiffness increment in some of the samples, while only the PCL-composite scaffold registered a decrease. Histological examination of the in vivo samples revealed good biocompatibility, with no adverse host tissue reactions up to 6 months. Preliminary results of medical-grade PCL scaffolds, which were implanted for 2 years in a critical-sized rabbit calvarial defect site, are also reported here and support our scaffold design goal for gradual and late molecular weight decreases combined with excellent long-term biocompatibility and bone regeneration.


Science Translational Medicine | 2012

A Tissue Engineering Solution for Segmental Defect Regeneration in Load-Bearing Long Bones

Johannes C. Reichert; Amaia Cipitria; Devakara R. Epari; Siamak Saifzadeh; Pushpanjali Krishnakanth; Arne Berner; Maria A. Woodruff; Hanna Schell; Manav Mehta; Michael Schuetz; Georg N. Duda; Dietmar W. Hutmacher

A polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate scaffold with recombinant human BMP-7 heals critical-sized bone defects in sheep. Building Up Bone Large gaps or defects in bone are typically bridged using segments of bone from elsewhere in the body [referred to as autologous bone grafts (ABGs)]. It is not ideal, however, to harvest bone tissue from elsewhere; it is two surgeries, two defect sites, and therefore an increased risk of infection. Instead, tissue engineers have taken on this challenge of replenishing lost bone. In this issue, Reichert and colleagues have designed a polymer-based scaffold that can be loaded with cells and growth factors and inserted directly into a bone defect, with healing demonstrated in sheep after only 3 months. Reichert et al. used their medical-grade polycaprolactone–tricalcium phosphate (mPCL-TCP) scaffolds either alone or in combination with donor mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 7 (rhBMP-7). The scaffolds were implanted into critical-sized defects (3 cm) in the long bones of sheep, whose bones resemble formation and structure in humans, and are therefore a good model for bone tissue regeneration. After 3 months, the authors reported bone bridging in 100% of the ABGs and scaffold/rhBMP-7 groups but saw bridging in only 38% of the bare scaffold and scaffold/MSC groups. After 12 months, however, animals treated with the scaffold/rhBMP-7 combination showed greater bone volume and mechanical strength than the ABG positive control. The authors attribute this improvement over time to be the result of local BMP delivery (greater stimulation of bone formation) in addition to more bone deposition along the periphery of the defect (enhanced strength). The addition of MSCs did not help bone regeneration, as other studies have shown previously. The next step is determining the ideal BMP dose and the mechanism underlying the effects of the scaffold/rhBMP-7 on surrounding cells and tissue. Then, the hope is to move to clinical trials, where this scaffold will be put to the test for evaluation of bone regeneration and load bearing in humans. The reconstruction of large defects (>10 mm) in humans usually relies on bone graft transplantation. Limiting factors include availability of graft material, comorbidity, and insufficient integration into the damaged bone. We compare the gold standard autograft with biodegradable composite scaffolds consisting of medical-grade polycaprolactone and tricalcium phosphate combined with autologous bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 7 (rhBMP-7). Critical-sized defects in sheep—a model closely resembling human bone formation and structure—were treated with autograft, rhBMP-7, or MSCs. Bridging was observed within 3 months for both the autograft and the rhBMP-7 treatment. After 12 months, biomechanical analysis and microcomputed tomography imaging showed significantly greater bone formation and superior strength for the biomaterial scaffolds loaded with rhBMP-7 compared to the autograft. Axial bone distribution was greater at the interfaces. With rhBMP-7, at 3 months, the radial bone distribution within the scaffolds was homogeneous. At 12 months, however, significantly more bone was found in the scaffold architecture, indicating bone remodeling. Scaffolds alone or with MSC inclusion did not induce levels of bone formation comparable to those of the autograft and rhBMP-7 groups. Applied clinically, this approach using rhBMP-7 could overcome autograft-associated limitations.


Bone research | 2013

Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions - A 21st Century Perspective.

Jan Henkel; Maria A. Woodruff; Devakara R. Epari; Roland Steck; Vaida Glatt; Ian C. Dickinson; Peter F. M. Choong; Michael Schuetz; Dietmar W. Hutmacher

The role of Bone Tissue Engineering in the field of Regenerative Medicine has been the topic of substantial research over the past two decades. Technological advances have improved orthopaedic implants and surgical techniques for bone reconstruction. However, improvements in surgical techniques to reconstruct bone have been limited by the paucity of autologous materials available and donor site morbidity. Recent advances in the development of biomaterials have provided attractive alternatives to bone grafting expanding the surgical options for restoring the form and function of injured bone. Specifically, novel bioactive (second generation) biomaterials have been developed that are characterised by controlled action and reaction to the host tissue environment, whilst exhibiting controlled chemical breakdown and resorption with an ultimate replacement by regenerating tissue. Future generations of biomaterials (third generation) are designed to be not only osteoconductive but also osteoinductive, i.e. to stimulate regeneration of host tissues by combining tissue engineering and in situ tissue regeneration methods with a focus on novel applications. These techniques will lead to novel possibilities for tissue regeneration and repair. At present, tissue engineered constructs that may find future use as bone grafts for complex skeletal defects, whether from post-traumatic, degenerative, neoplastic or congenital/developmental “origin” require osseous reconstruction to ensure structural and functional integrity. Engineering functional bone using combinations of cells, scaffolds and bioactive factors is a promising strategy and a particular feature for future development in the area of hybrid materials which are able to exhibit suitable biomimetic and mechanical properties. This review will discuss the state of the art in this field and what we can expect from future generations of bone regeneration concepts.


Materials Today | 2012

Bone tissue engineering: from bench to bedside

Maria A. Woodruff; Claudia Lange; Johannes C. Reichert; Arne Berner; Fulen Chen; Peter Fratzl; Jan-Thorsten Schantz; Dietmar W. Hutmacher

The drive to develop bone grafts for the filling of major gaps in the skeletal structure has led to a major research thrust towards developing biomaterials for bone engineering. Unfortunately, from a clinical perspective, the promise of bone tissue engineering which was so vibrant a decade ago has so far failed to deliver the anticipated results of becoming a routine therapeutic application in reconstructive surgery. Here we describe our bench to bedside concept, the first clinical results and a detailed analysis of long-term bone regeneration studies in preclinical animal models, exploiting methods of micro- and nano analysis of biodegradable composite scaffolds.


Stem Cells and Development | 2009

Heparan Sulfate Mediates the Proliferation and Differentiation of Rat Mesenchymal Stem Cells

ChristianDombrowski; Shu JunSong; PeiyingChuan; XinhongLim; EvelynSusanto; Amber A. Sawyer; Maria A. Woodruff; Dietmar W. Hutmacher; VictorNurcombe; Simon M. Cool

The growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is controlled by various growth factors, the activities of which can be modulated by heparan sulfates (HSs). We have previously noted the necessity of sulfated glycosaminoglycans for the fibroblast growth factor type 2 (FGF-2)-stimulated differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells. Here we show that exogenous application of HS to cultures of primary rat MSCs stimulates their proliferation, leading to increased expression of osteogenic markers and enhanced bone nodule formation. FGF-2 can also increase the proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow stem cells (rMSCs) when applied exogenously during their linear growth. However, as opposed to exogenous HS, the continuous use of FGF-2 during in vitro differentiation completely blocked rMSC mineralization. We show that the effects of both FGF-2 and HS are mediated through FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) and that inhibition of signaling through this receptor arrests cell growth, resulting in the cells being unable to reach the critical density necessary to induce differentiation. Blocking FGFR1 signaling in postconfluent osteogenic cultures significantly increased calcium deposition. Taken together our data suggest that FGFR1 signaling plays an important role during osteogenic differentiation, first by stimulating cell growth that is closely followed by an inhibitory effect once the cells have reached confluence. It also confirms the importance of HS as a coreceptor for the signaling of endogenous FGF-2 and suggests that purified glycosaminoglycans may be attractive alternatives to growth factors for improved ex vivo growth and differentiation of MSCs.


Biomaterials | 2010

The effect of unlocking RGD-motifs in collagen I on pre-osteoblast adhesion and differentiation.

Anna Taubenberger; Maria A. Woodruff; Huifen Bai; Daniel J. Müller; Dietmar W. Hutmacher

Denaturation of extracellular matrix proteins exposes cryptic binding sites. It is hypothesized that binding of cell adhesion receptors to these cryptic binding sites regulates cellular behaviour during tissue repair and regeneration. To test this hypothesis, we quantify the adhesion of pre-osteoblastic cells to native (Col) and partially-denatured (pdCol) collagen I using single-cell force spectroscopy. During early stages of cell attachment (< or =180 s) pre-osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) adhered significantly stronger to pdCol compared to Col. RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp)-containing peptides suppressed this elevated cell adhesion. We show that the RGD-binding alpha(5)beta(1)- and alpha(v)-integrins mediated pre-osteoblast adhesion to pdCol, but not to Col. On pdCol pre-osteoblasts had a higher focal adhesion kinase tyrosine-phosphorylation level that correlated with enhanced spreading and motility. Moreover, pre-osteoblasts cultured on pdCol showed a pronounced matrix mineralization activity. Our data suggest that partially-denatured collagen exposes RGD-motifs that trigger binding of alpha(5)beta(1)- and alpha(v)-integrins. These integrins initiate cellular processes that stimulate osteoblast adhesion, spreading, motility and differentiation. Taken together, these quantitative insights reveal an approach for the development of alternative collagen I- based surfaces for tissue engineering applications.


Acta Biomaterialia | 2013

Autologous vs. allogenic mesenchymal progenitor cells for the reconstruction of critical sized segmental tibial bone defects in aged sheep

Arne Berner; Johannes C. Reichert; Maria A. Woodruff; Siamak Saifzadeh; A.J. Morris; Devakara R. Epari; Michael Nerlich; Michael Schuetz; Dietmar W. Hutmacher

Mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) represent an attractive cell population for bone tissue engineering. Their special immunological characteristics suggest that MPCs may be used in allogenic applications. The objective of this study was to compare the regenerative potential of autologous vs. allogenic MPCs in an ovine critical size segmental defect model. Ovine MPCs were isolated from bone marrow aspirates, expanded and cultured with osteogenic medium for 2weeks before implantation. Autologous and allogenic transplantation was performed using the cell-seeded scaffolds and unloaded scaffolds, while the application of autologous bone grafts served as a control group (n=6). Bone healing was assessed 12weeks after surgery by radiology, microcomputed tomography, biomechanical testing and histology. Radiology, biomechanical testing and histology revealed no significant differences in bone formation between the autologous and allogenic groups. Both cell groups showed more bone formation than the scaffold alone, whereas the biomechanical data showed no significant differences between the cell groups and the unloaded scaffolds. The results of the study suggest that scaffold-based bone tissue engineering using allogenic cells offers the potential for an off-the-shelf product. Thus the results of this study serve as an important baseline for translation of the assessed concepts into clinical applications.


Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine | 2010

Ovine bone- and marrow-derived progenitor cells and their potential for scaffold-based bone tissue engineering applications in vitro and in vivo.

Johannes C. Reichert; Maria A. Woodruff; Thor Friis; Verena M.C. Quent; Stan Gronthos; Georg N. Duda; Michael Schütz; Dietmar W. Hutmacher

Recently, research has focused on bone marrow derived multipotent mesenchymal precursor cells (MPC) and osteoblasts (OB) for clinical use in bone engineering. Prior to clinical application, cell based treatment concepts need to be evaluated in preclinical, large animal models. Sheep in particular are considered a valid model for orthopaedic and trauma related research. However, only sheep aged > 6 years show secondary osteon formation characteristic of human bone. Osteogenic cells isolated from animals of this age group remain poorly characterized. In the present study, ex vivo expanded MPC isolated from ovine bone marrow proliferated at a higher rate than OB derived from tibial compact bone as assessed in standard 2D cultures. MPC expressed the respective phenotypic profile typical for different mesenchymal cell populations (CD14−/CD31−/CD45−/CD29+/CD44+/CD166+) and showed a multilineage differentiation potential. When compared to OB, MPC had a higher mineralization potential under standard osteogenic culture conditions and expressed typical bone related markers such as osteocalcin, osteonectin and type I collagen at the mRNA and protein level. After 4 weeks in 3D culture, MPC constructs demonstrated higher cell density and mineralization, whilst cell viability on the scaffolds was assessed > 90%. Cells displayed a spindle‐like morphology and formed interconnected networks. In contrast, when implanted subcutaneously into NOD/SCID mice, MPC presented a lower osteogenic potential than OB. In summary, this study provides a detailed characterisation of ovine MPC and OB from a bone engineering perspective and suggests that MPC and OB provide promising means for future bone disease related treatment applications. Copyright


Stem Cell Research | 2011

Cell sourcing for bone tissue engineering: Amniotic fluid stem cells have a delayed, robust differentiation compared to mesenchymal stem cells

Alexandra Peister; Maria A. Woodruff; Jarod Prince; Derwin P. Gray; Dietmar W. Hutmacher; Robert E. Guldberg

Cell based therapies for bone regeneration are an exciting emerging technology, but the availability of osteogenic cells is limited and an ideal cell source has not been identified. Amniotic fluid-derived stem cells (AFS) and bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were compared to determine their osteogenic differentiation capacity in both 2D and 3D environments. In 2D culture, the AFS cells produced more mineralized matrix but delayed peaks in osteogenic markers. Cells were also cultured on 3D scaffolds constructed of poly-ε-caprolactone for 15 weeks. MSCs differentiated more quickly than AFS cells on 3D scaffolds, but mineralized matrix production slowed considerably after 5 weeks. In contrast, the rate of AFS cell mineralization continued to increase out to 15 weeks, at which time AFS constructs contained 5-fold more mineralized matrix than MSC constructs. Therefore, cell source should be taken into consideration when used for cell therapy, as the MSCs would be a good choice for immediate matrix production, but the AFS cells would continue robust mineralization for an extended period of time. This study demonstrates that stem cell source can dramatically influence the magnitude and rate of osteogenic differentiation in vitro.


International Journal of Polymer Science | 2012

Scaffolds for Growth Factor Delivery as Applied to Bone Tissue Engineering

Keith A. Blackwood; Nathalie Bock; Tim R. Dargaville; Maria A. Woodruff

There remains a substantial shortfall in the treatment of severe skeletal injuries. The current gold standard of autologous bone grafting from the same patient has many undesirable side effects associated such as donor site morbidity. Tissue engineering seeks to offer a solution to this problem. The primary requirements for tissue-engineered scaffolds have already been well established, and many materials, such as polyesters, present themselves as potential candidates for bone defects; they have comparable structural features, but they often lack the required osteoconductivity to promote adequate bone regeneration. By combining these materials with biological growth factors, which promote the infiltration of cells into the scaffold as well as the differentiation into the specific cell and tissue type, it is possible to increase the formation of new bone. However due to the cost and potential complications associated with growth factors, controlling the rate of release is an important design consideration when developing new bone tissue engineering strategies. This paper will cover recent research in the area of encapsulation and release of growth factors within a variety of different polymeric scaffolds.

Collaboration


Dive into the Maria A. Woodruff's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dietmar W. Hutmacher

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roland Steck

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sean K. Powell

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Keith A. Blackwood

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nathalie Bock

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Siamak Saifzadeh

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arne Berner

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patrina S.P. Poh

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tim R. Dargaville

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Schuetz

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge