Maria Clara Merli
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Maria Clara Merli.
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture | 2014
Stefano Poni; Maria Clara Merli; Eugenio Magnanini; Marco Galbignani; Fabio Bernizzoni; Alberto Vercesi; Matteo Gatti
A multichamber whole-canopy gas exchange system coupled with an automatic pot weighing device was tested for continuous 24 hr recording over 50 days in a trial comparing cv. Sangiovese vines subjected to progressive reduction of total transpiration water supply to well-watered vines. The system ran smoothly under regular maintenance for the entire period and gravimetric vine water loss was highly correlated with chamber-derived vine transpiration (r = 0.95) for data pooled over treatments. Seasonal and diurnal whole-canopy net CO2 exchange rate (NCER) and transpiration (Tc) showed that supplying 50% and 30% of daily gravimetric vine water loss (Tg) consistently corresponded to a NCER more than proportionally limited as compared to Tc, hence leading to lower canopy water-use efficiency (WUE) expressed as NCER/Tc ratio. Conversely, canopy WUE did not differ between treatments at 70% Tg restitution and rewatering. Similarly, during the most limiting water supply periods, the WUE difference between treatments was greatly reduced during cloudy days with lower vapor pressure deficit and higher diffuse-to-direct light intensity ratio. Data sets taken over different time frames on whole-canopy WUE provide a scenario different from that which might derive from traditional single-leaf assessment, reporting in almost all cases that intrinsic WUE increases under stress and suggests that the methodology used can mask or alter conclusions about adaptive response of grapevine cultivars to water stress.
Functional Plant Biology | 2015
Maria Clara Merli; Matteo Gatti; Marco Galbignani; Fabio Bernizzoni; Eugenio Magnanini; Stefano Poni
Several recent papers have shown that in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), interpretation of responses to drought can differ depending upon the parameter chosen to express water use efficiency (WUE). In the present paper, a series of WUE expressions, including physiological and agronomical, were compared in potted grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sangiovese) that were either well-watered (WW) or subjected to progressive drought before veraison (WS) by supplying decreasing fractions (i.e. 70%, 50% and 30% of daily vine transpiration (Trd) determined gravimetrically before vines were fully rewatered. Although single-leaf intrinsic and instantaneous WUE increased with water stress severity, seasonal and whole-canopy WUE were similar to that before stress, at 70% Trd and upon rewatering, but dropped during severe water stress. WUE calculated as mass of DW stored in annual biomass (leaves, canes and bunches) per litre of water used did not differ on a seasonal basis, whereas WS plants showed lower must soluble solids at harvest, and unchanged colour and phenolic concentration in spite of smaller berries with higher relative skin growth. Results confirm that whole-canopy WUE is a much better index than any single-leaf based WUE parameter for extrapolation to agronomic WUE and actual grape composition. In our specific case study, it can be recommended that water supply to drought-stressed Sangiovese grapevines before veraison should not be lower than 70% of daily vine water use.
Sensors | 2016
Matteo Gatti; Paolo Dosso; Marco Maurino; Maria Clara Merli; Fabio Bernizzoni; Facundo Jose Pirez; Bonfiglio Platè; Gian Carlo Bertuzzi; Stefano Poni
Ground-based proximal sensing of vineyard features is gaining interest due to its ability to serve in even quite small plots with the advantage of being conducted concurrently with normal vineyard practices (i.e., spraying, pruning or soil tilling) with no dependence upon weather conditions, external services or law-imposed limitations. The purpose of the present work was to test performance of the new terrestrial multi-sensor MECS-VINE® in terms of reliability and degree of correlation with several canopy growth and yield parameters in the grapevine. MECS-VINE®, once conveniently positioned in front of the tractor, can provide simultaneous assessment of growth features and microclimate of specific canopy sections of the two adjacent row sides. MECS-VINE® integrates a series of microclimate sensors (air relative humidity, air and surface temperature) with two (left and right) matrix-based optical RGB imaging sensors and a related algorithm, termed Canoyct). MECS-VINE® was run five times along the season in a mature cv. Barbera vineyard and a Canopy Index (CI, pure number varying from 0 to 1000), calculated through its built-in algorithm, validated vs. canopy structure parameters (i.e., leaf layer number, fractions of canopy gaps and interior leaves) derived from point quadrat analysis. Results showed that CI was highly correlated vs. any canopy parameter at any date, although the closest relationships were found for CI vs. fraction of canopy gaps (R2 = 0.97) and leaf layer number (R2 = 0.97) for data pooled over 24 test vines. While correlations against canopy light interception and total lateral leaf area were still unsatisfactory, a good correlation was found vs. cluster and berry weight (R2 = 0.76 and 0.71, respectively) suggesting a good potential also for yield estimates. Besides the quite satisfactory calibration provided, main improvements of MECS-VINE® usage versus other current equipment are: (i) MECS-VINE® delivers a segmented evaluation of the canopy up to 15 different sectors, therefore allowing to differentiate canopy structure and density at specific and crucial canopy segments (i.e., basal part where clusters are located) and (ii) the sensor is optimized to work at any time of the day with any weather condition without the need of any supplemental lighting system.
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research | 2015
Matteo Gatti; Alessandra Garavani; Maria Giulia Parisi; Natalia Bobeica; Maria Clara Merli; Alberto Vercesi; Stefano Poni
Agricultural Water Management | 2016
Maria Clara Merli; Eugenio Magnanini; Matteo Gatti; Facundo Jose Pirez; I. Buesa Pueyo; Diego S. Intrigliolo; Stefano Poni
Scientia Horticulturae | 2015
Maria Clara Merli; Matteo Gatti; Marco Galbignani; Fabio Bernizzoni; Eugenio Magnanini; Stefano Poni
Scientia Horticulturae | 2014
Stefano Poni; Marco Galbignani; Eugenio Magnanini; Fabio Bernizzoni; Alberto Vercesi; Matteo Gatti; Maria Clara Merli
Irrigation Science | 2016
Marco Galbignani; Maria Clara Merli; Eugenio Magnanini; Fabio Bernizzoni; I. Talaverano; Matteo Gatti; Sergio Tombesi; Alberto Palliotti; Stefano Poni
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research | 2018
I. Buesa; Giulio Caccavello; Boris Basile; Maria Clara Merli; Stefano Poni; C. Chirivella; Diego S. Intrigliolo
II Jornadas de Viticultura : comunicaciones técnicas : Madrid, 3-4 de noviembre de 2016, 2016, ISBN 978-84-617-6515-7, págs. 402-408 | 2016
Ignacio Buesa Pueyo; Giulio Caccavello; Boris Basile; Maria Clara Merli; Stefano Poni; Camilo Chirivella Romero; Diego Sebastiano Intrigliolo Molina