Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Maria Vittoria Vettori is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Maria Vittoria Vettori.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Safety and efficacy of Sacox® microGranulate (salinomycin sodium) for chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying

Guido Rychen; Gabriele Aquilina; Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Georges Bories; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Gerhard Flachowsky; Boris Kolar; Maryline Kouba; Secundino López Puente; Marta López‐Alonso; Baltasar Mayo; Fernando Ramos; Maria Saarela; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Robert John Wallace; Pieter Wester; Paul Brantom; Ingrid Halle; Patrick van Beelen; Orsolya Holczknecht; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Jürgen Gropp

Abstract Salinomycin sodium (SAL‐Na) is active against certain Gram‐positive bacteria, while Gram‐negative species are resistant. SAL‐Na at the proposed concentration is unlikely to increase shedding of Salmonella, Escherichia coli and Campylobacter and or induce resistance and cross‐resistance to antimicrobials important in human and animal therapy. SAL‐Na is safe for chickens for fattening at 70 mg/kg complete feed, for chickens reared for laying at 50 mg/kg complete feed in the first 12 weeks of life. The simultaneous use of SAL‐Na and certain antibiotic drugs (e.g. tiamulin) is contraindicated. SAL‐Na is absorbed and extensively metabolised. Metabolites have reduced ionophoric activity. SAL is the marker residue (MR). No residues in eggs are expected. SAL‐Na is not genotoxic and not a carcinogen. A NOAEL of 0.5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day is derived from a cardiovascular study in dogs as well as from a 12‐month dog study. Consumer exposure complies with an acceptable daily intake of 0.005 mg SAL/kg bw after 1 h withdrawal. A withdrawal time and maximum residue limits are not considered necessary. SAL‐Na from Sacox® is not an irritant to skin and eyes; it is a potential sensitiser to skin and the respiratory tract. A toxicological risk by inhalation for persons handling the additive cannot be excluded. SAL‐Na in feed for chickens will not pose a risk for the aquatic environment. A risk for the terrestrial ecosystem is considered unlikely due to metabolisation and the rapid degradation of SAL in the environment. SAL‐Na at a minimum concentration of 50 mg/kg complete feed is an effective coccidiostat for chickens for fattening. This conclusion is extended to chickens reared for laying. SAL‐Na in Sacox® 120 microGranulate and Sacox® 200 microGranulate is considered bioequivalent with respect to its anticoccidial effect.


EFSA Journal | 2018

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Aviax 5% (semduramicin sodium) for chickens for fattening

Guido Rychen; Gabriele Aquilina; Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Georges Bories; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Gerhard Flachowsky; Boris Kolar; Maryline Kouba; Marta López‐Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Alberto Mantovani; Baltasar Mayo; Fernando Ramos; Maria Saarela; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Robert John Wallace; Pieter Wester; Paul Brantom; Ingrid Halle; Patrick van Beelen; Orsolya Holczknecht; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Jürgen Gropp

Abstract The feed additive Aviax 5%, containing the active substance semduramicin sodium, an ionophore anticoccidial, is intended to control coccidiosis in chickens for fattening at a dose of 20−25 mg/kg complete feed. Semduramicin sodium is present in Aviax 5% in its mycelial form and is produced by fermentation of Actinomadura spp. (ATCC 53664). Semduramicin sodium is active against certain Gram‐positive bacteria, while Gram‐negative bacteria are resistant; its use as a feed additive is unlikely to increase shedding of Salmonella, Escherichia coli and Campylobacter and to induce resistance and cross‐resistance to antimicrobials used of human and animal relevance. In the absence of a tolerance study in chickens for fattening performed according to the current EU standards, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety of Aviax 5%, containing semduramicin mycelium. Semduramicin sodium in the feed is not compatible with the concurrent use of tiamulin. Mycelial semduramicin sodium is not genotoxic. There is no evidence that the mycelial semduramicin is more toxic than the crystalline by oral administration. The acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 0.00125 mg/kg set for the crystalline semduramicin is applicable to mycelial semduramicin. The use of semduramicin sodium is safe for the consumer provided a withdrawal time of 24 h is respected. No conclusions can be made on the irritancy of Aviax 5% to skin and eye and on the potential for dermal and respiratory sensitisation. Model calculations on inhalation exposure of persons handling the additive indicate a serious risk. Aviax 5% used in feed for chickens for fattening up to 25 mg/kg complete feed does not pose a risk for the terrestrial compartment. A risk for the aquatic compartment and for groundwater pollution cannot be excluded. Aviax 5% at a minimum dose of 20 mg/kg feed has the potential to effectively control coccidiosis in chickens for fattening.


EFSA Journal | 2018

Safety and efficacy of COXAM® (amprolium hydrochloride) for chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying

Guido Rychen; Gabriele Aquilina; Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Georges Bories; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Gerhard Flachowsky; Boris Kolar; Maryline Kouba; Marta López‐Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Alberto Mantovani; Baltasar Mayo; Fernando Ramos; Maria Saarela; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Robert John Wallace; Pieter Wester; Paul Brantom; Ingrid Halle; Patrick van Beelen; Orsolya Holczknecht; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Jürgen Gropp

Abstract The coccidiostat amprolium hydrochloride from COXAM ® is considered safe for chickens for fattening at 125 mg/kg complete feed. The margin of safety is at least 5. This conclusion is extended to chickens reared for laying. Amprolium hydrochloride does not possess any significant antibacterial activity. The applicant provided no information on the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) and on the toxicology of the additive or active substance. Reference was made to the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) summary reports from 1999 and 2001 citing studies used for the establishment of maximum residue limits (MRLs) for amprolium. However, the original data used in these assessments were not provided and the literature review covering the subsequent period was not made. Thus, the FEEDAP Panel cannot independently evaluate all data relevant to the current application and is therefore unable to conclude on the safety for the consumer of amprolium when used as a feed additive in chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying. COXAM ® is considered to be a skin and respiratory sensitiser. Inhalation exposure to dust from COXAM ® may present a risk for the user. The use of amprolium hydrochloride from COXAM ® in feed for chickens for fattening up to 125 mg/kg complete feed does not pose a risk for the environment. This conclusion can be extended to chickens reared for laying because of the lower predicted concentration in soil. COXAM ® was effective as a coccidiostat in three floor pen studies and in two anticoccidial sensitivity tests. Since three anticoccidial sensitivity tests showing positive effects of the treatment are required, the FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of COXAM ® for chickens for fattening under EU farming conditions. Consequently, a conclusion on the efficacy for chickens reared for laying is also not possible.


EFSA Journal | 2018

Safety and efficacy of Coxar® (nicarbazin) for turkeys for fattening

Guido Rychen; Gabriele Aquilina; Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Georges Bories; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Gerhard Flachowsky; Boris Kolar; Maryline Kouba; Marta López Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Alberto Mantovani; Baltasar Mayo; Fernando Ramos; Maria Saarela; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Robert John Wallace; Pieter Wester; Paul Brantom; Ingrid Halle; Patrick van Beelen; Orsolya Holczknecht; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Jürgen Gropp

Abstract The coccidiostat Coxar® is safe for turkeys for fattening at the use level of 100 mg nicarbazin/kg complete feed, with a margin of safety of about 1.25. Nicarbazin, when ingested, is rapidly split in its two components 2‐hydroxy‐4,6‐dimethylpyrimidine (HDP) and dinitrocarbanilide (DNC), which behave independently. HDP‐related residues are much lower than those of DNC. DNC is the marker residue. Liver is the target tissue. Nicarbazin is not genotoxic. The primary toxicity resulting from the oral use of nicarbazin is renal toxicity. The lowest no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) identified in a 52‐week study in rat using DNC+HDP is 20 mg DNC + 8 mg HDP/kg body weight (bw) per day based on the absence of microcrystals in urine and related microscopic renal observations. The use of 100 mg nicarbazin from Coxar®/kg complete feed for turkeys for fattening will not pose a risk to consumers, provided that maximum contents in nicarbazin of 0.1% p‐nitroaniline (PNA) and 0.4% methyl(4‐nitrophenyl) carbamate (M4NPC) would be respected. No withdrawal time is required. Residue data comply with the established maximum residue limits (MRLs). Nicarbazin is not a skin or eye irritant and not a skin sensitiser. These conclusions also apply to the additive Coxar®. Inhalation toxicity of nicarbazin is limited; the granulated additive has a low dusting potential. No risk for users is identified. Based on the available data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety of Coxar® for the environment. The efficacy of 100 mg nicarbazin from Coxar®/kg feed was demonstrated in three anticoccidial sensitivity tests (AST), but only in one floor pen study. The floor pen study with 75 mg nicarbazin failed to demonstrate evidence of efficacy. No final conclusions on the efficacy of nicarbazin from Coxar® for turkeys for fattening can be drawn.


EFSA Journal | 2018

Safety and efficacy of Sacox® microGranulate (salinomycin sodium) for rabbits for fattening

Guido Rychen; Gabriele Aquilina; Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Georges Bories; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Gerhard Flachowsky; Boris Kolar; Maryline Kouba; Marta López‐Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Alberto Mantovani; Baltasar Mayo; Fernando Ramos; Maria Saarela; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Robert John Wallace; Pieter Wester; Paul Brantom; Ingrid Halle; Patrick van Beelen; Orsolya Holczknecht; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Jürgen Gropp

Abstract Sacox® microGranulates, containing salinomycin sodium (SAL‐Na), for chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying have been recently re‐evaluated by Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Following an urgent request from the European Commission, the safety and efficacy of the product when fed to rabbits for fattening was assessed based on the available data submitted by the applicant at the beginning of the assessment. SAL‐Na is largely absorbed and metabolised. Metabolites have a reduced ionophoric activity. SAL is the marker residue. SAL‐Na is not genotoxic and not a carcinogen. A no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 0.5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day is derived from a study in dogs. Only data on feed intake and body weight were available to conclude on the safety of SAL for rabbits. Levels of 35 mg SAL/kg feed and higher were not tolerated by growing rabbits. The Panel considers the available data indicate that the additive is tolerated by rabbits for fattening up to 25 mg/kg. The safety of SAL in rabbits for fattening needs to be established by a tolerance study compliant with the current standards. Adverse effects on breeding does cannot be excluded. The simultaneous use of SAL‐Na with certain medicinal substances (e.g. tiamulin and valnemulin) and bentonite is contraindicated. Consumer exposure to residues of toxicological concern complies with the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 0.005 mg/kg bw, after 1‐day withdrawal. A provisional maximum residue limit (MRL) of 0.01 mg/kg liver would ensure consumer safety. A 5‐day withdrawal period as proposed by the applicant is supported. SAL‐Na in feed for rabbits will not pose a risk for the aquatic environment. A risk for the terrestrial ecosystem is considered unlikely. Efficacy and effective dose of SAL‐Na under present farming conditions could not be established.


EFSA Journal | 2018

Safety and efficacy of ponceau 4R for cats, dogs and ornamental fish

Guido Rychen; Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Georges Bories; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Gerhard Flachowsky; Jürgen Gropp; Boris Kolar; Maryline Kouba; Marta López‐Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Alberto Mantovani; Baltasar Mayo; Fernando Ramos; Maria Saarela; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Robert John Wallace; Pieter Wester; Lucio G. Costa; Anne-Katrine Lundebye; Derek Renshaw; Orsolya Holczknecht; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Gabriele Aquilina

Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of ponceau 4R for cats, dogs and ornamental fish. The following ponceau 4R concentrations in complete feed were considered safe: 31 mg/kg for cats, 37 mg/kg for dogs and 137 mg/kg for ornamental fish. Inhalation exposure of ponceau 4R is regarded as hazardous. In the absence of data, the Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy potential of ponceau 4R to skin or eyes. No conclusion could be made on the skin sensitisation of ponceau 4R. Ponceau 4R is effective in adding colour to feedingstuffs.


EFSA Journal | 2018

Safety and efficacy of Coxiril® (diclazuril) for pheasants

Guido Rychen; Gabriele Aquilina; Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Georges Bories; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Gerhard Flachowsky; Boris Kolar; Maryline Kouba; Marta López‐Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Alberto Mantovani; Baltasar Mayo; Fernando Ramos; Maria Saarela; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Robert John Wallace; Pieter Wester; Paul Brantom; Ingrid Halle; Patrick van Beelen; Orsolya Holczknecht; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Jürgen Gropp

Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Coxiril® for pheasants. Coxiril®, containing 0.5% diclazuril, is intended for the prevention of coccidiosis in pheasants at a dose range of 1.0–1.2 mg/kg of complete feed. Diclazuril from Coxiril® is considered safe for pheasants at a level of 1.2 mg/kg complete feed. The conclusion was made by extrapolating the results of a tolerance study with turkeys for fattening. The FEEDAP Panel considered that the residues in pheasant tissues and eggs would be of the same magnitude as those measured in the physiologically similar major species chickens and turkeys for fattening. The use of diclazuril at a maximum concentration of 1.2 mg/kg complete fed for pheasants would be safe for the consumer, provided that the maximum residue limits (MRLs) established for poultry would not be exceeded. The conclusions on the safety of the additive for the target species and the consumer are made under the provision that Coxiril® is not fed to laying birds. Coxiril® is considered as a non‐irritant to eyes and skin. It is not a potential skin sensitiser. User inhalation exposure to Coxiril®, as a result of normal handling, is unlikely to cause respiratory or systemic toxicity. The use of diclazuril from Coxiril® in pheasants does not pose a risk to the environment for neutral/alkaline soils (pH ≥ 7). A final conclusion on the risk resulting from the use of the additive in acid soil cannot be done due to the high uncertainties related to potential accumulation of diclazuril over time. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that diclazuril from Coxiril® at a minimum dose of 1 mg/kg complete feed has the potential to control coccidiosis in pheasants.


EFSA Journal | 2018

Safety and efficacy of Coxiril® (diclazuril) for chickens reared for laying

Guido Rychen; Gabriele Aquilina; Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Georges Bories; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Gerhard Flachowsky; Boris Kolar; Maryline Kouba; Marta López Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Alberto Mantovani; Baltasar Mayo; Fernando Ramos; Maria Saarela; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Robert John Wallace; Pieter Wester; Paul Brantom; Ingrid Halle; Patrick van Beelen; Orsolya Holczknecht; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Jürgen Gropp

Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Coxiril® (diclazuril) for chickens reared for laying. Coxiril®, containing 0.5% diclazuril, is intended for the prevention of coccidiosis in chickens reared for laying at a dose range of 0.8–1.2 mg diclazuril/kg of complete feed up to a maximum age of 12 weeks. Derived from data already assessed for chickens and turkeys for fattening, diclazuril from Coxiril® is safe for chickens reared for laying up to 1.2 mg/kg complete feed when applied until 12 weeks of age. The FEEDAP Panel extended its previous assessment of consumer safety for the use of diclazuril from Coxiril® in chickens for fattening to chickens reared for laying. No measurable diclazuril residues were found in the first eggs laid from chickens reared for laying fed diclazuril from Coxiril® at 1.2 mg/kg complete feed until 12 weeks of age. Coxiril® was considered as a non‐irritant to eyes and skin. It is not a potential skin sensitiser. User inhalation exposure to Coxiril®, as a result of normal handling, is unlikely to cause respiratory or systemic toxicity. The use of diclazuril from Coxiril® in chickens reared for laying at the highest proposed feed concentration would not pose a risk to the environment for neutral/alkaline soils (pH ≥ 7). A final conclusion on the risk resulting from the use of diclazuril in acid soil from Coxiril® cannot be done due to the high uncertainties related to potential accumulation of diclazuril over time. Derived from data already assessed for chickens for fattening, diclazuril from Coxiril® has the potential to control coccidiosis in chickens reared for laying at a minimum concentration of 0.8 mg/kg complete feed.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Safety and efficacy of Monimax® (monensin sodium and nicarbazin) for turkeys for fattening

Guido Rychen; Gabriele Aquilina; Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Georges Bories; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Gerhard Flachowsky; Boris Kolar; Maryline Kouba; Marta López‐Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Alberto Mantovani; Baltasar Mayo; Fernando Ramos; Maria Saarela; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Robert John Wallace; Pieter Wester; Paul Brantom; Ingrid Halle; Patrick van Beelen; Orsolya Holczknecht; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Jürgen Gropp

Abstract The coccidiostat Monimax® (monensin sodium and nicarbazin) is considered safe for turkeys for fattening at the highest use level of 50 mg monensin and 50 mg nicarbazin/kg complete feed. The simultaneous use of Monimax® and certain antibiotic drugs (i.e. tiamulin) is contraindicated. For both active substances, the metabolic pathways in the chicken are similar to those in the turkey and rat. Nicarbazin, when ingested, is rapidly split in its two components dinitrocarbanilide (DNC) and 2‐hydroxy‐4,6‐dimethylpyrimidine (HDP) which behave independently. Monimax® does not represent a genotoxic risk. No safety concerns would arise from the nicarbazin impurities p‐nitroaniline and methyl(4‐nitrophenyl) carbamate. The lowest no observed effect level (NOEL) identified for monensin sodium in a developmental study in rabbits was 0.3 mg monensin sodium/kg body weight (bw) per day for maternal toxicity in rabbits. The lowest no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) identified in a 52‐week study in rat using DNC + HDP was 20 mg DNC + 8 mg HDP/kg bw per day. No significant interaction between monensin sodium and nicarbazin is expected from toxicological studies. The use of Monimax® at the highest proposed dose will not pose a risk to persons consuming animal products from treated turkeys for fattening. No withdrawal time is required for Monimax® in turkeys for fattening. Residue data comply with the established maximum residue limits for monensin and DNC. Monensin sodium presents a hazard by inhalation and may also be associated with dermal toxicity. Monimax® is not a skin irritant; however, no data are available for the eye irritation potential of monensin. Monimax® is not a skin sensitiser. Based on the available data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety of Monimax® for the environment. Monimax® has the potential to control coccidiosis in turkeys for fattening at a minimum concentration of 40 mg monensin and 40 mg nicarbazin/kg complete feed.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Safety and efficacy of cis‐norbixin di‐potassium salt (annatto F) for cats and dogs

Guido Rychen; Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Georges Bories; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Gerhard Flachowsky; Jürgen Gropp; Boris Kolar; Maryline Kouba; Secundino López Puente; Marta López‐Alonso; Alberto Mantovani; Baltasar Mayo; Fernando Ramos; Maria Saarela; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Robert John Wallace; Pieter Wester; Lucio G. Costa; Anne-Katrine Lundebye; Derek Renshaw; Orsolya Holczknecht; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Gabriele Aquilina

Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of annatto F (alkali‐processed norbixin, acid‐precipitated) for cats and dogs. Norbixin is considered safe for cats at a maximum concentration of 13 mg/kg complete feed and for dogs at 16 mg/kg complete feed. Annatto 2.5% is a strong alkaline solution of potassium or sodium hydroxide that makes it corrosive and therefore harmful for the user. Although the ability of the additive to colour feed has generally been demonstrated, no conclusion on the effective concentration can be drawn.

Collaboration


Dive into the Maria Vittoria Vettori's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriele Aquilina

Istituto Superiore di Sanità

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pier Sandro Cocconcelli

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vasileios Bampidis

Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerhard Flachowsky

Friedrich Loeffler Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Baltasar Mayo

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maria Saarela

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alberto Mantovani

Istituto Superiore di Sanità

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ingrid Halle

Friedrich Loeffler Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge