Marie-Claire Botte

Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences: Evidence for a multiple-look model

Differential thresholds for tempi (with interonset intervals ranging from 100 to 1,500 msec) were measured using an adaptive 2IFC paradigm for several types of auditory sequences. In Experiment 1, the number of intervals in an isochronous sequence was varied to compare the sensitivity for single intervals withthat for sequences of two to six intervals. Mean relative just noticeable differences (JNDs) decreased as the number of intervals increased (single intervals=6%, two intervals=4%, four intervals=3.2%, six intervals=3%) and were optimal at intermediate tempi for both sequences and single intervals (as low as 1.5% in the range between 300 and 800 msec). In Experiment 2, the sensitivity for different types of irregular sequences was studied. Globally, JNDs for irregular sequences were of an intermediate level between that observed for single intervals and that observed for regular sequences. However, the closer a sequence was to regularity, the lower its relative JND. Experiment 3 demonstrated that musicians were more sensitive than nonmusicians to changes in tempo, and this was true for single intervals and for regular and irregular sequences, demonstrating the role of training on these abilities. The results are discussed in terms of possible underlying mechanisms, in particular those providing a mental representation of the mean and dispersion of successive interval durations.

Perceptual organization of complex auditory sequences: effect of number of simultaneous subsequences and frequency separation.

Previous findings on streaming are generalized to sequences composed of more than 2 subsequences. A new paradigm identified whether listeners perceive complex sequences as a single unit (integrative listening) or segregate them into 2 (or more) perceptual units (stream segregation). Listeners heard 2 complex sequences, each composed of 1, 2, 3, or 4 subsequences. Their task was to detect a temporal irregularity within 1 subsequence. In Experiment 1, the smallest frequency separation under which listeners were able to focus on 1 subsequence was unaffected by the number of co-occurring subsequences; nonfocused sounds were not perceptually organized into streams. In Experiment 2, detection improved progressively, not abruptly, as the frequency separation between subsequences increased from 0.25 to 6 auditory filters. The authors propose a model of perceptual organization of complex auditory sequences.

Auditory continuity and loudness computationa)

Sequences composed of alternating bursts of different levels with no silences separating them can give rise to a perception of a continuous sound upon which is superimposed an intermittent stream. These experiments sought to determine how the perceived loudness of the intermittent stream depends on the level difference between higher-level and lower-level bursts in the sequence in cases in which continuity is either heard or not heard. In the main experiment, listeners were asked to adjust the level of continuous or intermittent comparison sequences to match the loudness of components that appeared to be either continuous or intermittent in an alternating-level reference sequence, thus urging them to focus on the two-stream percept. Loudness matches of the continuous comparison stimulus were close to physical levels of the lower-level bursts, whereas matches of the intermittent comparison stimulus were well below the physical levels of higher-level bursts. These results are discussed in terms of Bregman’s...

Perceptual attenuation of nonfocused auditory streams

The aim of this study was to measure the perceptual attenuation, measured in decibels, resulting from the focusing of attention on one stream within a multistream auditory sequence. The intensity of a nonfocused stream was increased until the accuracy of detecting a temporal irregularity in this stream was the same as in a focused stream. Eight subjects were required to detect a temporal irregularity created by delaying or advancing one tone which could be situated in one of three temporally regular streams played simultaneously to create a multistream sequence. The three streams differed in tempo and frequency. Subjects’ attention was focused on one of the streams by preceding the multistream sequence with one of the single streams (a cue). We first established the size of temporal irregularity detected at a 90% level in cued streams, confirming that subjects were able to focus on one particular stream. Second, an irregularity of this size was not detected above chance level in noncued streams, demonstrating that listeners focus only on the cued stream. Third, for 5 subjects, a 15-dB increase in the level of one of the noncued streams was necessary to bring detection up to that found in the cued streams. This gain provides an equivalent measure of the perceptual attenuation of nonfocused streams. For 3 other subjects, detection in the noncued stream remained at chance performance whatever the level. For all subjects, detection in the cued stream decreased slightly as the level of the noncued stream increased. We conclude that the attenuation of nonfocused auditory streams can attain as much as 15 dB, at least for some subjects.

Frequency selectivity in loudness adaptation and auditory fatigue

An intermittent monaural tone may induce a decline in the loudness of a continuous tone presented to the same ear [Canévet et al., Br. J. Audiol. 17, 49-57 (1983)]. Two experiments studied the frequency selectivity of loudness adaptation induced in this manner. The method of successive magnitude estimations was used to measure the loudness of a monaural 84-s test tone before and after a single presentation of a 24-s inducer tone in the same ear. The first experiment shows that, for an inducing tone (500, 1000, or 3000 Hz) approximately 15 dB more intense than a test tone set to one of 21 different frequencies, adaptation is greatest when the two tones have the same frequency; with increasing difference between the test-tone and inducer frequencies, adaptation progressively declines. The second experiment measured frequency selectivity in the loudness reduction caused by a 1000-Hz inducer as a function of its level. As inducer level went from 75 to 95 dB (with test tone constant at 60 phons), selectivity passes progressively from the type seen in short-term or low-level fatigue (maximal for the 1000-Hz test tone) to a type seen in long-term or high-level fatigue (maximal for the 1000-Hz test tone) to a type seen in long-term or high-level fatigue (maximal at frequencies higher than that of the inducer or fatiguing tone). A common cochlear origin and a continuity between the mechanisms of ipsilaterally induced adaptation and high-level fatigue are suggested by the data.

Loudness adaptation induced by an intermittent tone

The loudness of a continuous 1000-Hz tone at 60 dB SPL was measured in the presence of an intermittent tone in the contralateral ear. Over 70 observers participated in a series of eight experiments. The method of successive magnitude estimation showed that the intermittent tone causes the steady tone to diminish in loudness within 2 or 3 min by 40% to 60%. The amount of this induced loudness adaptation depends weakly upon the presentation rate, frequency, and level of the contralateral tone. Loudness reduction of the steady tone is coupled with loudness enhancement of the intermittent tone in the opposite ear. Induced loudness adaptation was also revealed by interaural and cross-modality matching. Induced loudness adaptation depends strongly on interaural interaction and is probably related to lateralization and interaural funneling of loudness. Adaptation induced by an intermittent tone stands in marked contrast to the near absence of loudness adaptation, except near threshold, when a continuous sound is presented alone.

Loudness Adaptation, When Induced, is Real

In two recent articles, Hood and Wade (1982) and Weiler et al. (1981) have argued that the loudness of a steady tone does not appear to decline over time unless listeners are given a reference sound by which to judge loudness. The present experiments show, by the method of successive magnitude estimation, that listeners do not need a reference sound in order (1) to track accurately the decline in the loudness of a tone slowly decreasing from 60 to 40 dB SPL or (2) to track the loudness decline of a constant-intensity tone under special conditions that lead to adaptation. Since a reference sound is not needed by listeners to track a decline in loudness, and since Hood and Wade and Weiler et al. have found a decline with a reference but not without, it follows that adding a reference sound to a sustained sound must induce adaptation that otherwise does not occur. In support of that interpretation, the present measurements show that when subjects are told to ignore the same reference sound as used by Hood and Wade and by Weiler et al.--an increment every 30 s to a steady tone--loudness still declines. The bigger the increment (20 dB v. 5 dB) and the longer (5 s v. 1 s), the more loudness declines. Thus, loudness adaptation may be induced not only by a contralateral intermittent sound (Botte et al., 1982) but also by an ipsilateral intermittent sound. However, under normal listening conditions at levels above about 30 dB SL, loudness does not adapt.

Simple and Induced Loudness Adaptation

Simple loudness adaptation is the decrease in loudness that takes place when a continuous sound is presented alone for a period of time. Simple adaptation normally occurs only when a sound is soft to begin with, no more than 30 dB above threshold; except for some persons with a retrocochlear lesion, sounds above 30 dB SL do not diminish in loudness over time. However, adaptation can be induced in at least two ways: (1) A steady sound to one ear, presented together with an intermittent sound to the contralateral ear, decreases in loudness by 50-60% within 3 min. (2) An otherwise steady sound that is intermittently increased in level by at least 5 dB becomes softer during its weaker periods. When, for example, a 40-dB tone is increased every 20 s to 60 dB for 15 s, its loudness decreases by about 50% within 3 min. We report measurements of both simple and induced adaptation on 10 persons listening to a 1 000-Hz tone via earphones or from a loudspeaker. The results provide an overview of both types of adaptation. They also permitted a correlational analysis that reveals some of the similarities and differences between the two kinds of adaptation.

Loudness reduction and adaptation induced by a contralateral tone

An intermittent tone in one ear may induce a large decline in the loudness of a continuous tone in the contralateral ear [Botte et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 727-739 (1982)]. To uncover the basis for this induced loudness adaptation, the method of successive magnitude estimations was used to measure the loudness of a test tone in one ear during and after a single presentation of a brief inducer tone in the contralateral ear. Duration and frequency of the inducer were varied. The frequency of the test tone was set at 500, 1000, or 3000 Hz. Both inducer and test tones were at 60 dB SPL. When the inducer lasted 5 s or more and was at the same frequency as the test tone, the loudness of the test tone was reduced by 80% to 100% while the inducer was on. As the inducer frequency moved away from the test tone, the loudness reduction declined gradually except for a more marked drop at the point where the frequency separation exceeded the critical bandwidth. Loudness remained depressed after the inducer went off. Additional measurements showed that the amount of loudness reduction corresponded closely to the measured movement of the inducers sound image away from the center of the listeners head (decentralization).

Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences

Differential thresholds for 11 tempi (ranging from 100 to 1500 ms between successive onsets) were measured for four subjects using a 2AFC paradigm. In a first experiment, the number of events in the sequence was varied to test whether sensitivity is greater in regularsequences than in simple duration discrimination tasks (only two events). Relative jnd were: (1) optimal at intermediate tempi (as low as 1.5% in the range between 300–800 ms), and (2) decreased as the number of events increased (2 events=6%, 3 events=4%, 5 events=3.2%, 7 events=3%). A second experiment tested whether this higher sensitivity was due to the fact that the sequences were regular or not by measuring differential tempo thresholds for irregular sequences of five events. Globally, sensitivity for these irregular sequences was of an intermediate level between that of the simple duration task and the sequences with five regular events. The results are discussed in terms of the hypothesized ‘‘regularity detectors.’’