Marie-Lise Benot

Responses of clonal architecture to experimental defoliation: a comparative study between ten grassland species

Clonal architecture may enable plants to effectively respond to environmental constraints but its role in plant tolerance to defoliation remains poorly documented. In several non-clonal species, modifications of plant architecture have been reported as a mechanism of plant tolerance to defoliation, yet this has been little studied in clonal plants. In a glasshouse experiment, five rhizomatous and five stoloniferous species of grazed pastures were subjected to three frequencies of defoliation in order to test two hypotheses. (1) We expected plant clonal response to defoliation to be either a more compact architecture (low clonal propagation, but high branching), or a more dispersed one (long-distance propagation and low branching). Such plastic adjustments of clonal architecture were assumed to be involved in tolerance to defoliation i.e. to promote genet performance in terms of biomass and number of ramets. (2) The response of clonal architecture to defoliation was expected to be dependent on the species and to be more plastic in stoloniferous than in rhizomatous species. Most genets of each species were tolerant to defoliation as they survived and developed in every treatment. Architectural modifications in response to defoliation did not match our predictions. Clonal growth was either maintained or reduced under defoliation. Relative growth rate (RGR) decreased in eight species, whereas defoliated genets of seven species produced as many ramets as control genets. Biomass allocation to ramet shoots remained stable for all but one species. In defoliated genets, the number and mean length of connections, and mean inter-ramet distance were equal to or lower than those in control genets. Four groups of species were distinguished according to their architectural response to defoliation and did not depend on the type of connections. We hypothesised that dense clonal architectures with low plasticity may be the most advantageous response in defoliated conditions such as in grazed pastures.

Clonal Growth Strategies Along Flooding and Grazing Gradients in Atlantic Coastal Meadows

Specific composition and species clonal traits were characterized along combined flooding and grazing gradients to answer two questions. i) To what extent does the interaction of flooding and grazing influence the clonal characteristics of the vegetation? ii) Are the effects of both environmental factors independent or interactive? This study was carried out in a wet meadow along the Atlantic coast (France). Three plant communities (hygrophilous, meso-hygrophilous and mesophilous) were distinguished along a flooding gradient and five levels of grazing pressure were controlled through an experimental design (from no grazing to heavy grazing). We monitored species composition and retrieved, for each species, the type of clonal growth organs (CGOs) and clonal traits from the CLO-PLA3 database. We identified two syndromes of clonal traits: “above-ground splitters” and “below-ground integrators”. Clonal traits played a key role in plant assembly in the studied meadows. The interaction of both environmental factors selected for particular syndromes of clonal traits; however, flooding had a stronger filtering effect than grazing. The hygrophilous community was dominated by above-ground splitters, whereas the meso-hygrophilous vegetation was dominated by below-ground integrators. In the mesophilous community, clonal composition was the most diverse and shared clonal traits with the vegetation of both the hygrophilous and meso-hygrophilous communities. Grazing impact on CGOs and clonal traits differed between plant communities, i.e., the effect of grazing was modulated by the flooding regime. This study confirmed that vegetation responses to grazing might depend on the pool of traits, primarily filtered by environmental factors such as flooding.

Do spatial patterns of clonal fragments and architectural responses to defoliation depend on the structural blue-print? An experimental test with two rhizomatous Cyperaceae

Clonal architecture is involved in performance of clonal fragments, as it determines spatial distribution of ramets. It is expected to rely on the species-specific expression of several architectural traits (structural blue-print). However, in contrasting environments, realized clonal architectures may differ, due to phenotypic plasticity. In this paper, we compared clonal architectures between two rhizomatous ecologically close Cyperaceae (Carex divisa and Eleocharis palustris) in non-defoliated and defoliated conditions. Two questions were addressed. (1) How much do the structural blue-print and resulting colonization and occupation of space differ between both species? (2) Does the structural blue-print constrain plastic responses of clonal architecture to defoliation? Traits related to performance, spatial pattern, architecture and biomass allocation of clonal fragments were monitored through an original non-destructive mapping method. In non-defoliated conditions, both species showed similar biomass but contrasting architectures and patterns of biomass allocation to rhizomes that resulted in different spatial patterns. The rhizome network of C. divisa, which consisted in only two primary rhizomes but several branches, was involved in resource storage rather than in spatial colonization. Conversely, E. palustris produced on average six primary rhizomes that grew in the whole horizontal plane, maximizing both occupation and colonization of space. These differences in structural constraints coupled with allometric relationships, resulted in differential responses to defoliation. In C. divisa, the costs associated to defoliation caused a decrease in branching, limiting the area occupied and number of ramets produced by clonal fragments, but increasing ramet density. Conversely, the weakly branched rhizome network of E. palustris was not affected by defoliation. Both spatial strategies (consolidation vs. colonization) are likely to provide ecological advantages allowing their coexistence in grazed meadows.