Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marielouise Schuttelaar is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marielouise Schuttelaar.


Contact Dermatitis | 2009

The European baseline series in 10 European Countries, 2005/2006 : results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA)

Wolfgang Uter; Christiane Rämsch; Werner Aberer; Fabio Ayala; Anna Balato; Aiste Beliauskiene; Anna Belloni Fortina; Andreas J. Bircher; Jochen Brasch; M.M.U. Chowdhury; Pieter Jan Coenraads; Marielouise Schuttelaar; S. Cooper; Maria Teresa Corradin; Peter Elsner; John English; Manigé Fartasch; Vera Mahler; Peter J. Frosch; Thomas Fuchs; David J. Gawkrodger; Ana-Maria Gimènez-Arnau; C. Green; Helen L. Horne; Riitta Jolanki; C. M. King; Beata Kręcisz; Marta Kiec-Swierczynska; A.D. Ormerod; David Orton

Background: Continual surveillance based on patch test results has proved useful for the identification of contact allergy.


Allergy | 2009

Filaggrin mutations in the onset of eczema, sensitization, asthma, hay fever and the interaction with cat exposure

Marielouise Schuttelaar; Marjan Kerkhof; Marcel F. Jonkman; Gerard H. Koppelman; Bert Brunekreef; J. C. de Jongste; Alet H. Wijga; W.H.I. McLean; Dirkje S. Postma

Background:  Filaggrin gene (FLG) mutations contribute to the development of eczema and asthma, but their contribution to sensitization and hay fever remains unclear.


Allergy | 2012

Towards global consensus on outcome measures for atopic eczema research: results of the HOME II meeting

Jochen Schmitt; Phyllis I. Spuls; Maarten Boers; Kim S Thomas; Joanne R. Chalmers; Evelien Roekevisch; M.E. Schram; Richard Allsopp; Valeria Aoki; Christian Apfelbacher; Carla A.F.M. Bruijnzeel-Koomen; Marjolein S. de Bruin-Weller; Carolyn R. Charman; Arnon D. Cohen; Magdalene A. Dohil; Carsten Flohr; Masutaka Furue; Uwe Gieler; Lotty Hooft; Rosemary Humphreys; Henrique Akira Ishii; Ichiro Katayama; Willem Kouwenhoven; Sinéad M. Langan; Sue Lewis-Jones; Stephanie Merhand; Hiroyuki Murota; Dédée F. Murrell; Helen Nankervis; Yukihiro Ohya

The use of nonstandardized and inadequately validated outcome measures in atopic eczema trials is a major obstacle to practising evidence‐based dermatology. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative is an international multiprofessional group dedicated to atopic eczema outcomes research. In June 2011, the HOME initiative conducted a consensus study involving 43 individuals from 10 countries, representing different stakeholders (patients, clinicians, methodologists, pharmaceutical industry) to determine core outcome domains for atopic eczema trials, to define quality criteria for atopic eczema outcome measures and to prioritize topics for atopic eczema outcomes research. Delegates were given evidence‐based information, followed by structured group discussion and anonymous consensus voting. Consensus was achieved to include clinical signs, symptoms, long‐term control of flares and quality of life into the core set of outcome domains for atopic eczema trials. The HOME initiative strongly recommends including and reporting these core outcome domains as primary or secondary endpoints in all future atopic eczema trials. Measures of these core outcome domains need to be valid, sensitive to change and feasible. Prioritized topics of the HOME initiative are the identification/development of the most appropriate instruments for the four core outcome domains. HOME is open to anyone with an interest in atopic eczema outcomes research.


Contact Dermatitis | 2012

Current patch test results with the European baseline series and extensions to it from the 'European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy' network, 2007-2008

Wolfgang Uter; Werner Aberer; J.C. Armario-Hita; J.M. Fernández-Vozmediano; Fabio Ayala; Anna Balato; Andrea Bauer; Barbara Ballmer-Weber; Aiste Beliauskiene; Anna Belloni Fortina; Andreas J. Bircher; Jochen Brasch; M.M.U. Chowdhury; Pieter Jan Coenraads; Marielouise Schuttelaar; S. Cooper; Magda Czarnecka-Operacz; Maria Zmudzinska; Peter Elsner; John English; Peter J. Frosch; Thomas Fuchs; J. Garcia-Gavin; Virginia Fernández-Redondo; David J. Gawkrodger; Ana Giménez-Arnau; C. Green; Helen L. Horne; Jeanne Duus Johansen; Riitta Jolanki

Background. The pattern of contact sensitization to the supposedly most important allergens assembled in the baseline series differs between countries, presumably at least partly because of exposure differences.


British Journal of Dermatology | 2010

A randomized controlled trial in children with eczema: nurse practitioner vs. dermatologist

Marielouise Schuttelaar; Karin M. Vermeulen; N Drukker; Pieter Jan Coenraads

Background  We hypothesized that a nurse practitioner would improve the quality of life of a child with eczema more than a dermatologist because of a structured intervention and more consultation time.


British Journal of Dermatology | 2016

Report from the fourth international consensus meeting to harmonize core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis clinical trials (HOME initiative)

Joanne R. Chalmers; Eric L. Simpson; Christian Apfelbacher; Kim S Thomas; L.B. von Kobyletzki; Jochen Schmitt; Jasvinder A. Singh; Åke Svensson; Hywel C. Williams; Katrina Abuabara; Valeria Aoki; M. Ardeleanu; M. Awici-Rasmussen; S. Barbarot; Teresa Løvold Berents; Joel A. Block; A. Bragg; T. Burton; K. K. Bjerring Clemmensen; A. Creswell-Melville; M. Dinesen; Aaron M. Drucker; L. Eckert; Carsten Flohr; M. Garg; L. A. A. Gerbens; A. L. B. Graff; Jon M. Hanifin; Daniel Heinl; Rosemary Humphreys

This article is a report of the fourth meeting of the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative held in Malmö, Sweden on 23–24 April 2015 (HOME IV). The aim of the meeting was to achieve consensus over the preferred outcome instruments for measuring patient‐reported symptoms and quality of life for the HOME core outcome set for atopic eczema (AE). Following presentations, which included data from systematic reviews, consensus discussions were held in a mixture of whole group and small group discussions. Small groups were allocated a priori to ensure representation of different stakeholders and countries. Decisions were voted on using electronic keypads. For the patient‐reported symptoms, the group agreed by vote that itch, sleep loss, dryness, redness/inflamed skin and irritated skin were all considered essential aspects of AE symptoms. Many instruments for capturing patient‐reported symptoms were discussed [including the Patient‐Oriented SCOring Atopic Dermatitis index, Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Self‐Administered Eczema Area and Severity Index, Itch Severity Scale, Atopic Dermatitis Quickscore and the Nottingham Eczema Severity Score] and, by consensus, POEM was selected as the preferred instrument to measure patient‐reported symptoms. Further work is needed to determine the reliability and measurement error of POEM. Further work is also required to establish the importance of pain/soreness and the importance of collecting information regarding the intensity of symptoms in addition to their frequency. Much of the discussion on quality of life concerned the Dermatology Life Quality Index and Quality of Life Index for Atopic Dermatitis; however, consensus on a preferred instrument for measuring this domain could not be reached. In summary, POEM is recommended as the HOME core outcome instrument for measuring AE symptoms.


Pediatrics | 2015

Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus in atopic dermatitis: a 5-year randomized trial.

Bardur Sigurgeirsson; Andrzej Boznański; Gail Todd; André Vertruyen; Marielouise Schuttelaar; Xuejun Zhu; Uwe Schauer; Paul Y. Qaqundah; Yves Poulin; Sigurdur Kristjansson; Andrea von Berg; Antonio Nieto; Mark Boguniewicz; Amy S. Paller; Rada Dakovic; Johannes Ring; Thomas A. Luger

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Atopic dermatitis (AD) primarily affects infants and young children. Although topical corticosteroids (TCSs) are often prescribed, noncorticosteroid treatments are needed because compliance with TCSs is poor due to concerns about their side effects. In this longest and largest intervention study ever conducted in infants with mild-to-moderate AD, pimecrolimus 1% cream (PIM) was compared with TCSs. Methods: A total of 2418 infants were enrolled in this 5-year open-label study. Infants were randomized to PIM (n = 1205; with short-term TCSs for disease flares) or TCSs (n = 1213). The primary objective was to compare safety; the secondary objective was to document PIM’s long-term efficacy. Treatment success was defined as an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Results: Both PIM and TCSs had a rapid onset of action with >50% of patients achieving treatment success by week 3. After 5 years, >85% and 95% of patients in each group achieved overall and facial treatment success, respectively. The PIM group required substantially fewer steroid days than the TCS group (7 vs 178). The profile and frequency of adverse events was similar in the 2 groups; in both groups, there was no evidence for impairment of humoral or cellular immunity. Conclusions: Long-term management of mild-to-moderate AD in infants with PIM or TCSs was safe without any effect on the immune system. PIM was steroid-sparing. The data suggest PIM had similar efficacy to TCS and support the use of PIM as a first-line treatment of mild-to-moderate AD in infants and children.


Contact Dermatitis | 2009

Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU‐labelled fragrances

Eleonoor J van Oosten; Marielouise Schuttelaar; Pieter Jan Coenraads

Background: Fragrance mix I (FM I) and fragrance mix II (FM II) in the European baseline series are used as screening tools for fragrance contact allergy. In 2005 the European Union (EU) required labelling of 26 fragrances when present in cosmetic products. INCI nomenclature is obligatory for such labelling.


Contact Dermatitis | 2004

Characteristics of wet work in the cleaning industry

Frank Jungbauer; J J Van Der Harst; Marielouise Schuttelaar; Johan W. Groothoff; Pieter Jan Coenraads

Wet work is the main cause of occupational contact dermatitis in the cleaning industry. Dermatologists and occupational physicians need to base their primary and secondary prevention for workers in the cleaning industry on the characteristics of wet work exposures. We quantified the burden of wet work in professional office cleaning activities with a continuous standardized observation by trained observers of 41 office cleaners. Duration and frequency of wet work exposure and of different cleaning activities were assessed. Wet work made up 50% of such cleaning work. Within a typical 3‐hr shift, a mean frequency of 68 episodes of wet work was observed, which classifies office cleaning as wet work. Skin exposure to irritants was markedly different among cleaners who did the same cleaning activities. Reduction in skin irritation can be achieved by training the workers. Because this group of workers, who have a low level of education, has a high risk of developing irritant hand dermatitis, a special effort on training and instruction should be made. A reduction of exposure can be achieved by: using gloves more often; using gloves for a shorter period of time; using gloves while doing activities that otherwise cause the skin to be in contact with water and cleaning substances and washing hands with water only, reserving soap for when the hands are visibly dirty.


Journal of The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology | 2003

Bullous eosinophilic cellulitis (Wells’ syndrome) associated with Churg–Strauss syndrome

Marielouise Schuttelaar; Marcel F. Jonkman

We report a patient with Churg–Strauss syndrome (CSS) with asthma, eosinophilia, nasal polyposis and ANCA‐associated multisystem vasculitis, whos skin eruption started with erythematous urticarial‐plaques followed by haemorrhagic bullae. Histology of the plaques revealed ‘flame figures’ in the dermis with no granulomatous or vasculitic process, consistent with the diagnosis of eosinophilic cellulitis or Wells’ syndrome. The association of CSS and Wells’ syndrome observed in this patient may have a common pathogenesis. CSS may induce Wells’ syndrome by an unknown factor.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marielouise Schuttelaar's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pieter Jan Coenraads

University Medical Center Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wietske Andrea Christoffers

University Medical Center Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tatiana A. Vogel

University Medical Center Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wolfgang Uter

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karin M. Vermeulen

University Medical Center Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jart A. F. Oosterhaven

University Medical Center Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge