Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marilina Tampoia is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marilina Tampoia.


Autoimmunity Reviews | 2014

Automated antinuclear immunofluorescence antibody screening: a comparative study of six computer-aided diagnostic systems.

Nicola Bizzaro; Antonio Antico; Stefan Platzgummer; Elio Tonutti; Danila Bassetti; Fiorenza Pesente; Renato Tozzoli; Marilina Tampoia; Danilo Villalta

BACKGROUND Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) plays an important role in immunological assays for detecting and measuring autoantibodies. However, the method is burdened by some unfavorable features: the need for expert morphologists, the subjectivity of interpretation, and a low degree of standardization and automation. Following the recent statement by the American College of Rheumatology that the IIF technique should be considered as the standard screening method for the detection of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), the biomedical industry has developed technological solutions which might significantly improve automation of the procedure, not only in the preparation of substrates and slides, but also in microscope reading. METHODS We collected 104 ANA-positive sera from patients with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of autoimmune disease and 40 ANA-negative sera from healthy blood donors. One aliquot of each serum, without information about pattern and titer, was sent to six laboratories of our group, where the sera were tested with the IIF manual method provided by each of the six manufacturers of automatic systems. Assignment of result (pos/neg), of pattern and titer was made by consensus at a meeting attended by all members of the research team. Result was assigned if consensus for pos/neg was reached by at least four of six certifiers, while for the pattern and for the titer, the value observed with higher frequency (mode) was adopted. Seventeen ANA-positive sera and six ANA-negative sera were excluded. Therefore, the study with the following automatic instrumentation was conducted on 92 ANA-positive sera and on 34 ANA-negative sera: Aklides, EUROPattern, G-Sight (I-Sight-IFA), Helios, Image Navigator, and Nova View. Analytical imprecision was measured in five aliquots of the same serum, randomly added to the sample series. RESULTS Overall sensitivity of the six automated systems was 96.7% and overall specificity was 89.2%. Most false negatives were recorded for cytoplasmic patterns, whereas among nuclear patterns those with a low level of fluorescence (i.e., multiple nuclear dots, midbody, nuclear rim) were sometimes missed. The intensity values of the light signal of various instruments showed a good correlation with the titer obtained by manual reading (Spearmans rho between 0.672 and 0.839; P<0.0001 for all the systems). Imprecision ranged from 1.99% to 25.2% and, for all the systems, it was lower than that obtained by the manual IIF test (39.1%). The accuracy of pattern recognition, which is for now restricted to the most typical patterns (homogeneous, speckled, nucleolar, centromere, multiple nuclear dots and cytoplasmic) was limited, ranging from 52% to 79%. CONCLUSIONS This study, which is the first to compare the diagnostic accuracy of six systems for automated ANA-IIF reading on the same series of sera, showed that all systems are able to perform very well the task for which they were created. Indeed, cumulative automatic discrimination between positive and negative samples had 95% accuracy. All the manufacturers are actively continuing the development of new and more sophisticated software for a better definition in automatic recognition of patterns and light signal conversion in end-point titer. In the future, this may avert the need for serum dilution for titration, which will be a great advantage in economic terms and time-saving.


Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | 2005

Prevalence and Clinical Correlation of Anti-Phospholipid-Binding Protein Antibodies in Anticardiolipin-Negative Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Women With Unexplained Recurrent Miscarriages

Nicola Bizzaro; Elio Tonutti; Danilo Villalta; Marilina Tampoia; Renato Tozzoli

CONTEXT Anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies, the presence of which is associated with thrombotic events and miscarriage. OBJECTIVE To establish whether antibodies directed against phospholipid-binding plasma proteins such as beta(2)-glycoprotein I (beta(2)GPI), prothrombin (PT), and annexin V (Anx V) constitute a risk factor for thromboembolism in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and for miscarriage in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), independently of the presence of the classic anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies, and whether their determination together with that of aCL would help to increase the diagnostic sensitivity of aPL tests. DESIGN The prevalence of various antibodies directed toward phospholipids (CL and other anionic phospholipids [APL]) and phospholipid-binding proteins (beta(2)GPI, PT, and Anx V) was determined by immunoenzymatic methods in 311 serum samples. PATIENTS Twenty-five patients with aCL-positive primary anti-phospholipid syndrome (pAPS); 89 patients with SLE, 23 of whom had thrombotic complications (SLE/APS) and 66 of whom had no thrombosis; and 77 women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss comprised our study group. One hundred twenty healthy subjects matched for age and sex were studied as the control group. RESULTS Immunoglobulin (Ig) G and/or IgM aAPL, anti-beta(2)GPI, anti-PT, and IgG anti-Anx V antibodies were detected in 25 (100%), 20 (80%), 15 (60%), and 6 (24%), respectively, of the 25 aCL-positive pAPS patients; IgG and/or IgM aCL, aAPL, anti-beta(2)GPI, anti-PT, and IgG anti-Anx V antibodies were detected in 33 (37%), 42 (47%), 31 (35%), 40 (45%), and 12 (13%) of the 89 SLE patients, respectively. Of the 56 SLE patients who proved to be aCL negative, anti-beta(2)GPI was present in 3 patients (5%), anti-PT in 13 (23%) patients, and anti-Anx V in 5 (9%) patients. In the subset of 23 SLE/APS patients, IgG anti-PT prevalence was higher than that of the other autoantibodies (87% vs 70% aCL, 66% aAPL, 57% anti-beta(2)GPI, and 4% anti-Anx V), and in 26% of cases, IgG anti-PT was the only antibody present. Anti-PT had a slightly lower specificity than aCL (46% vs 49%); however, the occurrence of both antibodies brought the specificity to 92.4%. The highest risk for thrombosis in SLE patients was associated with the presence of IgG anti-PT antibody (odds ratio [OR] 15.3, P < .001, vs 6.5 aCL, 3.5 aAPL, 3.4 anti-beta(2)GPI, 0.2 anti-Anx V). Fifty-one of the 77 women with recurrent pregnancy loss were negative for all antibodies investigated; the prevalence of IgG and/or IgM aCL, aAPL, anti-beta(2)GPI, anti-PT, and IgG anti-Anx V antibodies was 6% (5), 12% (9), 6% (5), 16% (12), and 17% (13), respectively. Of the 67 aCL-negative women, none had anti-beta(2)GPI antibodies, 7 (11%) were anti-PT positive, and 13 (19%) were anti-Anx V positive. In the subgroup of 26 recurrent pregnancy loss patients who had at least one antibody, anti-Anx V was present in 50% of cases (in 42% as the sole antibody) and was the only antibody significantly associated with miscarriage (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that it is useful to measure anti-PT antibodies in addition to the more widely used aCL and anti-beta(2)GPI antibodies in the prognostic evaluation of SLE patients for the risk of thrombosis, and the results also confirm that anti-Anx V antibodies may play an important role in recurrent pregnancy loss.


Autoimmunity Reviews | 2012

Diagnostic value of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin in comparison to anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and anti-viral citrullinated peptide 2 antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: An Italian multicentric study and review of the literature

Elena Bartoloni; Alessia Alunno; Onelia Bistoni; Nicola Bizzaro; Paola Migliorini; Gabriella Morozzi; Andrea Doria; Alessandro Mathieu; Milvia Lotzniker; Flavio Allegri; Valeria Riccieri; Claudia Alpini; Armando Gabrielli; Marilina Tampoia; Roberto Gerli

In the last years, the detection of antibodies (Abs) against citrullinated peptides (ACPA) has largely replaced rheumatoid factor (RF) as the most helpful biomarker in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Current assays detect ACPA reactivity with epitopes on various different citrullinated proteins. Among these, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) Abs have been widely demonstrated to be an important diagnostic and prognostic tool because of their high specificity. Recently, citrullinated vimentin, a protein highly released in synovial microenvironment, has been identified as potential autoantigen in the pathophysiology of RA and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of Abs directed against a mutated citrullinated vimentin (anti-MCV) was developed. Several recent studies evaluating the characteristics of anti-MCV in comparison to anti-CCP Abs, have given conflicting results. Anti-MCV have been demonstrated to perform better than anti-CCP as predictor of radiographic damage. Conversely, its additional diagnostic and prognostic role in comparison to anti-CCP in both early and established RA is controversial. Aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of anti-MCV in RA and to compare it to anti-CCP and the recently developed assay targeting viral citrullinated peptide 2 (VCP2) in a large cohort of RA patients (n=285), healthy subjects and other disease controls (n=227). Anti-MCV resulted to have a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 92%. In comparison, anti-CCP and anti-VCP2 displayed a sensitivity of 77% and 61% and a specificity of 96% and 95%, respectively. Of interest, at the manufacturer recommended cutoff value of 20U/mL, a high percentage of healthy subjects as well as Epstein Barr (EBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) virus infected patients resulted anti-MCV positive. In our large cohort of RA patients, anti-MCV demonstrated lower sensitivity than anti-CCP and VCP2 test, thus not allowing to confirm previously published data. Moreover, the high rate of detection in infectious diseases limits its diagnostic value in undifferentiated arthritis.


Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 2007

Diagnostic Accuracy of IgA Anti‐Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody Assays in Celiac Disease Patients with Selective IgA Deficiency

Danilo Villalta; Maria Grazia Alessio; Marilina Tampoia; Elio Tonutti; I. Brusca; Marcello Bagnasco; Giampaola Pesce; Nicola Bizzaro

Abstract:  Clinical studies have estimated a 10‐ to 20‐fold increased risk for celiac disease (CD) in patients with selective IgA deficiency (SIgAD). For this reason, screening for CD is mandatory in SIgAD patients, but it represents a special challenge since the specific IgA class antibodies against gliadin (AGA), endomysium (EMA), and tissue‐transglutaminase (tTG) are not produced in patients with CD. IgG class counterparts of these antibodies may be informative; in particular IgG EMA has been demonstrated to be a valid marker for diagnosing CD in SIgAD cases, but it is not used much in clinical laboratories, because it is cumbersome and involves some technical difficulties. Even if it was widely used in clinical laboratories, the measuring of IgG AGA has shown a less‐than‐optimum diagnostic accuracy, so that now it tends to be substituted by tests for anti‐tTG IgG, for which the few available studies have shown diagnostic performances superior to AGA. Since it is not known whether various available methods for measuring IgG anti‐tTG antibodies offer similar diagnostic performances, we have compared the results obtained from nine second‐generation commercial methods (D‐tek, Phadia, Immco, Orgentec, Radim, Euroimmun, Inova, Aesku, Generic Assays), measuring IgG anti‐tTG antibodies in 20 patients with CD and SIgAD and in 113 controls (9 patients with SIgAD without CD, 54 patients with chronic liver disease, and 50 healthy individuals). Diagnostic sensitivity, calculated by means of ROC plot analysis, ranged between 75% and 95%, and specificity ranged from 94% to 100%. In the same population, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of AGA IgG were 40% and 87%, respectively. Even though they perform differently, all IgG anti‐tTG methods evaluated are reliable serological assays for the diagnosis of CD in SIgAD patients, with diagnostic accuracy superior to the AGA IgG method. The methods that use a mix of tTG and gliadin peptides as the antigenic preparation have a specificity slightly lower than that of the methods that use only tTG.


Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 2009

Evaluation of a New ELISA Assay for Detection of BP230 Autoantibodies in Bullous Pemphigoid

Marilina Tampoia; Valeria Lattanzi; Antonietta Zucano; Danilo Villalta; Raffaele Filotico; Antonietta Fontana; Gino A. Vena; Francesca Di Serio

The diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid is based on clinical observations and on the presence of autoantibodies directed against proteins of the dermoepidermal junction. Human recombinant BP180 and BP230 peptides have been used to develop new quantitative enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for the detection of specific antibodies. This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a new immunoassay for the detection of BP230 autoantibodies and clinical correlations. Serum samples were tested from patients with bullous pemphigoid, other skin diseases, and from healthy donors. Autoantibodies anti‐BP230 and anti‐BP180 were assayed using the EIA method. Diagnostic specificity for both tests was over 98%; diagnostic sensitivity was 90% and 60% for anti‐BP180 and anti‐BP230, respectively. IgG anti‐BP180 titers exhibited a significant correlation with disease activity. No patient in remission was positive for anti‐BP230. In conclusion, anti‐BP180 and anti‐BP230 assays are useful in the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid and provide information on disease activity.


Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | 2007

Application of a combined protocol for rational request and utilization of antibody assays improves clinical diagnostic efficacy in autoimmune rheumatic disease.

Marilina Tampoia; Vincenzo Brescia; Antonietta Fontana; Antonietta Zucano; Luigi Morrone; Nicola Pansini

CONTEXT Because of a marked increase in the number of requests for antinuclear antibodies, anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies, and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies for the diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic disease, guidelines have been proposed for their appropriate use. OBJECTIVE To evaluate in terms of clinical efficacy and cost-benefit ratio the outcome of applying a protocol for the diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic disease. DESIGN A diagnostic protocol for the rational utilization of second-level tests (anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies) was applied at Hospital Polyclinic beginning January 2004. The appropriateness of 685 consecutive requests received at the clinical pathology laboratory from January to June 2004 was assessed. Patients who underwent these laboratory tests were followed up for 12 months after blood sample drawing. RESULTS Introduction of the protocol led to a significant reduction in the number of second-level tests prescribed (27.9% vs 49.5% for anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies; 27.5% vs 56.6% for anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies). After the period of observation, none of the 163 patients who had negative results on the first-level test and were asymptomatic, for whom second-level tests had not therefore been performed, were found to have autoimmune rheumatic disease. In 90.5% (77/85) of patients positive for the second-level tests, clinical confirmation of autoimmune rheumatic disease was obtained. CONCLUSIONS Not only did application of the diagnostic protocol reduce the number of second-level tests performed but it also increased their specificity. Our data thus indicate that the use of shared guidelines by clinical and laboratory specialists yields satisfactory results.


Arthritis Research & Therapy | 2013

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody titer predicts time to rheumatoid arthritis onset in patients with undifferentiated arthritis: results from a 2-year prospective study

Nicola Bizzaro; Elena Bartoloni; Gabriella Morozzi; Stefania Manganelli; Valeria Riccieri; Paola Sabatini; Matteo Filippini; Marilina Tampoia; Antonella Afeltra; Giandomenico Sebastiani; Claudia Alpini; Vittorio Bini; Onelia Bistoni; Alessia Alunno; Roberto Gerli

IntroductionThe diagnostic, predictive and prognostic role of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is widely accepted. Moreover, detection of these antibodies in subjects presenting with undifferentiated arthritis (UA) is associated with a significant risk to develop the disease. On the other hand, clinical and prognostic significance of evaluating anti-CCP levels in subjects with inflammatory arthritis at disease onset has not been fully clarified. The goal of this prospective study is to analyze the value and prognostic significance of anti-CCP titer quantification in UA subjects.MethodsSerial anti-CCP assays were measured in 192 consecutive patients presenting with UA lasting less than 12 weeks. Clinical and serological data and arthritis outcome were evaluated every 6 months until two years of follow-up.ResultsAnti-CCP positivity, at both low and high titer, and arthritis of hand joints significantly predicted RA at two years, risk increasing in subjects with high anti-CCP titers at baseline. Moreover, time to RA diagnosis was shorter in patients with high anti-CCP2 titers at enrollment with respect to those with low antibody concentration.ConclusionsPresence of anti-CCP antibodies, at both low and high concentration, is significantly associated with RA development in subjects with recent onset UA. However, time interval from the onset of the first symptoms to the fulfilment of the classification criteria appears to be directly related to the initial anti-CCP level.


Clinica Chimica Acta | 2015

Specific chemoluminescence and immunoasdorption tests for anti-DFS70 antibodies avoid false positive results by indirect immunofluorescence.

Nicola Bizzaro; Elio Tonutti; Marilina Tampoia; Maria Infantino; Francesco Cucchiaro; Fiorenza Pesente; Gabriella Morozzi; Martina Fabris; Danilo Villalta

OBJECTIVE To evaluate two new diagnostic methods for the identification of anti-DFS70 antibodies in samples showing a DFS70-staining pattern by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). METHODS We studied 731 patients: 576 were collected consecutively among those that in the ANA test on HEp-2 cells had produced a DFS70 fluorescence pattern and 155 were a consecutive series of patients sent by referring physicians for routine ANA testing. As controls we studied 50 patients with autoimmune diseases and 120 patients with active infectious disease. All 731 sera were assayed for anti-DFS70 antibodies by a specific chemoluminescence assay (CLIA); 70 randomly selected IIF-positive sera and 35 samples from patients with autoimmune diseases were studied by inhibition tests using the HEp-2 Select method. RESULTS Assays performed with the CLIA-DFS70 method were positive in 30.4% of the samples presenting a DFS70 pattern by IIF, in 1.3% of the routine ANA sera, in 1.6% of the infectious sera and in none of the 50 autoimmune controls. However, as the IIF-DFS70 positive group included 106 patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), 11 of which were DFS70 positive by CLIA, the prevalence of DFS70 antibodies in SARD was 7.5%. The ANA test performed after the use of HEp-2 Select showed an inhibition in 95.7% of the sera. No change in fluorescence intensity and pattern morphology between the native sera and the same sera tested with the solution containing the DFS70 antigen was observed in the 35 samples from patients with autoimmune diseases. CONCLUSIONS To avoid misinterpretation of ANA pattern and consequent diagnostic errors, confirmation of the DFS70-IIF pattern by CLIA or other specific methods is mandatory before reporting the presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies. The HEp-2 Select test in most cases eliminates the interference by anti-DFS70 antibodies and avoids the possible reporting of false positive results.


Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | 2013

Prevalence of specific anti-skin autoantibodies in a cohort of patients with inherited epidermolysis bullosa

Marilina Tampoia; Domenico Bonamonte; Angela Filoni; Lucrezia Garofalo; Maria Grazia Morgese; Luigia Brunetti; Chiara Di Giorgio; Giuseppina Annicchiarico

BackgroundInherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of skin diseases characterized by blistering of the skin and mucous membranes.There are four major types of EB (EB simplex, junctional EB, dystrophic EB and Kindler syndrome) caused by different gene mutations. Dystrophic EB is derived from mutations in the type VII collagen gene (COL7A1), encoding a protein which is the predominant component of the anchoring fibrils at the dermal-epidermal junction.For the first time in literature, we have evaluated the presence of anti-skin autoantibodies in a wider cohort of patients suffering from inherited EB and ascertained whether they may be a marker of disease activity.MethodsSera from patients with inherited EB, 17 with recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB), 10 with EB simplex (EBS) were analysed. As much as 20 patients with pemphigus vulgaris, 21 patients with bullous pemphigoid and 20 healthy subjects were used as controls.Anti-skin autoantibodies were tested in all samples with the Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) method and the currently available ELISA method in order to detect anti-type VII collagen, anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 autoantibodies.ResultsThe mean concentrations of anti-type VII collagen autoantibodies titres, anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 autoantibodies were statistically higher in RDEB patients than in EBS patients.The sensitivity and specificity of the anti-type VII collagen ELISA test were 88.2% and 96.7%. The Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity score, which is used to evaluate the severity of the disease, correlated with anti-skin autoantibodies titres.ConclusionsThe precise pathogenic role of circulating anti-skin autoantibodies in RDEB is unclear. There is a higher prevalence of both anti-type VII collagen and other autoantibodies in patients with RDEB, but their presence can be interpreted as an epiphenomenon.


Dermatology | 2012

Anti-skin specific autoantibodies detected by a new immunofluorescence multiplex biochip method in patients with autoimmune bullous diseases.

Marilina Tampoia; Antonietta Zucano; Danilo Villalta; Antonio Antico; Nicola Bizzaro

Background: Autoimmune blistering skin diseases are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by autoantibodies against structural components of the skin. In pemphigus vulgaris (PV) autoantibodies react mainly with desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) alone and/or in combination with desmoglein 1 (Dsg1). In bullous pemphigoid (BP) autoantibodies target two hemidesmosomal proteins, BP180 and BP230. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) multiplex biochip method for the detection of anti-skin specific autoantibodies. Methods: Sera from 36 patients with PV and from 40 patients with BP were collected. The control group included 54 patients with other skin diseases and 40 healthy subjects. The detection of circulating autoantibodies to Dsg1, Dsg3, BP230 and BP180 was performed with a new IIF multiplex biochip method and with two currently commercially available ELISA methods. Results: The multiplex IIF method showed a high diagnostic sensitivity (100%) for PV on cells transfected with Dsg3. In patients with BP, the positivity to the BP180 antigen was higher (90%) than that on monkey esophagus (50%) and on cells transfected with BP230 (40%). A good rate of agreement was observed among methods (IIF vs. ELISA) and among ELISA systems. Conclusions: The new multiplex biochip IIF method has a high diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of PV and BP, comparable to ELISA methods, and is able to screen autoimmune bullous diseases.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marilina Tampoia's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge