Marilyn M. Morris

Airway Responsiveness to Leukotrienes C4 and D4 and to Methacholine in Patients with Asthma and Normal Controls

Leukotrienes C4 and D4 may serve as chemical mediators in asthma. Although patients with asthma are known to be hyperresponsive to the bronchoconstrictive effects of histamine and methacholine, whether the same is true for the leukotrienes is controversial. We compared the airway responses to methacholine and to leukotrienes C4 and D4 in 12 asthmatic patients and 6 controls. We found that the patients were more responsive to the leukotrienes than the controls, and we observed a linear correlation between airway response to methacholine and that to leukotriene C4 (r = 0.68, P less than 0.01) and D4 (r = 0.79, P less than 0.001). However, relative to the airway response to methacholine, the response to the leukotrienes was much greater in the controls than in the patients. Furthermore, the asthmatic subjects who were most responsive to methacholine had the lowest relative airway response to both leukotrienes. Thus, the patients with the greatest airway responsiveness to methacholine paradoxically showed the lowest relative airway response to the leukotrienes. In contrast, this difference in relative airway responses has not been observed between methacholine and other bronchoconstrictor mediators, such as histamine. Although no adequate explanation for these observations has yet emerged, our data suggest that leukotrienes C4 and D4 are unique bronchoconstrictors with a possible role in the pathogenesis of asthma.

Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine in chronic bronchitis: relationship to airflow obstruction and cold air responsiveness.

The response to inhaled methacholine is increased in patients with chronic airflow obstruction, but it is not known whether this is due to true hyperresponsiveness or is a result of the airflow obstruction. In asthmatics the response to methacholine correlates with the bronchoconstriction produced by hyperventilation of cold dry air. We studied 27 patients with a history of smoking and chronic bronchitis with a range of severity of airflow obstruction. Bronchial responses to methacholine (expressed as the provocation concentration causing a fall in FEV1 of 20%-PC20) and isocapnic hyperventilation of cold dry air were measured. In 19 patients the PC20 was less than 8 mg/ml (that is, in the asthmatic range) but only three developed bronchoconstriction in response to hyperventilation. There was a linear correlation between the log PC20 and the FEV1 (r = 0.86, p less than 0.001). The results suggest that in patients with chronic airflow obstruction the response to methacholine is determined by the degree of airflow obstruction, and cannot be used in the diagnosis of asthma in the absence of additional information.

Stable COPD: predicting benefit from high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment.

The role of inhaled corticosteroids in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether sputum eosinophilia (defined as eosinophils ≥3%) predicts clinical benefit from inhaled corticosteroid treatment in patients with smoking-related clinically stable moderate-to-severe COPD. Forty consecutive patients with effort dyspnoea (mean age 67 yrs; 52 pack-yr smoking history; post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) <60% predicted, consistent with moderate-to-severe smoking-related chronic airflow limitation) were enrolled. Subjects were treated with inhaled placebo followed by inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler® 1,600 µg·day−1), each given for 4 weeks. While the treatment was single-blind (subject level), sputum cell counts before and after treatment interventions were double-blind, thus removing bias. Outcome variables included spirometry, quality-of-life assessment and 6-min walk test. Sputum eosinophilia was present in 38% of subjects. In these, budesonide treatment normalised the eosinophil counts and, in comparison to placebo treatment, resulted in clinically significant improvement in the dyspnoea domain of the disease-specific chronic respiratory questionnaire (0.8 versus 0.3) and a small but statistically significant improvement in post-bronchodilator spirometry (FEV1 100 mL versus 0 mL; p<0.05). In conclusion, sputum eosinophilia predicts short-term clinical benefit from high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment in patients with stable moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Effect of salmeterol compared with beclomethasone on allergen-induced asthmatic and inflammatory responses

Salmeterol is a selective long-acting beta 2-agonist bronchodilator considered to have added anti-inflammatory effects, but this is controversial. We investigated the effects of a single dose of salmeterol, 100 micrograms, on the physiological and inflammatory responses to inhaled allergen and compared these with the effects of a single dose of beclomethasone, 500 micrograms, and of placebo. Eight atopic adults with mild stable asthma, treated only with inhaled short-acting beta 2-agonist when needed, attended the laboratory sequentially for screening tests, two single-blind control inhalation tests preceded 30 min by placebo or salmeterol and three allergen inhalation tests preceded by placebo, salmeterol or beclomethasone double-blind in random order. Airway responsiveness to methacholine (assessed as the provocative concentration of methacholine producing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20)), induced sputum eosinophils, blood eosinophils and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were examined before and 7-48 h after treatment. The statistical power to detect twofold changes in blood and sputum parameters was > or = 90%. Salmeterol inhaled before allergen challenge completely prevented the early asthmatic response, late asthmatic response and fall in methacholine PC20 at 24 h, and produced additional bronchodilatation. These effects were similar to those obtained by the inhalation of a single dose of salmeterol before the control inhalation test, and significantly better than those observed after a single dose of beclomethasone inhaled before the allergen test. Beclomethasone had no effect on the early asthmatic response or on the fall in methacholine PC20 at 24 h but partially inhibited the late asthmatic response. Neither salmeterol nor beclomethasone had any significant effect on sputum or blood inflammatory changes 7-48 h after allergen inhalation. In conclusion, whilst salmeterol had no demonstrable anti-inflammatory action in sputum after allergen challenge in asthma, neither did a single dose of the positive anti-inflammatory control, beclomethasone. The latter result excludes a more positive judgement on the possible anti-inflammatory action of salmeterol. However, the results do indicate that potent functional effects of a single dose of salmeterol can mask the airway inflammatory cell influx caused by inhaled allergen.

Differences in responsiveness to hyperventilation and methacholine in asthma and chronic bronchitis.

In a previous study on 27 patients with chronic bronchitis we found that only three developed bronchoconstriction in response to hyperventilation of cold, dry air despite an increased responsiveness to methacholine inhalation. We therefore investigated bronchial responsiveness to hyperventilation with cold, dry air and methacholine in 27 patients with stable asthma who had a similar range of baseline FEV1 values but who developed bronchoconstriction that could be reversed to give an FEV1 more than 70% of the predicted value. Baseline FEV1 was 0.88-3.98 l (37-114% predicted). All but one subject developed bronchoconstriction in response to hyperventilation. There was a linear relationship between baseline FEV1 and response to methacholine (r2 = 0.37, p less than 0.001) and the relationship was significantly different from that found in the bronchitic subjects (F2.50 = 24.94, p less than 0.001). In general, the response to methacholine was greater in the asthmatic than in the bronchitic subjects for any baseline FEV1. The results suggest that there are different mechanisms underlying the increased responsiveness to methacholine in asthma and chronic bronchitis.

Protective effects of fluticasone on allergen-induced airway responses and sputum inflammatory markers.

BACKGROUND A direct comparison of the protective effects of single and regular doses of inhaled glucocorticoid on allergen-induced asthmatic responses and inflammation has not been made. OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of pretreatment with fluticasone 250 microg 30 min before allergen inhalation and two weeks of 250 microg twice daily (last dose 24 h before challenge) with single and regular (twice daily) placebo doses on early and late asthmatic responses, induced sputum cell counts and measures of eosinophil activation at 7 h and 24 h, and methacholine airway responsiveness at 24 h. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ten mild asthmatic patients were studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled crossover study. RESULTS Regular fluticasone increased the baseline mean provocative concentration of methacholine to cause a 20% fall (PC20) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from 2.6 to 6.4 mg/mL (P<0.05) and lowered the eosinophil count from 3.1% to 0.4% (P<0.05) compared with regular placebo. Neither single nor regular fluticasone had any effect on the early asthmatic response. Single fluticasone attenuated the late asthmatic response, the mean +/- SEM maximum percentage fall in FEV1 (10.8+/-3.6 compared with single placebo 18. 8+/-3.5, P=0.03), the allergen-induced increase of airway responsiveness (P<0.05), and the eosinophilia (P<0.005) and activated eosinophils at 7 h (P<0.01) but not at 24 h. Regular fluticasone also attenuated the late asthmatic response (11.1+/-2.5) compared with regular placebo (19.6+/-4.5), but this was not statistically significant and did not protect against the induced increase in airway responsiveness or the sputum eosinophilia. CONCLUSION Two weeks of regular inhaled fluticasone discontinued 24 h before allergen challenge does not offer any additional protection against the early or late asthmatic responses, increased airway responsiveness or sputum eosinophilia compared with a single dose of 250 microg immediately before allergen challenge, despite increasing baseline PC20 and decreasing sputum eosinophilia prechallenge. The significance of the protective effect of a single dose of inhaled steroid before an allergen inhalation and the duration of the protective effect need further investigation.

Interpretation of the variability of peak flow rates in chronic bronchitis.

Increased diurnal variation of expiratory flow rates has been documented in patients with chronic bronchitis, but this could be secondary to the disease process of bronchitis rather than an associated disease--namely, asthma. Peak expiratory flow was measured twice daily before and after inhalation of 200 micrograms salbutamol in 34 subjects with chronic bronchitis. The FEV1 ranged from 38% to 121% predicted. Diurnal variation (expressed as highest-lowest/highest (%)) was increased in 18 subjects, all but three of whom had airflow obstruction and an increase in methacholine airway responsiveness. There was only a weak correlation between diurnal variation and airway responsiveness (r = -0.54) or the severity of the airflow obstruction. This finding, together with the occurrence of an increase in diurnal variation without an increase in methacholine airway responsiveness in three subjects, suggests that the increased diurnal variation in chronic bronchitis may have a different underlying mechanism from that in asthma.

Inhibition of the bronchial response to respiratory heat exchange by increasing doses of terbutaline sulphate.

Ten asthmatic patients inhaled terbutaline sulphate (250, 500, or 1000 micrograms) or placebo on separate days, double blind and in random order, 30 minutes before isocapnic hyperventilation induced by cold air inhaled in doses that increased in a precisely controlled manner. The respiratory heat exchange (RHE) was calculated for each level of ventilation and the results were expressed as the RHE causing a fall in FEV1 of 10% (PD10RHE). The PD10RHE after placebo was highly reproducible. After terbutaline inhalation there was a highly significant shift in the RHE dose-response curves to the right and a trend towards a linear increase in PD10RHE with increasing doses of terbutaline. The subjects who were most responsive to the RHE required more terbutaline to inhibit the response completely. The results indicate that RHE dose-response curves are a precise method to examine the effects of drugs on hyperventilation-induced asthma, that increasing doses of terbutaline can produce increasing protection, and that the degree of protection is dependent on the level of increased bronchial responsiveness to RHE.

Airway responses to hyperventilation of cold dry air: Duration of protection by cromolyn sodium

The magnitude and duration of the inhibitory effect of three doses of cromolyn sodium on the airway response to hyperventilation of cold dry air was examined in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Eight subjects with well controlled asthma were studied. On 4 separate days, doses of either 2 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, or placebo were administered by metered-dose inhaler. Twenty minutes, 2 hours, and 4 hours after each medication, airway responsiveness to isocapnic hyperventilation of cold dry air was measured by use of a standardized dose-response method. At 20 minutes, all three doses inhibited bronchoconstriction, and there was no evidence of any difference in the magnitude of the inhibition between the doses. All three doses progressively provided less protection with time. By 2 hours, the inhibition induced by 2 mg was no longer different from placebo, and by 4 hours, only 20 mg still provided significant protection. The results demonstrate that, although the initial magnitude of inhibition may not be different between 2 mg and 20 mg, the rate at which the protective effect wears off is dose related.

The effect of inhaled hexamethonium bromide and atropine sulphate on airway responsiveness to histamine

The degree of protection against inhaled histamine achieved by inhalation of the ganglion blocker hexamethonium bromide plus placebo, hexamethonium plus atropine sulphate, and placebo plus placebo was examined in six atopic subjects, four of whom had current asthma. Hexamethonium was administered until there was systemic evidence of ganglionic blockade with a postural drop in blood pressure of 31 +/- 7.5 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) (p = 0.01) and an increase in heart rate of 30 +/- 3.1 bpm (mean +/- SD) (p = 0.01). Atropine was inhaled in a dose (18 mg nebulized during tidal breathing) known to produce systemic inhibition of cardiac and salivary cholinergic (muscarinic) receptors. The airway effects were measured by FEV1. Hexamethonium caused bronchoconstriction in all four subjects with asthma, which was reversed by atropine. The mean provocation concentration of histamine to provoke a 20% fall in FEV1 was 2.97 mg/ml after premedication with placebo, it was not different at 2.84 mg/ml after hexamethonium alone, and it increased slightly to 5.31 mg/ml after both hexamethonium and atropine (p = 0.06). The results suggest that the main effect of inhaled histamine is not by reflex bronchoconstriction but rather through stimulation of H1-receptors on airway smooth muscle. Therefore, histamine hyperresponsiveness in asthma is not primarily caused by a defect in the parasympathetic nervous supply to the airway.