Mario D. Lacerna
Beaumont Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mario D. Lacerna.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1997
Frank A. Vicini; Eric M. Horwitz; Mario D. Lacerna; Douglas M. Brown; Carl F. Dmuchowski; Vijay R. Kini; A. Martinez
PURPOSE To determine the incidence of regional nodal failure (RNF) and indications for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in patients with Stage I and II breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Four hundred fifty-six patients with Stage I/II breast cancer were treated with BCT at William Beaumont Hospital. All patients underwent excisional biopsy and 288 (63%) were reexcised. A Level I/II ipsilateral axillary lymph node dissection was performed on 431 patients (95%). Pathologically involved nodes were found in 106 (23%) cases (69 with one to three nodes and 37 with > or = four nodes involved). All patients received whole breast irradiation (median dose 50 Gy) and 415 (91%) were boosted to the tumor bed (median total dose 60.4 Gy). Three hundred and sixty (79%) patients received breast alone irradiation and 96 (21%) also received RNI. The median axilla/supraclavicular fossa dose was 50 Gy. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 83 months, 15 patients developed a RNF for a 5- and 8-year actuarial rate of 3 and 4%, respectively. The 5- and 8-year actuarial rates of axillary failure (AF) were 0.7 and 1.0%, respectively. The incidence of RNF or AF was not affected by the use of RNI in N0 or N1 patients with one to three positive nodes. Only in patients with four or more positive nodes was there a trend towards improved regional control with RNI (p = 0.09). However, patient numbers were extremely small, and this improvement was limited to a reduction in the rate of failure in the supraclavicular fossa (SCF) (20 vs. 0%, p = 0.04). Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment related factors were analyzed for an association with AF. On univariate analysis, AF was associated with the number of lymph nodes excised (p < 0.0001) estrogen receptor status (p = 0.0016), and pathologic node status (p = 0.0021). CONCLUSIONS Regional nodal failure as the first site of failure is uncommon in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with BCT with < or = three positive lymph nodes and appears unaffected by RNI. For patients with four or more positive lymph nodes, a trend towards improved RNF was noted with RNI, primarily in the SCF. However, patient numbers were extremely small in all subsets analyzed. Additional studies are needed to further define the need for RNI in these patients and help determine other factors associated with RNF.
Cancer | 1996
Eric M. Horwitz; Arthur Frazier; A. Martinez; Richard D. Keidan; Daniel H. Clarke; Mario D. Lacerna; Gary S. Gustafson; Edward Heil; Carl F. Dmuchowski; Frank A. Vicini
Local control, functional outcome, and complications in patients with carcinoma of the base of tongue (BOT) were analyzed to assess the impact of interstitial implant boost with I‐125 seeds.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1997
Frank A. Vicini; Mario D. Lacerna; Neal S. Goldstein; Eric M. Horwitz; Carl F. Dmuchowski; Julia White; G. Gustafson; John A. Ingold; A. Martinez
PURPOSE We reviewed our institutions experience treating predominantly mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) to determine if any clinical, pathologic, or treatment-related factors affected outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS From January 2, 1980 to January 6, 1992, 107 breasts in 105 patients were treated with BCT at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI. All patients underwent at least an excisional biopsy and 70 patients (65%) were reexcised. All patients received whole-breast irradiation to a median dose of 50.4 Gy (range 43.1 to 56.0 Gy). Ninety-nine patients (93%) received a supplemental boost to the tumor bed for a median total dose of 60.4 Gy (range 59.1 to 71.8 Gy) using either photons (2 patients), electrons (69 patients), or an interstitial implant (28 patients). RESULTS With a median follow-up of 78 months, 10 patients have failed in the treated breast for a 5- and 10-year actuarial local control rate of 91.2 and 89.8%, respectively. Thirteen percent of the population have been followed for 10 years or more. Three recurrences were pure DCIS, and seven were invasive. All patients were salvaged with mastectomy. Nine patients remain without evidence of disease a median of 30.6 months after surgery. One patient failed distantly 36 months after local recurrence for an ultimate cause specific survival of 99%. Potential clinical (age, mammographic findings, method of detection, etc.), pathologic (nuclear grade, margins, etc.), and treatment-related factors (dose, boost technique, reexcision status, etc.) affecting outcome were analyzed. No variable was found to be associated with an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. However, when only recurrences that occurred within or immediately adjacent to the lumpectomy cavity were analyzed, both margin status and the extent of cancerization of lobules (COL) near the surgical margin were associated with the development of a local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with BCT for predominantly mammographically detected DCIS achieve excellent rates of local control and overall survival. Both margin status and the extent of COL near the surgical margin appear to be associated with recurrences within or immediately adjacent to the lumpectomy cavity. These data suggest that careful attention to the completeness of surgical resection of DCIS is an important determinant of outcome.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1997
Frank A. Vicini; Eric M. Horwitz; Mario D. Lacerna; Carl F. Dmuchowski; Douglas M. Brown; Peter Y. Chen; Gregory K. Edmundson; Gary S. Gustafson; Daniel H. Clarke; S Gregory S. Gustafson; Richard C. Matter; A. Martinez
PURPOSE We reviewed our institutions experience with interstitial implant boosts to determine their long-term impact on local control and cosmetic results. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 1987, 390 women with 400 cases of Stage I and II breast cancer were managed with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) at William Beaumont Hospital. All patients were treated with an excisional biopsy and 253 (63%) underwent reexcision. Radiation consisted of 45-50 Gy external beam irradiation to the whole breast followed by a boost to the tumor bed to at least 60 Gy using either electrons [108], photons [15], or an interstitial implant [277] with either 192Ir [190] or 125I [87]. Long-term local control and cosmetic outcome were assessed and contrasted between patients boosted with either interstitial implants, electrons, or photons. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 81 months, 25 patients have recurred in the treated breast for a 5- and 8-year actuarial rate of local recurrence of 4 and 8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the 5- or 8-year actuarial rates of local recurrence using either electrons, photons, or an interstitial implant. Greater than 90% of patients obtained a good or excellent cosmetic result, and no statistically significant differences in cosmetic outcome were seen whether electrons, photons, or implants were used. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that patients with Stage I and II breast cancer undergoing BCT and judged to be candidates for boosts can be effectively managed with LDR interstitial brachytherapy. Long-term local control and cosmetic outcome are excellent and similar to patients boosted with either electrons or photons.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 1998
Neal S. Goldstein; Mario D. Lacerna; Frank A. Vicini
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1996
Frank A. Vicini; Mario D. Lacerna; Eric M. Horwitz; G. Gustafson; Alvaro Martinez
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1996
Mario D. Lacerna; C Yu; Frank A. Vicini; Michael B. Sharpe; David A. Jaffray; John Wong; Alvaro Martinez
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1999
Frank A. Vicini; L.L. Kestin; Neal S. Goldstein; Mario D. Lacerna; Mamtha Balasubramaniam; M. Rebner; Jane Pettinga; Robert C. Frazier; A. Martinez
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1998
Larry L. Kestin; Neal S. Goldstein; Mario D. Lacerna; Mamtha Balasubramaniam; Alvaro Martinez; Robert C. Frazier; John T. Register; Frank A. Vicini
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1997
Mario D. Lacerna; Michael B. Sharpe; John M. Robertson