Mario Matta

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS Diabetes mellitus (DM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) share pathophysiological links, as supported by the high prevalence of AF within DM patients. Catheter ablation of AF (AFCA) is an established therapeutic option for rhythm control in drug resistant symptomatic patients. Its efficacy and safety among patients with DM is based on small populations, and long-term outcome is unknown. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess safety and long-term outcome of AFCA in DM patients, focusing on predictors of recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies including patients with DM undergoing AFCA were screened and included if matching inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifteen studies were included, adding up to 1464 patients. Mean follow-up was 27 (20-33) months. Overall complication rate was 3.5 (1.5-5.0)%. Efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm at follow-up end was 66 (58-73)%. Meta-regression analysis revealed that advanced age (P < 0.001), higher body mass index (P < 0.001), and higher basal glycated haemoglobin level (P < 0.001) related to higher incidence of arrhythmic recurrences. Performing AFCA lead to a reduction of patients requiring treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) from 55 (46-74)% at baseline to 29 (17-41)% (P < 0.001) at follow-up end. CONCLUSIONS Catheter ablation of AF safety and efficacy in DM patients is similar to general population, especially when performed in younger patients with satisfactory glycemic control. Catheter ablation of AF reduces the amount of patients requiring AADs, an additional benefit in this population commonly exposed to adverse effects of AF pharmacological treatments.

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background—Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AFCA) is an established therapeutic option for rhythm control in symptomatic patients. Its efficacy and safety among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction is based on small populations, and data concerning long-term outcome are limited. We performed this meta-analysis to assess safety and long-term outcome of AFCA in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, to evaluate predictors of recurrence and impact on left ventricular function. Methods and Results—A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies including patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction undergoing AFCA were included. Twenty-six studies were selected, including 1838 patients. Mean follow-up was 23 (95% confidence interval, 18–40) months. Overall complication rate was 4.2% (3.6%–4.8%). Efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm at follow-up end was 60% (54%–67%). Meta-regression analysis revealed that time since first atrial fibrillation (P=0.030) and heart failure (P=0.045) diagnosis related to higher, whereas absence of known structural heart disease (P=0.003) to lower incidence of atrial fibrillation recurrences. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved significantly during follow-up by 13% (P<0.001), with a significant reduction of patients presenting an ejection fraction <35% (P<0.001). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide blood levels decreased by 620 pg/mL (P<0.001). Conclusions—AFCA efficacy in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function improves when performed early in the natural history of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. AFCA provides long-term benefits on left ventricular function, significantly reducing the number of patients with severely impaired systolic function.

Long‐Term Results of Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients with Impaired Left Ventricular Systolic Function

AF Ablation and Impaired Left Ventricular Function. Introduction: Long‐term outcome of AF ablation in patients with impaired LVEF is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance, clinical status, and echocardiographic parameters over a long‐term period following atrial fibrillation (AF) transcatheter ablation in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in chronic heart failure: state-of-the-art and future perspectives

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AFCA) is a widely recommended treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients refractory to pharmacological treatment. Catheter ablation of AF is becoming a therapeutic option also among patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), on top of optimal medical treatment, being this arrhythmia related to a higher risk of death and/or symptoms worsening. In fact, in this setting, clinical evidences are continuously increasing. The present systematic review pools all published experiences concerning AFCA among CHF patients, or patients with structural cardiomyopathies, in order to summarize procedural safety and efficacy in this specific population. Moreover, the effects of AFCA on functional class and quality of life and the different procedural protocols available are discussed. The present work, therefore, attempts to provide an evidence-based clinical perspective to optimize clinical indication and tailor procedural characteristics and endpoints to patients affected by CHF referred for AFCA.

Very long-term outcome following transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Are results maintained after 10 years of follow up?

Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) transcatheter ablation is a safe and effective procedure. However, outcome over 10 years of follow-up has never been reported. The aim of this study is to assess outcome, describe predictors of recurrences, and report on quality of life (QoL) the decade after an AF ablation. Methods and results Patients referred for AF ablation in a single high volume centre from June 2004 to June 2006 were enrolled and followed in a prospective fashion by yearly clinical assessment and Holter monitoring. Among 255 patients (42.7% paroxysmal AF, 77% males, after a follow-up of 125 ± 7 months), 132 (52%) were arrhythmia-free including (58, 32% after a single procedure) while 27 (10%) progressed to permanent AF. At multivariate analysis, a greater left atrium antero-posterior diameter (HR 1.05 95% CI 1.02-1.09, P = 0.02) related to arrhythmic recurrences, while no increase in blood pressure (HR 0.06 95% CI 0.02-0.20, P = 0.01), BMI (HR 0.06 95% CI 0.02-0.09, P < 0.001), and fasting glucose (HR 0.58 95% CI 0.36-0.92, P = 0.02) during follow-up were protective for arrhythmic recurrences. Overall QoL improved significantly, significantly related to the absence of recurrences, arrhythmic burden reduction and blood pressure, and BMI control (P < 0.001). Conclusion The outcome of AF ablation over more than 10 years is characterized by a low incidence of progression towards permanent AF. Greater LA anteroposterior diameter related to arrhythmic recurrences, while blood pressure, BMI, and fasting blood glucose control emerged as predictors of sinus rhythm maintenance. Eventually, QoL improved significantly over the follow-up.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: can we break the vicious circle?

Heart failure (HF) management should aim to provide symptom relief, increased exercise tolerance, and reduction of disease-related morbidities and mortality. As atrial fibrillation (AF) relates to worsening of symptoms and increased risk of mortality,1 it warrants maximum consideration. However, although HF and AF are two strongly correlated emerging epidemics, the approach to patients presenting these cardiovascular diseases together remains challenging and cause for concern. Atrial fibrillation and HF often coexist in patients, as they share several pathophysiological links. Patients with AF, caused by the deleterious haemodynamic effects of atrial contraction loss and irregularity of ventricular systole, are more prone to develop HF compared with patients in sinus rhythm (SR).2 In contrast, patients with HF present with incidence of AF more frequently than patients with normal ventricular function, with increased left ventricular filling pressures and left atrial dilation and fibrosis being the ideal conditions for onset and perpetuation of AF. Notably, this link is relevant both in case of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) than in patients with preserved LVEF HF. Therefore, AF and HF can perpetuate each other in a vicious circle, and this mechanism contributes to worsen prognosis when compared with that of a similar patient affected by only one of the two pathologies at a time. In fact, higher mortality was reported among HF patients with AF compared with those in SR. In particular, patients with preserved LVEF HF suffer an even worse negative prognostic effect of AF compared with those with HF and reduced LVEF.3 Patients with AF and concomitant HF also present with higher mortality and thromboembolic events compared with patients with AF without HF.4 Of note, the risk of death and thromboembolic events related to AF is comparably higher in patients with reduced LVEF HF and those with preserved LVEF HF.5 No direct evidence favour rhythm control by antiarrhythmic drugs compared with rate control: rhythm control by antiarrhythmic drugs achieves poor results and exposes patients to side-effects. The Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure (AF-CHF) trial observed no difference in cardiovascular mortality, death from any cause, and worsening of heart failure between patients with LVEF ≤35% and symptoms of HF randomized to rate

Atrial fibrillation and female sex.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia. Its prevalence increases with age and preferentially affects male patients. Over 75 years of age, however, female patients being more prevalent, the absolute number of patients affected is similar between sexes. Despite this, few data are available in the literature concerning sex-related differences in atrial fibrillation patients. The present systematic review therefore considers comorbidities, referring symptoms, quality of life, pharmacological approaches and trans-catheter ablation in female rather than in male atrial fibrillation patients in search of parameters that may have an impact on the treatment outcome. In brief, female atrial fibrillation patients more commonly present comorbidities, leading to a higher prevalence of persistent atrial fibrillation; moreover, they refer to hospital care later and with a longer disease history. Atrial fibrillation symptoms relate to low quality of life in female patients; in fact, atrial fibrillation paroxysm usually presents higher heart rate, leading to preferentially adopt a rate rather than a rhythm-control strategy. Female atrial fibrillation patients present an increased risk of stroke, worsened by the lower oral anticoagulant prescription rate related to the concomitant higher haemorrhagic risk profile. Trans-catheter ablation is under-used in female patients and, on the contrary, they are more commonly affected by anti-arrhythmic drug side effects.

Conduction recovery following catheter ablation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation and heart failure

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is increasingly proposed for patients suffering from AF and concomitant heart failure (HF). However, the optimal ablation strategy remains controversial. We performed this study to assess the prevalence of pulmonary vein (PV) or linear lesion reconnection in HF patients undergoing repeated procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS At seven high-volume centres, 165 patients with HF underwent a repeat procedure after a first AF ablation including PV isolation alone (47 patients, group A) or PV isolation plus left atrial lines (118 patients, group B). Group A patients presented more often paroxysmal AF (p<0.001), less enlarged left atrium (p<0.001) and less left ventricular systolic dysfunction (p=0.031) compared to Group B, that more commonly had atypical atrial flutter (p<0.001). Forty-one (87%) patients in Group A and 69 (58%) in Group B presented at least one reconnected PV (p<0.001). Sixty-one (52%) patients in Group B presented at least one reconnected atrial line (left isthmus or roof). Patients without any reconnected PV (n=54, 33%) more frequently experienced persistent AF (p<0.001), had longer AF duration (p=0.047) and larger left atrial volume (p<0.001). Twenty-five patients (15%) with no PV and/or line reconnection did not significantly differ, concerning baseline characteristics, compared to those with at least one reconnected ablation site. CONCLUSION As in the general AF population undergoing catheter ablation, PV reconnection is frequent in patients with HF and symptomatic recurrence. However, one third of patients presented arrhythmic recurrences even in the absence of PV reconnection, highlighting the importance of the underlying atrial substrate.

Do left atrial appendage morphology and function help predict thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation

Clinical scores (i.e. CHA2DS2-VASc) are the mainstay of thromboembolic risk management in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Nonetheless, they bear some limitations to precisely define risk–benefit ratio of oral anticoagulation (OAC), both with vitamin K antagonists and with novel direct oral anticoagulants, especially in patients with low-intermediate scores. Cardiovascular imaging, allowing directly visualization of those pathophysiological alterations, which may lead to the formation of intracardiac thrombi, offers itself as a unique tool helping to refine thromboembolic risk stratification. Many parameters have been tested, focusing primarily on functional and morphological variables of the left atrium and left atrial appendage (LAA). Left atrium volume and LAA peak flow velocity have, for a longtime, been associated with increased thromboembolic risk, whereas some new parameters, such as left atrium fibrosis assessed by late-gadolinium enhanced (LGE) MRI, left atrium and LAA strain and LAA morphology have more recently shown some ability in predicting embolic events in atrial fibrillation patients. Overall, however, these parameters have seen, to date, scarce clinical implementation, especially because of the inconsistency of validated cutoffs and/or strong clinical evidence driven by technical limitations, such as expensiveness of the technologies (i.e. MRI or computed tomography), invasiveness (i.e. transesophageal echocardiography) or limited reproducibility (i.e. LGE MRI). In conclusion, to date, cardiovascular imaging plays a limited role; however, validation and diffusion of the new techniques hereby systematically presented hold the potential to refine thromboembolic risk stratification in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Drug abuse: another challenge for the cardiologist?

The abuse of illicit drugs is a major social and health problem. In fact, illicit drugs are responsible for many adverse systemic effects, which may require urgent medical treatment. In the present review, we report details on the prevalence of the major illicit drugs abused in Europe in 2009, according to the 2011 report of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), focusing on the effects on the cardiovascular system, including sudden cardiac death.