Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marita Laukkanen.
Water Economics and Policy | 2017
Antti Iho; Heini Ahtiainen; Janne Artell; Outi Heikinheimo; Pirkko Kauppila; Anna-Kaisa Kosenius; Marita Laukkanen; Marko Lindroos; Soile Oinonen; Kimmo Ollikka; Katja Parkkila; Yulia Pavlova; Heikki Peltonen; Eija Pouta; Laura Uusitalo
We analyze dynamically optimal eutrophication management using two controls, targeted fishing and reduction of external nutrient loads. Fishing removes nutrients from the water ecosystem, and the size of the fish stock also influences eutrophication through food web effects and other mechanisms. We show that fisheries have a role to play in cost-efficient water quality management in combination with external load reductions. Our numerical application considers phosphorus driven eutrophication, agricultural phosphorus abatement and fisheries targeted on cyprinids on a coastal bay in the Baltic Sea. The socially and privately optimal intensity of fishing efforts, phosphorus abatement and the resulting water quality are influenced by damages, revenues and costs. Furthermore, we show that the link between cyprinid fish stock and water quality, and the form of the fishing industry — sole owner or open access — have joint dynamics that lead to very different outcomes. A weak link between cyprinid stock and water quality is associated with socially optimal stock close to its maximum sustainable yield. This maximizes phosphorus removal. With a strong link, socially optimal stock and phosphorus removal are low. Coincidentally, open-access fishing sometimes yields socially desirable outcome automatically — a market failure in industry structure may counteract eutrophication.
Marine Resource Economics | 2016
Soile Oinonen; Lone Grønbæk; Marita Laukkanen; Polina Levontin; Marko Lindroos; Emmi Nieminen; Katja Parkkila; Pedro Pintassilgo; Henni Pulkkinen; Atso Romakkaniemi
ABSTRACT This article studies how accounting for the benefits of recreational fisheries affects the formation and stability of an international fisheries agreement (IFA) on the management of Baltic salmon stocks. The interaction between four countries is modelled through a partition function game, under two scenarios. In the first scenario, countries take their participation decision for the IFA based only on the net present value of profits from commercial fisheries. In the second scenario, the net present value of the recreational benefits from angling is also considered. The results show that accounting for recreational benefits leads to the formation of the grand coalition, whereas only partial cooperation occurs when payoffs are confined to profits from commercial fisheries. JEL Codes: C70, F53, Q22.
Ecological Economics | 2012
Antti Iho; Marita Laukkanen
Agricultural and Food Science | 2012
Antti Iho; Marita Laukkanen
Archive | 2009
Antti Iho; Marita Laukkanen
Archive | 2018
Marita Laukkanen; Saara Tamminen; Esa Sipilä; Heidi Kiuru; Jaakko Jokinen; Jaakko Saarela; Petteri Palonen; Nils-Olof Nylund; Kai Sipilä
Archive | 2016
Jarkko Harju; Topi Hokkanen; Marita Laukkanen; Kimmo Ollikka; Saara Tamminen
Archive | 2016
Saara Tamminen; Kimmo Ollikka; Marita Laukkanen
Eighteenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade: Challenging new frontiers in the global sector, a Northern Enlightenment | 2016
Pedro Pintassilgo; Marita Laukkanen; Lone Grønbæk; Marko Lindroos
Archive | 2012
Soile Kulmala; Polina Levontin; Katja Parkkila; Emmi Nieminen; Henni Pulkkinen; Atso Romakkaniemi; Pedro Pintassilgo; Marita Laukkanen; Marko Lindroos