Mark Downing
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mark Downing.
Archive | 2011
Mark Downing; Laurence Eaton; Robin L. Graham; Matthew Langholtz; Robert D. Perlack; Anthony Turhollow; Bryce J. Stokes; Craig C. Brandt
The Report, Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply (generally referred to as the Billion-Ton Study or 2005 BTS), was an estimate of “potential” biomass within the contiguous United States based on numerous assumptions about current and future inventory and production capacity, availability, and technology. In the 2005 BTS, a strategic analysis was undertaken to determine if U.S. agriculture and forest resources have the capability to potentially produce at least one billion dry tons of biomass annually, in a sustainable manner—enough to displace approximately 30% of the country’s present petroleum consumption. To ensure reasonable confidence in the study results, an effort was made to use relatively conservative assumptions. However, for both agriculture and forestry, the resource potential was not restricted by price. That is, all identified biomass was potentially available, even though some potential feedstock would more than likely be too expensive to actually be economically available. In addition to updating the 2005 study, this report attempts to address a number of its shortcomings
Ecological Applications | 2011
Virginia H. Dale; Keith L. Kline; Lynn L. Wright; Robert D. Perlack; Mark Downing; Robin L. Graham
Landscape implications of bioenergy feedstock choices are significant and depend on land-use practices and their environmental impacts. Although land-use changes and carbon emissions associated with bioenergy feedstock production are dynamic and complicated, lignocellulosic feedstocks may offer opportunities that enhance sustainability when compared to other transportation fuel alternatives. For bioenergy sustainability, major drivers and concerns revolve around energy security, food production, land productivity, soil carbon and erosion, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, air quality, and water quantity and quality. The many implications of bioenergy feedstock choices require several indicators at multiple scales to provide a more complete accounting of effects. Ultimately, the long-term sustainability of bioenergy feedstock resources (as well as food supplies) throughout the world depends on land-use practices and landscape dynamics. Land-management decisions often invoke trade-offs among potential environmental effects and social and economic factors as well as future opportunities for resource use. The hypothesis being addressed in this paper is that sustainability of bioenergy feedstock production can be achieved via appropriately designed crop residue and perennial lignocellulosic systems. We find that decision makers need scientific advancements and adequate data that both provide quantitative and qualitative measures of the effects of bioenergy feedstock choices at different spatial and temporal scales and allow fair comparisons among available options for renewable liquid fuels.
Biomass & Bioenergy | 1997
Robin L. Graham; W. Liu; Mark Downing; Charles E. Noon; M.J. Daly; A. Moore
Cost-supply curves for delivered wood chips from short rotation woody crops were calculated for 21 regularly spaced locations spanning the state of Tennessee. These curves were used to systematically evaluate the combined effects of location and facility demand on wood chip feedstock costs in Tennessee. The cost-supply curves were developed using BRAVO, a GIS-based decision support system which calculates marginal cost of delivering wood chips to a specific location given road network maps and maps of farm-gate prices and supplies of wood chips from short rotation energy crops. Marginal costs of delivered chips varied by both facility location in the state and facility demand. Marginal costs were lowest in central Tennessee, unless the facility demand was greater than 2 700 000 dry Mg/y (3 000 000 dry t/y) in which case west Tennessee was the lowest cost region. Marginal costs rose rapidly with increasing facility demand in the mountainous eastern portion of the state. Transportation costs accounted for 18–29% of the delivered cost and ranged between
Biomass & Bioenergy | 1996
Mark Downing; Robin L. Graham
8 and 18/dry Mg (
Environmental Management | 1996
Robin L. Graham; Mark Downing; Marie E. Walsh
7 and 16/dry t). Reducing the expected farmer participation rate from 100 to 50 or 25% dramatically raised the marginal costs of feedstock supply in the east and central regions of the state. The analysis demonstrates the need to use geographically-specific information when projecting the potential costs and supplies of biomass feedstock.
Biofuels | 2012
Gbadebo Oladosu; Keith L. Kline; Paul Leiby; Rocio Uria-Martinez; Maggie R. Davis; Mark Downing; Laurence Eaton
Abstract The economic and supply structures of short rotation woody crop (SRWC) and herbaceous energy crop (HEC) markets have not been established. Establishing the likely price and supply of biomass in a region is a complex task because biomass is not an established commodity as are oil, natural gas and coal. In this study we project the cost and supply of short-rotation woody biomass for the TVA region—a 276 county area that includes portions of 11 states in the southeastern United States. Projected prices and quantities of SRWC are assumed to be a function of the amount and quality of crop and pasture land available in a region, expected biomass crop yields and production costs on differing soils and land types, and the profit potential from current conventional crop production on these same lands. Projected switchgrass yields ranged from 9.7–19.8 dry Mg ha −1 (4.3–8.8 dry tons acre −1 ) across the region while production costs ranged from
Archive | 2011
Matthew Langholtz; Kevin R Caffrey; Elliott J Barnett; Erin Webb; Mark W Brummette; Mark Downing
30.80–
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management | 1996
Mark Downing; Teofilo Ozuna
70.40 (U.S. dollars) dry Mg −1 (
Ecological Indicators | 2011
Allen C. McBride; Virginia H. Dale; Latha M. Baskaran; Mark Downing; Laurence Eaton; Rebecca A. Efroymson; Charles T. Garten; Keith L. Kline; Henriette I. Jager; Patrick J. Mulholland; Esther S. Parish; Peter E. Schweizer; John M. E. Storey
28–
Ecological Indicators | 2013
Virginia H. Dale; Rebecca A. Efroymson; Keith L. Kline; Matthew Langholtz; Paul Leiby; Gbadebo Oladosu; Maggie R. Davis; Mark Downing; Michael R. Hilliard
64 dry ton −1 ). SRWC production costs ranged from