Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Matthew Langholtz is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Matthew Langholtz.


Archive | 2011

U.S. Billion-ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry

Mark Downing; Laurence Eaton; Robin L. Graham; Matthew Langholtz; Robert D. Perlack; Anthony Turhollow; Bryce J. Stokes; Craig C. Brandt

The Report, Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply (generally referred to as the Billion-Ton Study or 2005 BTS), was an estimate of “potential” biomass within the contiguous United States based on numerous assumptions about current and future inventory and production capacity, availability, and technology. In the 2005 BTS, a strategic analysis was undertaken to determine if U.S. agriculture and forest resources have the capability to potentially produce at least one billion dry tons of biomass annually, in a sustainable manner—enough to displace approximately 30% of the country’s present petroleum consumption. To ensure reasonable confidence in the study results, an effort was made to use relatively conservative assumptions. However, for both agriculture and forestry, the resource potential was not restricted by price. That is, all identified biomass was potentially available, even though some potential feedstock would more than likely be too expensive to actually be economically available. In addition to updating the 2005 study, this report attempts to address a number of its shortcomings


Gcb Bioenergy | 2017

Socioeconomic indicators for sustainable design and commercial development of algal biofuel systems

Rebecca A. Efroymson; Virginia H. Dale; Matthew Langholtz

Social and economic indicators can be used to support design of sustainable energy systems. Indicators representing categories of social well‐being, energy security, external trade, profitability, resource conservation, and social acceptability have not yet been measured in published sustainability assessments for commercial algal biofuel facilities. We review socioeconomic indicators that have been modeled at the commercial scale or measured at the pilot or laboratory scale, as well as factors that affect them, and discuss additional indicators that should be measured during commercialization to form a more complete picture of socioeconomic sustainability of algal biofuels. Indicators estimated in the scientific literature include the profitability indicators, return on investment (ROI) and net present value (NPV), and the resource conservation indicator, fossil energy return on investment (EROI). These modeled indicators have clear sustainability targets and have been used to design sustainable algal biofuel systems. Factors affecting ROI, NPV, and EROI include infrastructure, process choices, and financial assumptions. The food security indicator, percent change in food price volatility, is probably zero where agricultural lands are not used for production of algae‐based biofuels; however, food‐related coproducts from algae could enhance food security. The energy security indicators energy security premium and fuel price volatility and external trade indicators terms of trade and trade volume cannot be projected into the future with accuracy prior to commercialization. Together with environmental sustainability indicators, the use of a suite of socioeconomic sustainability indicators should contribute to progress toward sustainability of algal biofuels.


Gcb Bioenergy | 2016

Simulated impact of the renewable fuels standard on US Conservation Reserve Program enrollment and conversion

Chad M. Hellwinckel; Christopher M. Clark; Matthew Langholtz; Laurence Eaton

A socioeconomic model is used to estimate the land‐use implications on the U.S. Conservation Reserve Program from potential increases in second‐generation biofuel production. A baseline scenario with no second‐generation biofuel production is compared to a scenario where the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS2) volumes are met by 2022. We allow for the possibility of converting expiring CRP lands to alternative uses such as conventional crops, dedicated second‐generation biofuel crops, or harvesting existing CRP grasses for biomass. Results indicate that RFS2 volumes (RFS2‐v) can be met primarily with crop residues (78% of feedstock demand) and woody residues (19% of feedstock demand) compared with dedicated biomass (3% of feedstock demand), with only minimal conversion of cropland (0.27 million hectares, <1% of total cropland), pastureland (0.28 million hectares of pastureland, <1% of total pastureland), and CRP lands (0.29 million hectares of CRP lands, 3% of existing CRP lands) to biomass production. Meeting RFS2 volumes would reduce CRP re‐enrollment by 0.19 million hectares, or 4%, below the baseline scenario where RFS2 is not met. Yet under RFS2‐v scenario, expiring CRP lands are more likely to be converted to or maintain perennial cover, with 1.78 million hectares of CRP lands converting to hay production, and 0.29 million hectares being harvested for existing grasses. A small amount of CRP is harvested for existing biomass, but no conversion of CRP to dedicated biomass crops, such as switchgrass, are projected to occur. Although less land is enrolled in CRP under RFS2‐v scenario, total land in perennial cover increases by 0.15 million hectares, or 2%, under RFS2‐v. Sensitivity to yield, payment and residue retention assumptions are evaluated.


International Journal of Forestry Research | 2013

Environmental and Socioeconomic Indicators for Bioenergy Sustainability as Applied to Eucalyptus

Virginia H. Dale; Matthew Langholtz; Beau M. Wesh; Laurence Eaton

Eucalyptus is a fast-growing tree native to Australia and could be used to supply biomass for bioenergy and other purposes along the coastal regions of the southeastern United States (USA). At a farmgate price of


Archive | 2011

Demonstration of the BioBaler harvesting system for collection of small-diameter woody biomass

Matthew Langholtz; Kevin R Caffrey; Elliott J Barnett; Erin Webb; Mark W Brummette; Mark Downing

66 dry Mg−1, a potential supply of 27 to 41.3 million dry Mg year−1 of Eucalyptus could be produced on about 1.75 million ha in the southeastern USA. A proposed suite of indicators provides a practical and consistent way to measure the sustainability of a particular situation where Eucalyptus might be grown as a feedstock for conversion to bioenergy. Applying this indicator suite to Eucalyptus culture in the southeastern USA provides a basis for the practical evaluation of socioeconomic and environmental sustainability in those systems. Sustainability issues associated with using Eucalyptus for bioenergy do not differ greatly from those of other feedstocks, for prior land-use practices are a dominant influence. Particular concerns focus on the potential for invasiveness, water use, and social acceptance. This paper discusses opportunities and constraints of sustainable production of Eucalyptus in the southeastern USA. For example, potential effects on sustainability that can occur in all five stages of the biofuel life cycle are depicted.


Archive | 2013

The Economic Availability of Woody Biomass Feedstocks in the Northeast

Matthew Langholtz; Michael G. Jacobson

As part of a project to investigate sustainable forest management practices for producing wood chips on the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) for the ORNL steam plant, the BioBaler was tested in various Oak Ridge locations in August of 2011. The purpose of these tests and the subsequent economic analysis was to determine the potential of this novel woody biomass harvesting method for collection of small-diameter, low value woody biomass. Results suggest that opportunities may exist for economical harvest of low-value and liability or negative-cost biomass. (e.g., invasives). This could provide the ORR and area land managers with a tool to produce feedstock while improving forest health, controlling problem vegetation, and generating local employment.


Ecological Indicators | 2013

Indicators for assessing socioeconomic sustainability of bioenergy systems: a short list of practical measures.

Virginia H. Dale; Rebecca A. Efroymson; Keith L. Kline; Matthew Langholtz; Paul Leiby; Gbadebo Oladosu; Maggie R. Davis; Mark Downing; Michael R. Hilliard

The viability of bioenergy projects and policies depends in part on the economic availability (supplies and prices) of biomass feedstocks. The Northeast USA is poised with significant woody biomass resources, largely available from forest lands and urban wood waste. Further, the Northeast has great potential to augment feedstock supplies with short-rotation woody crops. Based on the results from a national agricultural simulation model, by the year 2030, the Northeast USA could potentially provide between 4.3 and 25.5 million dry Mg year−1 at farmgate prices of


Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining | 2013

Investigation of biochemical biorefinery sizing and environmental sustainability impacts for conventional bale system and advanced uniform biomass logistics designs

Andrew M Argo; Eric Tan; Daniel Inman; Matthew Langholtz; Laurence Eaton; Jacob J. Jacobson; Christopher T. Wright; David J. Muth; May M. Wu; Yi-Wen Chiu; Robin L. Graham

22 and


OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY, Oak Ridge,Tennessee, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY | 2016

2016 Billion-ton report: Advancing domestic resources for a thriving bioeconomy, Volume 1: Economic availability of feedstock

Matthew Langholtz; B.J. Stokes; Laurence Eaton

88 dry Mg−1, respectively. These supplies represent between 9 and 14 % of total woody biomass supplies that might be available in the lower 48 states.


Energy Policy | 2012

Price Projections of Feedstocks for Biofuels and Biopower in the U.S.

Matthew Langholtz; Robin L. Graham; Laurence Eaton; Robert D. Perlack; Chad Hellwinkel; Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte

Collaboration


Dive into the Matthew Langholtz's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laurence Eaton

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Craig C. Brandt

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Turhollow

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maggie R. Davis

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Downing

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robin L. Graham

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rebecca A. Efroymson

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert D. Perlack

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge