Mark F. Gourley

Methylprednisolone and Cyclophosphamide, Alone or in Combination, in Patients with Lupus Nephritis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Therapy for patients with life-threatening systemic lupus erythematosus has included high doses of corticosteroids and cytotoxic or cytostatic drugs [1-20]. Cyclophosphamide, given in intermittent intravenous boluses, has been widely used to treat renal [1-68, 15, 21] and central nervous system disease [2, 3, 6, 7, 19-21], but this therapy is sometimes withheld in the hope that disease might be controlled with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs. Moreover, some patients do not respond adequately to therapy with intermittent boluses of cyclophosphamide, and these patients might benefit from more intensive therapy. In a previous study [3], monthly administration of methylprednisolone (1.0 g/m2 body surface area) was less effective than bolus therapy with cyclophosphamide. However, the limited duration of the methylprednisolone regimen [6 months] might have been insufficient to treat lupus nephritis. To address this concern, we evaluated patients receiving methylprednisolone once a month for 1 year; additional boluses were given as needed to control disease. We compared these patients with patients receiving our standard therapy: intermittent boluses of cyclophosphamide. A group of patients randomly assigned to receive both cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone was also included for three major reasons: 1) some patients with lupus nephritis respond inadequately to boluses of cyclophosphamide, 2) anecdotal experience had suggested that cyclophosphamide therapy might be more effective for all patients when given with substantial doses of corticosteroids, and 3) animal studies had shown the advantage of combined chemotherapy for lupus nephritis [22, 23]. Our study design was modified from previous designs so that therapy could be intensified for patients with refractory or relapsing disease. Methods Patient Selection We enrolled 82 patients with lupus nephritis into this randomized, parallel study at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland) between 1986 and 1990. To enter the study, patients had to have both glomerulonephritis and a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus [24]. Glomerulonephritis was defined as a sediment on two or more urinalyses that showed either 10 or more erythrocytes per high-power field or erythrocyte or leukocyte casts (without evidence of infection) or both, plus histologic evidence of active proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis on a renal biopsy specimen obtained within 3 months of study entry (provided that a biopsy could be done safely). Scores for renal histologic activity and chronicity were assessed as reported elsewhere [25]. All eligible patients were invited to participate. Exclusion criteria were 1) receipt of cytotoxic drug treatment for more than 2 weeks during the 6 weeks before study entry or receipt of cyclophosphamide therapy for more than 10 weeks at any time; 2) receipt of pulse therapy with corticosteroids during the 6 weeks before study entry; 3) need [at the time of study entry] for oral corticosteroids in dosages greater than 0.5 mg of a prednisone equivalent per kilogram of body weight per day to control extrarenal disease; 4) active or chronic infection; 5) pregnancy; 6) the presence of only one kidney; 7) insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; and 8) allergy to methylprednisolone or cyclophosphamide. Study Design The protocol that we used was approved by the NIDDK/NIAMS (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases) Institutional Review Board [86-AR-0189]. After giving signed, written informed consent, patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups by drawing from a masked card sequence arranged from a table of random numbers. Each group received one of the following regimens: 1) intravenous methylprednisolone [1 g/m2 body surface area], given as boluses over 60 minutes on 3 consecutive days followed by at least 12 consecutive monthly single infusions; 2) intravenous cyclophosphamide, given as boluses once a month for 6 consecutive months and then once every 3 months for at least 2 more years; and 3) the combination of these two regimens. After a patient completed 1 year of study, a decision about whether therapy would be modified was made on the basis of the patients renal status at that time (Figure 1). In patients receiving methylprednisolone, therapy was discontinued if urine studies showed that renal remission had occurred. Renal remission was defined as the presence of fewer than 10 dysmorphic erythrocytes per high-power field, the absence of cellular casts, and excretion of less than 1 g of protein per day. If a renal remission was not evident, the patient continued to receive methylprednisolone every month for 6 more months. After the additional 6 months, if renal remission was still not evident, the patient received treatment for another 6 months. Therapy with methylprednisolone was limited to a maximum of 36 monthly boluses. Figure 1. Treatment regimens and decision pathways used in this clinical trial for lupus nephritis. At 1 year, patients who had been receiving cyclophosphamide alone or in combination with methylprednisolone continued to receive or began to receive cyclophosphamide alone, once every 3 months, if the results of urine studies were substantially improved. Substantial improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 50% in 1) the number of dysmorphic erythrocytes seen in urine samples, 2) the number of cellular casts, and 3) proteinuria, without a mmol of the serum creatinine level. Quarterly administration of cyclophosphamide was continued for 2 years after renal remission occurred, after which time therapy was stopped. After the first year of the study, patients in any treatment group who were no longer receiving monthly therapy but who had evidence of the reactivation of glomerular disease had their originally assigned regimens reinstituted as if they were beginning therapy from enrollment. Reactivation of glomerular disease was defined as new active nephritis with an increase of at least 50% (relative to the lowest reproducible values obtained during the study) in at least two of the following: number of dysmorphic erythrocytes ( 10 per high-power field), number of cellular casts, proteinuria ( 1 g of protein per day), or serum creatinine level. One year after the reinstitution of therapy, patients were again evaluated for evidence of active glomerulonephritis (as described above). As before, patients could be withdrawn from therapy, could restart treatment, or could continue to receive cyclophosphamide every 3 months. Patients could restart therapy no more than twice; if therapy failed more than three times, patients were declared to be nonresponders. Treatment and Follow-up Cyclophosphamide was infused for 60 minutes at an initial dose of 0.75 g/m2 body surface area. If the leukocyte nadir was greater than 3000 cells/mm3, the cyclophosphamide dose was increased by 25%, to a maximum of 1 g/m2 body surface area. The dose was reduced by 25% for leukocyte counts less than 1500 cells/mm3. Patients with a creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL/min received an initial dose of 0.5 g/m2 body surface area, and subsequent doses were adjusted on the basis of the lowest leukocyte count. Patients treated with cyclophosphamide were hydrated, and diuretics were used to maintain neutral fluid balance. Thiethylperazine, 10 mg, with 25 mg of diphenhydramine or 0.25 mg of lorazepam, was administered orally or intravenously every 6 hours for nausea. After the middle of 1990, patients were treated in a day hospital setting, where they received intravenous saline, 200 mL per hour for 10 hours. Mesna (2-mercaptoethanesulfonate), at 20% of the cyclophosphamide dose, was infused intravenously for 10 minutes before cyclophosphamide was administered and every 3 hours thereafter, for a total of four doses. Ondansetron, 8 mg, was given every 4 hours beginning 4 hours after infusion of cyclophosphamide, for a total of three doses. Dexamethasone, 10 mg, was given 4 hours after administration of cyclophosphamide [26]. Patients were instructed to continue oral hydration after discharge from the day hospital to maintain a dilute and frequent diuresis for at least 24 hours after infusion of cyclophosphamide. All patients were initially given oral prednisone, 0.5 mg/kg per day for 4 weeks. The prednisone dose was then tapered by 5 mg every other day each week to the minimal dose required to control extrarenal disease or 0.25 mg/kg every other day, whichever was greater. For severe extrarenal flares of lupus, patients were permitted to receive prednisone, 1.0 mg/kg per day for 2 weeks. Blood pressure was closely monitored and was maintained within 110 to 130/70 to 85 mm Hg with antihypertensive therapy. The intervals at which patients were followed were dictated by the activity of lupus and nephritis. In general, all patients were seen monthly during the first year of the study and every 3 months thereafter. At each study visit, patients were questioned about and examined for adverse events. Outcome Measures The primary study outcome was the response to the study drugs as defined by 1) the percentage of patients who achieved renal remission, 2) the number of nonresponders (nonresponse was defined as 10 erythrocytes per high-power field, cellular casts, proteinuria [>1 g of protein per day], and doubling of the serum creatinine level), and 3) the percentage of adverse events. The outcome data, with the exception of data on adverse events, were collected in a blinded manner on 1 May 1995, 5 years after the last patient was enrolled in the study. Secondary outcome measures were renal failure that required dialysis (end-stage renal disease), stable doubling of the serum creatinine level, and number of renal relapses (renal relapse was defined as a reactivation of renal disease after 6 or more months of remissio

Fc gamma RIIA alleles are heritable risk factors for lupus nephritis in African Americans

Allelic variants of Fc gamma R confer distinct phagocytic capacities providing a mechanism for heritable susceptibility to immune complex disease. Human Fc gamma RIIa has two codominantly expressed alleles, R131 and H131, which differ substantially in their ability to ligate human IgG2. The Fc gamma RIIa-H131 is the only human Fc gamma R which recognizes IgG2 efficiently and optimal IgG2 handling occurs only in the homozygous state. Therefore, since immune complex clearance is essential in SLE, we hypothesized that Fc gamma RIIA genes are important disease susceptibility factors for SLE, particularly lupus nephritis. In a two-stage cross-sectional study, we compared the distribution of Fc gamma RIIA alleles in African Americans with SLE to that in African American non-SLE controls. A pilot study of 43 SLE patients and 39 controls demonstrated a skewed distribution of Fc gamma RIIA alleles, with only 9% of SLE patients homozygous for Fc gamma RIIa-H131 compared with 36% of controls (odds ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05-0.69, P = 0.009). This was confirmed with a multicenter study of 214 SLE patients and 100 non-SLE controls. The altered distribution of Fc gamma RIIA alleles was most striking in lupus nephritis. Trend analysis of the genotype distribution showed a highly significant decrease in Fc gamma RIIA-H131 as the likelihood for lupus nephritis increased (P = 0.0004) consistent with a protective effect of the Fc gamma RIIA-H131 gene. The skewing in the distribution of Fc gamma RIIA alleles identifies this gene as a risk factor with pathophysiologic importance for the SLE diathesis in African Americans.

Treatment of refractory myositis: a randomized crossover study of two new cytotoxic regimens.

OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical usefulness of 2 novel therapies for treatment-resistant myositis. METHODS Thirty patients with refractory myositis, of whom 25 had an inadequate or no response to previous cytotoxic therapy, were randomized to begin either a combination of weekly oral methotrexate and daily azathioprine (MTX/AZA) or intravenous methotrexate with leucovorin rescue (I.V. MTX) every 2 weeks for 6 months. Crossover to the alternate therapy occurred according to defined rules; evaluations of muscle strength and functional abilities were performed at the beginning, and after 3 and 6 months, of each treatment. RESULTS Of the 15 patients initially randomized to oral MTX/AZA, 8 improved with oral therapy and 1 improved with I.V. MTX during the crossover period. Of the 15 patients initially randomized to I.V. MTX therapy, 3 improved with the I.V. therapy and 4 with the oral combination during the crossover period. Although the study lacked the power to directly compare both treatments, intention-to-treat analysis showed a trend in favor of those patients who first received oral combination therapy (P = 0.025). There were 0.09 adverse events per patient-month with oral combination therapy and 0.16 per patient-month with I.V. therapy (P = 0.09). CONCLUSION Combination oral MTX/AZA may benefit patients with treatment-resistant myositis, including those who previously had inadequate responses to either MTX or AZA alone. I.V. MTX with leucovorin rescue may also benefit some patients with refractory myositis.

Genome-wide association study of dermatomyositis reveals genetic overlap with other autoimmune disorders

OBJECTIVE To identify new genetic associations with juvenile and adult dermatomyositis (DM). METHODS We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of adult and juvenile DM patients of European ancestry (n = 1,178) and controls (n = 4,724). To assess genetic overlap with other autoimmune disorders, we examined whether 141 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) outside the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) locus, and previously associated with autoimmune diseases, predispose to DM. RESULTS Compared to controls, patients with DM had a strong signal in the MHC region consisting of GWAS-level significance (P < 5 × 10(-8)) at 80 genotyped SNPs. An analysis of 141 non-MHC SNPs previously associated with autoimmune diseases showed that 3 SNPs linked with 3 genes were associated with DM, with a false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.05. These genes were phospholipase C-like 1 (PLCL1; rs6738825, FDR = 0.00089), B lymphoid tyrosine kinase (BLK; rs2736340, FDR = 0.0031), and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 (CCL21; rs951005, FDR = 0.0076). None of these genes was previously reported to be associated with DM. CONCLUSION Our findings confirm the MHC as the major genetic region associated with DM and indicate that DM shares non-MHC genetic features with other autoimmune diseases, suggesting the presence of additional novel risk loci. This first identification of autoimmune disease genetic predispositions shared with DM may lead to enhanced understanding of pathogenesis and novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Theoretical and experimental approaches to generalized autoimmunity

This paper summarizes some of our views on the pathogenesis of systemic lupus. It considers theoretical aspects of generalized autoimmunity and data from studies of human and, especially, murine lupus. We emphasize aspects of pathogenesis of disease rather than mechanisms of organ inflammation. In this endeavor, we draw upon both published and unpublished work from our group. We make no attempt to exhaustively cite the literature for the many fields of immunology mentioned.

Mechanisms of Disease: environmental factors in the pathogenesis of rheumatic disease

Most rheumatic diseases are complex disorders for which pathogenetic mechanisms are poorly understood. Nonetheless, increasing evidence suggests that many of these illnesses result from one or more specific environmental exposures in genetically susceptible individuals. Although much progress has been made over the past few decades in advancing our knowledge of the genetics of rheumatic diseases, few studies have assessed environmental features and understanding of which exposures are important in pathogenesis remains limited. In this article, we review the difficulties inherent in deciphering the interacting environmental and genetic risk factors for rheumatic diseases, the current state of knowledge of infectious and noninfectious risk factors, possible mechanisms by which environmental exposures might induce pathologic processes and future directions. The advances in technologies and statistical approaches, development of collaborating consortia and focused resources that have resulted in the explosion of genetic information must now be applied to environmental studies so we can eventually interrupt pathogenesis before the onset of disease and transform the practice of medicine from curative to pre-emptive paradigms.

Diagnostic testing and interpretation of tests for autoimmunity.

Laboratory testing is of great value when evaluating a patient with a suspected autoimmune disease. The results can confirm a diagnosis, estimate disease severity, aid in assessing prognosis and are useful for following disease activity. Components of the laboratory examination include a complete blood count with differential, a comprehensive metabolic panel, measurement of inflammatory markers and autoantibodies, and flow cytometry. This chapter discusses these components and includes a discussion about organ-specific immunologic diseases for which immunologic laboratory testing is used. Comprehensive laboratory evaluation of a suspected autoimmune illness in conjunction with a thorough clinical evaluation provides a better understanding of a patients immunologic disease.

Gene expression profiles from discordant monozygotic twins suggest that molecular pathways are shared among multiple systemic autoimmune diseases

IntroductionThe objective of this study is to determine if multiple systemic autoimmune diseases (SAID) share gene expression pathways that could provide insights into pathogenic mechanisms common to these disorders.MethodsRNA microarray analyses (Agilent Human 1A(V2) 20K oligo arrays) were used to quantify gene expression in peripheral blood cells from 20 monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs discordant for SAID. Six affected probands with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), six with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), eight with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), and their same-gendered unaffected twins, were enrolled. Comparisons were made between discordant twin pairs and these were also each compared to 40 unrelated control subjects (matched 2:1 to each twin by age, gender and ethnicity) using statistical and molecular pathway analyses. Relative quantitative PCR was used to verify independently measures of differential gene expression assessed by microarray analysis.ResultsProbands and unrelated, matched controls differed significantly in gene expression for 104 probes corresponding to 92 identifiable genes (multiple-comparison adjusted P values < 0.1). Differentially expressed genes involved several overlapping pathways including immune responses (16%), signaling pathways (24%), transcription/translation regulators (26%), and metabolic functions (15%). Interferon (IFN)-response genes (IFI27, OASF, PLSCR1, EIF2AK2, TNFAIP6, and TNFSF10) were up-regulated in probands compared to unrelated controls. Many of the abnormally expressed genes played regulatory roles in multiple cellular pathways. We did not detect any probes expressed differentially in comparisons among the three SAID phenotypes. Similarly, we found no significant differences in gene expression when comparing probands to unaffected twins or unaffected twins to unrelated controls. Gene expression levels for unaffected twins appeared intermediate between that of probands and unrelated controls for 6535 probes (32% of the total probes) as would be expected by chance. By contrast, in unaffected twins intermediate ordering was observed for 84 of the 104 probes (81%) whose expression differed significantly between probands and unrelated controls.ConclusionsAlterations in expression of a limited number of genes may influence the dysregulation of numerous, integrated immune response, cell signaling and regulatory pathways that are common to a number of SAID. Gene expression profiles in peripheral blood suggest that for genes in these critical pathways, unaffected twins may be in a transitional or intermediate state of immune dysregulation between twins with SAID and unrelated controls, perhaps predisposing them to the development of SAID given the necessary and sufficient environmental exposures.

Diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory myopathy: issues and management.

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies include polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM) and inclusion body myositis (IBM). The specific etiologies of these muscle diseases are not well known and are thought to involve components of the humoral and cellular immune system as well as other nonimmune factors. Diagnosing these myopathies involves a laboratory evaluation, imaging studies, multidisciplinary consultations, histologic examination and potentially genetic studies. Despite all that we currently know about inflammatory muscle disease with these studies, we find that our current concept of muscle disease is changing. In the cases of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and inclusion body myositis, the concept of inflammation needs to be rethought. Moreover, the classification schemes for these idiopathic myopathies may need updating to include current research findings that relate to pathogenesis. With ongoing discoveries, classification and appropriate treatment is becoming increasingly challenging. This paper discusses the inflammatory myopathies, the challenges to diagnosis, classification controversies and potential treatment options.

Plasma proteomic profiles from disease-discordant monozygotic twins suggest that molecular pathways are shared in multiple systemic autoimmune diseases*

IntroductionAlthough systemic autoimmune diseases (SAID) share many clinical and laboratory features, whether they also share some common features of pathogenesis remains unclear. We assessed plasma proteomic profiles among different SAID for evidence of common molecular pathways that could provide insights into pathogenic mechanisms shared by these diseases.MethodsDifferential quantitative proteomic analyses (one-dimensional reverse-phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) were performed to assess patterns of plasma protein expression. Monozygotic twins (four pairs discordant for systemic lupus erythematosus, four pairs discordant for juvenile idiopathic arthritis and two pairs discordant for juvenile dermatomyositis) were studied to minimize polymorphic gene effects. Comparisons were also made to 10 unrelated, matched controls.ResultsMultiple plasma proteins, including acute phase reactants, structural proteins, immune response proteins, coagulation and transcriptional factors, were differentially expressed similarly among the different SAID studied. Multivariate Random Forest modeling identified seven proteins whose combined altered expression levels effectively segregated affected vs. unaffected twins. Among these seven proteins, four were also identified in univariate analyses of proteomic data (syntaxin 17, α-glucosidase, paraoxonase 1, and the sixth component of complement). Molecular pathway modeling indicated that these factors may be integrated through interactions with a candidate plasma biomarker, PON1 and the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6.ConclusionsTogether, these data suggest that different SAID may share common alterations of plasma protein expression and molecular pathways. An understanding of the mechanisms leading to the altered plasma proteomes common among these SAID may provide useful insights into their pathogeneses.