Mark H. Schoenfeld

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair nnAlice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA, Vice-Chair nnCynthia D. Adams, RN, PhD, FAHA[§][1]nnJeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA[§][1]nnChristopher E. Buller, MD, FACCnnMark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHAnnSteven M. Ettinger, MD, FACCnnDavid P. Faxon, MD, FACC,

ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)

The current update of the ACC/AHA/NASPE Guidelines for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices includes several significant changes in the recommendations and in the supporting narrative portion. In this summary, we list the updated recommendations along with the respective

2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons nnAndrew E. Epstein, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS, Chair ; John P. DiMarco, MD, PhD, FACC, FHRS; Kenneth A. Ellenbogen. MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; N.A. Mark Estes III, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; Roger A.

ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article

The current update of the ACC/AHA/NASPE Guidelines for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices includes several significant changes in the recommendations and in the supporting narrative portion. In this summary, we list the updated recommendations along with the respective 1998 recommendations, each one accompanied by a brief comment outlining the rationale for the changes, additions, or deletions. All new or revised recommendations are listed in the second column and appear in boldface type. References that support either the 1998 recommendations that have not changed or the new or revised recommendations are noted in parentheses at the end of each recommendation. The reader is referred to the full-text version of the guidelines posted on the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE) World Wide Web sites for a more detailed exposition of the rationale for these changes. In addition to the recommendation changes listed here, this update includes an expanded section on the selection of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) that reflects the technical advances that have taken place since 1998. A brief expanded summary of pacemaker follow-up procedures is also new to these guidelines. For both of these …

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities.

the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of ssociation Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee, oard of Trustees in February 2008. iology Foundation, American Heart Association, and Heart s document be cited as follows: Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, I, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, y MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, CC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of report of the American College of Cardiology/American n Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the deline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and oll Cardiol 2008;51:e1–62. This article h 2008 issue of H Copies: Thi College of C americanheart.o document, plea reprints@elsevie Permissions: tion of this doc College of Ca Society. Pleas elsevier.com. avid L. Hayes, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS* ark A. Hlatky, MD, FACC, FAHA . Kristin Newby, MD, FACC, FAHA ichard L. Page, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS ark H. Schoenfeld, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS ichael J. Silka, MD, FACC ynne Warner Stevenson, MD, FACC, FAHA‡ ichael O. Sweeney, MD, FACC*

2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update of the 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

Andrew E. Epstein, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS, Chair; John P. DiMarco, MD, PhD, FACC, FHRS; Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; N.A. Mark Estes III, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; Roger A. Freedman, MD, FACC, FHRS; Leonard S. Gettes, MD, FACC, FAHA; A. Marc Gillinov, MD, FACC, FAHA; Gabriel Gregoratos, MD

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: executive summary.

Practice Guideline: Executive Summary ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update of the 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities

Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Heart Failure Society of America, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Restrictive cardiomyopathy versus constrictive pericarditis: role of endomyocardial biopsy in avoiding unnecessary thoracotomy.

Despite careful clinical, noninvasive, and hemodynamic assessment of patients with constrictive/restrictive physiology, the differentiation of restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis remains difficult. We examined the role of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in defining the underlying process in 54 patients with evidence of constrictive/restrictive physiology, including 38 patients with profound symptoms of heart failure in whom diagnostic/therapeutic thoracotomy was contemplated (group I) and 16 patients with milder symptoms (group II). All patients in group I had NYHA class III or IV heart failure with depressed cardiac index (mean 2.5 liters/min/m2), right atrial hypertension (mean 15 mm Hg), and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (mean 59%). Endomyocardial biopsy identified a specific source of restrictive cardiomyopathy in 15 of 38 patients (39%) (11 amyloid, four myocarditis). Of the 23 remaining patients with either normal biopsy findings or nonspecific abnormalities on biopsy, 18 had intraoperative or autopsy evaluation of their pericardium, and constriction was found in 14 (77%). A specific form of restrictive cardiomyopathy was also identified in four of the 16 patients with milder symptoms (group II). We conclude that endomyocardial biopsy is useful in patients with severe constrictive/restrictive physiology. It identifies a large subset of patients with specific forms of restrictive cardiomyopathy in whom thoracotomy should be avoided. It supports the need for thoracotomy and the likelihood of finding pericardial constriction in patients without specific pathologic findings.

Long-term reproducibility of responses to programmed cardiac stimulation in spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Programmed electrical stimulation (PES) of the heart has been used to initiate and terminate ventricular tachyarrhythmias under controlled conditions in patients in whom these arrhythmias have occurred spontaneously. The long-term reproducibility of the response to programmed cardiac stimulation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias is unknown. Seventeen patients with previously documented spontaneously occurring ventricular tachyarrhythmias were evaluated: 5 with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), 10 with sustained VT and 2 with ventricular fibrillation. The underlying cardiac diagnosis was atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CAD) in 11 patients, dilated cardiomyopathy in 2 patients, congenital heart disease in 1 patient and no structural heart disease in 3. All patients underwent PES in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug treatment, and patients with inducible VT underwent serial electrophysiologic-pharmacologic testing in an attempt to suppress the arrhythmia. All 17 patients were reexamined with PES at a mean of 18 months (range 2 to 42) after their initial electrophysiologic study, during which time none had a myocardial infarction or intervening cardiac surgery. Repeat electrophysiologic studies, performed in the absence of antiarrhythmic agents, were undertaken because of drug intolerance, availability of new drugs, recurrent arrhythmia or preoperative reevaluation. All 11 patients with CAD had inducible VT on both the first and second electrophysiologic evaluation. Of the 6 patients with no CAD, only 1 had inducible VT on both occasions. Thus, long-term reproducibility of PES-induced VT in patients with stable CAD appears to be high.