Michael J. Silka

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA, Vice-Chair Cynthia D. Adams, RN, PhD, FAHA[§][1] Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA[§][1] Christopher E. Buller, MD, FACC Mark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHA Steven M. Ettinger, MD, FACC David P. Faxon, MD, FACC,

ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)

The current update of the ACC/AHA/NASPE Guidelines for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices includes several significant changes in the recommendations and in the supporting narrative portion. In this summary, we list the updated recommendations along with the respective

2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Andrew E. Epstein, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS, Chair ; John P. DiMarco, MD, PhD, FACC, FHRS; Kenneth A. Ellenbogen. MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; N.A. Mark Estes III, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; Roger A.

ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article

The current update of the ACC/AHA/NASPE Guidelines for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices includes several significant changes in the recommendations and in the supporting narrative portion. In this summary, we list the updated recommendations along with the respective 1998 recommendations, each one accompanied by a brief comment outlining the rationale for the changes, additions, or deletions. All new or revised recommendations are listed in the second column and appear in boldface type. References that support either the 1998 recommendations that have not changed or the new or revised recommendations are noted in parentheses at the end of each recommendation. The reader is referred to the full-text version of the guidelines posted on the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE) World Wide Web sites for a more detailed exposition of the rationale for these changes. In addition to the recommendation changes listed here, this update includes an expanded section on the selection of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) that reflects the technical advances that have taken place since 1998. A brief expanded summary of pacemaker follow-up procedures is also new to these guidelines. For both of these …

ACC/AHA Guidelines for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation)

The publication of major studies dealing with the natural history of bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias and major advances in the technology of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has mandated this revision of the 1991 ACC/AHA Guidelines for Implantation of Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices. This executive summary appears in the April 7, 1998 issue of Circulation. The full text of the guidelines, including the ACC/AHA Class I, II, and III recommendations, is published in the April 1998 issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Reprints of both the executive summary and the full text are available from both organizations. Following extensive review of the medical literature and related documents previously published by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology, the writing committee developed recommendations that are evidence based whenever possible. Evidence supporting current recommendations is ranked as level A if the data were derived from multiple randomized clinical trials involving a large number of individuals. Evidence was ranked as level B when data were derived from a limited number of trials involving comparatively small numbers of patients or from well-designed data analysis of nonrandomized studies or observational data registries. Evidence was ranked as level C when consensus of expert opinion was the primary source of recommendation. The committee emphasizes that for certain conditions for which no other therapies are available, the indications for device therapies are based on years of clinical experience as well as expert consensus and are thus well supported, even though the evidence was ranked as level C. These guidelines include expanded sections on selection of pacemakers and ICDs, optimization of technology, cost, and follow-up of implanted devices. The follow-up sections are relatively brief because in many instances the type and frequency of follow-up examinations …

A population-based prospective evaluation of risk of sudden cardiac death after operation for common congenital heart defects

OBJECTIVES This study sought to define 1) the risk of sudden death after operation for common congenital heart defects; and 2) factors associated with an increased risk of sudden death. BACKGROUND Although the prognosis for patients with congenital heart defects is improved by surgical treatment, they remain at a well recognized but poorly defined risk of late sudden death. METHODS This population-based study evaluated all patients < 19 years old undergoing surgical treatment of common forms of congenital heart disease in the state of Oregon between 1958 and 1996. Patients were identified retrospectively through 1958, with prospective biannual follow-up beginning in 1982. The incidence and cause of late sudden death were evaluated for 3,589 patients surviving operation for the following defects: atrial, ventricular and atrioventricular septal defects; patent ductus arteriosus; pulmonary stenosis; aortic stenosis; coarctation of the aorta; tetralogy of Fallot; and D-transposition of the great arteries. RESULTS There were 41 unexpected late sudden deaths during 45,857 patient-years of follow-up, an overall event rate of 1/1,118 patient-years. Thirty-seven of the 41 late sudden deaths occurred in patients with aortic stenosis, coarctation, transposition of the great arteries or tetralogy of Fallot, an event rate of 1/454 patients-years. In contrast, only four sudden deaths occurred among the other defects, an event rate of 1/7,154 patient-years (p < 0.01). The risk of late sudden death increased incrementally 20 years after operation for tetralogy of Fallot, aortic stenosis and coarctation. However, risk was not dependent on patient age at operation or surgical era. The causes of sudden death were arrhythmia in 30 patients, circulatory (embolic or aneurysm rupture) in 7 and acute heart failure in 4. CONCLUSIONS The risk of late sudden death for patients surviving operation for common congenital heart defects is 25 to 100 times greater than an age-matched control population. This increased risk is primarily represented by patients with cyanotic or left heart obstructive lesions. The risk of sudden death appears to be time dependent, increasing primarily after the second postoperative decade.

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities.

the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of ssociation Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee, oard of Trustees in February 2008. iology Foundation, American Heart Association, and Heart s document be cited as follows: Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, I, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, y MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, CC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of report of the American College of Cardiology/American n Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the deline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and oll Cardiol 2008;51:e1–62. This article h 2008 issue of H Copies: Thi College of C americanheart.o document, plea reprints@elsevie Permissions: tion of this doc College of Ca Society. Pleas elsevier.com. avid L. Hayes, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS* ark A. Hlatky, MD, FACC, FAHA . Kristin Newby, MD, FACC, FAHA ichard L. Page, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS ark H. Schoenfeld, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS ichael J. Silka, MD, FACC ynne Warner Stevenson, MD, FACC, FAHA‡ ichael O. Sweeney, MD, FACC*

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Tachyarrhythmias in Children and Adolescents

Background Although radiofrequency catheter ablation has been used extensively to treat refractory supraventricular tachycardia in adults, few data are available on its safety and efficacy in children and adolescents. We reviewed registry data obtained from 24 centers to evaluate the indications, early results, complications, and short-term follow-up data in young patients who underwent this procedure. Methods Standardized data were submitted for 652 patients who underwent 725 procedures between January 1, 1991, and September 1, 1992. The mean length of follow-up was 13.5 months. Results The median age of the patients was 13.5 years, and 84 percent of them had structurally normal hearts. The initial success rates for ablation of atrioventricular accessory pathways (508 of 615 procedures) and atrioventricular-node reentry (63 of 76 procedures) were both 83 percent. Greater institutional experience in performing ablation in children and location of the accessory pathway in the left free wall correlated with...

2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update of the 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

Andrew E. Epstein, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS, Chair; John P. DiMarco, MD, PhD, FACC, FHRS; Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; N.A. Mark Estes III, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; Roger A. Freedman, MD, FACC, FHRS; Leonard S. Gettes, MD, FACC, FAHA; A. Marc Gillinov, MD, FACC, FAHA; Gabriel Gregoratos, MD

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: executive summary.

Practice Guideline: Executive Summary ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons