Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mark L. Schattenburg is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mark L. Schattenburg.


Journal of Applied Physics | 1978

High‐efficiency low‐energy x‐ray spectroscopy in the 100–500‐eV region

Burton L. Henke; Rupert C. C. Perera; Eric Morton Gullikson; Mark L. Schattenburg

The lead myristate multilayer analyzer has provided a basis for a relatively simple and efficient spectroscopy for the low‐energy x‐ray emissions in the 20–80‐A region (where conventional crystal spectroscopy and grazing incidence grating spectroscopy are generally inefficient). The percent reflectivity, the integrated coefficient of reflection, and the Bragg diffraction width of the lead myristate analyzer have been measured and found to be consistent with the predictions of a simple theoretical model for multilayer diffraction. This multilayer spectroscopy at large Bragg angles has a high efficiency (high instrument transmission) as compared to grazing incidence grating spectroscopy in this 20–80‐A region. However, the resolution is limited to that set by the diffraction width of the lead myristate analyzer of about 1 eV. Because the collimator‐crystal broadening function can be precisely defined, a simple and effective deconvolution procedure can be applied with this multilayer spectroscopy to bring th...


Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B | 1991

A new approach to high fidelity e‐beam and ion‐beam lithography based on an in situ global‐fiducial grid

Henry I. Smith; Scott Daniel Hector; Mark L. Schattenburg; Erik H. Anderson

The distortion‐free scan field of an electron‐beam or ion‐beam lithography system is generally quite small (∼104×104 beam addresses) and hence to achieve pattern fidelity over large areas laser‐interferometer‐controlled stages are employed. Because the laser interferometer monitors the stage, not the electron or ion beam, beam drift of thermal, mechanical, electrostatic, magnetic, or electronic origin is not accounted for, leading to pattern placement error. To overcome this fundamental problem of ‘‘dead reckoning’’ we propose a new approach in which a global‐fiducial reference grid, which does not disturb the writing process, is put directly on the substrate. The grid is scanned with sufficiently low areal dose that the subsequent pattern development is not adversely affected. This can be achieved by ‘‘sparse sampling’’ of the grid over the entire scan field in conjunction with phase‐locking technqiues in the time domain. In this way one can spatially phase lock the two grids together and thereby ensure ...


Journal of The Electrochemical Society | 1992

An anti-reflection coating for use with PMMA at 193 nm

A. Yen; Henry I. Smith; Mark L. Schattenburg; Gary N. Taylor

An antireflection coating (ARC) for use with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) resist for ArF excimer laser lithography (193 nm) was formulated. It consists of PMMA and a bis-azide, 4.4-prime-diazidodiphenyl sulfone (DDS) which crosslinks the film after deep UV (260 nm) irradiation and subsequent annealing. The reacted DDS then serves as the absorber for the 193 nm radiation and also prevents mixing of the ARC and PMMA during PMMA spin-coating and development. The effectiveness of the ARC was demonstrated by exposing, in PMMA, using achromatic holographic lithography, gratings of 100 nm period (about 50 nm linewidth) that are almost entirely free of an orthogonal standing wave.


Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B | 1992

Modeling and experimental verification of illumination and diffraction effects on image quality in x‐ray lithography

Scott Daniel Hector; Mark L. Schattenburg; Erik H. Anderson; William Chu; Vincent V. Wong; Henry I. Smith

Most analyses of the effects of diffraction and source coherence on image quality in proximity x‐ray lithography have used Kirchhoff boundary conditions and scalar diffraction theory. In this article we treat the x‐ray absorber as a lossy dielectric and employ the vector form of Maxwell’s equations to calculate image intensity as a function of position for lines, spaces, and gratings, at 100 nm linewidths and below. We show that vector and scalar theories give different results. Simulations are done for two point sources (CuL and an Fe‐plasma) so that calculations could be compared with our experimental results. Agreement was excellent for 80 and 50 nm features at relatively large gaps. We define image contrast and show that, contrary to common intuition, it is enhanced (and spurious ringing is suppressed) as penumbral blurring is increased, reaching a maximum when the extent of blurring is somewhat larger than the minimum feature size.


Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B | 1991

Electromagnetic calculation of soft x‐ray diffraction from 0.1‐μm scale gold structures

Mark L. Schattenburg; K. Li; R. T. Shin; J. A. Kong; D. B. Olster; Henry I. Smith

Because the effects of diffraction during proximity‐print x‐ray lithography are of critical importance, a number of previous researchers have attempted to calculate the diffraction patterns and minimum achievable feature sizes as a function of wavelength and gap. Work to date has assumed that scalar diffraction theory is applicable—as calculated, e.g., by the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld formulation—and that Kirchhoff boundary conditions (KBC) can be applied. KBC assume that the fields (amplitude and phase) are constant in the open regions between absorbers, and a different constant in regions just under the absorbers (i.e., that there are no fringing fields). An x‐ray absorber is, however, best described as a lossy dielectric that is tens or hundreds of wavelengths tall, and hence KBC are unsuitable. In this report we use two numerical techniques to calculate (on a Cray 2 supercomputer) accurate diffracted fields from gold absorbers for two cases: a 30‐nm‐wide line at λ=4.5 nm, and a 100‐nm‐wide line at λ=1.3 nm....


Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray | 2018

Arcus: the x-ray grating spectrometer explorer (Conference Presentation)

Laura W. Brenneman; Adam S. Foster; H. M. Günther; Andrew F. Ptak; Randall K. Smith; Meghan Abraham; Marshall W. Bautz; Jay A. Bookbinder; Joel N. Bregman; Nancy S. Brickhouse; David N. Burrows; Vadim Burwitz; Peter Cheimets; Elisa Costantini; Simon Dawson; Casey T. DeRoo; A. Falcone; Luigi C. Gallo; Catherine E. Grant; Ralf K. Heilmann; Edward Hertz; Butler Hine; David P. Huenemoerder; Jelle S. Kaastra; Ingo Kreykenbohm; Kristin Madsen; Randall L. McEntaffer; Eric D. Miller; Jon M. Miller; Elisabeth Morse

Arcus, a Medium Explorer (MIDEX) mission, was selected by NASA for a Phase A study in August 2017. The observatory provides high-resolution soft X-ray spectroscopy in the 12-50 A bandpass with unprecedented sensitivity: effective areas of >350 cm^2 and spectral resolution >2500 at the energies of O VII and O VIII for z=0-0.3. The Arcus key science goals are (1) to measure the effects of structure formation imprinted upon the hot baryons that are predicted to lie in extended halos around galaxies, groups, and clusters, (2) to trace the propagation of outflowing mass, energy, and momentum from the vicinity of the black hole to extragalactic scales as a measure of their feedback and (3) to explore how stars, circumstellar disks and exoplanet atmospheres form and evolve. Arcus relies upon the same 12m focal length grazing-incidence silicon pore X-ray optics (SPO) that ESA has developed for the Athena mission; the focal length is achieved on orbit via an extendable optical bench. The focused X-rays from these optics are diffracted by high-efficiency Critical-Angle Transmission (CAT) gratings, and the results are imaged with flight-proven CCD detectors and electronics. The power and telemetry requirements on the spacecraft are modest. Arcus will be launched into an ~ 7 day 4:1 lunar resonance orbit, resulting in high observing efficiency, low particle background and a favorable thermal environment. Mission operations are straightforward, as most observations will be long (~100 ksec), uninterrupted, and pre-planned. The baseline science mission will be completed in <2 years, although the margin on all consumables allows for 5+ years of operation.


Advances in X-Ray/EUV Optics and Components IV - part of program track on X-Ray, Gamma-Ray, and Particle Technologies. Optical Engineering + Applications - part of SPIE Optics + Photonics 2009, San Diego, CA | 2009

5000 groove/mm multilayer-coated blazed grating with 33percent efficiency in the 3rd order in the EUV wavelength range

Dmitriy L. Voronov; Erik H. Anderson; Rossana Cambie; Farhad Salmassi; Eric M. Gullikson; Valeriy V. Yashchuk; Howard A. Padmore; Minseung Ahn; Chih-Hao Chang; Ralf K. Heilmann; Mark L. Schattenburg


Frontiers in Optics / Laser Science | 2018

Ultrafast Laser Micro-stressing for Correction of Thin Fused Silica Optics for Future X-Ray Space Telescopes

Heng E. Zuo; Brandon Chalifoux; Ralf K. Heilmann; Mark L. Schattenburg


Archive | 2010

Development of a Raytrace Model for IXO

John E. Davis; Ralf K. Heilmann; Daniel Dewey; Mark W. Bautz; Roger Sherman Foster; John Charles Houck; David P. Huenemoerder; Alan M. Levine; Herman L. Marshall; Michael A. Nowak; Mark L. Schattenburg; Norbert S. Schulz


SPIE | 2009

5000 Groove/mm multilayer-coated blazed grating with 33% efficiency in the 3rd order in the EUV wavelength range

Mark L. Schattenburg; Ralf K. Heilmann; Chih-Hao Chang; Minseung Ahn; Howard A. Padmore; Valeriy V. Yashchuk; Eric M. Gullikson; Farhad Salmassi; Rossana Cambie; Erik H. Anderson; Dmitriy L. Voronov

Collaboration


Dive into the Mark L. Schattenburg's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erik H. Anderson

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Henry I. Smith

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chih-Hao Chang

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David P. Huenemoerder

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dmitriy L. Voronov

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric M. Gullikson

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Farhad Salmassi

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge