Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mark R. Hutchinson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mark R. Hutchinson.


Brain Behavior and Immunity | 2010

Evidence that opioids may have toll-like receptor 4 and MD-2 effects

Mark R. Hutchinson; Yingning Zhang; Mitesh Shridhar; John H. Evans; Madison M. Buchanan; Tina X. Zhao; Peter F. Slivka; Benjamen D. Coats; Niloofar Rezvani; Julie Wieseler; Travis S. Hughes; Kyle E. Landgraf; Stefanie Chan; Stephanie Fong; Simon Phipps; Joseph J. Falke; Leslie A. Leinwand; Steven F. Maier; Hang Yin; Kenner C. Rice; Linda R. Watkins

Opioid-induced proinflammatory glial activation modulates wide-ranging aspects of opioid pharmacology including: opposition of acute and chronic opioid analgesia, opioid analgesic tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, development of opioid dependence, opioid reward, and opioid respiratory depression. However, the mechanism(s) contributing to opioid-induced proinflammatory actions remains unresolved. The potential involvement of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) was examined using in vitro, in vivo, and in silico techniques. Morphine non-stereoselectively induced TLR4 signaling in vitro, blocked by a classical TLR4 antagonist and non-stereoselectively by naloxone. Pharmacological blockade of TLR4 signaling in vivo potentiated acute intrathecal morphine analgesia, attenuated development of analgesic tolerance, hyperalgesia, and opioid withdrawal behaviors. TLR4 opposition to opioid actions was supported by morphine treatment of TLR4 knockout mice, which revealed a significant threefold leftward shift in the analgesia dose response function, versus wildtype mice. A range of structurally diverse clinically-employed opioid analgesics was found to be capable of activating TLR4 signaling in vitro. Selectivity in the response was identified since morphine-3-glucuronide, a morphine metabolite with no opioid receptor activity, displayed significant TLR4 activity, whilst the opioid receptor active metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide, was devoid of such properties. In silico docking simulations revealed ligands bound preferentially to the LPS binding pocket of MD-2 rather than TLR4. An in silico to in vitro prediction model was built and tested with substantial accuracy. These data provide evidence that select opioids may non-stereoselectively influence TLR4 signaling and have behavioral consequences resulting, in part, via TLR4 signaling.


Nature Reviews Immunology | 2014

Pathological pain and the neuroimmune interface

Peter M. Grace; Mark R. Hutchinson; Steven F. Maier; Linda R. Watkins

Reciprocal signalling between immunocompetent cells in the central nervous system (CNS) has emerged as a key phenomenon underpinning pathological and chronic pain mechanisms. Neuronal excitability can be powerfully enhanced both by classical neurotransmitters derived from neurons, and by immune mediators released from CNS-resident microglia and astrocytes, and from infiltrating cells such as T cells. In this Review, we discuss the current understanding of the contribution of central immune mechanisms to pathological pain, and how the heterogeneous immune functions of different cells in the CNS could be harnessed to develop new therapeutics for pain control. Given the prevalence of chronic pain and the incomplete efficacy of current drugs — which focus on suppressing aberrant neuronal activity — new strategies to manipulate neuroimmune pain transmission hold considerable promise.


Trends in Neurosciences | 2005

Glia: novel counter-regulators of opioid analgesia

Linda R. Watkins; Mark R. Hutchinson; Ian Johnston; Steven F. Maier

Development of analgesic tolerance and withdrawal-induced pain enhancement present serious difficulties for the use of opioids for pain control. Although neuronal mechanisms to account for these phenomena have been sought for many decades, their bases remain unresolved. Within the past four years, a novel non-neuronal candidate has been uncovered that opposes acute opioid analgesia and contributes to development of opioid tolerance and tolerance-associated pain enhancement. This novel candidate is spinal cord glia. Glia are important contributors to the creation of enhanced pain states via the release of neuroexcitatory substances. New data suggest that glia also release neuroexcitatory substances in response to morphine, thereby opposing its effects. Controlling glial activation could therefore increase the clinical utility of analgesic drugs.


The Scientific World Journal | 2007

Opioid-Induced Glial Activation: Mechanisms of Activation and Implications for Opioid Analgesia, Dependence, and Reward

Mark R. Hutchinson; Sondra T. Bland; Kirk W. Johnson; Kenner C. Rice; Steven F. Maier; Linda R. Watkins

This review will introduce the concept of toll-like receptor (TLR)–mediated glial activation as central to all of the following: neuropathic pain, compromised acute opioid analgesia, and unwanted opioid side effects (tolerance, dependence, and reward). Attenuation of glial activation has previously been demonstrated both to alleviate exaggerated pain states induced by experimental pain models and to reduce the development of opioid tolerance. Here we demonstrate that selective acute antagonism of TLR4 results in reversal of neuropathic pain as well as potentiation of opioid analgesia. Attenuating central nervous system glial activation was also found to reduce the development of opioid dependence, and opioid reward at a behavioral (conditioned place preference) and neurochemical (nucleus accumbens microdialysis of morphine-induced elevations in dopamine) level of analysis. Moreover, a novel antagonism of TLR4 by (+)- and (˗)-isomer opioid antagonists has now been characterized, and both antiallodynic and morphine analgesia potentiating activity shown. Opioid agonists were found to also possess TLR4 agonistic activity, predictive of glial activation. Targeting glial activation is a novel and as yet clinically unexploited method for treatment of neuropathic pain. Moreover, these data indicate that attenuation of glial activation, by general or selective TLR antagonistic mechanisms, may also be a clinical method for separating the beneficial (analgesia) and unwanted (tolerance, dependence, and reward) actions of opioids, thereby improving the safety and efficacy of their use.


European Journal of Neuroscience | 2008

Non-stereoselective reversal of neuropathic pain by naloxone and naltrexone: involvement of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)

Mark R. Hutchinson; Yingning Zhang; Kimberley Brown; Benjamen D. Coats; Mitesh Shridhar; Paige W. Sholar; Sonica J. Patel; Nicole Y. Crysdale; Jacqueline A. Harrison; Steven F. Maier; Kenner C. Rice; Linda R. Watkins

Although activated spinal cord glia contribute importantly to neuropathic pain, how nerve injury activates glia remains controversial. It has recently been proposed, on the basis of genetic approaches, that toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4) may be a key receptor for initiating microglial activation following L5 spinal nerve injury. The present studies extend this idea pharmacologically by showing that TLR4 is key for maintaining neuropathic pain following sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury (CCI). Established neuropathic pain was reversed by intrathecally delivered TLR4 receptor antagonists derived from lipopolysaccharide. Additionally, (+)‐naltrexone, (+)‐naloxone, and (−)‐naloxone, which we show here to be TLR4 antagonists in vitro on both stably transfected HEK293‐TLR4 and microglial cell lines, suppressed neuropathic pain with complete reversal upon chronic infusion. Immunohistochemical analyses of spinal cords following chronic infusion revealed suppression of CCI‐induced microglial activation by (+)‐naloxone and (−)‐naloxone, paralleling reversal of neuropathic pain. Together, these CCI data support the conclusion that neuron‐to‐glia signaling through TLR4 is important not only for initiating neuropathic pain, as suggested previously, but also for maintaining established neuropathic pain. Furthermore, these studies suggest that the novel TLR4 antagonists (+)‐naloxone and (−)‐naloxone can each fully reverse established neuropathic pain upon multi‐day administration. This finding with (+)‐naloxone is of potential clinical relevance. This is because (+)‐naloxone is an antagonist that is inactive at the (−)‐opioid selective receptors on neurons that produce analgesia. Thus, these data suggest that (+)‐opioid antagonists such as (+)‐naloxone may be useful clinically to suppress glial activation, yet (−)‐opioid agonists suppress pain.


Trends in Pharmacological Sciences | 2009

The “Toll” of Opioid-Induced Glial Activation: Improving the Clinical Efficacy of Opioids by Targeting Glia

Linda R. Watkins; Mark R. Hutchinson; Kenner C. Rice; Steven F. Maier

Glial activation participates in the mediation of pain including neuropathic pain, due to release of neuroexcitatory, proinflammatory products. Glial activation is now known to occur in response to opioids as well. Opioid-induced glial activation opposes opioid analgesia and enhances opioid tolerance, dependence, reward and respiratory depression. Such effects can occur, not via classical opioid receptors, but rather via non-stereoselective activation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), a recently recognized key glial receptor participating in neuropathic pain as well. This discovery identifies a means for separating the beneficial actions of opioids (opioid receptor mediated) from the unwanted side-effects (TLR4/glial mediated) by pharmacologically targeting TLR4. Such a drug should be a stand-alone therapeutic for treating neuropathic pain as well. Excitingly, with newly-established clinical trials of two glial modulators for treating neuropathic pain and improving the utility of opioids, translation from rats-to-humans now begins with the promise of improved clinical pain control.


Brain Behavior and Immunity | 2008

Proinflammatory cytokines oppose opioid-induced acute and chronic analgesia

Mark R. Hutchinson; Benjamen D. Coats; Susannah S. Lewis; Yingning Zhang; David B. Sprunger; Niloofar Rezvani; Eric M. Baker; Brian M. Jekich; Julie Wieseler; Andrew A. Somogyi; David Martin; Stephen Poole; Charles M. Judd; Steven F. Maier; Linda R. Watkins

Spinal proinflammatory cytokines are powerful pain-enhancing signals that contribute to pain following peripheral nerve injury (neuropathic pain). Recently, one proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin-1, was also implicated in the loss of analgesia upon repeated morphine exposure (tolerance). In contrast to prior literature, we demonstrate that the action of several spinal proinflammatory cytokines oppose systemic and intrathecal opioid analgesia, causing reduced pain suppression. In vitro morphine exposure of lumbar dorsal spinal cord caused significant increases in proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine release. Opposition of analgesia by proinflammatory cytokines is rapid, occurring < or =5 min after intrathecal (perispinal) opioid administration. We document that opposition of analgesia by proinflammatory cytokines cannot be accounted for by an alteration in spinal morphine concentrations. The acute anti-analgesic effects of proinflammatory cytokines occur in a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and nitric oxide dependent fashion. Chronic intrathecal morphine or methadone significantly increased spinal glial activation (toll-like receptor 4 mRNA and protein) and the expression of multiple chemokines and cytokines, combined with development of analgesic tolerance and pain enhancement (hyperalgesia, allodynia). Statistical analysis demonstrated that a cluster of cytokines and chemokines was linked with pain-related behavioral changes. Moreover, blockade of spinal proinflammatory cytokines during a stringent morphine regimen previously associated with altered neuronal function also attenuated enhanced pain, supportive that proinflammatory cytokines are importantly involved in tolerance induced by such regimens. These data implicate multiple opioid-induced spinal proinflammatory cytokines in opposing both acute and chronic opioid analgesia, and provide a novel mechanism for the opposition of acute opioid analgesia.


Pharmacological Reviews | 2011

Exploring the Neuroimmunopharmacology of Opioids: An Integrative Review of Mechanisms of Central Immune Signaling and Their Implications for Opioid Analgesia

Mark R. Hutchinson; Yehuda Shavit; Peter M. Grace; Kenner C. Rice; Steven F. Maier; Linda R. Watkins

Vastly stimulated by the discovery of opioid receptors in the early 1970s, preclinical and clinical research was directed at the study of stereoselective neuronal actions of opioids, especially those played in their crucial analgesic role. However, during the past decade, a new appreciation of the non-neuronal actions of opioids has emerged from preclinical research, with specific appreciation for the nonclassic and nonstereoselective sites of action. Opioid activity at Toll-like receptors, newly recognized innate immune pattern recognition receptors, adds substantially to this unfolding story. It is now apparent from molecular and rodent data that these newly identified signaling events significantly modify the pharmacodynamics of opioids by eliciting proinflammatory reactivity from glia, the immunocompetent cells of the central nervous system. These central immune signaling events, including the release of cytokines and chemokines and the associated disruption of glutamate homeostasis, cause elevated neuronal excitability, which subsequently decreases opioid analgesic efficacy and leads to heightened pain states. This review will examine the current preclinical literature of opioid-induced central immune signaling mediated by classic and nonclassic opioid receptors. A unification of the preclinical pharmacology, neuroscience, and immunology of opioids now provides new insights into common mechanisms of chronic pain, naive tolerance, analgesic tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and allodynia. Novel pharmacological targets for future drug development are discussed in the hope that disease-modifying chronic pain treatments arising from the appreciation of opioid-induced central immune signaling may become practical.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2012

Morphine activates neuroinflammation in a manner parallel to endotoxin

Xin-Lun Wang; Lisa C. Loram; Khara M. Ramos; A.J. de Jesus; Jacob Thomas; Kejun Cheng; Anireddy Reddy; Andrew A. Somogyi; Mark R. Hutchinson; Linda R. Watkins; Hang Yin

Opioids create a neuroinflammatory response within the CNS, compromising opioid-induced analgesia and contributing to various unwanted actions. How this occurs is unknown but has been assumed to be via classic opioid receptors. Herein, we provide direct evidence that morphine creates neuroinflammation via the activation of an innate immune receptor and not via classic opioid receptors. We demonstrate that morphine binds to an accessory protein of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), myeloid differentiation protein 2 (MD-2), thereby inducing TLR4 oligomerization and triggering proinflammation. Small-molecule inhibitors, RNA interference, and genetic knockout validate the TLR4/MD-2 complex as a feasible target for beneficially modifying morphine actions. Disrupting TLR4/MD-2 protein–protein association potentiated morphine analgesia in vivo and abolished morphine-induced proinflammation in vitro, the latter demonstrating that morphine-induced proinflammation only depends on TLR4, despite the presence of opioid receptors. These results provide an exciting, nonconventional avenue to improving the clinical efficacy of opioids.


Journal of Neurochemistry | 2010

Toll‐like receptor 4 in CNS pathologies

Madison M. Buchanan; Mark R. Hutchinson; Linda R. Watkins; Hang Yin

J. Neurochem. (2010) 114, 13–27.

Collaboration


Dive into the Mark R. Hutchinson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda R. Watkins

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenner C. Rice

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven F. Maier

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter M. Grace

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Rolan

University of Adelaide

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hang Yin

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yingning Zhang

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa C. Loram

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge