Mark Roman

Accuracy, Precision, and Reliability of Chemical Measurements in Natural Products Research

Natural products chemistry is the discipline that lies at the heart of modern pharmacognosy. The field encompasses qualitative and quantitative analytical tools that range from spectroscopy and spectrometry to chromatography. Among other things, modern research on crude botanicals is engaged in the discovery of the phytochemical constituents necessary for therapeutic efficacy, including the synergistic effects of components of complex mixtures in the botanical matrix. In the phytomedicine field, these botanicals and their contained mixtures are considered the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), and pharmacognosists are increasingly called upon to supplement their molecular discovery work by assisting in the development and utilization of analytical tools for assessing the quality and safety of these products. Unlike single-chemical entity APIs, botanical raw materials and their derived products are highly variable because their chemistry and morphology depend on the genotypic and phenotypic variation, geographical origin and weather exposure, harvesting practices, and processing conditions of the source material. Unless controlled, this inherent variability in the raw material stream can result in inconsistent finished products that are under-potent, over-potent, and/or contaminated. Over the decades, natural product chemists have routinely developed quantitative analytical methods for phytochemicals of interest. Quantitative methods for the determination of product quality bear the weight of regulatory scrutiny. These methods must be accurate, precise, and reproducible. Accordingly, this review discusses the principles of accuracy (relationship between experimental and true value), precision (distribution of data values), and reliability in the quantitation of phytochemicals in natural products.

Certification of standard reference materials containing bitter orange

A suite of three dietary supplement standard reference materials (SRMs) containing bitter orange has been developed, and the levels of five alkaloids and caffeine have been measured by multiple analytical methods. Synephrine, octopamine, tyramine, N-methyltyramine, hordenine, total alkaloids, and caffeine were determined by as many as six analytical methods, with measurements performed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and at two collaborating laboratories. The methods offer substantial independence, with two types of extractions, two separation methods, and four detection methods. Excellent agreement was obtained among the measurements, with data reproducibility for most methods and analytes better than 5% relative standard deviation. The bitter-orange-containing dietary supplement SRMs are intended primarily for use as measurement controls and for use in the development and validation of analytical methods.

Development and certification of green tea-containing standard reference materials.

AbstractA suite of three green tea-containing Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) has been issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): SRM 3254 Camellia sinensis (Green Tea) Leaves, SRM 3255 Camellia sinensis (Green Tea) Extract, and SRM 3256 Green Tea-Containing Solid Oral Dosage Form. The materials are characterized for catechins, xanthine alkaloids, theanine, and toxic elements. As many as five methods were used in assigning certified and reference values to the constituents, with measurements carried out at NIST and at collaborating laboratories. The materials are intended for use in the development and validation of new analytical methods, and for use as control materials as a component in the support of claims of metrological traceability.n FigureGreen Tea - Camellia sinensis

Separation techniques for biotechnology in the 1990s

Scientists are constantly looking for better and cheaper separation techniques to replace or complement the current technology. Over the past few decades, and in particular the last 10 years, new separation techniques or modifications of existing techniques have become available for separating compounds from complex sample matrices. There are many areas, however, where the separation technology is not sufficient to achieve high purity and yield while remaining cost effective. In the area of biotechnology, separation techniques are urgently needed to meet demands for ultra-high purity and yield. Thus, a variety of techniques are being developed to address these needs. Generally, biological compounds for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries must be obtained at greater than 99.9% purity (sometimes greater than 99.99%) while maintaining high yield. In any area of chemistry this degree of purity would cause problems; in biotechnology it is even more difficult to achieve because of the complex sample matrices. In addition, the compounds of interest may be very similar to impurities or contaminants in the sample matrix, and the compounds could be denatured (or even destroyed) by certain solvents and/or high temperature. In particular, three areas of biotechnology have presented scientists with problems in separations: cell separations, DNA-RNA separations, and protein-peptide separations. The current technology available and possible future trends in these areas are discussed, and also problems to be solved in the future.

Accuracy of computer-simulated gas chromatographic separations based on a linear elution strength model

Abstract Computer simulation using commercially available software (DryLab GC) for temperature-programmed gas chromatography was investigated for accuracy of predicted retention and resolution. The simulations, based on a linear elution strength model, were evaluated for a variety of samples, temperature programming rates and stationary phases. Reliable simulations were obtained for both linear and segmented temperatures programs. Predicted retention times were accurate to within ± 4% and the resolution of adjacent bands was generally accurate to within ± 12%.

A New Approach to Scaling Up Electrophoresis

Abstract Free Flow Electrophoresis (FFE) has been utilized for the separation of proteins and cells for many years, and has evolved into the most promising method of continuous separation. One of the major drawbacks inherent with FFE, however, is the thermal convection due to Joule heating which occurs whenever current is passed through a conducting solution. To provide efficient heat dissipation, the size of FFE units is restricted, which limits sample throughput. A new type of FFE design, which internally cools the separation unit by passing water through capillary tubes, has been developed and tested. Results of separations of dyes are presented, using a bed 1/4 inch thick which maintains efficient cooling.

Single-laboratory validation of a method for the detection and/or quantification of select alkaloids in goldenseal supplements and raw materials by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography

Abstract Quality of botanical products and raw materials is important to manufacturers, regulators, researchers, and consumers. Many modern botanical quality-assurance schemes set specifications for select phytochemicals and measure against those specifications as one determinant of quality. While numerous publications describe procedures for determining compounds of interest in plant species, few methods have been systematically evaluated for accuracy, precision, or reliability, and often the analysis of finished products is not within the scope of the method. Hydrastis canadensis. L., commonly referred to as Goldenseal, is an economically important North American medicinal plant that has been subject to adulteration in commerce. The phytochemicals of interest in the plant are the alkaloids hydrastine, berberine, and canadine. Of interest is also palmatine, an alkaloid found in potential adulterant species but not in goldenseal. In this study, goldenseal materials in raw, capsule, and tablet form, including an Echinacea/ Goldenseal combination product, were extracted with acidified water and acetonitrile and their hydrastine, berberine, canadine, and palmitine content determined by HPLC. The analytical method was optimized and evaluated in a single-laboratory validation study. Calibration curves for hydrastine and berberine were linear from 10 to 150 μ g/mL. The limits of detection for palmatine and canadine were determined to be 0.5 μ g/mL, which translates to detection of levels of 0.004% w/w in test samples. Chromatographic resolution was achieved for all analytes in an isocratic 12.5-min chromatographic run employing a binary mobile phase. Triplicate determinations performed on 10 test materials by two analysts on 3 days resulted in relative standard deviations ranging from 0.9% to 3.4%.

Determination of Total Phenolic Content Using the Folin-C Assay: Single-Laboratory Validation, First Action 2017.13

A single-laboratory validation of a method using Folin & Ciocalteus phenol reagent (Folin-C reagent) for determination of total phenolic content of selected dietary supplement extracts was performed. The method is composed of a water extraction of dried extracts with sonication followed by reaction with the Folin-C reagent. The resulting colorimetric reaction is measured at 765 nm and compared with a standard curve generated with gallic acid standard solutions. The validation results were compared with Standard Method Performance Requirement (SMPR®) 2015.009, developed by the Stakeholder Panel on Dietary Supplements. The method demonstrated acceptable within-day RSDr of 1.96-7.47% for the five matrixes studied (grape seed extract, grape skin extract, black tea extract, green coffee extract, and cocoa extract). When gallic acid was spiked into maltodextrin (a surrogate dietary supplement carrier) at 30 or 70%, the recovery ranged from 91 to 104%, within the acceptable range established by SMPR 2015.009. Selectivity testing with glucose, fructose, and sucrose demonstrated no positive interference by these compounds. Finally, ruggedness studies demonstrated no significant effects due to changes in the heating apparatus, test material weight, read time after reaction, amount of Folin-C reagent, reaction time, reaction temperature, and amount of Na2CO3. The single-laboratory validation results support adoption of the method as First Action Official MethodSM 2017.13 and further evaluation in a collaborative study.