Marshall Dozier

Assessing Competence in Veterinary Medical Education: Where's the Evidence?

A systematic review of the literature was carried out to determine the evidence for the reliability and validity of the assessment methods used in veterinary medical education. The review followed the approach used by the Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) group. This process has established baseline data on published evidence and found that a relatively small number of articles exist relating to assessment specific to veterinary medical education. These articles include a number of general discussion papers, employer observations on graduate competence, and descriptions of methods to assess particular attributes--in particular, clinical skills. However, only five of the papers retrieved in this comprehensive search provide evidence relating to evaluation of the assessment method itself. There is a need for more research on assessment of clinical competence in veterinary medical education.

Handsearching did not yield additional unique FDG‐PET diagnostic test accuracy studies compared with electronic searches: a preliminary investigation

We explored the value of handsearching to identify diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies to inform systematic reviews of DTA. Handsearching was conducted alongside a systematic review of the DTA of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) for colorectal cancer. Ten journals, identified by frequency analysis of studies from six imaging reviews, were handsearched for reports of DTA studies. The numbers of studies identified by handsearching and by database searching were compared. A total of 573 journal issues from ten journals were handsearched in 185 h. A total of 936 potential reports of DTA studies were identified: 25 were relevant to the FDG PET-CT review. 7/25 FDG PET-CT papers had not been identified by database searches. No papers met the systematic review inclusion criteria. The FDG-PET systematic review included 30 papers, from 24 different journals. Handsearching two of those journals identified 211 potential reports of DTA studies for all topics and 18 for FDG PET-CT. Handsearching identified previously unseen papers but did not yield unique relevant DTA studies for the specific review. DTA imaging studies are widely distributed, and it may be more efficient to choose journals to handsearch after the identification of some relevant studies. Copyright

Which professional (non-technical) competencies are most important to the success of graduate veterinarians? A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 38

ABSTRACT Background: Despite the growing prominence of professional (non-technical) competencies in veterinary education, the evidence to support their importance to veterinary graduates is unclear. Aim: To summarize current evidence within the veterinary literature for the importance of professional competencies to graduate success. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted (CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, Australian and British Education Index, Dissertations & Theses) from 1988 to 2015 and limited to the veterinary discipline (veterinar* term required). Evidence was sought from consensus-based competence frameworks, surveys of stakeholder perceptions, and empirical evidence linked to relevant outcomes (e.g. employability, client satisfaction or compliance). Data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers and included a quality assessment of each source. Results: Fifty-two sources were included in the review, providing evidence from expert frameworks (10 sources), stakeholder perceptions (30 sources, including one from the previous category), and empirical research (13 sources). Communication skills were the only competency to be well-supported by all three categories of evidence. Other competencies supported by multiple sources of empirical evidence include empathy, relationship-centered care, self-efficacy, and business skills. Other competencies perceived to be relatively more important included awareness of limitations, professional values, critical thinking, collaboration, and resilience. Conclusions: This review has highlighted the comparatively weak body of evidence supporting the importance of professional competencies for veterinary graduate success, with the exception of communication skills. However we stress this is more indicative of the scarcity of high-quality veterinary-based education research in the field, than of the true priority of these competencies.

METRO taxonomy - progress report on assessment.

The Medical Education Taxonomy Research Organization (METRO) was formed to map and create terms to comprehensively describe the processes, procedures and concepts of medical education. The terms will be used in a variety of purposes, such as describing content for retrieval from e-learning environments, indexing literature in databases, and extracting and exchanging data for research, such as for BEME systematic reviews. METRO has now completed an extensive set of descriptors for assessment, which are freely available at http://metro2.blogspot.com. The organization welcomes the response and participation of all medical education professionals.

Systematic Review Part 1. Introduction to Systematic Review

Abstract Systematic review is a system of primary research that sifts the medical literature in an objective and transparent fashion, with the primary aim of minimising bias and error. Systematic review, similar to other primary research, has an aim (research question), methods, results, and discussion. The advantage to the clinician is that in the current ‘evidence-based’ environment, systematic review should provide an objective answer to a defined question. In this respect, systematic review has already begun to contribute to the specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Approaches to the databases, reading a systematic review, and the limitations of systematic review are outlined in this part. The description of the procedure will be discussed in part 2.

Systematic Review Part 2. Conducting a Systematic Review

Abstract In Part 1 of this series, published in the previous issue of Asian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, systematic review was introduced to the readers of this Journal. Part 2 describes the procedure, in terms of the stages of systematic review, causes of bias, and database search.

Lifestyle and neurodegeneration in midlife as expressed on functional magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review

Lifestyle factors may influence brain health in midlife. Functional magnetic resonance imaging is a widely used tool to investigate early changes in brain health, including neurodegeneration. In this systematic review, we evaluate the relationship between lifestyle factors and neurodegeneration in midlife, as expressed using functional magnetic resonance imaging.