Marta Penas-Prado

Intracranial hemangiopericytoma and the role of radiation therapy: A population based analysis

BACKGROUND Intracranial hemangiopericytoma (HPC) is a rare malignancy for which treatment recommendations vary. OBJECTIVE We sought to characterize outcomes of HPC patients treated with postoperative external beam radiotherapy (PORT). METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program of the US National Cancer Institute. We identified patients with intracranial hemangiopericytoma who underwent surgery alone or PORT. RESULTS We identified 88 patients with a diagnosis of HPC between 1982 and 2009 treated with surgery alone or PORT. The majority of patients were female (53%) and white (84%) with a median age of 50.5 years (range, 0-92 years). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 55%, and PORT was delivered to 48% of the entire cohort. The median overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were 111 months and 161 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, age older than 50 years correlated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.70-6.95; P = .001) and CSS (HR: 2.77; 95% CI: 1.18-6.48; P = .019). On multivariate analysis (MVA), age >50 years correlated with poor OS (HR: 3.69; 95% CI: 1.72-7.93; P = .001) and CSS (HR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.08-6.59; P = .034). On MVA, GTR correlated with improved OS (HR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.11-0.71; P = .007) and CSS (HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07-0.76; P = .016). In addition, PORT correlated with improved OS (MVA HR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.00-0.31; P = .005) and CSS (MVA HR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.00-0.45; P = .015). Patients undergoing STR with PORT compared favorably with those undergoing GTR alone with respect to OS (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.15-1.26; P = .13) and CSS (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.15-1.78; P = .29). CONCLUSION In intracranial HPC, both PORT and GTR independently correlate with improved OS and CSS.

Molecularly targeted therapies for malignant gliomas: advances and challenges.

The identification of molecular markers associated with tumor but not with normal tissue has allowed the development of highly specific, targeted therapies for the treatment of cancer. Over the last several years, tremendous advances in our understanding of the genetic and molecular changes involved in the progression of malignant gliomas have triggered a large effort in the development of targeted therapies to treat these tumors. However, to date only a modest clinical benefit, limited to subsets of patients, has been demonstrated. Furthermore, despite a high degree of target selectivity, the use of targeted therapies often has systemic toxicity. The reasons behind this limited clinical success are complex and include the intricacy of the signaling pathways in gliomas and the heterogeneity of the disease process, compounded by existing limitations in assessing the efficacy of these novel agents when conventional end points and clinical trial designs are utilized. However, despite these difficulties targeted therapies remain a very attractive avenue of treatment for malignant gliomas. Three basic approaches are needed to overcome the hurdles associated with targeted therapies: first, further development of genetic profiling techniques will help to better determine the genetic changes and molecular pathways involved in gliomas and will potentially allow the design of individualized therapies based on the genetic and molecular signature of each tumor. Second, there is a need for the development of better combination strategies (complementary targeted agents or targeted agents with chemotherapy drugs) directed towards disease heterogeneity. Third, we need to optimize the design of preclinical and clinical trials to obtain the maximum amount of information in the shortest period of time.

Intracranial hemangiopericytoma: Patterns of failure and the role of radiation therapy

BACKGROUND Meningeal hemangiopericytoma (M-HPC) is a rare entity. OBJECTIVE To characterize our institutional experience in treating M-HPC. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of patients with M-HPC evaluated at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1979 and 2009. RESULTS We identified 63 patients diagnosed between 1979 and 2009 with M-HPC treated with surgery alone or with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). The majority were male (59%) and with a median age of 40.9 years (range, 0-71). Gross total resection (GTR) predominated (n = 31, 49%) followed by subtotal resection (n = 23, 37%) and unknown status (n = 9, 14.3%). PORT was delivered to 39 of the 63 patients (62%). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall survival were 90%, 68%, and 28%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year local control (LC) were 70%, 37%, and 20%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year metastasis-free survival were 85%, 39%, and 7%. PORT resulted in improved LC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, P = .008). Radiotherapy (RT) dose ≥60 Gy correlated with improved LC relative to <60 Gy (HR 0.12, P = .045). GTR correlated with improved LC (HR 0.40, P = .03). On multivariate analysis, PORT (HR 0.33, P = .003), GTR (HR = 0.33, P = .008), and RT dose ≥60 Gy (HR 0.33, P = .003) correlated with improved LC. Among those with GTR, PORT resulted in improved LC (HR 0.18, P = .027). Extent of resection and PORT did not correlate with improved overall survival. CONCLUSION In M-HPC, both PORT and GTR independently correlate with improved LC. PORT improves LC following GTR. We recommend RT dose ≥60 Gy to optimize LC.

Randomized phase II adjuvant factorial study of dose-dense temozolomide alone and in combination with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and/or thalidomide for glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND Chemoradiation, followed by adjuvant temozolomide, is the standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Adding other active agents may enhance treatment efficacy. METHODS The primary objective of this factorial phase II study was to determine if one of 3 potential chemotherapy agents added to dose-dense temozolomide (ddTMZ) improves progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. A prior phase I trial established the safety of combining ddTMZ with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and/or thalidomide. Adults with good performance status and no evidence of progression post chemoradiation were randomized into 8 arms: ddTMZ alone (7 days on/7 days off) or doublet, triplet, and quadruplet combinations with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and thalidomide. RESULTS The study enrolled 155 participants with a median age of 53 years (range, 18-84 y). None of the agents demonstrated improved PFS when compared with arms not containing that specific agent. There was no difference in PFS for triplet compared with doublet regimens, although a trend for improved overall survival (OS) was seen (20.1 vs 17.0 months, P = .15). Compared with ddTMZ, the ddTMZ + isotretinoin doublet had worse PFS (10.5 vs 6.5 months, P = .043) and OS (21.2 vs 11.7 months, P = .037). Trends were also seen for worse outcomes with isotretinoin-containing regimens, but there was no impact with celecoxib or thalidomide combinations. Treatment was well tolerated with expected high rates of lymphopenia. CONCLUSIONS The results do not establish a benefit for these combinations but indicate that adding isotretinoin to ddTMZ may be detrimental. This study demonstrated the feasibility and utility of the factorial design in efficiently testing drug combinations in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT00112502.

An independently validated nomogram for individualized estimation of survival among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: NRG Oncology RTOG 0525 and 0825

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor. Nomograms are often used for individualized estimation of prognosis. This study aimed to build and independently validate a nomogram to estimate individualized survival probabilities for patients with newly diagnosed GBM, using data from 2 independent NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trials. Methods This analysis included information on 799 (RTOG 0525) and 555 (RTOG 0825) eligible and randomized patients with newly diagnosed GBM and contained the following variables: age at diagnosis, race, gender, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), extent of resection, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status, and survival (in months). Survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression, random survival forests, and recursive partitioning analysis, with adjustment for known prognostic factors. The models were developed using the 0525 data and were independently validated using the 0825 data. Models were internally validated using 10-fold cross-validation, and individually predicted 6-, 12-, and 24-month survival probabilities were generated to measure the predictive accuracy and calibration against the actual survival status. Results A final nomogram was built using the Cox proportional hazards model. Factors that increased the probability of shorter survival included greater age at diagnosis, male gender, lower KPS, not having total resection, and unmethylated MGMT status. Conclusions A nomogram that assesses individualized survival probabilities (6-, 12-, and 24-mo) for patients with newly diagnosed GBM could be useful to health care providers for counseling patients regarding treatment decisions and optimizing therapeutic approaches. Free software for implementing this nomogram is provided: http://cancer4.case.edu/rCalculator/rCalculator.html.

Treatment, prognostic factors, and outcomes in spinal cord astrocytomas

BACKGROUND Spinal astrocytomas are rare intramedullary CNS tumors for which there is limited consensus on treatment; the importance of the extent of resection (EOR), postoperative radiotherapy, and chemotherapy remains poorly understood. We report on outcomes associated with surgery, postoperative radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in a series of patients treated at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) with the aim of elucidating the role of these treatments in spinal astrocytomas. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed charts from a series of 83 patients with histologically confirmed spinal astrocytoma treated at MDACC during 1990-2011. Data collected included patient demographic characteristics, prognostic indicators, and treatment modality at diagnosis. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for pilocytic (World Health Organization [WHO] grade I) and infiltrative (WHO grades II, III, and IV) astrocytomas, separately. Multivariate analysis was performed for the infiltrative patients but not the pilocytic patients because of a limited number of cases. RESULTS Higher WHO grade among all patients was associated with worse OS (P < .0001) and PFS (P = .0003). Among patients with infiltrative tumors, neither EOR nor radiotherapy was associated with a difference in outcomes in multivariate analysis; however, among patients with infiltrative astrocytomas, chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio = .22, P = .0075) but not OS (hazard ratio = .89, P = .83) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION WHO grade was the strongest prognostic indicator in patients with spinal cord astrocytomas. Our results also show that chemotherapy improved PFS in infiltrative astrocytomas in multivariate analysis, but neither EOR nor radiation therapy influenced outcomes in this group.

Phase III randomized study of radiation and temozolomide versus radiation and nitrosourea therapy for anaplastic astrocytoma: Results of nrg oncology RTOG 9813

Background The primary objective of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) treated with radiotherapy (RT) and either temozolomide (TMZ) or a nitrosourea (NU). Secondary endpoints were time to tumor progression (TTP), toxicity, and the effect of IDH1 mutation status on clinical outcome. Methods Eligible patients with centrally reviewed, histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed AA were randomized to receive either RT+TMZ (n = 97) or RT+NU (n = 99). The study closed early because the target accrual rate was not met. Results Median follow-up time for patients still alive was 10.1 years (1.9-12.6 y); 66% of the patients died. Median survival time was 3.9 years in the RT/TMZ arm (95% CI, 3.0-7.0) and 3.8 years in the RT/NU arm (95% CI, 2.2-7.0), corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.94 (P = .36; 95% CI, 0.67-1.32). The differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and TTP between the 2 arms were not statistically significant. Patients in the RT+NU arm experienced more grade ≥3 toxicity (75.8% vs 47.9%, P < .001), mainly related to myelosuppression. Of the 196 patients, 111 were tested for IDH1-R132H status (60 RT+TMZ and 51 RT+NU). Fifty-four patients were IDH negative and 49 were IDH positive with a better OS in IDH-positive patients (median survival time 7.9 vs 2.8 y; P = .004, HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.81). Conclusions RT+TMZ did not appear to significantly improve OS or TTP for AA compared with RT+ NU. RT+TMZ was better tolerated. IDH1-R132H mutation was associated with longer survival.

Clinical outcomes and patterns of failure in pineoblastoma: A 30-year, single-institution retrospective review

OBJECTIVE To update outcomes and assess prognostic factors in the modern, multimodality treatment of patients with pineoblastoma. METHODS The medical records of patients with pineoblastoma evaluated at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1982 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS Thirty-one patients with medical records suitable for review were identified. The majority of patients were female (67.7%) with a median age at diagnosis of 18.2 years (range, 0.3-52.8 years). Twenty-one patients underwent surgical resection, recorded as gross total (n = 9) or subtotal (n = 12) resections. Thirty patients received radiation with photon-based therapy (n = 16), proton-based therapy (n = 13), or radiosurgery (n = 1) to a median craniospinal irradiation dose of 36 Gy (range, 23.4-40 Gy) and a median focal dose of 54 Gy (range, 40-58.4 Gy). Twenty-eight patients received chemotherapy before (n = 10), during (n = 10), and after (n = 22) radiation. Median overall survival was 8.7 years for the entire cohort, with 2-, 5-, and 10- year actuarial rates of 89.5%, 69.4%, and 48.6%, respectively. Median disease-free survival was 10 years with 2-, 5-, and 10- year actuarial rates of 84.3%, 62.6%, and 55.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis failed to correlate age, sex, or extent of surgical resection with disease-free or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Modern, multimodality treatment of pineoblastoma yields a high rate of overall survival, with acceptable short- and long-term toxicity. A greater M-stage at presentation and development of disease recurrence correlate with worse overall survival. Patients who received focal radiation initially experienced a greater rate of disease recurrence compared with those treated to the craniospinal axis.

C11orf95–RELA fusion present in a primary supratentorial ependymoma and recurrent sarcoma

Ependymomas are rare glial tumors of the central nervous system that arise from the cells lining the ventricles and central canal within the spinal cord. The distribution of these tumors along the neuroaxis varies by age, most commonly involving the spinal cord in adults and the posterior fossa in children. It is becoming evident that ependymomas of infratentorial, supratentorial, and spinal cord location are genetically distinct which may explain the differences in clinical outcomes. A novel oncogenic fusion involving the C11orf95 and RELA genes was recently described in supratentorial ependymomas that results in constitutive aberrant activation of the nuclear factor-kB signaling pathway. Ependymosarcomas are rare neoplasms in which a malignant mesenchymal component arises within an ependymoma. We here describe a case of a sarcoma developing in a patient previously treated with chemotherapy and radiation whose original ependymoma and recurrent sarcoma were both shown to carry the type 1 C11orf95–RELA fusion transcript indicating a monoclonal origin for both tumors.

Middle cerebral artery territory infarct due to Cryptococcus infectionstitle: An uncommon indication for cerebrospinal fluid analysis in stroke patients

Cryptococcal meningitis is the most common manifestation of cryptococcosis and is caused by the encapsulated yeast organism Cryptococcus neoformans. It occurs most commonly in patients with impaired cell‐mediated immunity such as in HIV infection; patients with hematological malignancies; patients post solid‐organ transplantation; on chronic steroids or immunosuppressants. Clinically, stroke can arise as a complication of cryptococcal meningitis. While cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination is usually not indicated for evaluation of stroke patients, demonstration of cryptococcal yeast forms in CSF is valuable in guiding appropriate therapy in arterial stroke caused by Cryptococci. Herein, we describe the CSF and radiologic correlation in a female patient who presented with disseminated cryptococcosis, cryptococcal meninigitis and a middle cerebral artery infarct. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2015;43:632–634.