Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marta Ponce is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marta Ponce.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012

Colonoscopy versus Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Colorectal-Cancer Screening

Enrique Quintero; Antoni Castells; Luis Bujanda; Joaquín Cubiella; Dolores Salas; Angel Lanas; Montserrat Andreu; Fernando Carballo; Juan Diego Morillas; Cristina Hernández; Rodrigo Jover; Isabel Montalvo; Juan Arenas; Eva Laredo; Vicent Hernandez; Felipe Iglesias; Estela Cid; Raquel Zubizarreta; Teresa Sala; Marta Ponce; Mercedes Andrés; Gloria Teruel; Antonio Peris; María-Pilar Roncales; Mónica Polo-Tomás; Xavier Bessa; Olga Ferrer-Armengou; Jaume Grau; Anna Serradesanferm; Akiko Ono

BACKGROUND Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) are accepted strategies for colorectal-cancer screening in the average-risk population. METHODS In this randomized, controlled trial involving asymptomatic adults 50 to 69 years of age, we compared one-time colonoscopy in 26,703 subjects with FIT every 2 years in 26,599 subjects. The primary outcome was the rate of death from colorectal cancer at 10 years. This interim report describes rates of participation, diagnostic findings, and occurrence of major complications at completion of the baseline screening. Study outcomes were analyzed in both intention-to-screen and as-screened populations. RESULTS The rate of participation was higher in the FIT group than in the colonoscopy group (34.2% vs. 24.6%, P<0.001). Colorectal cancer was found in 30 subjects (0.1%) in the colonoscopy group and 33 subjects (0.1%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 1.64; P=0.99). Advanced adenomas were detected in 514 subjects (1.9%) in the colonoscopy group and 231 subjects (0.9%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.69; P<0.001), and nonadvanced adenomas were detected in 1109 subjects (4.2%) in the colonoscopy group and 119 subjects (0.4%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 9.80; 95% CI, 8.10 to 11.85; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Subjects in the FIT group were more likely to participate in screening than were those in the colonoscopy group. On the baseline screening examination, the numbers of subjects in whom colorectal cancer was detected were similar in the two study groups, but more adenomas were identified in the colonoscopy group. (Funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00906997.).


The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2009

Time trends and impact of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation in clinical practice.

Angel Lanas; Luis A. García-Rodríguez; Mónica Polo-Tomás; Marta Ponce; Inmaculada Alonso-Abreu; María Angeles Pérez-Aisa; Javier Perez-Gisbert; Luis Bujanda; Manuel Castro; María Jesús Muñoz; Luis Rodrigo; Xavier Calvet; Dolores Del-Pino; Santiago García

OBJECTIVES:Changing patterns in medical practice may contribute to temporal changes in the incidence of upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) complications. There are limited data on the incidence of lower GI complications in clinical practice and most studies that have been done have serious methodological limitations to inferring the actual burden of this problem. The aims of this study were to analyze time trends of hospitalizations resulting from GI complications originating both from the upper and lower GI tract in the general population, and to determine the risk factors, severity, and clinical impact of these GI events.METHODS:This was a population-based study of patients hospitalized because of GI complications in 10 general hospitals between 1996 and 2005 in Spain. We report the age- and gender-specific rates, estimate the regression coefficients of the upper and lower GI event trends, and evaluate the severity and associated risk factors. GI hospitalization charts were validated by an independent review of large random samples of unspecific and specific codes distributed among all hospitals and study years.RESULTS:Upper GI complications fell from 87/100,000 persons in 1996 to 47/100,000 persons in 2005, whereas lower GI complications increased from 20/100,000 to 33/100,000. Overall, mortality rates decreased, but the case fatality remained constant over time. Lower GI events had a higher mortality rate (8.8 vs. 5.5%), a longer hospitalization (11.6±13.9 vs. 7.9±8.8 days), and higher resource utilization than did upper GI events. The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) without concomitant proton pump inhibitor was more frequently recorded among upper GI complications than among lower GI complications. When comparing upper GI events with lower GI events, we found that male gender (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.70–2.21), and recorded NSAID use (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.60–2.30) were associated to a greater extent with upper GI events, whereas older age (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.77–0.89), number of comorbidities (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.86–0.96), and having a diagnosis in recent years (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.90–0.94) were all associated to a greater extent with lower GI events than with upper GI events after adjusting for age, sex, hospitalization, and discharge year.CONCLUSIONS:Over the past decade, there has been a progressive change in the overall picture of GI events leading to hospitalization, with a clear decreasing trend in upper GI events and a significant increase in lower GI events, causing the rates of these two GI complications to converge. Overall, mortality has also decreased, but the in-hospital case fatality of upper or lower GI complication events has remained constant. It will be a challenge to improve future care in this area unless we develop new strategies to reduce the number of events originating in the lower GI tract, as well as reducing their associated mortality.


Microbial Ecology | 2011

Assessing Gut Microbial Diversity from Feces and Rectal Mucosa

Ana Durbán; Juan J. Abellán; Nuria Jiménez-Hernández; Marta Ponce; Julio Ponce; Teresa Sala; Giuseppe D’Auria; Amparo Latorre; Andrés Moya

Gut microbiota is the most complex bacterial community in the human body and its study may give important clues to the etiology of different intestinal diseases. Most studies carried out so far have used fecal samples, assuming that these samples have a similar distribution to the communities present throughout the colon. The present study was designed to test this assumption by comparing samples from the rectal mucosa and feces of nine healthy volunteers by sequencing libraries of 16S rRNA genes. At the family taxonomic level, where rarefaction curves indicate that the observed number of taxa is close to the expected one, we observe under different statistical analyses that fecal and mucosal samples cluster separately. The same is found at the level of species considering phylogenetic information. Consequently, it cannot be stated that both samples from a given individual are of similar composition. We believe that the evidence in support of this statement is strong and that it would not change by increasing the number of individuals and/or performing massive sequencing. We do not expect clinicians to stop using feces for research, but we think it is important to caution them on their potential lack of representativeness with respect to the bacterial biofilm on the rectal mucosa.


Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2011

The changing face of hospitalisation due to gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation

A. Lanas; L. A. García-Rodríguez; Mónica Polo-Tomás; Marta Ponce; Enrique Quintero; M. A. Perez-Aisa; Javier P. Gisbert; Luis Bujanda; Manuel Castro; Maria Fe Muñoz; M. D. Del-Pino; S. Garcia; Xavier Calvet

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 585–591


Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology | 2011

Clinical patterns and outcomes of ischaemic colitis: results of the Working Group for the Study of Ischaemic Colitis in Spain (CIE study).

Miguel Montoro; Lawrence J. Brandt; Santos Santolaria; Fernando Gomollón; Belén Sánchez Puértolas; Jesús Vera; Luis Bujanda; Angel Cosme; José Luis Cabriada; Margarita Durán; Laura Mata; Ana Santamaría; G. Ceña; Jose Manuel Blas; Julio Ponce; Marta Ponce; Luis Rodrigo; Jacobo Ortiz; Carmen Muñoz; Gloria Arozena; Daniel Ginard; Antonio López-Serrano; Manuel Castro; Miquel Sans; Rafael Campo; Alex Casalots; Victor Orive; Alberto Loizate; Llúcia Titó; Eva Portabella

Abstract Background. There is a lack of prospective studies evaluating the natural history of colonic ischaemia (CI). We performed such a study to evaluate the clinical presentation, outcome, and mortality as well as clinical variables associated with poor prognosis. Methods. An open, prospective, and multicentre study was conducted in 24 Spanish hospitals serving a population of 3.5 million people. The study included only patients who met criteria for definitive or probable CI. A website (www.colitisisquemica.org) provided logistical support. Results. A total of 364 patients met criteria for inclusion. CI was suspected clinically in only 24.2% of cases. The distribution of clinical patterns was as follows: reversible colopathy (26.1%), transient colitis (43.7%), gangrenous colitis (9.9%), fulminant pancolitis (2.5%), and chronic segmental colitis (17.9%). A total of 47 patients (12.9%) had an unfavorable outcome as defined by mortality and/or the need for surgery. Multivariate analysis identified the following signs as independent risk factors for an unfavorable outcome: abdominal pain without rectal bleeding [odds ratio (OR) 3.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6–9.3], non-bloody diarrhoea (OR 10; 95% CI = 3.7–27.4), and peritoneal signs (OR 7.3; 95% CI = 2.7–19.6). Unfavorable outcomes also were more frequent in isolated right colon ischaemia (IRCI) compared with non-IRCI (40.9 vs. 10.3%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The overall mortality rate was 7.7%. Conclusions. The clinical presentation of CI is very heterogeneous, perhaps explaining why clinical suspicion of this disease is so low. The presence of IRCI, and occurrence of peritoneal signs or onset of CI as severe abdominal pain without bleeding, should alert the physician to a potentially unfavorable course.


Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2013

Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies

Rodrigo Jover; Pedro Zapater; Eduardo Polanía; Luis Bujanda; Angel Lanas; Jose Antonio Hermo; Joaquín Cubiella; Akiko Ono; Yanira González-Méndez; Antonio Peris; Maria Pellise; Agustín Seoane; Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada; Marta Ponce; Jc Marín-Gabriel; María Chaparro; Guillermo Cacho; Servando Fernández-Díez; Juan Arenas; Federico Sopeña; Luisa De-Castro; Pablo Vega-Villaamil; Maria Rodriguez-Soler; Fernando Carballo; Dolores Salas; Juan Diego Morillas; Montserrat Andreu; Enrique Quintero; Antoni Castells

BACKGROUND Adenoma detection rate (ADR) has become the most important quality indicator for colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate which modifiable factors, directly related to the endoscopic procedure, influenced the ADR in screening colonoscopies. DESIGN Observational, nested study. SETTING Multicenter, randomized, controlled trials. PATIENTS Asymptomatic people aged 50 to 69 years were eligible for a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial designed to compare colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal cancer screening. A total of 4539 individuals undergoing a direct screening colonoscopy were included in this study. INTERVENTION Colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Bowel cleansing, sedation, withdrawal time in normal colonoscopies, and cecal intubation were analyzed as possible predictors of adenoma detection by using logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age and sex, factors independently related to the ADR were a mean withdrawal time longer than 8 minutes (odds ratio [OR] 1.51; 95% CI, 1.17-1.96) in normal colonoscopies and split preparation (OR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.57). For advanced adenomas, only withdrawal time maintained statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. For proximal adenomas, withdrawal time and cecal intubation maintained independent statistical significance, whereas only withdrawal time longer than 8 minutes and a <10-hour period between the end of preparation and colonoscopy showed independent associations for distal adenomas. LIMITATIONS Only endoscopic variables have been analyzed. CONCLUSION Withdrawal time was the only modifiable factor related to the ADR in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies associated with an increased detection rate of overall, advanced, proximal, and distal adenomas.


Environmental Microbiology Reports | 2012

Structural alterations of faecal and mucosa-associated bacterial communities in irritable bowel syndrome.

Ana Durbán; Juan J. Abellán; Nuria Jiménez-Hernández; Patricia Salgado; Marta Ponce; Julio Ponce; Vicente Garrigues; Amparo Latorre; Andrés Moya

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common functional gastrointestinal disorder in western countries. Previous studies on IBS, mostly based on faecal samples, suggest alterations in the intestinal microbiota. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the association between specific bacteria and IBS. We explore the alterations of intestinal bacterial communities in IBS using massive sequencing of amplified 16S rRNA genes. Mucosal biopsies of the ascending and descending colon and faeces from 16 IBS patients and 9 healthy controls were analysed. Strong inter-individual variation was observed in the composition of the bacterial communities in both patients and controls. These communities showed less diversity in IBS cases. There were larger differences in the microbiota composition between biopsies and faeces than between patients and controls. We found a few over-represented and under-represented taxa in IBS cases with respect to controls. The detected alterations varied by site, with no changes being consistent across sample types.


Obesity | 2006

Value of Heartburn for Diagnosing Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Severely Obese Patients

Vicente Ortiz; Marta Ponce; Alberto Fernández; Beatriz Martínez; Jose Luis Ponce; Vicente Garrigues; Julio Ponce

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in severely obese patients and the association between symptoms and objective data of GERD in this population.


Digestive Diseases and Sciences | 2004

On-Demand Therapy with Rabeprazole in Nonerosive and Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Clinical Practice: Effectiveness, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Patient Satisfaction

Julian Ponce; Lidia Argüello; Guillermo Bastida; Marta Ponce; Vicente Ortiz; Vicente Garrigues

On-demand therapy is effective for maintaining symptoms control in nonerosive gastroesophagealreflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to assess the clinical effectiveness of on-demand therapy witha proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in mild GERD (nonerosive and low-grade esophagitis), its impact onhealth-related quality of life (HRQoL), and the degree of patient satisfaction. Fifty-five patients (17with nonerosive GERDand 38 with low-grade esophagitis) were treated with rabeprazole, 20 mg/day.The healed patients started on-demand therapy. We evaluated symptoms (clinical questionnaire),HRQoL (SF-36 questionnaire), and patient satisfaction (visual analogue scale). Of the 55 patientsincluded, 51 started on-demand therapy for 6 months. Symptom control (heartburn <twice a week)was achieved in over 85% of the patients. The mean (SD) amount of PPI used was 0.3 (0.19)tablet/day. The patient satisfaction score at the end of the acute phase was 98 (range, 0-100) andremained high (90; range, 10-100) and stable during on-demand therapy. Short-term treatmentnormalized the HRQoL scores, which were subsequently maintained during on-demand therapy.On-demand therapy is useful for the clinical management of patients with mild GERD, allowingadequate symptoms control, limiting PPI consumption, and affording important patient satisfactionwith normalization of HRQoL.


Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2006

Healthcare seeking for constipation: a population‐based survey in the Mediterranean area of Spain

C. Gálvez; V. Garrigues; V. Ortiz; Marta Ponce; P. Nos; J. Ponce

The use of healthcare resources for the management of constipation is not well‐known.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marta Ponce's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julio Ponce

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luis Bujanda

University of the Basque Country

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rodrigo Jover

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xavier Calvet

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Javier P. Gisbert

Autonomous University of Madrid

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angel Lanas

University of Zaragoza

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge