Marta Rueda

What Do Range Maps and Surveys Tell Us About Diversity Patterns

Keywords Distribution(range)maps.Richnessmaps.Diversitysurveys.DiversitygradientsPalmer et al. (2008) begin their article by pointing out that diversity numbers“should mean something”. Clearly, it is futile to try to understand diversity patternsif we do not know what the patterns really are. Thus, the first steps in studyinggeographic diversity patterns are to decide how to generate quantitative estimates,followed by an evaluation of their robustness, if possible. Unfortunately, as the otherpapers in this forum clearly demonstrate, this is more easily said than done.There are currently three methods to generate diversity patterns over largegeographical areas. The most widely used to date is to overlay distribution (range)maps and sum the maps that overlap a predefined point or grid system. The resultantmaps are referred to as either richness maps or, more properly, range overlap maps(LaSorte and Hawkins 2007). Alternatively, richness maps are generated usingbroadly based systematic surveys that actually record the species observed in sites,transects or grids. Such surveys have historically been very limited over large scales,but the recent interest in climate change and biological conservation has led to the

Global richness patterns of venomous snakes reveal contrasting influences of ecology and history in two different clades.

Recent studies addressing broad-scale species richness gradients have proposed two main primary drivers: contemporary climate and evolutionary processes (differential balance between speciation and extinction). Here, we analyze the global richness patterns of two venomous snake clades, Viperidae and Elapidae. We used ordinary least squares multiple regression (OLS) and partial regression analysis to investigate to what extent actual evapotranspiration (AET; summarizing current environmental conditions) and biogeographical regions (representing evolutionary effects) were associated with species richness. For viperids, AET explained 45.6% of the variance in richness whereas the effect of this variable for elapids was almost null (0.5%). On the other hand, biogeographic regions were the best predictors of elapid richness (56.5%), against its relatively small effect (25.9%) in viperid richness. Partial regressions also revealed similar patterns for independent effects of climate and history in both clades. However, the independent historical effect in Elapidae decreased from 45.2 to 17.8% when we excluded Australia from the analyses, indicating that the strong historical effect that had emerged for the global richness pattern was reflecting the historical process of elapid radiation into Australia. Even after excluding Australia, the historical signal in elapid richness in the rest of the globe was still significant and much higher than that observed in viperid richness at a global scale (2.7% after controlling for AET effects). Differences in the evolutionary age of these two clades can be invoked to explain these contrasting results, in that viperids probably had more time for diversification, generating richness responses to environmental gradients, whereas the pattern of distribution of elapid richness can be more directly interpreted in an evolutionary context. Moreover, these results show the importance of starting to adopt deconstructive approaches to species richness, since the driving factors of these patterns may vary from group to group according to their evolutionary history.

Trait syndromes among North American trees are evolutionarily conserved and show adaptive value over broad geographic scales

Adaptive syndromes and their evolutionary constraints represent a powerful construct for understanding plant distributions. However, it is unclear how the species requirements to face multiple stressors promotes syndrome formation and to which abiotic stressors these syndromes show adaptive value over broad geographic scales. We combined local occurrence data from the U.S. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) of 219 angiosperm and 85 gymnosperm species living across the conterminous US with phylogenies and trait data to identify tree syndromes, their evolutionary conservatism, and their adaptive value over broad scales. Factor analyses and evolutionary model selection revealed that trees possess functional trait syndromes that are strongly conserved. Major syndromes at the species level differed between angiosperms and gymnosperms. While the two main syndromes in angiosperms were related to cold and drought-waterlogging tolerance, in gymnosperms a trade-off between shade and drought tolerance was the main syndrome followed by a growth-fire resistance syndrome. Additional RLQ and fourth-corner approaches revealed that trait syndromes at the community level were broadly similar to those observed at the species level for angiosperms, although this was less clear for gymnosperms. This suggests that syndrome evolution has played an important role on angiosperm distributions, whereas additional ecological factors explain gymnosperm distributions. Importantly, syndromes show adaptive value, as they were geographically associated with several environmental variables showing structure from continental to local scales, being temperature the main abiotic stressor. Our results indicate that across the conterminous US tree species possess clear syndromes that are subjected to strong evolutionary constraints driving tree species and forest community distribution. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Detecting Fragmentation Extinction Thresholds for Forest Understory Plant Species in Peninsular Spain

Ecological theory predicts that fragmentation aggravates the effects of habitat loss, yet empirical results show mixed evidences, which fail to support the theory instead reinforcing the primary importance of habitat loss. Fragmentation hypotheses have received much attention due to their potential implications for biodiversity conservation, however, animal studies have traditionally been their main focus. Here we assess variation in species sensitivity to forest amount and fragmentation and evaluate if fragmentation is related to extinction thresholds in forest understory herbs and ferns. Our expectation was that forest herbs would be more sensitive to fragmentation than ferns due to their lower dispersal capabilities. Using forest cover percentage and the proportion of this percentage occurring in the largest patch within UTM cells of 10-km resolution covering Peninsular Spain, we partitioned the effects of forest amount versus fragmentation and applied logistic regression to model occurrences of 16 species. For nine models showing robustness according to a set of quality criteria we subsequently defined two empirical fragmentation scenarios, minimum and maximum, and quantified species’ sensitivity to forest contraction with no fragmentation, and to fragmentation under constant forest cover. We finally assessed how the extinction threshold of each species (the habitat amount below which it cannot persist) varies under no and maximum fragmentation. Consistent with their preference for forest habitats probability occurrences of all species decreased as forest cover contracted. On average, herbs did not show significant sensitivity to fragmentation whereas ferns were favored. In line with theory, fragmentation yielded higher extinction thresholds for two species. For the remaining species, fragmentation had either positive or non-significant effects. We interpret these differences as reflecting species-specific traits and conclude that although forest amount is of primary importance for the persistence of understory plants, to neglect the impact of fragmentation for some species can lead them to local extinction.

Stress from cold and drought as drivers of functional trait spectra in North American angiosperm tree assemblages

Abstract Understanding how environmental change alters the composition of plant assemblages, and how this in turn affects ecosystem functioning is a major challenge in the face of global climate change. Assuming that values of plant traits express species adaptations to the environment, the trait‐based approach is a promising way to achieve this goal. Nevertheless, how functional traits are related to species’ environmental tolerances and how trait spectra respond to broad‐scale environmental gradients remains largely unexplored. Here, we identify the main trait spectra for US angiosperm trees by testing hypotheses for the relationships between functional traits and species’ environmental tolerances to environmental stresses, as well as quantifying the environmental drivers of assemblage means and variances of these traits. We analyzed >74,000 community assemblages from the US Forest Inventory and Analysis using 12 functional traits, five traits expressing species’ environmental tolerances and 10 environmental variables. Results indicated that leaf traits, dispersal traits, and traits related to stem hydraulics were related to cold or drought tolerance, and their assemblage means were best explained by minimum temperatures. Assemblage means of traits related to shade tolerance (tree growth rate, leaf phosphorus content, and bark thickness) were best explained by aridity index. Surprisingly, aridity index, rather than minimum temperature, was the best predictors of assemblage variances of most traits, although these relationships were variable and weak overall. We conclude that temperature is likely to be the most important driver of functional community structure of North American angiosperm trees by selecting for optimum strategies along the cold and drought stress trade‐off. In turn, water availability primarily affects traits related to shade tolerance through its effect on forest canopy structure and vegetation openness.