Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marten Winter is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marten Winter.


Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences | 2014

A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers.

Myla F. J. Aronson; Frank A. La Sorte; Charles H. Nilon; Madhusudan Katti; Mark A. Goddard; Christopher A. Lepczyk; Paige S. Warren; Nicholas S. G. Williams; S.S. Cilliers; Bruce D. Clarkson; Cynnamon Dobbs; Rebecca W. Dolan; Marcus Hedblom; Stefan Klotz; Jip Louwe Kooijmans; Ingolf Kühn; Ian MacGregor-Fors; Mark J. McDonnell; Ulla Mörtberg; Petr Pyšek; S.J. Siebert; Jessica Sushinsky; Peter Werner; Marten Winter

Urbanization contributes to the loss of the worlds biodiversity and the homogenization of its biota. However, comparative studies of urban biodiversity leading to robust generalities of the status and drivers of biodiversity in cities at the global scale are lacking. Here, we compiled the largest global dataset to date of two diverse taxa in cities: birds (54 cities) and plants (110 cities). We found that the majority of urban bird and plant species are native in the worlds cities. Few plants and birds are cosmopolitan, the most common being Columba livia and Poa annua. The density of bird and plant species (the number of species per km2) has declined substantially: only 8% of native bird and 25% of native plant species are currently present compared with estimates of non-urban density of species. The current density of species in cities and the loss in density of species was best explained by anthropogenic features (landcover, city age) rather than by non-anthropogenic factors (geography, climate, topography). As urbanization continues to expand, efforts directed towards the conservation of intact vegetation within urban landscapes could support higher concentrations of both bird and plant species. Despite declines in the density of species, cities still retain endemic native species, thus providing opportunities for regional and global biodiversity conservation, restoration and education.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2010

Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe

Petr Pyšek; Vojtěch Jarošík; Philip E. Hulme; Ingolf Kühn; Jan Wild; Margarita Arianoutsou; Sven Bacher; François Chiron; Viktoras Didžiulis; Franz Essl; Piero Genovesi; Francesca Gherardi; Martin Hejda; Salit Kark; Philip W. Lambdon; Marie Laure Desprez-Loustau; Wolfgang Nentwig; Jan Pergl; Katja Poboljšaj; Wolfgang Rabitsch; Alain Roques; David B. Roy; Susan Shirley; Wojciech Solarz; Montserrat Vilà; Marten Winter

The accelerating rates of international trade, travel, and transport in the latter half of the twentieth century have led to the progressive mixing of biota from across the world and the number of species introduced to new regions continues to increase. The importance of biogeographic, climatic, economic, and demographic factors as drivers of this trend is increasingly being realized but as yet there is no consensus regarding their relative importance. Whereas little may be done to mitigate the effects of geography and climate on invasions, a wider range of options may exist to moderate the impacts of economic and demographic drivers. Here we use the most recent data available from Europe to partition between macroecological, economic, and demographic variables the variation in alien species richness of bryophytes, fungi, vascular plants, terrestrial insects, aquatic invertebrates, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Only national wealth and human population density were statistically significant predictors in the majority of models when analyzed jointly with climate, geography, and land cover. The economic and demographic variables reflect the intensity of human activities and integrate the effect of factors that directly determine the outcome of invasion such as propagule pressure, pathways of introduction, eutrophication, and the intensity of anthropogenic disturbance. The strong influence of economic and demographic variables on the levels of invasion by alien species demonstrates that future solutions to the problem of biological invasions at a national scale lie in mitigating the negative environmental consequences of human activities that generate wealth and by promoting more sustainable population growth.


PLOS Biology | 2014

A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts.

Tim M. Blackburn; Franz Essl; Thomas P. Oléron Evans; Philip E. Hulme; Jonathan M. Jeschke; Ingolf Kühn; Sabrina Kumschick; Zuzana Marková; Agata Mrugała; Wolfgang Nentwig; Jan Pergl; Petr Pyšek; Wolfgang Rabitsch; Anthony Ricciardi; Agnieszka Sendek; Montserrat Vilà; John R. U. Wilson; Marten Winter; Piero Genovesi; Sven Bacher

We present a method for categorising and comparing alien or invasive species in terms of how damaging they are to the environment, that can be applied across all taxa, scales, and impact metrics.


Trends in Ecology and Evolution | 2013

Phylogenetic diversity and nature conservation: where are we?

Marten Winter; Vincent Devictor; Oliver Schweiger

To date, there is little evidence that phylogenetic diversity has contributed to nature conservation. Here, we discuss the scientific justification of using phylogenetic diversity in conservation and the reasons for its neglect. We show that, apart from valuing the rarity and richness aspect, commonly quoted justifications based on the usage of phylogenetic diversity as a proxy for functional diversity or evolutionary potential are still based on uncertainties. We discuss how a missing guideline through the variety of phylogenetic diversity metrics and their relevance for conservation might be responsible for the hesitation to include phylogenetic diversity in conservation practice. We outline research routes that can help to ease uncertainties and bridge gaps between research and conservation with respect to phylogenetic diversity.


Nature | 2015

Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants

Mark van Kleunen; Wayne Dawson; Franz Essl; Jan Pergl; Marten Winter; Ewald Weber; Holger Kreft; Patrick Weigelt; John Kartesz; Misako Nishino; Liubov A. Antonova; Julie F. Barcelona; Francisco Cabezas; Dairon Cárdenas; Juliana Cárdenas-Toro; Nicolás Castaño; Eduardo Chacón; Cyrille Chatelain; Aleksandr L. Ebel; Estrela Figueiredo; Nicol Fuentes; Quentin Groom; Lesley Henderson; Inderjit; Andrey N. Kupriyanov; Silvana Masciadri; Jan Meerman; Olga Morozova; Dietmar Moser; Daniel L. Nickrent

All around the globe, humans have greatly altered the abiotic and biotic environment with ever-increasing speed. One defining feature of the Anthropocene epoch is the erosion of biogeographical barriers by human-mediated dispersal of species into new regions, where they can naturalize and cause ecological, economic and social damage. So far, no comprehensive analysis of the global accumulation and exchange of alien plant species between continents has been performed, primarily because of a lack of data. Here we bridge this knowledge gap by using a unique global database on the occurrences of naturalized alien plant species in 481 mainland and 362 island regions. In total, 13,168 plant species, corresponding to 3.9% of the extant global vascular flora, or approximately the size of the native European flora, have become naturalized somewhere on the globe as a result of human activity. North America has accumulated the largest number of naturalized species, whereas the Pacific Islands show the fastest increase in species numbers with respect to their land area. Continents in the Northern Hemisphere have been the major donors of naturalized alien species to all other continents. Our results quantify for the first time the extent of plant naturalizations worldwide, and illustrate the urgent need for globally integrated efforts to control, manage and understand the spread of alien species.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2009

Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora

Marten Winter; Oliver Schweiger; Stefan Klotz; Wolfgang Nentwig; Pavlos Andriopoulos; Margarita Arianoutsou; Corina Basnou; Pinelopi Delipetrou; Viktoras Didžiulis; Martin Hejda; Philip E. Hulme; Philip W. Lambdon; Jan Pergl; Petr Pyšek; David B. Roy; Ingolf Kühn

Human activities have altered the composition of biotas through two fundamental processes: native extinctions and alien introductions. Both processes affect the taxonomic (i.e., species identity) and phylogenetic (i.e., species evolutionary history) structure of species assemblages. However, it is not known what the relative magnitude of these effects is at large spatial scales. Here we analyze the large-scale effects of plant extinctions and introductions on taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of floras across Europe, using data from 23 regions. Considering both native losses and alien additions in concert reveals that plant invasions since AD 1500 exceeded extinctions, resulting in (i) increased taxonomic diversity (i.e., species richness) but decreased phylogenetic diversity within European regions, and (ii) increased taxonomic and phylogenetic similarity among European regions. Those extinct species were phylogenetically and taxonomically unique and typical of individual regions, and extinctions usually were not continent-wide and therefore led to differentiation. By contrast, because introduced alien species tended to be closely related to native species, the floristic differentiation due to species extinction was lessened by taxonomic and phylogenetic homogenization effects. This was especially due to species that are alien to a region but native to other parts of Europe. As a result, floras of many European regions have partly lost and will continue to lose their uniqueness. The results suggest that biodiversity needs to be assessed in terms of both species taxonomic and phylogenetic identity, but the latter is rarely used as a metric of the biodiversity dynamics.


Biological Reviews | 2010

Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination

Oliver Schweiger; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; Riccardo Bommarco; Thomas Hickler; Philip E. Hulme; Stefan Klotz; Ingolf Kühn; Mari Moora; Anders Nielsen; Ralf Ohlemüller; Theodora Petanidou; Simon G. Potts; Petr Pyšek; Jane C. Stout; Martin T. Sykes; Thomas Tscheulin; Montserrat Vilà; Gian-Reto Walther; Catrin Westphal; Marten Winter; Martin Zobel; Josef Settele

Global change may substantially affect biodiversity and ecosystem functioning but little is known about its effects on essential biotic interactions. Since different environmental drivers rarely act in isolation it is important to consider interactive effects. Here, we focus on how two key drivers of anthropogenic environmental change, climate change and the introduction of alien species, affect plant–pollinator interactions. Based on a literature survey we identify climatically sensitive aspects of species interactions, assess potential effects of climate change on these mechanisms, and derive hypotheses that may form the basis of future research. We find that both climate change and alien species will ultimately lead to the creation of novel communities. In these communities certain interactions may no longer occur while there will also be potential for the emergence of new relationships. Alien species can both partly compensate for the often negative effects of climate change but also amplify them in some cases. Since potential positive effects are often restricted to generalist interactions among species, climate change and alien species in combination can result in significant threats to more specialist interactions involving native species.


Conservation Biology | 2014

Defining the Impact of Non-Native Species

Jonathan M. Jeschke; Sven Bacher; Tim M. Blackburn; Jaimie T. A. Dick; Franz Essl; Thomas J. Evans; Mirijam Gaertner; Philip E. Hulme; Ingolf Kühn; Agata Mrugała; Jan Pergl; Petr Pyšek; Wolfgang Rabitsch; Anthony Ricciardi; Agnieszka Sendek; Montserrat Vilà; Marten Winter; Sabrina Kumschick

Non-native species cause changes in the ecosystems to which they are introduced. These changes, or some of them, are usually termed impacts; they can be manifold and potentially damaging to ecosystems and biodiversity. However, the impacts of most non-native species are poorly understood, and a synthesis of available information is being hindered because authors often do not clearly define impact. We argue that explicitly defining the impact of non-native species will promote progress toward a better understanding of the implications of changes to biodiversity and ecosystems caused by non-native species; help disentangle which aspects of scientific debates about non-native species are due to disparate definitions and which represent true scientific discord; and improve communication between scientists from different research disciplines and between scientists, managers, and policy makers. For these reasons and based on examples from the literature, we devised seven key questions that fall into 4 categories: directionality, classification and measurement, ecological or socio-economic changes, and scale. These questions should help in formulating clear and practical definitions of impact to suit specific scientific, stakeholder, or legislative contexts. Definiendo el Impacto de las Especies No-Nativas Resumen Las especies no-nativas pueden causar cambios en los ecosistemas donde son introducidas. Estos cambios, o algunos de ellos, usualmente se denominan como impactos; estos pueden ser variados y potencialmente dañinos para los ecosistemas y la biodiversidad. Sin embargo, los impactos de la mayoría de las especies no-nativas están pobremente entendidos y una síntesis de información disponible se ve obstaculizada porque los autores continuamente no definen claramente impacto. Discutimos que definir explícitamente el impacto de las especies no-nativas promoverá el progreso hacia un mejor entendimiento de las implicaciones de los cambios a la biodiversidad y los ecosistemas causados por especies no-nativas; ayudar a entender cuáles aspectos de los debates científicos sobre especies no-nativas son debidos a definiciones diversas y cuáles representan un verdadero desacuerdo científico; y mejorar la comunicación entre científicos de diferentes disciplinas y entre científicos, administradores y quienes hacen las políticas. Por estas razones y basándonos en ejemplos tomados de la literatura, concebimos siete preguntas clave que caen en cuatro categorías: direccionalidad, clasificación y medida, cambios ecológicos o socio-económicos, y escala. Estas preguntas deberían ayudar en la formulación de definiciones claras y prácticas del impacto para encajar mejor con contextos científicos, de las partes interesadas o legislativos específicos.


Nature Communications | 2017

No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide

Hanno Seebens; Tim M. Blackburn; Ellie E. Dyer; Piero Genovesi; Philip E. Hulme; Jonathan M. Jeschke; Shyama Pagad; Petr Pyšek; Marten Winter; Margarita Arianoutsou; Sven Bacher; Bernd Blasius; Giuseppe Brundu; César Capinha; Laura Celesti-Grapow; Wayne Dawson; Stefan Dullinger; Nicol Fuentes; Heinke Jäger; John Kartesz; Marc Kenis; Holger Kreft; Ingolf Kühn; Bernd Lenzner; Andrew M. Liebhold; Alexander Mosena; Dietmar Moser; Misako Nishino; David A. Pearman; Jan Pergl

Although research on human-mediated exchanges of species has substantially intensified during the last centuries, we know surprisingly little about temporal dynamics of alien species accumulations across regions and taxa. Using a novel database of 45,813 first records of 16,926 established alien species, we show that the annual rate of first records worldwide has increased during the last 200 years, with 37% of all first records reported most recently (1970–2014). Inter-continental and inter-taxonomic variation can be largely attributed to the diaspora of European settlers in the nineteenth century and to the acceleration in trade in the twentieth century. For all taxonomic groups, the increase in numbers of alien species does not show any sign of saturation and most taxa even show increases in the rate of first records over time. This highlights that past efforts to mitigate invasions have not been effective enough to keep up with increasing globalization.


Journal of Ecology | 2013

Contrasting changes in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity during a long-term succession: insights into assembly processes

Oliver Purschke; Barbara Christine Schmid; Martin T. Sykes; Peter Poschlod; Stefan G. Michalski; Walter Durka; Ingolf Kühn; Marten Winter; Honor C. Prentice

Summary 1. Theory predicts that the processes generating biodiversity after disturbance will change during succession. Comparisons of phylogenetic and functional (alpha and beta) diversity with taxonomic diversity can provide insights into the extent to which community assembly is driven by deterministic or stochastic processes, but comparative approaches have yet to be applied to successional systems. 2. We characterized taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional plant (alpha and beta) diversity within and between four successional stages in a > 270-year-long arable-to-grassland chronosequence. Null models were used to test whether functional and phylogenetic turnover differed from random expectations, given the levels of species diversity. 3. The three facets of diversity showed different patterns of change during succession. Between early and early-mid succession, species richness increased but there was no increase in functional or phylogenetic diversity. Higher than predicted levels of functional similarity between species within the early and early-mid successional stages, indicate that abiotic filters have selected for sets of functionally similar species within sites. Between late-mid and late succession, there was no further increase in species richness, but a significant increase in functional alpha diversity, suggesting that functionally redundant species were replaced by functionally more dissimilar species. Functional turnover between stages was higher than predicted, and higher than within-stage turnover, indicating that different assembly processes act at different successional stages. 4. Synthesis. Analysis of spatial and temporal turnover in different facets of diversity suggests that deterministic processes generate biodiversity during post-disturbance ecosystem development and that the relative importance of assembly processes has changed over time. Trait-mediated abiotic filtering appears to play an important role in community assembly during the early and early-mid stages of arable-to-grassland succession, whereas the relative importance of competitive exclusion appears to have increased towards the later successional stages. Phylogenetic diversity provided a poor reflection of functional diversity and did not contribute to inferences about underlying assembly processes. Functionally deterministic assembly suggests that it may be possible to predict future post-disturbance changes in biodiversity, and associated ecosystem attributes, on the basis of species’ functional traits but not phylogeny.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marten Winter's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Petr Pyšek

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Pergl

Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ingolf Kühn

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Holger Kreft

University of Göttingen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge