Martin Heck

Monomeric G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin in solution activates its G protein transducin at the diffusion limit

G protein-coupled receptors mediate biological signals by stimulating nucleotide exchange in heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαβγ). Receptor dimers have been proposed as the functional unit responsible for catalytic interaction with Gαβγ. To investigate whether a G protein-coupled receptor monomer can activate Gαβγ, we used the retinal photoreceptor rhodopsin and its cognate G protein transducin (Gt) to determine the stoichiometry of rhodopsin/Gt binding and the rate of catalyzed nucleotide exchange in Gt. Purified rhodopsin was prepared in dodecyl maltoside detergent solution. Rhodopsin was monomeric as concluded from fluorescence resonance energy transfer, copurification studies with fluorescent labeled and unlabeled rhodopsin, size exclusion chromatography, and multiangle laser light scattering. A 1:1 complex between light-activated rhodopsin and Gt was found in the elution profiles, and one molecule of GDP was released upon complex formation. Analysis of the speed of catalytic rhodopsin/Gt interaction yielded a maximum of ≈50 Gt molecules per second and molecule of activated rhodopsin. The bimolecular rate constant is close to the diffusion limit in the diluted system. The results show that the interaction of Gt with an activated rhodopsin monomer is sufficient for fully functional Gt activation. Although the activation rate in solution is at the physically possible limit, the rate in the native membrane is still 10-fold higher. This is likely attributable to the precise orientation of the G protein to the membrane surface, which enables a fast docking process preceding the actual activation step. Whether docking in membranes involves the formation of rhodopsin dimers or oligomers remains to be elucidated.

Distinct loops in arrestin differentially regulate ligand binding within the GPCR opsin

G-protein-coupled receptors are universally regulated by arrestin binding. Here we show that rod arrestin induces uptake of the agonist all-trans-retinol in only half the population of phosphorylated opsin in the native membrane. Agonist uptake blocks subsequent entry of the inverse agonist 11-cis-retinal (that is, regeneration of rhodopsin), but regeneration is not blocked in the other half of aporeceptors. Environmentally sensitive fluorophores attached to arrestin reported that conformational changes in loopV−VI (N-domain) are coupled to the entry of agonist, while loopXVIII−XIX (C-domain) engages the aporeceptor even before agonist is added. The data are most consistent with a model in which each domain of arrestin engages its own aporeceptor, and the different binding preferences of the domains lead to asymmetric ligand binding by the aporeceptors. Such a mechanism would protect the rod cell in bright light by concurrently sequestering toxic all-trans-retinol and allowing regeneration with 11-cis-retinal.

Arrestin-rhodopsin binding stoichiometry in isolated rod outer segment membranes depends on the percentage of activated receptors.

In the rod cell of the retina, arrestin is responsible for blocking signaling of the G-protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin. The general visual signal transduction model implies that arrestin must be able to interact with a single light-activated, phosphorylated rhodopsin molecule (Rho*P), as would be generated at physiologically relevant low light levels. However, the elongated bi-lobed structure of arrestin suggests that it might be able to accommodate two rhodopsin molecules. In this study, we directly addressed the question of binding stoichiometry by quantifying arrestin binding to Rho*P in isolated rod outer segment membranes. We manipulated the “photoactivation density,” i.e. the percentage of active receptors in the membrane, with the use of a light flash or by partially regenerating membranes containing phosphorylated opsin with 11-cis-retinal. Curiously, we found that the apparent arrestin-Rho*P binding stoichiometry was linearly dependent on the photoactivation density, with one-to-one binding at low photoactivation density and one-to-two binding at high photoactivation density. We also observed that, irrespective of the photoactivation density, a single arrestin molecule was able to stabilize the active metarhodopsin II conformation of only a single Rho*P. We hypothesize that, although arrestin requires at least a single Rho*P to bind the membrane, a single arrestin can actually interact with a pair of receptors. The ability of arrestin to interact with heterogeneous receptor pairs composed of two different photo-intermediate states would be well suited to the rod cell, which functions at low light intensity but is routinely exposed to several orders of magnitude more light.

Precision vs Flexibility in GPCR signaling

The G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) rhodopsin activates the heterotrimeric G protein transducin (Gt) to transmit the light signal into retinal rod cells. The rhodopsin activity is virtually zero in the dark and jumps by more than one billion fold after photon capture. Such perfect switching implies both high fidelity and speed of rhodopsin/Gt coupling. We employed Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and supporting all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to study the conformational diversity of rhodopsin in membrane environment and extend the static picture provided by the available crystal structures. The FTIR results show how the equilibria of inactive and active protein states of the receptor (so-called metarhodopsin states) are regulated by the highly conserved E(D)RY and Yx7K(R) motives. The MD data identify an intrinsically unstructured cytoplasmic loop region connecting transmembrane helices 5 and 6 (CL3) and show how each protein state is split into conformational substates. The C-termini of the Gtγ- and Gtα-subunits (GαCT and GγCT), prepared as synthetic peptides, are likely to bind sequentially and at different sites of the active receptor. The peptides have different effects on the receptor conformation. While GγCT stabilizes the active states but preserves CL3 flexibility, GαCT selectively stabilizes a single conformational substate with largely helical CL3, as it is found in crystal structures. Based on these results we propose a mechanism for the fast and precise signal transfer from rhodopsin to Gt, which assumes a stepwise and mutual reduction of their conformational space. The mechanism relies on conserved amino acids and may therefore underlie GPCR/G protein coupling in general.

Conserved Tyr2235.58 Plays Different Roles in the Activation and G-Protein Interaction of Rhodopsin

Rhodopsin, a seven transmembrane helix (TM) receptor, binds its ligand 11-cis-retinal via a protonated Schiff base. Coupling to the G-protein transducin (G(t)) occurs after light-induced cis/trans-retinal isomerization, which leads through photoproducts into a sequence of metarhodopsin (Meta) states: Meta I ⇌ Meta IIa ⇌ Meta IIb ⇌ Meta IIbH(+). The structural changes behind this three-step activation scheme are mediated by microswitch domains consisting of conserved amino acids. Here we focus on Tyr223(5.58) as part of the Y(5.58)X(7)K(R)(5.66) motif. Mutation to Ala, Phe, or Glu results in specific impairments of G(t)-activation measured by intrinsic G(t) fluorescence. UV-vis/FTIR spectroscopy of rhodopsin and its complex with a C-terminal G(t)α peptide allows the assignment of these deficiencies to specific steps in the activation path. Effects of mutation occur already in Meta I but do not directly influence deprotonation of the Schiff base during formation of Meta IIa. Absence of the whole phenol ring (Y223A) allows the activating motion of TM6 in Meta IIb but impairs the coupling to G(t). When only the hydroxyl group is lacking (Y223F), Meta IIb does not accumulate, but the activity toward G(t) remains substantial. From the FTIR features of Meta IIbH(+) we conclude that proton uptake to Glu134(3.49) is mandatory for Tyr223(5.58) to engage in the interaction with the key player Arg135(3.50) predicted by X-ray analysis. This polar interaction is partially recovered in Y223E, explaining its relatively high activity. Only the phenol side chain of tyrosine provides all characteristics for accumulation of the active state and G-protein activation.

Chemical composition of glass beads of the Merovingian period from graveyards in the Black Forest, Germany

White, orange, green and brown glass beads from womens burial places of the Merovingian period were scientifically characterized by x-ray fluorescence analysis, scanning electron microscopy, electron probe microanalysis and x-ray diffraction. In most cases non-destructive procedures were used. By this combination of methods the elemental composition and in some cases the chemical compounds were determined. The elements could be separated into main and minor components of the glass matrix and in those from the colouring compounds. The composition of the glass matrix was determined to be 18 ± 2% Na2O, 67 ± 3% SiO2 and 9 ± 2% CaO. A comparison with literature data showed the similarity of this composition to the composition of glassware of Roman production. Copyright

Light-induced protein-protein interactions on the rod photoreceptor disc membrane

Publisher Summary Membrane-bound protein-protein interactions are key processes in biological signal transduction. The biomembrane reduces the dimensionality of the interactions and provides a barrier for the soluble components involved. With the vertebrate rod outer segment, nature has provided a model system for the study of such interactions. It contains the relevant proteins in abundance, and is accessible to biophysical as well as biochemical techniques. The analysis is simpler than in most related systems, because the rod photoreceptive apparatus is specialized to just one purpose, the monochromatic detection of low light levels. Besides the high quantum yield of the receptor protein, the fidelity of signal transduction via protein-protein interactions is most important for the high sensitivity achieved. Absorption of light initiates a cascade of biochemical reactions in the rod outer segment that finally leads to the hydrolysis of intracellular cyclic GMP, hyperpolarization of the cell and synaptic signaling. Many biochemical reactions can be assigned to specific steps of the physiological signal transduction pathway. Interactions of the receptor protein, rhodopsin, of the G-protein, transducin, and of the effector, cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase, have been analyzed in detail. In this chapter, aspects of signal transduction and regulation are discussed with emphasis on the role of these membrane bound interactions.

Alkylated hydroxylamine derivatives eliminate peripheral retinylidene Schiff bases but cannot enter the retinal binding pocket of light-activated rhodopsin.

Besides Lys-296 in the binding pocket of opsin, all-trans-retinal forms adducts with peripheral lysine residues and phospholipids, thereby mimicking the spectral and chemical properties of metarhodopsin species. These pseudophotoproducts composed of nonspecific retinylidene Schiff bases have long plagued the investigation of rhodopsin deactivation and identification of decay products. We discovered that, while hydroxylamine can enter the retinal binding pocket of light-activated rhodopsin, the modified hydroxylamine compounds o-methylhydroxylamine (mHA), o-ethylhydroxylamine (eHA), o-tert-butylhydroxylamine (t-bHA), and o-(carboxymethyl)hydroxylamine (cmHA) are excluded. However, the alkylated hydroxylamines react quickly and efficiently with exposed retinylidene Schiff bases to form their respective retinal oximes. We further investigated how t-bHA affects light-activated rhodopsin and its interaction with binding partners. We found that both metarhodopsin II (Meta II) and Meta III are resistant to t-bHA, and neither arrestin nor transducin binding is affected by t-bHA. This discovery suggests that the hypothetical solvent channel that opens in light-activated rhodopsin is extremely stringent with regard to size and/or polarity. We believe that alkylated hydroxylamines will prove to be extremely useful reagents for the investigation of rhodopsin activation and decay mechanisms. Furthermore, the use of alkylated hydroxylamines should not be limited to in vitro studies and could help elucidate visual signal transduction mechanisms in the living cells of the retina.

Nondestructive characterization of nanoscale layered samples

Multilayered samples consisting of Al, Co and Ni nanolayers were produced by MBE and characterized nondestructively by means of SRXRF, μ-XRF, WDXRF, RBS, XRR, and destructively with SIMS. The main aims were to identify the elements, to determine their purity and their sequence, and also to examine the roughness, density, homogeneity and thickness of each layer. Most of these important properties could be determined by XRF methods, e.g., on commercial devices. For the thickness, it was found that all of the results obtained via XRR, RBS, SIMS and various XRF methods (SRXRF, μ-XRF, WDXRF) agreed with each other within the limits of uncertainty, and a constant deviation from the presets used in the MBE production method was observed. Some serious preliminary discrepancies in the results from the XRF methods were examined, but all deviations could be explained by introducing various corrections into the evaluation methods and/or redetermining some fundamental parameters.

Response to comment "Transient complexes between dark rhodopsin and transducin: circumstantial evidence or physiological necessity?" by D. Dell'Orco and K.-W. Koch.

In retinal rod cells, absorption of a photon by the visual GPCR rhodopsin (R) initiates a cascade of biochemical reactions that amplifies the light signal and eventually generates an electrical response. Despite a vast number of experimental and simulation studies, the precise spatiotemporal mechanism by which rod cell phototransduction occurs on the supramolecular level is still elusive. As yet, the simultaneous observation of structure and dynamics in intact rod cells goes beyond experimental capabilities.