Martin Mikoláš
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Martin Mikoláš.
Forest Ecology and Management | 2017
Pavel Janda; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Martin Mikoláš; Radek Bače; Thomas A. Nagel; Rupert Seidl; Meelis Seedre; Robert C. Morrissey; Stanislav Kucbel; Peter Jaloviar; Marián Jasík; Juraj Vysoký; Pavel Šamonil; Vojtěch Čada; Hana Mrhalová; Jana Lábusová; Markéta H. Nováková; Miloš Rydval; Lenka Matějů; Miroslav Svoboda
In order to gauge ongoing and future changes to disturbance regimes, it is necessary to establish a solid baseline of historic disturbance patterns against which to evaluate these changes. Further, understanding how forest structure and composition respond to variation in past disturbances may provide insight into future resilience to climate-driven alterations of disturbance regimes. We established 184 plots (mostly 1000 m2) in 14 primary mountain Norway spruce forests in the Western Carpathians. On each plot we surveyed live and dead trees and regeneration, and cored around 25 canopy trees. Disturbance history was reconstructed by examining individual tree growth trends. The study plots were further aggregated into five groups based on disturbance history (severity and timing) to evaluate and explain its influence on forest structure. These ecosystems are characterized by a mixed severity disturbance regime with high spatiotemporal variability in severity and frequency. However, periods of synchrony in disturbance activity were also found. Specifically, a peak of canopy disturbance was found for the mid-19th century across the region (about 60% of trees established), with the most important periods of disturbance in the 1820s and from the 1840s to the 1870s. Current stand size and age structure were strongly influenced by past disturbance activity. In contrast, past disturbances did not have a significant effect on current tree density, the amount of coarse woody debris, and regeneration. High mean densities of regeneration with height >50 cm (about 1400 individuals per ha) were observed. Extensive high severity disturbances have recently affected Central European forests, spurring a discussion about the causes and consequences. We found some evidence that forests in the Western Carpathians were predisposed to recent severe disturbance events as a result of synchronized past disturbance activity, which partly homogenized size and age structure and made recent stands more vulnerable to bark beetle outbreak. Our data suggest that these events are still part of the range of natural variability. The finding that regeneration density and volume of coarse woody debris were not influenced by past disturbance illustrates that vastly different past disturbance histories are not likely to change the future trajectories of these forests. These ecosystems currently have high ecological resilience to disturbance. In conclusion, we suggest that management should recognize disturbances as a natural part of ecosystem dynamics in the mountain forests of Central Europe, account for their stochastic occurrence in management planning, and mimic their patterns to foster biodiversity in forest landscapes.
The Holocene | 2018
Miloš Rydval; Daniel L. Druckenbrod; Miroslav Svoboda; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Pavel Janda; Martin Mikoláš; Vojtěch Čada; Radek Bače; Marius Teodosiu; Rob Wilson
Accurately capturing medium- to low-frequency trends in tree-ring data is vital to assessing climatic response and developing robust reconstructions of past climate. Non-climatic disturbance can affect growth trends in tree-ring-width (RW) series and bias climate information obtained from such records. It is important to develop suitable strategies to ensure the development of chronologies that minimize these medium- to low-frequency biases. By performing high density sampling (760 trees) over a ~40-ha natural high-elevation Norway spruce (Picea abies) stand in the Romanian Carpathians, this study assessed the suitability of several sampling strategies for developing chronologies with an optimal climate signal for dendroclimatic purposes. There was a roughly equal probability for chronologies (40 samples each) to express a reasonable (r = 0.3–0.5) to non-existent climate signal. While showing a strong high-frequency response, older/larger trees expressed the weakest overall temperature signal. Although random sampling yielded the most consistent climate signal in all sub-chronologies, the outcome was still sub-optimal. Alternative strategies to optimize the climate signal, including very high replication and principal components analysis, were also unable to minimize this disturbance bias and produce chronologies adequately representing climatic trends, indicating that larger scale disturbances can produce synchronous pervasive disturbance trends that affect a large part of a sampled population. The Curve Intervention Detection (CID) method, used to identify and reduce the influence of disturbance trends in the RW chronologies, considerably improved climate signal representation (from r = 0.28 before correction to r = 0.41 after correction for the full 760 sample chronology over 1909–2009) and represents a potentially important new approach for assessing disturbance impacts on RW chronologies. Blue intensity (BI) also shows promise as a climatically more sensitive variable which, unlike RW, does not appear significantly affected by disturbance. We recommend that studies utilizing RW chronologies to investigate medium- to long-term climatic trends also assess disturbance impact on those series.
Journal of Vegetation Science | 2014
Miroslav Svoboda; Pavel Janda; Radek Bače; Shawn Fraver; Thomas A. Nagel; Jan Rejzek; Martin Mikoláš; Jan Douda; Karel Boublík; Pavel Šamonil; Vojtěch Čada; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Marius Teodosiu; Olivier Bouriaud; Adrian I. Biriş; Ondřej Sýkora; Petr Uzel; Jiří Zelenka; Vít Sedlák; Jiří Lehejček
Forest Ecology and Management | 2014
Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Miroslav Svoboda; Pavel Janda; Martin Mikoláš; Radek Bače; Jan Rejzek; Pavel Šamonil; Oleh Chaskovskyy; Mykola Korol; Stepan Myklush
Forest Ecology and Management | 2015
Martin Mikoláš; Marek Svitok; Martin Tejkal; Pedro J. Leitão; Robert C. Morrissey; Miroslav Svoboda; Meelis Seedre; Joseph B. Fontaine
Forest Ecology and Management | 2017
Garrett W. Meigs; Robert C. Morrissey; Radek Bače; Oleh Chaskovskyy; Vojtěch Čada; Tiphaine Després; Daniel C. Donato; Pavel Janda; Jana Lábusová; Meelis Seedre; Martin Mikoláš; Thomas A. Nagel; Jonathan S. Schurman; Michal Synek; Marius Teodosiu; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Lucie Vítková; Miroslav Svoboda
Landscape Ecology | 2017
Martin Mikoláš; Martin Tejkal; Tobias Kuemmerle; Patrick Griffiths; Miroslav Svoboda; Tomáš Hlásny; Pedro J. Leitão; Robert C. Morrissey
Global Change Biology | 2018
Jonathan S. Schurman; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Radek Bače; Vojtěch Čada; Shawn Fraver; Pavel Janda; Dominik Kulakowski; Jana Lábusová; Martin Mikoláš; Thomas A. Nagel; Rupert Seidl; Michal Synek; Kristýna Svobodová; Oleh Chaskovskyy; Marius Teodosiu; Miroslav Svoboda
Biological Journal of The Linnean Society | 2015
Peter Klinga; Martin Mikoláš; Petar Zhelev; Jacob Höglund; Ladislav Paule
Forest Ecology and Management | 2016
Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Miroslav Svoboda; Pascale Weber; Neil Pederson; Stefan Klesse; Pavel Janda; Dario Martin-Benito; Martin Mikoláš; Meelis Seedre; Radek Bače; Lenka Mateju; David Frank