Martin T. Butterfield
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Martin T. Butterfield.
EPL | 2008
Tomasz Durakiewicz; Peter S. Riseborough; C. G. Olson; John J. Joyce; Peter M. Oppeneer; S. Elgazzar; Eric D. Bauer; John L. Sarrao; E. Guziewicz; David J. P. Moore; Martin T. Butterfield; Kevin S. Graham
Strong interactions in correlated electron systems may result in the formation of heavy quasiparticles that exhibit kinks in their dispersion relation. Spectral weight is incoherently shifted away from the Fermi energy, but Luttingers theorem requires the Fermi volume to remain constant. Our angle-resolved photoemission study of USb2 reveals a kink in a noncrossing 5f band, representing the first experimental observation of a kink structure in f-electron systems. The kink energy scale of 21 meV and the ultra-small peak width of 3 meV are observed. We propose the novel mechanism of renormalization of a point-like Fermi surface, and that Luttingers theorem remains applicable.
Philosophical Magazine | 2009
Xiaodong Yang; Peter S. Riseborough; Tomasz Durakiewicz; C. G. Olson; John J. Joyce; E. D. Bauer; J. L. Sarrao; David J. P. Moore; Kevin S. Graham; S. Elgazzar; Peter M. Oppeneer; E. Guziewicz; Martin T. Butterfield
Angle-resolved photoemission experiments have been performed on USb2, and very narrow quasiparticle peaks have been observed in a band, which local spin-density approximation (LSDA) predicts to osculate the Fermi energy. The observed band is found to be depressed by 17 meV below the Fermi energy. Furthermore, the inferred quasiparticle dispersion relation for this band exhibits a kink at an energy of about 23 meV below the Fermi energy. The kink is not found in LSDA calculations and, therefore, is attributable to a change in the quasiparticle mass renormalization by a factor of approximately 2. The existence of a kink in the quasiparticle dispersion relation of a band that does not cross the Fermi energy is unprecedented. The kink in the quasiparticle dispersion relation is attributed to the effect of the interband self-energy, involving transitions from the osculating band into a band that does cross the Fermi energy.
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2008
James Hawreliak; Martin T. Butterfield; Huw Davies; Bassem S. El-Dasher; Andrew Higginbotham; D. H. Kalantar; Giles Kimminau; J. M. McNaney; Despina Milathianaki; William L. Murphy; B. Nagler; Nigel Park; B. A. Remington; Lee Thorton; T. Whitcher; J. S. Wark; H. E. Lorenzana
Lattice level measurements of material response under extreme conditions are required to build a phenomenological understanding of the shock response of solids. We have successfully used laser produced plasma x‐ray sources coincident with laser driven shock waves to make in‐situ measurements of the lattice response during shock compression for both single crystal and polycrystalline materials. Using a detailed analysis of shocked single crystal iron which has undergone the α‐e phase transition we can constrain the transition mechanism to be consistent with a compression and shuffle of alternate lattice planes.
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2008
J. S. Wark; Andrew Higginbotham; Giles Kimminau; William J. Murphy; B. Nagler; T. Whitcher; James Hawreliak; Dan Kalantar; Martin T. Butterfield; Bassem S. El-Dasher; J. M. McNaney; Despina Milathianaki; H. E. Lorenzana; B. A. Remington; Huw Davies; Lee Thornton; Nigel Park; Stan Lukezic
In situ picosecond X‐ray diffraction has proved to be a useful tool in furthering our understanding of the response of shocked crystals at the lattice level. To date the vast majority of this work has used single crystals as the shocked samples, owing to their diffraction efficiency, although the study of the response of polycrystalline samples is clearly of interest for many applications. We present here the results of experiments to develop sub‐nanosecond powder/polycrystalline diffraction using a cylindrical pinhole camera. By allowing the incident X‐ray beam to impinge on the sample at non‐normal angles, the response of grains making a variety of angles to the shock propagation direction can potentially be interrogated.
MRS Proceedings | 2005
J. G. Tobin; K. T. Moore; B. W. Chung; Mark A. Wall; Adam J. Schwartz; Bartley B. Ebbinghaus; Martin T. Butterfield; N E Teslich; R A Bliss; S. A. Morton; S.-W. Yu; T Komesu; George Daniel Waddill; G der Laan; A L Kutepov
The standard method to determine the band structure of a condensed phase material is to (1) obtain a single crystal with a well defined surface and (2) map the bands with angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (occupied or valence bands) and inverse photoelectron spectroscopy (unoccupied or conduction bands). Unfortunately, in the case of Pu, the single crystals of Pu are either nonexistent, very small and/or having poorly defined surfaces. Furthermore, effects such as electron correlation and a large spin-orbit splitting in the 5f states have further complicated the situation. Thus, we have embarked upon the utilization of unorthodox electron spectroscopies, to circumvent the problems caused by the absence of large single crystals of Pu with well-defined surfaces. Our approach includes the techniques of resonant photoelectron spectroscopy [1], x-ray absorption spectroscopy [1,2,3,4], electron energy loss spectroscopy [2,3,4], Fano Effect measurements [5], and Bremstrahlung Isochromat Spectroscopy [6], including the utilization of micro-focused beams to probe single-crystallite regions of polycrystalline Pu samples. [2,3,6]
Physical Review B | 2008
Martin T. Butterfield; K. T. Moore; G. van der Laan; Mark A. Wall; Richard G. Haire
Physical Review B | 2006
E. Guziewicz; Tomasz Durakiewicz; Peter M. Oppeneer; John J. Joyce; Joe D. Thompson; C. G. Olson; Martin T. Butterfield; A. Wojakowski; David J. P. Moore; A. J. Arko
MRS Proceedings | 2005
John J. Joyce; J. M. Wills; Tomasz Durakiewicz; Martin T. Butterfield; E. Guziewicz; Kevin S. Graham; J. L. Sarrao; A. J. Arko; E. D. Bauer; David J. P. Moore; Luis A. Morales; Olle Eriksson
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2009
J. M. McNaney; Martin T. Butterfield; Bassem S. El-Dasher; Jan P. Hessler; H. E. Lorenzana; Soenke Seifert; Tony van Buuren
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2009
Tomasz Durakiewicz; Peter S. Riseborough; C. G. Olson; John J. Joyce; Peter M. Oppeneer; S. Elgazzar; Eric D. Bauer; John L. Sarrao; E. Guziewicz; David J. P. Moore; Martin T. Butterfield; Kevin S. Graham