Mary Jo Pilat

Phase I Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor Veliparib (ABT-888) in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Purpose: PARP is essential for recognition and repair of DNA damage. In preclinical models, PARP inhibitors modulate topoisomerase I inhibitor–mediated DNA damage. This phase I study determined the MTD, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of veliparib, an orally bioavailable PARP1/2 inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with 100 mg/m2 irinotecan on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Twice-daily oral dosing of veliparib (10–50 mg) occurred on days 3 to 14 (cycle 1) and days −1 to 14 (subsequent cycles) followed by a 6-day rest. PK studies were conducted with both agents alone and in combination. Paired tumor biopsies were obtained after irinotecan alone and veliparib/irinotecan to evaluate PARP1/2 inhibition and explore DNA damage signals (nuclear γ-H2AX and pNBS1). Results: Thirty-five patients were treated. DLTs included fatigue, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia. The MTD was 100 mg/m2 irinotecan (days 1 and 8) combined with veliparib 40 mg twice daily (days −1–14) on a 21-day cycle. Of 31 response-evaluable patients, there were six (19%) partial responses. Veliparib exhibited linear PK, and there were no apparent PK interactions between veliparib and irinotecan. At all dose levels, veliparib reduced tumor poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) content in the presence of irinotecan. Several samples showed increases in γ-H2AX and pNBS1 after veliparib/irinotecan compared with irinotecan alone. Conclusions: Veliparib can be safely combined with irinotecan at doses that inhibit PARP catalytic activity. Preliminary antitumor activity justifies further evaluation of the combination. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3227–37. ©2016 AACR.

Pilot Trial of Selecting Molecularly Guided Therapy for Patients with Non–V600 BRAF-Mutant Metastatic Melanoma: Experience of the SU2C/MRA Melanoma Dream Team

Targeted therapies and immunotherapies have led to significant improvements in the treatment of advanced cancers, including metastatic melanoma. However, new strategies are desperately needed to overcome therapeutic resistance to these agents, as well as to identify effective treatment approaches for cancer patients that fall outside major targetable mutational subtypes (e.g., non–V600 BRAF melanoma). One such strategy is to extend the paradigm of individually tailored, molecularly targeted therapy into a broader spectrum of melanoma patients, particularly those bearing tumors without commonly recognized therapeutic targets, as well as having failed or were ineligible for immunotherapy. In this nontreatment pilot study, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies were utilized, including whole genome and whole transcriptome sequencing, to identify molecular aberrations in patients with non–V600 BRAF metastatic melanoma. This information was then rationally matched to an appropriate clinical treatment from a defined pharmacopeia. Five patients with advanced non–V600 BRAF metastatic melanoma were enrolled. We demonstrated successful performance of the following during a clinically relevant time period: patient tumor biopsy, quality DNA/RNA extraction, DNA/RNA-based sequencing for gene expression analysis, analysis utilizing a series of data integration methodologies, report generation, and tumor board review with formulated treatment plan. Streamlining measures were conducted based on the experiences of enrolling, collecting specimens, and analyzing the molecular signatures of patients. We demonstrated the feasibility of using NGS to identify molecular aberrations and generate an individualized treatment plan in this patient population. A randomized treatment study utilizing lessons learned from the conduct of this pilot study is currently underway. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(8); 1962–71. ©2015 AACR.

A phase 2 study of vorinostat in locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma

Purpose Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi). Based on a confirmed partial response (PR) in an adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) patient treated with vorinostat in a prior phase 1 trial, we initiated this phase 2 trial. Methods: Vorinostat was administered orally 400 mg daily, 28 day cycles. The primary objective was to evaluate response rate (RR). Exploratory studies included whole exome sequencing (WES) of selected patients. Results Thirty patients were enrolled. Median age of patients was 53 years (range 21–73). Median number of cycles was 5 (range 1-66). Lymphopenia (n = 5), hypertension (n = 3), oral pain (n = 2), thromboembolic events (n = 2) and fatigue (n = 2) were the only grade 3 adverse events (AEs) that occurred in more than 1 patient. Eleven patients were dose reduced secondary to drug-related AEs. Two patients had a partial response (PR), with response durations of 53 and 7.2 months. One patient had a minor response with a decrease in ascites (for 19 cycles). Stable disease was the best response in 27 patients. Targeted and WES of 8 patients in this trial identified mutations in chromatin remodeling genes highlighting the role of the epigenome in ACC. Conclusion: Vorinostat demonstrated efficacy in patients with ACC supporting the inclusion of HDACi in future studies to treat ACC.

Abstract CT325: Combination of the PARP inhibitor veliparib (ABT888) with irinotecan in patients with triple negative breast cancer: Preliminary activity and signature of response

Background: The nuclear enzyme PARP is essential in recognition and repair of DNA damage. Preclinical evidence suggests that PARP inhibitors work as sensitizing agents for DNA-damaging agents such as irinotecan. Veliparib is an orally bioavailable PARP 1 and 2 inhibitor. This expansion to a phase I study, which demonstrated veliparib reduces PAR levels in tumor after irinotecan exposure, was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary anti-tumor activity of the combination of veliparib and irinotecan in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (pts), as well as to apply next generation sequencing technologies to define a signature of response. Methods: Pts were enrolled to two breast cancer cohorts: (1) TNBC, germline BRCA-mutant positive and (2) TNBC, non-BRCA mutated (wt). Eligibility included performance status 0-2; ≥ age 18; adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function. Cycles were 21 days. Irinotecan was given i.v. 100 mg/m2 over 90 min on Days 1 and 8. Twice daily (BID) oral dosing of 40 mg veliparib occurred Days 2-15 (Cycle 1) and Days 1-15 (subsequent cycles) followed by a 6-day rest. Tumor biopsies were collected at baseline, 4-6 hours after the first dose of irinotecan (day 1) and the combination (day 8) in cycle 1. Whole exome and transcriptome sequencing was performed using both normal and tumor tissue. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) were evaluated using the CellSearch platform. Results: 24 TNBC pts were enrolled, with 20 pts treated and evaluable for response (8 germline BRCA-mutation positive, 10 non-BRCA mutated, 2 suspected deleterious). Median age was 51 (range 31-63). Median number of prior treatments was 4 (range 1-7). Most frequent drug-related toxicities included: leukopenia (60%), neutropenia (60%), nausea (55%), diarrhea (40%), fatigue (40%), anemia (30%), and vomiting (30%). Best responses were as follows: Germline BRCA-mutant positive 7/8 PR (88%; median number of days on study = 330; range 148-594 days), 1/8 PD (12%); suspected deleterious 2/2 PD (100%); non-BRCA mutated 7/10 SD (70%; median number of days on study = 70; range 42-98 days), 3/10 PD (30%). Exploratory molecular profiling has been performed in a subset of these pts and the results will be presented. EpCAM+ CTC numbers were evaluable in 11 of 22 enrolled pts, and nuclear γH2Ax+, a pharmacodynamic biomarker of DNA damage, was identified in a fraction of CTCs from all 11 of these pts. Conclusions: Veliparib in combination with irinotecan was safe and tolerable in TNBC pts. Although the cohort in this trial is small, the preliminary response rate of 88% in pts with germline BRCA mutation is encouraging and higher than that historically reported with PARP inhibitor monotherapy in this population. Deep molecular profiling among BRCA mutant carriers will be validated in a larger, independent cohort to define potential biomarkers of response. Support: NCI U01-CA062487, NCI U01-CA062490, Komen KG120001, NCI R21-CA135572, and HHSN261200800001E. Citation Format: Patricia M. LoRusso, Sara M. Tolaney, Shukmei Wong, Ralph E. Parchment, Robert J. Kinders, Lihua Wang, Jessica Aldrich, Alice Chen, Diane Durecki, Scott A. Boerner, Tina Guthrie, Adam Bowditch, Lance K. Heilbrun, Mary Jo Pilat, David Craig, Dongpo Cai, Tracy Bell, John Carpten, Geoffrey Shapiro. Combination of the PARP inhibitor veliparib (ABT888) with irinotecan in patients with triple negative breast cancer: Preliminary activity and signature of response. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT325. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT325

Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor veliparib with irinotecan in patients with advanced tumors

Purpose: PARP is essential for recognition and repair of DNA damage. In preclinical models, PARP inhibitors modulate topoisomerase I inhibitor–mediated DNA damage. This phase I study determined the MTD, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of veliparib, an orally bioavailable PARP1/2 inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with 100 mg/m2 irinotecan on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Twice-daily oral dosing of veliparib (10–50 mg) occurred on days 3 to 14 (cycle 1) and days −1 to 14 (subsequent cycles) followed by a 6-day rest. PK studies were conducted with both agents alone and in combination. Paired tumor biopsies were obtained after irinotecan alone and veliparib/irinotecan to evaluate PARP1/2 inhibition and explore DNA damage signals (nuclear γ-H2AX and pNBS1). Results: Thirty-five patients were treated. DLTs included fatigue, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia. The MTD was 100 mg/m2 irinotecan (days 1 and 8) combined with veliparib 40 mg twice daily (days −1–14) on a 21-day cycle. Of 31 response-evaluable patients, there were six (19%) partial responses. Veliparib exhibited linear PK, and there were no apparent PK interactions between veliparib and irinotecan. At all dose levels, veliparib reduced tumor poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) content in the presence of irinotecan. Several samples showed increases in γ-H2AX and pNBS1 after veliparib/irinotecan compared with irinotecan alone. Conclusions: Veliparib can be safely combined with irinotecan at doses that inhibit PARP catalytic activity. Preliminary antitumor activity justifies further evaluation of the combination. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3227–37. ©2016 AACR.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetic Behavior of the Potent Oral Taxane BMS-275183

Purpose: BMS-275183 is a potent oral paclitaxel analogue that previously showed promising activity. The goal of the present trial was to investigate whether food affects the pharmacokinetics of BMS-275183. Additionally, we evaluated its pharmacokinetic variability using flat-fixed dosing compared with dosing individualized by body surface area (BSA). Patients and Methods: The patients were treated with 200 mg of BMS-275183 under fasting condition (A), after a standard low-fat meal (B), or after a high-fat meal (C). The patients were randomized to one of six treatment sequences (ABC, ACB, BAC, BCA, CAB, or CBA). The fourth (D) and consecutive weekly doses were normalized by BSA and consisted of 200 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic sampling was done up to 72 hours after the first four doses and analyzed with a validated liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry assay. Results: A total of 31 patients were treated. Pharmacokinetic data were available for 26 patients (A and C), 24 patients (B), and 21 patients (D). Compared with administration under fasted conditions, a decrease of 39% and 63% in the maximal observed drug concentration was observed when BMS-275183 was administered after a low-fat and a high-fat meal, respectively. There was no change in systemic exposure as measured by the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf). No apparent relationship was observed between AUCinf and BSA for either the 200 mg or the 200 mg/m2 regimen. BMS-275183 was well tolerated with grade 3 and 4 toxicity in eight patients. One partial response was observed in a non–small cell lung cancer patient. Conclusions: Food intake does not affect the pharmacologic exposure to BMS-275183. BMS-275183 can be given orally by flat dosing instead of BSA-normalized dosing.

Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor veliparib with irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose: PARP is essential for recognition and repair of DNA damage. In preclinical models, PARP inhibitors modulate topoisomerase I inhibitor–mediated DNA damage. This phase I study determined the MTD, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of veliparib, an orally bioavailable PARP1/2 inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with 100 mg/m2 irinotecan on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Twice-daily oral dosing of veliparib (10–50 mg) occurred on days 3 to 14 (cycle 1) and days −1 to 14 (subsequent cycles) followed by a 6-day rest. PK studies were conducted with both agents alone and in combination. Paired tumor biopsies were obtained after irinotecan alone and veliparib/irinotecan to evaluate PARP1/2 inhibition and explore DNA damage signals (nuclear γ-H2AX and pNBS1). Results: Thirty-five patients were treated. DLTs included fatigue, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia. The MTD was 100 mg/m2 irinotecan (days 1 and 8) combined with veliparib 40 mg twice daily (days −1–14) on a 21-day cycle. Of 31 response-evaluable patients, there were six (19%) partial responses. Veliparib exhibited linear PK, and there were no apparent PK interactions between veliparib and irinotecan. At all dose levels, veliparib reduced tumor poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) content in the presence of irinotecan. Several samples showed increases in γ-H2AX and pNBS1 after veliparib/irinotecan compared with irinotecan alone. Conclusions: Veliparib can be safely combined with irinotecan at doses that inhibit PARP catalytic activity. Preliminary antitumor activity justifies further evaluation of the combination. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3227–37. ©2016 AACR.

The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of BMS-275183, a novel oral taxane, in patients with advanced solid malignancies

2053 Background: BMS-275183 is a novel oral taxane with promising activity against NSCLC and other tumor types. The effect of food on absorption of BMS-275183 is not known. In this study, the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of BMS-275183 was assessed in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. The inter-patient PK variability after a fixed dose was also compared to that after a dose based on body surface area. Methods: Thirty-two patients were randomized to receive weekly 200 mg doses of BMS-275183 on each of three occasions: after a fast of 10 hours, 30 minutes after a standard low-fat meal, or 30 minutes after a standard high-fat meal. Patients were subsequently treated at the 200 mg/m2 Phase II dose on a continuous, weekly schedule under fasted conditions. Blood samples for BMS-275183 PK were collected predose and over 72 hours from the start of dosing on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22. BMS-275183 plasma concentrations were measured using a validated LC/MS/MS assay. Determ...