Mary M. Klote

Risk of angioedema with angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with prior angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUNDnPatients who have angioedema after taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) have been reported to develop angioedema when taking an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), but few studies quantify the risk.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo perform a systematic review of the literature.nnnMETHODSnA literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and Current Contents, with no limitations from January 1990 to May 2007. Any article that described a cohort of patients who had angioedema after taking an ACE-I, were subsequently exposed to an ARB, and were followed for a least 1 month were included. The percentage of patients who had angioedema was abstracted from each article, and confidence intervals were calculated using the exact binomial method. The pooled percentage was calculated with the inverse variance method.nnnRESULTSnTwo-hundred fifty-four unique articles were identified, and 3 articles met inclusion criteria, which described 71 patients with the outcome of interest. One was a randomized controlled trial and 2 were retrospective cohorts. These articles described both confirmed and possible cases of angioedema. The risk of angioedema was 9.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.6%-17%) for possible cases and 3.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.0%-9.2%) for confirmed cases. No fatal events were reported. No statistical heterogeneity was reported between trials (P > .3).nnnCONCLUSIONSnLimited evidence suggests that for patients who develop angioedema when taking an ACE-I, the risk of development of any subsequent angioedema when taking an ARB is between 2% and 17%; for confirmed angioedema, the risk is 0% to 9.2%. This information will aid clinicians in counseling patients regarding therapy options after development of angioedema due to ACE-Is.

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection Incidence in Hospitalized Renal Transplant Patients in the United States, 1998–2000

The incidence, risk factors, and prognosis for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection have not been reported in a national population of renal transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 15 870 Medicare patients who received renal transplants from January 1 1998 to July 31 2000. Cox regression analysis derived adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) for factors associated with a diagnosis of MTB infection (by Medicare Institutional Claims) and the association of MTB infection with survival. There were 66 renal transplant recipients diagnosed with tuberculosis infection after transplant (2.5 cases per 1000 person years at risk, with some falling off of cases over time). The most common diagnosis was pulmonary TB (41 cases). In Cox regression analysis, only systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was independently associated with TB. Mortality after TB was diagnosed was 23% at 1 year, which was significantly higher than in renal transplant recipients without TB (AHR, 4.13, 95% CI, 2.21, 7.71, p < 0.001). Although uncommon, MTB infection is associated with a substantially increased risk of mortality after renal transplantation. High‐risk groups, particularly those with SLE prior to transplant, might benefit from intensified screening.

Lack of Vaccinia Viremia after Smallpox Vaccination

Although the transmission of certain viral infections (human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B and C viruses, and West Nile virus) through donated blood products is well described, the risk of transmitting vaccinia virus after smallpox vaccination is unknown. Blood samples from patients receiving the smallpox vaccine were obtained before vaccination; then from one-half of the study group on alternate days for each of the first 10 days after vaccination; then from all patients on days 14 and 21 after vaccination. Samples were analyzed by culture, polymerase chain reaction, and antigen detection (electrochemiluminescence) assay for the presence of vaccinia virus. Two hundred and twenty samples from 28 volunteers were processed by all 3 laboratory detection methods and all were negative for the presence of vaccinia virus (confidence interval, 0%-12.3%). Viremia with vaccinia virus after smallpox vaccination appears to be an uncommon occurrence.

Absence of oropharyngeal vaccinia virus after vaccinia (smallpox) vaccination

BACKGROUNDnWith the resumption of the vaccinia (smallpox) vaccination, questions regarding transmission risk prompted this study to determine whether vaccinia virus could be detected in the oropharynx of adults recently vaccinated with vaccinia (smallpox) vaccine. German, Russian, and American studies on the oropharyngeal presence of vaccinia virus revealed conflicting results in different age groups.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo measure vaccinia viral particle or antigen presence in the oropharynx of adult health care workers after vaccination with vaccinia (smallpox) vaccine using viral culture and high-sensitivity assays (polymerase chain reaction [PCR] and electrochemiluminescence) and to determine whether there is an association between the presence of vaccinia virus and adverse reactions.nnnMETHODSnA total of 155 adults (primary vaccinees and revaccinees) were enrolled for 1 baseline and 5 subsequent throat swabs. The swabs were evaluated using viral culture, PCR, and electrochemiluminescence.nnnRESULTSnOf the 155 participants, 144 had more than 2 throat swabs in the 2 weeks after vaccination. Of the 801 specimens evaluated, there were no positive results by culture, PCR, or electrochemiluminescence except in the control samples (n = 6), which were positive by all 3 methods.nnnCONCLUSIONSnBased on the absence of detectable vaccinia virus in this study population, one can be 95% certain that the true rate of vaccinia virus in the oropharynx of adults during the 2 weeks after vaccination with vaccinia (smallpox) vaccine is 0% to 3.3%. These data should be reassuring to the medical community and support the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice guidelines that respiratory precautions are not necessary after vaccinia (smallpox) vaccination in healthy adults.

Implications of Venom Hypersensitivity for a Deploying Soldier

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is a life-saving medical treatment for individuals allergic to Hymenoptera species. Delivery of VIT is a complex process that requires proper extract preparation, shipping, storage, refrigeration, and administration by qualified medical personnel in a facility that can manage a life-threatening allergic emergency (anaphylaxis). Successful VIT requires 3 to 5 years of uninterrupted maintenance injections, which may be difficult to maintain during deployments, particularly in combat operations. The complexity of VIT has resulted in service members being deemed nondeployable and has led to interruption or discontinuation of VIT for deployed service members in the past. We report the case of a 34-year-old Army National Guard soldier who successfully received maintenance VIT while deployed to Operation Iraqi Freedom. This case demonstrates that, with proper coordination and appropriate risk assessment, continuation of complex medical care, such as VIT, can be supported in a combat zone.

Persistence of Vaccinia at the Site of Smallpox Vaccination

Persistence of vaccinia at vaccination sites may help determine the risk associated with secondary transmission. Culture, PCR, and antigen detection were performed on serial vaccination site swab specimens. On day 21 after vaccination, 37% of volunteers were culture positive, most of whom had received vaccine for the first time. Vaccinia is detectable at least through day 21 after vaccination.