Masahiro Takihata
Yokohama City University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Masahiro Takihata.
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism | 2013
Masahiro Takihata; Akinobu Nakamura; Kazuki Tajima; T. Inazumi; Y. Komatsu; H. Tamura; S. Yamazaki; Yoshinobu Kondo; Masayo Yamada; Masayo Kimura; Yasuo Terauchi
To compare the efficacy and safety of these two agents and the impact on surrogate markers related to diabetic complications in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients.
Obesity Research & Clinical Practice | 2014
Masahiro Takihata; Akinobu Nakamura; Kazutaka Aoki; Mari Kimura; Yusuke Sekino; Masahiko Inamori; Shin Maeda; Eiji Gotoh; Atsushi Nakajima; Yasuo Terauchi
This study compared the impacts of intragastric balloon (IGB) therapy and intensive lifestyle modification therapy on abdominal fat distribution. Sixteen extremely obese Japanese patients were assigned to an intensive lifestyle modification therapy group with educational hospitalisation (8 patients) or an IGB therapy group (8 patients) and were followed up for 6 months. The main outcome measures were the differences at 6 months, relative to the baseline values, in the visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA), and liver volume as measured using computed tomography. At 0 month, the body weights (BWs) were 121.3±19.0 kg and 127.1±24.4 kg and the VFAs were 299±55 cm2 and 257±56 cm2 in the intensive lifestyle modification therapy group and the IGB therapy group, respectively. No statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics were observed between these two groups. At 6 months, no difference in the changes in BW from the baseline value (-11.5 [-16.4, -6.6] kg vs. -11.2 [-18.9, -3.4] kg) was seen between the two groups. However, a statistically significant difference in the change in the VFA (-66 [-87, -44] cm2 vs. -22 [-70, 26]cm(2) [P=0.027]) was observed; no significant changes in the SFA or liver volume were seen. In conclusion, IGB therapy was as effective as intensive lifestyle modification therapy for weight reduction but was less effective with respect to the improvement in abdominal visceral fat accumulation and liver steatosis in super-obese Japanese patients.
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research | 2016
Kotaro Iemitsu; Takashi Iizuka; Masahiro Takihata; Masahiko Takai; Shigeru Nakajima; Nobuaki Minami; Shinichi Umezawa; Akira Kanamori; Hiroshi Takeda; Takehiro Kawata; Shogo Ito; Taisuke Kikuchi; Hikaru Amemiya; Mizuki Kaneshiro; Atsuko Mokubo; Tetsuro Takuma; Hideo Machimura; Keiji Tanaka; Taro Asakura; Akira Kubota; Sachio Aoyagi; Kazuhiko Hoshino; Masashi Ishikawa; Mitsuo Obana; Nobuo Sasai; Hideaki Kaneshige; Masaaki Miyakawa; Yasushi Tanaka; Yasuo Terauchi; Ikuro Matsuba
Background Ipragliflozin is a selective sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that blocks glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubules. SGLT2 inhibitors are expected to be effective in patients with insulin resistance and obesity, but it is important to select treatment according to patient background factors that minimizes the risk of adverse events. There have been a limited number of investigations into the relationship between the clinical efficacy (reducing hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body weight (BW)) or safety of SGLT2 inhibitors and patient characteristics. Methods ASSIGN-K is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective observational study examining the efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin (50 - 100 mg/day for 52 weeks) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had inadequate glycemic control with HbA1c ≥ 6.0% (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program) despite diet and exercise therapy or diet and exercise plus antidiabetic drug therapy. We conducted an interim analysis of the relationship between changes in HbA1c or BW and characteristics in patients who had been on treatment for more than 12 weeks. Results In 257 patients completing 12 weeks of treatment, HbA1c decreased significantly from 8.23% to 7.55% (-0.68%, P < 0.01). The change in HbA1c after 12 weeks was -0.17%, -0.33%, and -1.16% when baseline HbA1c was < 7%, 7% to < 8%, and ≥ 8%, respectively (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively), and -1.30%, -0.62%, and -0.62% when baseline body mass index (BMI) was < 25, 25 to < 30, and ≥ 30, respectively (all P < 0.01). Stratified analysis showed that age, gender, or BMI did not have a significant influence on the improvement in HbA1c. Multiple regression analysis showed that reduction in HbA1c was greater as baseline HbA1c increased and the duration of diabetes decreased. A higher baseline HbA1c was associated with less weight loss. Conclusions Ipragliflozin significantly improved HbA1c in patients with T2DM. HbA1c improved more when baseline HbA1c was higher and the duration of diabetes was shorter, suggesting that current treatment policies for diabetes could be re-examined.
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy | 2013
Kiyomi Masuda; Kazutaka Aoki; Kazunari Kamiko; Masahiro Takihata; Yuzuru Ito; Mieko Nagakura; Satsuki Kawasaki; Noriko Akema; Maki Hasegawa; Shigeru Nakajima; Kazuaki Shinoda; Shyoken Toumura; Seishi Tsunoda; Hitoshi Enomoto; Hidefumi Shimotomai; Yasuo Terauchi
Objective: We investigated the effect of addition of alogliptin, while continuing the α-glucosidase inhibitor (αGI) administration at the same or reduced dose, or discontinuing the drug, on the glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients showing inadequate response to αGI treatment. Research design and methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter interventional study trial. Subjects were randomly assigned to treatment with alogliptin alone (Intake 0 group), or alogliptin in addition to an αGI administered once-/twice-/thrice-daily (Intake 1, 2 and 3 groups). Main outcome measures: Changes in glycemic control were measured. Results: The HbA1c and glycoalbumin levels at 1 and 3 months were significantly lower than the values at the baseline in the Intake 1, 2 and 3 groups, but not the Intake 0 group. The body weight at 3 months was significantly lower than that at the baseline in the Intake 3 group. There were no significant differences in the degree of satisfaction or participating volition recorded, before and after the start of the study treatments. Conclusions: Addition of alogliptin to once-/twice-daily administration of an αGI may be effective for obtaining improved glycemic control, without lowering the treatment satisfaction level, in type 2 diabetic patients.
Endocrine Journal | 2016
Yumiko Komatsu; Akinobu Nakamura; Masahiro Takihata; Yuichiro Inoue; Satoko Yahagi; Kazuki Tajima; Hirohisa Tsuchiya; Tatsuro Takano; Tadashi Yamakawa; Masahiro Yoshida; Hideaki Miyoshi; Yasuo Terauchi
Diazoxide is a non-diuretic benzothiadiazine derivative, one of a group of substances introduced into clinical practice in the 1950s for the treatment of hypertension. Fajans reported the use of diazoxide for the treatment of insulinoma in 1979. Although patients with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia worldwide have been treated with diazoxide for more than 30 years, there are no recent reports about the adverse effects of this drug in Asian patients, including Japanese patients. Herein, we report the results of our retrospective clinical record review of 6 Japanese patients (3 females and 3 males, ranging in age from 58 to 91 years) with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia and inoperable insulinoma treated with diazoxide. Diazoxide improved control of hypoglycemic symptoms and maintained normoglycemia in 5 of the 6 patients, and was ineffective in one patient. Surprisingly, although all 6 patients received diazoxide according to the treatment strategy recommended in Western patients, 5 of the 6 patients developed edema and two developed congestive heart failure. Thus, when starting treatment with diazoxide in Japanese patients, the symptoms and signs of fluid retention should be evaluated carefully. Also, appropriate protocols for treatment with diazoxide should be evaluated by means of clinical trials in Japanese patients with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia.
PLOS ONE | 2015
Masahiro Takihata; Akinobu Nakamura; Yoshinobu Kondo; Satsuki Kawasaki; Mari Kimura; Yasuo Terauchi
Objective This study compared the efficacy and safety of azelnidipine with that of trichlormethiazide in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension. Methods In a multicenter, open-label trial, 240 patients with adequately controlled diabetes (HbA1c ≤ 7.0%) under lifestyle modification and/or administration of hypoglycemic agents and inadequately controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure [sBP] ≥ 130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [dBP] ≥ 80 mmHg) who were being treated with olmesartan were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to an azelnidipine group or a trichlormethiazide group and were followed up for 48 weeks. Main outcome measure was the difference in the change in HbA1c levels from the baseline values at 48 weeks between these two groups. Results Of the 240 subjects that were enrolled, 209 subjects (azelnidipine group: 103 patients, trichlormethiazide group: 106 patients) completed this trial. At 48 weeks, the following changes were observed in the azelnidipine and trichlormethiazide groups, respectively: HbA1c levels, 0.19 ± 0.52% and 0.19 ± 0.54%; sBP/dBP, -10.7 ± 9.6/-6.6 ± 6.6 mmHg and -7.1 ± 7.7/-3.3 ± 6.1 mmHg (P < 0.001 for both sBP and dBP). In both groups, dizziness (12 patients [11.7%] and 16 patients [15.1%]) and edema (16 patients [15.5%] and 7 patients [6.6%], P = 0.047) were observed during the 48-week follow-up period. Conclusions Azelnidipine was more effective for controlling blood pressure than trichlormethiazide in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients, whereas trichlormethiazide was more effective for reducing albuminuria than azelnidipine. Both of these agents, however, similarly exacerbated glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension. Trial Registration UMIN 000006081.
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research | 2018
Kazuo Kobayashi; Masao Toyoda; Moritsugu Kimura; Nobuo Hatori; Takayuki Furuki; Hiroyuki Sakai; Masahiro Takihata; Tomoya Umezono; Shun Ito; Daisuke Suzuki; Hiroshi Takeda; Akira Kanamori; Hisakazu Degawa; Hareaki Yamamoto; Hideo Machimura; Atsuko Mokubo; Keiichi Chin; Mitsuo Obana; Toshimasa Hishiki; Kouta Aoyama; Shinichi Nakajima; Shinichi Umezawa; Hidetoshi Shimura; Togo Aoyama; Kazuyoshi Sato; Masaaki Miyakawa
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the renal effects of the glucose-lowering SGLT2 inhibitors in Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with chronic kidney disease. Methods: The Kanagawa Physicians Association maintains a registry of patients who visit their 31 clinics. Clinical data of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with chronic kidney disease, who were prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors in addition to other treatments, were collected and analysed. Results: SGLT2i was associated with a fall in HbA1c from 64.1 ± 16.7 mmol/mol (8.0 ± 1.5%) to 56.5 ± 12.9 mmol/mol (7.3 ± 1.2%) (p < 0.01) in 869 analysed cases, a decrease in urine albumin-creatinine ratio from a median of 47.1 to 41.1 mg/gCr, and decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate from 77.7 ± 23.9 to 75.0 ± 23.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.01). The effect on albumin-creatinine ratio was independent of age or stage of estimated glomerular filtration; however, there was a significant negative correlation between albumin-creatinine ratio at the initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor and change in ACR. Multiple linear regression analysis identified use of empagliflozin, β-blockers, and sulphonylureas, Δsystolic blood pressure at office, serum Cr and albumin-creatinine ratio value at initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor as independent and significant determinants of change in ACR. Conclusions: This study confirmed that the beneficial renal effects of SGLT2 inhibitor in Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with chronic kidney disease, similar to those reported in large-scale clinical trials conducted in Western countries.
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research | 2016
Takashi Iizuka; Kotaro Iemitsu; Masahiro Takihata; Masahiko Takai; Shigeru Nakajima; Nobuaki Minami; Shinichi Umezawa; Akira Kanamori; Hiroshi Takeda; Takehiro Kawata; Shogo Ito; Taisuke Kikuchi; Hikaru Amemiya; Mizuki Kaneshiro; Atsuko Mokubo; Tetsuo Takuma; Hideo Machimura; Keiji Tanaka; Taro Asakura; Akira Kubota; Sachio Aoyagi; Kazuhiko Hoshino; Masashi Ishikawa; Yoko Matsuzawa; Mitsuo Obana; Nobuo Sasai; Hideaki Kaneshige; Fuyuki Minagawa; Tatsuya Saito; Kazuaki Shinoda
Internal Medicine | 2011
Yusuke Sekino; Kento Imajo; Eiji Sakai; Takashi Uchiyama; Hiroshi Iida; Hiroki Endo; Kunihiro Hosono; Yasunari Sakamoto; Koji Fujita; Masato Yoneda; Hirokazu Takahashi; Tomoko Koide; Chikako Tokoro; Yasunobu Abe; Satoru Saito; Shin Maeda; Eiji Gotoh; Masahiro Takihata; Yasuo Terauchi; Atsushi Nakajima; Masahiko Inamori
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research | 2017
Takehiro Kawata; Takashi Iizuka; Kotaro Iemitsu; Masahiro Takihata; Masahiko Takai; Shigeru Nakajima; Nobuaki Minami; Shinichi Umezawa; Akira Kanamori; Hiroshi Takeda; Shogo Ito; Taisuke Kikuchi; Hikaru Amemiya; Mizuki Kaneshiro; Atsuko Mokubo; Tetsuo Takuma; Hideo Machimura; Keiji Tanaka; Taro Asakura; Akira Kubota; Sachio Aoyanagi; Kazuhiko Hoshino; Masashi Ishikawa; Yoko Matsuzawa; Mitsuo Obana; Nobuo Sasai; Hideaki Kaneshige; Fuyuki Minagawa; Tatsuya Saito; Kazuaki Shinoda