Masashi Hirakawa

Intraoperative assessment of midflexion laxity in total knee prosthesis

BACKGROUND Soft-tissue balancing of the knee is fundamental to the success of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In posterior-stabilized TKA, there is no stabilizer of the anterior-posterior translation in the midflexion range in which the cam-post mechanism does not engage yet. Therefore, instability in the midflexion range is suspected to occur in posterior-stabilized TKA. The purpose of this study was to measure the joint gap throughout a full range of motion and to analyze the joint gap laxity in the midflexion range after implantation of a mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis. METHODS Joint gap kinematics in 259 knees with varus osteoarthritis were measured during TKAs using a tensor device with the same shape of a total knee prosthesis of the same design was used. After the implantation of a mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized prosthesis and the reduction of the patellofemoral joint, the joint gap was measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 145° of flexion. RESULTS The center size of the joint gap was tight in extension and deep flexion and loose at midflexion ranges, especially at 30° of flexion (p<0.001). The symmetry of the joint gap was varus at 0° and 145° of flexion (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed the joint gap laxity in the midflexion range after the implantation of a mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized prosthesis. Our new tensor device, which can attach the polyethylene insert trial, will provide the important information about the joint gap kinematics after implantation of total knee prostheses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.

Midflexion Laxity After Implantation Was Influenced by the Joint Gap Balance Before Implantation in TKA

The relationship between the joint gap before and after implantation in 259 knees during the total knee arthroplasty was investigated using a tensor device which can attach the polyethylene insert trial. Patients were divided into following 3 groups according to the joint gap balance before implantation (flexion joint gap--extension joint gap); group 1: >1mm; group 2: -1 to 1mm, and group 3: <-1mm. Joint gap after implantation was loose at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion in group 1 and 2, but loose only at 30° of flexion in group 3 (p<0.01). This study showed that loose flexion joint gap before implantation increased the risk of joint gap laxity after implantation especially at midflexion ranges.