Mate Toth

Early social deprivation induces disturbed social communication and violent aggression in adulthood.

Disturbed social relations during childhood (e.g., social neglect) often lead to aggression-related psychopathologies in adulthood. Social isolation also increased aggressiveness in laboratory animals. Here the authors show in rats, that social isolation from weaning not only increases the level of aggressiveness, but results in abnormal attack patterns and deficits in social communication. In socially deprived rats, the share of attacks aimed at vulnerable body parts of opponents (head, throat, and belly) dramatically increased and the attack/threat ratio was shifted toward attacks, suggesting a decrease in intention signaling. Moreover, a Multiple Regression Analysis showed that the nonassociation of attacks with offensive threats predicted the occurrence of vulnerable attacks with 81.1% accuracy. The authors suggest that the social deprivation-induced abnormal aggression models the aggression-related problems resulting from early social neglect in humans, and studies on its brain mechanisms may increase our understanding of the mechanisms underlying psychopathologies resulting from early social problems.

The activation of prefrontal cortical neurons in aggression : A double labeling study

Violence is associated with prefrontal deficits in humans, suggesting that this brain area inhibits aggressiveness. Its role, however, remains controversial, as certain subdivisions of the prefrontal cortex become activated by fights in rodents. Disparate human findings also show that this area is acutely activated by aggression under certain conditions. We explored prefrontal neuronal activation patterns in resident rats exposed to psychosocial (sensory contact with the intruder) and aggressive encounters. Both psychosocial and aggressive encounters increased c-Fos activation in the prelimbic (PrL), anterior cingular (Cg1), agranular insular (AI), ventral (VO) and lateral orbital (LO) cortices. The infralimbic (IL) and medial orbital (MO) cortices were activated significantly by aggressive encounters only. No other prefrontal regions were activated by psychosocial or aggressive encounters. The overwhelming majority of activated cells were pyramidal (glutamatergic) cells in the Cg1, IL, PrL, MO, and VO, whereas interneuron and pyramidal cell activation was similar in AI and LO. When rats showed violent aggression, the activation of GABAergic inhibitory cells decreased in these two, and two other areas (IL and MO). Notably, the latter two areas appeared to be specifically involved in aggressive behavior. The change occurred in a recently developed model of violent aggression. In this model, pyramidal cell activation in the above mentioned four areas (IL, MO, AI, and LO) predicted over 95% of variation in attack counts in general and violent attacks in particular. Based on these data, we present a tentative hypothesis on the involvement of the prefrontal cortex in the control of aggression.

The neural background of hyper-emotional aggression induced by post-weaning social isolation.

Post-weaning social isolation in rats is believed to model symptoms of early social neglect-induced externalizing problems including aggression-related problems. We showed earlier that rats reared in social isolation were hyper-aroused during aggressive contacts, delivered substantially more attacks that were poorly signaled and were preferentially aimed at vulnerable body parts of opponents (head, throat and belly). Here we studied the neural background of this type of aggression by assessing the expression of the activation marker c-Fos in 22 brain areas of male Wistar rats submitted to resident-intruder conflicts. Post-weaning social isolation readily produced the behavioral alterations noticed earlier. Social isolation significantly increased the activation of brain areas that are known to directly or indirectly control inter-male aggression. Particularly, the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortices, anterior cingulate cortex, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, medial and basolateral amygdala, hypothalamic attack area, hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and locus coeruleus showed increased activations. This contrasts our earlier findings obtained in rats with experimentally induced hypoarousal, where abnormal attack patterns were associated with over-activated central amygdala, lateral hypothalamus, and ventrolateral periaqueductal gray that are believed to control predatory attacks. We have observed no similar activation patterns in rats socially isolated from weaning. In summary, these findings suggest that despite some phenotypic similarities, the neuronal background of hypo and hyperarousal-associated abnormal forms of aggression are markedly different. While the neuronal activation patterns induced by normal rivalry and hypoarousal-driven aggression are qualitative different, hyperarousal-associated aggression appears to be an exaggerated form of rivalry aggression.

Brain mechanisms involved in predatory aggression are activated in a laboratory model of violent intra-specific aggression

Callous‐unemotional violence associated with antisocial personality disorder is often called ‘predatory’ because it involves restricted intention signaling and low emotional/physiological arousal, including decreased glucocorticoid production. This epithet may be a mere metaphor, but may also cover a structural similarity at the level of the hypothalamus where the control of affective and predatory aggression diverges. We investigated this hypothesis in a laboratory model where glucocorticoid production is chronically limited by adrenalectomy with glucocorticoid replacement (ADXr). This procedure was proposed to model important aspects of antisocial violence. Sham and ADXr rats were submitted to resident/intruder conflicts, and the resulting neuronal activation patterns were investigated by c‐Fos immunocytochemistry. In line with earlier findings, the share of attacks aimed at vulnerable targets (head, throat and belly) was dramatically increased by ADXr, while intention signaling by offensive threats was restricted. Aggressive encounters activated the mediobasal hypothalamus, a region involved in intra‐specific aggression, but sham and ADXr rats did not differ in this respect. In contrast, the activation of the lateral hypothalamus that is tightly involved in predatory aggression was markedly larger in ADXr rats; moreover, c‐Fos counts correlated positively with the share of vulnerable attacks and negatively with social signaling. Glucocorticoid deficiency increased c‐Fos activation in the central amygdala, a region also involved in predatory aggression. In addition, activation patterns in the periaqueductal gray – involved in autonomic control – also resembled those seen in predatory aggression. These findings suggest that antisocial and predatory aggression are not only similar but are controlled by overlapping neural mechanisms.

Lasting changes in social behavior and amygdala function following traumatic experience induced by a single series of foot-shocks

Neuronal plasticity within the amygdala mediates many behavioral effects of traumatic experience, and this brain region also controls various aspects of social behavior. However, the specific involvement of the amygdala in trauma-induced social deficits has never been systematically investigated. We exposed rats to a single series of electric foot-shocks--a frequently used model of trauma--and studied their behavior in the social avoidance and psychosocial stimulation tests (non-contact versions of the social interaction test) at different time intervals. Social interaction-induced neuronal activation patterns were studied in the prefrontal cortex (orbitofrontal and medial), amygdala (central, medial, and basolateral), dorsal raphe and locus coeruleus. Shock exposure markedly inhibited social behavior in both tests. The effect lasted at least 4 weeks, and amplified over time. As shown by c-Fos immunocytochemistry, social interactions activated all the investigated brain areas. Traumatic experience exacerbated this activation in the central and basolateral amygdala, but not in other regions. The tight correlation between the social deficit and amygdala activation patterns suggest that the two phenomena were associated. A real-time PCR study showed that CRF mRNA expression in the amygdala was temporarily reduced 14, but not 1 and 28 days after shock exposure. In contrast, amygdalar NK1 receptor mRNA expression increased throughout. Thus, the trauma-induced social deficits appear to be associated with, and possibly caused by, plastic changes in fear-related amygdala subdivisions.

The activation of raphe serotonergic neurons in normal and hypoarousal-driven aggression: A double labeling study in rats

The serotonergic system is well known for its aggression lowering effects. It has been shown repeatedly, however, that the serotonergic system is activated during fights, and recent data suggested that it is necessary for the expression of aggressive behavior. We investigated the interaction between serotonergic activation and aggressive behavior by assessing the co-localization of the c-Fos signal (marker of neuronal activation) with tryptophan-hydroxylase activity (marker of serotonin secretion) in the raphe. Control rats were compared with rats exposed to visual and olfactory (but not physical) contacts with opponents (psychosocial stimulation) as well as with rats exposed to aggressive encounters. Fights were accompanied by the activation of the raphe; however, the effect was not aggression-specific, as a similar activation was induced by psychosocial contacts. The lack of behavioral specificity in activation suggests that it was related to social arousal rather than to the execution of fights. The activation of serotonergic raphe neurons showed a negative correlation with aggressive behavior, which is in line with the widespread view that serotonin neurotransmission downregulates aggressive behavior. The activation of serotonergic neurons did not show a correlation with measures of hypoarousal-driven abnormal aggression, which indicates that factors other than the raphe control this behavior. The latter finding may explain the low efficacy of serotonergic treatments in conduct and antisocial personality disorders, in which violence correlates with hypoarousal.

Effects of resocialization on post-weaning social isolation-induced abnormal aggression and social deficits in rats

As previously shown, rats isolated from weaning develop abnormal social and aggressive behavior characterized by biting attacks targeting vulnerable body parts of opponents, reduced attack signaling, and increased defensive behavior despite increased attack counts. Here we studied whether this form of violent aggression could be reversed by resocialization in adulthood. During the first weak of resocialization, isolation-reared rats showed multiple social deficits including increased defensiveness and decreased huddling during sleep. Deficits were markedly attenuated in the second and third weeks. Despite improved social functioning in groups, isolated rats readily showed abnormal features of aggression in a resident-intruder test performed after the 3-week-long resocialization. Thus, post-weaning social isolation-induced deficits in prosocial behavior were eliminated by resocialization during adulthood, but abnormal aggression was resilient to this treatment. Findings are compared to those obtained in humans who suffered early social maltreatment, and who also show social deficits and dysfunctional aggression in adulthood.

The Effect of Neurokinin1 Receptor Blockade on Territorial Aggression and in a Model of Violent Aggression

BACKGROUND Neurokinin1 (NK1) receptor blockers were recently proposed for the treatment of anxiety and depression. Disparate data suggest that NK1 receptors are also involved in the control of aggressiveness, but their role is poorly known. METHODS We evaluated the aggression-induced activation of NK1 neurons by double-labeling brain sections for NK1 receptors and c-Fos in two laboratory models of aggression. We also studied the effects of the NK1 antagonist L-703,606 in these models. RESULTS Aggressive encounters activated a large number of NK1 receptor-expressing neurons in areas relevant for aggression control. The activation was aggression-specific, because the effects of psychosocial encounters (that allowed sensory but not physical contacts) were markedly weaker. In the medial amygdala, the activation of neurons expressing NK1 receptors showed a marked positive correlation with the occurrence of violent attacks. In resident/intruder conflicts, NK1 blockade lowered the number of hard bites, without affecting milder forms of attack. In the model of violent aggression, attacks on vulnerable body parts of opponents (the main indicators of violence in this model) were decreased to the levels seen in control subjects. Autonomic deficits seen in the model of violent aggression were also ameliorated. The effects of the compound were not secondary to changes in locomotion or in the behavior of intruders. CONCLUSIONS Our data show that neurons expressing NK1 receptors are involved in the control of aggressiveness, especially in the expression of violent attacks. This suggests that NK1 antagonists-beyond anxiety and depression-might also be useful in the treatment of aggressiveness and violence.

Substance P neurotransmission and violent aggression: The role of tachykinin NK1 receptors in the hypothalamic attack area

Substance P and its tachykinin NK(1) receptors are highly expressed in brain regions involved in emotional control. We recently showed that NK(1)-mediated substance P neurotransmission is deeply involved in the control of aggressiveness. To get further insights into the NK(1) receptor/aggression relationship, we studied the role of NK(1) receptor-expressing neurons of the hypothalamic attack area, the only brain region in rats from which biting attacks can reliably be elicited by both electrical and neurochemical stimulation. We show here that the hypothalamic attack area preferentially expresses the NK(1) type of tachykinin receptors. When such neurons were lesioned by substance P-conjugated saporin (SP-sap) infused into the hypothalamic attack area, violent attacks were dramatically reduced, whereas milder forms of aggression (soft bites and offensive threats) remained unaltered. The lesions were neuron type-specific as SP-sap lesions markedly reduced NK(1) staining without significantly affecting total cell counts. NK(1) staining in the neighboring lateral hypothalamus was not affected, which confirms the spatial specificity of the lesion. Surprisingly, the lesions also reduced anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus-maze. This effect is likely explained by the extensive connections of the hypothalamic attack area with brain regions involved in the control of anxiety. The present findings suggest that violent and milder forms of attack are differentially controlled. NK(1) receptor-expressing neurons of the hypothalamic attack area are tightly and specifically involved in the former but not in the latter. Our data also raise the possibility of a coordinated control of violent attacks and anxiety by the same NK(1)-expressing neurons.

NR2B subunit-specific NMDA antagonist Ro25-6981 inhibits the expression of conditioned fear: a comparison with the NMDA antagonist MK-801 and fluoxetine.

N-methyl-D-asparate (NMDA)-mediated glutamatergic neurotransmission is strongly involved in the development of trauma-induced behavioral dysfunctions, and indirect evidence suggests that NR2B subunit-expressing NMDA receptors are primarily involved in this process. Earlier studies showed that NR2B blockers inhibit the acquisition of conditioned fear, a frequently used model of post-traumatic stress disorder, but their effects on the expression of conditioned fear was poorly studied. We investigated here the effects of the selective serotonin reuptake blocker, fluoxetine, the NMDA blocker, MK-801, and the NR2B subunit blocker, Ro25-6981 on the expression of conditioned fear. Rats received 10 foot shocks administered over 5 min and were tested 24 h later in the shocking context. Treatments were administered 1 h before testing. Shocks dramatically increased freezing and reduced exploration. MK-801 and Ro25-6981 significantly ameliorated both changes. The effects of fluoxetine were less pronounced. In the open field, MK-801 increased locomotion, ataxia, and stereotypy (effects typical of NMDA blockade). Neither fluoxetine nor Ro25-6981 affected locomotion in the open field. Thus, the NR2B-specific NMDA blockade preserved the beneficial effects of general NMDA antagonists on the expression of conditioned fear but did not produce the locomotor side-effects typical of the latter. These findings warrant further studies on the effects of NR2B antagonists in models of post-traumatic stress disorder.