Mathias Scholz
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mathias Scholz.
Ecology | 2008
Christiane Ilg; Frank Dziock; Francis Foeckler; Klaus Follner; Michael Gerisch; Judith Glaeser; Anke Rink; Arno Schanowski; Mathias Scholz; Oskar Deichner; Klaus Henle
Extreme summertime flood events are expected to become more frequent in European rivers due to climate change. In temperate areas, where winter floods are common, extreme floods occurring in summer, a period of high physiological activity, may seriously impact floodplain ecosystems. Here we report on the effects of the 2002 extreme summer flood on flora and fauna of the riverine grasslands of the Middle Elbe (Germany), comparing pre- and post-flooding data collected by identical methods. Plants, mollusks, and carabid beetles differed considerably in their response in terms of abundance and diversity. Plants and mollusks, displaying morphological and behavioral adaptations to flooding, showed higher survival rates than the carabid beetles, the adaptation strategies of which were mainly linked to life history. Our results illustrate the complexity of responses of floodplain organisms to extreme flood events. They demonstrate that the efficiency of resistance and resilience strategies is widely dependent on the mode of adaptation.
International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services & Management | 2012
Sven Lautenbach; Joachim Maes; Mira Kattwinkel; Ralf Seppelt; Michael Strauch; Mathias Scholz; Christiane Schulz-Zunkel; Martin Volk; Jens Weinert; Carsten F. Dormann
One of the challenges of using the ecosystem service (ES) framework in the context of planning and decision support is the question of how to map these services in an appropriate way. For water quality-related ESs, this implies a movement from the display of classical water quality indicators towards the mapping of the service itself. We explore the potential of mapping such water quality-related ESs based on three case studies focusing on different aspects of these services: (1) a European case study on pesticides, (2) a multi-scale German case study on nitrogen retention and (3) a more local case study on nitrogen retention in the Elbe floodplain (Lödderitzer Forst). All these studies show a high spatial variation of the results that can be depicted in maps of ES supply. This allows an identification of areas in which nitrogen retention is highest or which areas face the highest ecological risk due to pesticides. The multi-scale case study shows how the level of detail of the results varies with model resolution – a hierarchical approach to environmental and river basin management seems useful, because it allows the planners to determine scale-specific environmental problems and implement specific measures for the different planning levels.
Hydrobiologia | 2016
Andrea Rumm; Francis Foeckler; Oskar Deichner; Mathias Scholz; Michael Gerisch
Dyke openings are regarded as suitable measures for restoring biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in degraded floodplains. Nevertheless, only few studies evaluate the effects and success of such measures on biodiversity. The present work analyses the influence of one of the first dyke-slotting projects carried out along the Middle Elbe River (Germany) on floodplain mollusc assemblages. By applying a before-after-reference-control-impact-monitoring design, we specifically tested how species diversity and composition responded to the restoration measure. Floodplain reconnection led to a considerable increase in mollusc diversity. However, the overall community turnover was rather small only present among species with high soil humidity preferences. They mainly profited from the frequent floodings shifting species composition to be more hygrophilous and floodplain characteristic. Moderately hygrophilous and desiccation tolerant species were almost not affected by the dyke-slotting. Presumably, this can be explained by the already similar species composition of the active reference and the reactivated floodplain due to a high seepage water influence. So far, this indicates a successfully initiated recovery process. All in all, our results emphasize the crucial need of long-term monitoring to reveal the full ecological effects of restoration measures and the consideration of diversity-, community-, and species-level responses to evaluate restoration success.
Klimaanpassung in Forschung und Politik | 2017
Bernd Hansjürgens; Christoph Schröter-Schlaack; Augustin Berghöfer; Aletta Bonn; Alexandra Dehnhardt; Jochen Kantelhardt; Horst Liebersbach; Bettina Matzdorf; Bernhard Osterburg; Irene Ring; Norbert Röder; Mathias Scholz; Daniela Thrän; Lena Schaller; Felix Witing; Henry Wüstemann
Die Leistungen der Natur konnen zur Losung des Klimaproblems beitragen, indem sie gezielt fur den Klimaschutz und die Anpassung an den Klimawandel genutzt werden. Hierdurch lassen sich einerseits kostengunstiger Klimaschutz und andererseits Synergien zwischen Klimapolitik und Naturschutz- und Biodiversitatspolitik erzielen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden zunachst die Wirkungen der deutschen Energie- und Klimapolitik auf die Biodiversitat und die Okosysteme in Deutschland aufgezeigt. Im Anschluss daran erfolgt eine Untersuchung der Okosystemleistungen naturnaher Landnutzungen fur Klimaschutz und Klimaanpassung. Es zeigt sich, dass im Agrarsektor erhebliche Minderungspotenziale fur Klimaschutz vor allem durch den verringerten Ausstos von Lachgas sowie die Erhaltung von Grunland bestehen. Moore und andere kohlenstoffreiche Boden konnen durch Erhaltung und Wiederherstellung als Kohlenstoffsenken dienen. Auenflachen leisten insbesondere einen Beitrag zum Hochwasserschutz und damit zur Anpassung an den Klimawandel. Die Klimawirkungen in den einzelnen Bereichen werden okonomisch bewertet und Handlungsempfehlungen fur eine okosystembasierte Klimapolitik formuliert.
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy | 2011
Joachim Maes; Leon Braat; Kurt Jax; Mike Hutchins; Eeva Furman; Mette Termansen; Sandra Luque; Maria Luisa Paracchini; C. Chauvin; Richard J. Williams; Martin Volk; Sven Lautenbach; Leena Kopperoinen; M. Schelhaas; J. Weinert; C.M. Goossen; Egon Dumont; Michael Strauch; Christoph Görg; Carsten F. Dormann; M. Katwinkel; Grazia Zulian; Riku Varjopuro; Outi Ratamäki; Jennifer Hauck; Martin Forsius; G.M. Hengeveld; Marta Pérez-Soba; F. Bouraoui; Mathias Scholz
International Review of Hydrobiology | 2006
Frank Dziock; Klaus Henle; Francis Foeckler; Klaus Follner; Mathias Scholz
Diversity and Distributions | 2014
Danijela Markovic; Savrina F. Carrizo; Jörg Freyhof; Núria Cid; Szabolcs Lengyel; Mathias Scholz; Hans Kasperdius; William Darwall
International Review of Hydrobiology | 2006
Klaus Henle; Frank Dziock; Francis Foeckler; Klaus Volker; Volker Hüsing; Anke Hettrich; Marcus Rink; Sabine Stab; Mathias Scholz
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | 2011
Frank Dziock; Michael Gerisch; Marian Siegert; Isabel Hering; Mathias Scholz; Raffael Ernst
River Systems | 2003
M. Scholten; A. Anlauf; B. Büchele; P. Faulhaber; Klaus Henle; S. Kofalk; Ilona Leyer; Jürgen Meyerhoff; J. Purps; G. Rast; Mathias Scholz