Matthew Auton

Anatomy of energetic changes accompanying urea-induced protein denaturation

Because of its protein-denaturing ability, urea has played a pivotal role in the experimental and conceptual understanding of protein folding and unfolding. The measure of ureas ability to force a protein to unfold is given by the m value, an experimental quantity giving the free energy change for unfolding per molar urea. With the aid of Tanfords transfer model [Tanford C (1964) J Am Chem Soc 86:2050–2059], we use newly obtained group transfer free energies (GTFEs) of protein side-chain and backbone units from water to 1 M urea to account for the m value of urea, and the method reveals the anatomy of protein denaturation in terms of residue-level free energy contributions of groups newly exposed on denaturation. The GTFEs were obtained by accounting for solubility and activity coefficient ratios accompanying the transfer of glycine from water to 1 M urea. Contrary to the opinions of some researchers, the GTFEs show that urea does not denature proteins through favorable interactions with nonpolar side chains; what drives urea-induced protein unfolding is the large favorable interaction of urea with the peptide backbone. Although the m value is said to be proportional to surface area newly exposed on denaturation, only ≈25% of the area favorably contributes to unfolding (because of newly exposed backbone units), with ≈75% modestly opposing urea-induced denaturation (originating from side-chain exposure). Use of the transfer model and newly determined GTFEs achieves the long-sought goal of predicting urea-dependent cooperative protein unfolding energetics at the level of individual amino acid residues.

Structural thermodynamics of protein preferential solvation: osmolyte solvation of proteins, aminoacids, and peptides.

Protein stability and solubility depend strongly on the presence of osmolytes, because of the protein preference to be solvated by either water or osmolyte. It has traditionally been assumed that only this relative preference can be measured, and that the individual solvation contributions of water and osmolyte are inaccessible. However, it is possible to determine hydration and osmolyte solvation (osmolation) separately using Kirkwood‐Buff theory, and this fact has recently been utilized by several researchers. Here, we provide a thermodynamic assessment of how each surface group on proteins contributes to the overall hydration and osmolation. Our analysis is based on transfer free energy measurements with model‐compounds that were previously demonstrated to allow for a very successful prediction of osmolyte‐dependent protein stability. When combined with Kirkwood‐Buff theory, the Transfer Model provides a space‐resolved solvation pattern of the peptide unit, amino acids, and the folding/unfolding equilibrium of proteins in the presence of osmolytes. We find that the major solvation effects on protein side‐chains originate from the osmolytes, and that the hydration mostly depends on the size of the side‐chain. The peptide backbone unit displays a much more variable hydration in the different osmolyte solutions. Interestingly, the presence of sucrose leads to simultaneous accumulation of both the sugar and water in the vicinity of peptide groups, resulting from a saccharide accumulation that is less than the accumulation of water, a net preferential exclusion. Only the denaturing osmolyte, urea, obeys the classical solvent exchange mechanism in which the preferential interaction with the peptide unit excludes water. Proteins 2008.

Application of the transfer model to understand how naturally occurring osmolytes affect protein stability

A primary thermodynamic goal in protein biochemistry is to attain a predictive understanding of the energetic changes responsible for solvent-induced folding and unfolding. This chapter demonstrates the use of Tanfords transfer model to predict solvent-dependent cooperative protein folding/unfolding free energy changes (m values). This approach provides a thermodynamic description of these free energy changes in terms of individual contributions from the peptide backbone and residue side chains. The quantitative success of the transfer model has been hindered for many years because of unresolved issues involving proper measurement of the group transfer-free energies of amino acid side chains and the peptide backbone unit. This chapter demonstrates what is necessary to design experiments properly so that reliable values of group transfer-free energies are obtainable. It then demonstrates how to derive a prediction of the m value for the description of protein folding/unfolding cooperativity and that the calculated values using the transfer model agree quite well with experimentally measured values.

Destabilization of the A1 Domain in von Willebrand Factor Dissociates the A1A2A3 Tri-domain and Provokes Spontaneous Binding to Glycoprotein Ibα and Platelet Activation under Shear Stress

This study used recombinant A1A2A3 tri-domain proteins to demonstrate that A domain association in von Willebrand factor (VWF) regulates the binding to platelet glycoprotein Ibα (GPIbα). We performed comparative studies between wild type (WT) A1 domain and the R1450E variant that dissociates the tri-domain complex by destabilizing the A1 domain. Using urea denaturation and differential scanning calorimetry, we demonstrated the destabilization of the A1 domain structure concomitantly results in a reduced interaction among the three A domains. This dissociation results in spontaneous binding of R1450E to GPIbα without ristocetin with an apparent KD of 85 ± 34 nm, comparable with that of WT (36 ± 12 nm) with ristocetin. The mutant blocked 100% ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination, whereas WT failed to inhibit. The mutant enhanced shear-induced platelet aggregation at 500 and 5000 s−1 shear rates, reaching 42 and 66%, respectively. Shear-induced platelet aggregation did not exceed 18% in the presence of WT. A1A2A3 variants were added before perfusion over a fibrin(ogen)-coated surface. At 1500 s−1, platelets from blood containing WT adhered <10% of the surface area, whereas the mutant induced platelets to rapidly bind, covering 100% of the fibrin(ogen) surface area. Comparable results were obtained with multimeric VWF when ristocetin (0.5 mg/ml) was added to blood before perfusion. EDTA or antibodies against GPIbα and αIIbβ3 blocked the effect of the mutant and ristocetin on platelet activation/adhesion. Therefore, the termination of A domain association within VWF in solution results in binding to GPIba and platelet activation under high shear stress.

N-terminal Flanking Region of A1 Domain in von Willebrand Factor Stabilizes Structure of A1A2A3 Complex and Modulates Platelet Activation under Shear Stress

Background: A conformational change in A1 domain of vWF is required for GPIbα binding. Results: N-terminal flanking region of the A1 domain inhibits binding to GPIbα, stabilizes the A1A2A3 structure, and prevents platelet activation. Conclusion: Coupling between the N-terminal flanking region of the A1 domain and the A1A2A3 complex inhibits vWF-GPIbα interaction. Significance: This autoinhibitory mechanism prevents spontaneous thrombosis in circulation. von Willebrand factor (vWF) mediates platelet adhesion and thrombus formation via its interaction with the platelet receptor glycoprotein (GP)Ibα. We have analyzed two A1A2A3 tri-domain proteins to demonstrate that the amino acid sequence, Gln1238-Glu1260, in the N-terminal flanking region of the A1 domain, together with the association between the A domains, modulates vWF-GPIbα binding and platelet activation under shear stress. Using circular dichroism spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry, we have described that sequence Gln1238-Glu1260 stabilizes the structural conformation of the A1A2A3 tri-domain complex. The structural stabilization imparted by this particular region inhibits the binding capacity of the tri-domain protein for GPIbα. Deletion of this region causes a conformational change in the A1 domain that increases binding to GPIbα. Only the truncated protein was capable of effectively blocking ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination. To determine the capacity of activating platelets via the interaction with GPIbα, whole blood was incubated with the N-terminal region truncated or intact tri-A domain protein prior to perfusion over a fibrin(ogen)-coated surface. At a high shear rate of 1,500 s−1, platelets from blood containing the truncated protein rapidly bound, covering >90% of the fibrin(ogen) surface area, whereas the intact tri-A domain protein induced platelets to bind <10%. The results obtained in this study ascertain the relevant role of the structural association between the N-terminal flanking region of the A1 domain (amino acids Gln1238-Glu1260) and the A1A2A3 domain complex in preventing vWF to bind spontaneously to GPIbα in solution under high shear forces.

Kinetic control in protein folding for light chain amyloidosis and the differential effects of somatic mutations

Light chain amyloidosis is a devastating disease where immunoglobulin light chains form amyloid fibrils, resulting in organ dysfunction and death. Previous studies have shown a direct correlation between the protein thermodynamic stability and the propensity for amyloid formation for some proteins involved in light chain amyloidosis. Here we investigate the effect of somatic mutations on protein stability and in vitro fibril formation of single and double restorative mutants of the protein AL-103 compared to the wild-type germline control protein. A scan rate dependence and hysteresis in the thermal unfolding and refolding was observed for all proteins. This indicates that the unfolding/refolding reaction is kinetically determined with different kinetic constants for unfolding and refolding even though the process remains experimentally reversible. Our structural analysis of AL-103 and AL-103 delP95aIns suggests a kinetic coupling of the unfolding/refolding process with cis-trans prolyl isomerization. Our data reveal that the deletion of proline 95a (AL-103 delP95aIns), which removes the trans-cis di-proline motif present in the patient protein AL-103, results in a dramatic increment in the thermodynamic stability and a significant delay in fibril formation kinetics with respect to AL-103. Fibril formation is pH dependent; all proteins form fibrils at pH2; reactions become slower and more stochastic as the pH increases up to pH7. Based on these results, we propose that, in addition to thermodynamic stability, kinetic stability (possibly influenced by the presence of cis proline 95a) plays a major role in the AL-103 amyloid fibril formation process.

The Mechanism of VWF-Mediated Platelet GPIbα Binding

The binding of Von Willebrand Factor to platelets is dependent on the conformation of the A1 domain which binds to platelet GPIbalpha. This interaction initiates the adherence of platelets to the subendothelial vasculature under the high shear that occurs in pathological thrombosis. We have developed a thermodynamic strategy that defines the A1:GPIbalpha interaction in terms of the free energies (DeltaG values) of A1 unfolding from the native to intermediate state and the binding of these conformational states to GPIbalpha. We have isolated the intermediate conformation of A1 under nondenaturing conditions by reduction and carboxyamidation of the disulfide bond. The circular dichroism spectrum of reduction and carboxyamidation A1 indicates that the intermediate has approximately 10% less alpha-helical structure that the native conformation. The loss of alpha-helical secondary structure increases the GPIbalpha binding affinity of the A1 domain approximately 20-fold relative to the native conformation. Knowledge of these DeltaG values illustrates that the A1:GPIbalpha complex exists in equilibrium between these two thermodynamically distinct conformations. Using this thermodynamic foundation, we have developed a quantitative allosteric model of the force-dependent catch-to-slip bonding that occurs between Von Willebrand Factor and platelets under elevated shear stress. Forced dissociation of GPIbalpha from A1 shifts the equilibrium from the low affinity native conformation to the high affinity intermediate conformation. Our results demonstrate that A1 binding to GPIbalpha is thermodynamically coupled to A1 unfolding and catch-to-slip bonding is a manifestation of this coupling. Our analysis unites thermodynamics of protein unfolding and conformation-specific binding with the force dependence of biological catch bonds and it encompasses the effects of two subtypes of mutations that cause Von Willebrand Disease.

Protein stability in the presence of cosolutes

Protein scientists have long used cosolutes to study protein stability. While denaturants, such as urea, have been employed for a long time, the attention became focused more recently on protein stabilizers, including osmolytes. Here, we provide practical experimental instructions for the use of both stabilizing and denaturing osmolytes with proteins, as well as data evaluation strategies. We focus on protein stability in the presence of cosolutes and their mixtures at constant and variable temperature.

The linker between the D3 and A1 domains of vWF suppresses A1-GPIbα catch bonds by site-specific binding to the A1 domain.

Platelet attachment to von Willebrand factor (vWF) requires the interaction between the platelet GP1bα and exposed vWF‐A1 domains. Structural insights into the mechanism of the A1‐GP1bα interaction have been limited to an N‐terminally truncated A1 domain that lacks residues Q1238 − E1260 that make up the linker between the D3 and A1 domains of vWF. We have demonstrated that removal of these residues destabilizes quaternary interactions in the A1A2A3 tridomain and contributes to platelet activation under high shear (Auton et al., J Biol Chem 2012;287:14579–14585). In this study, we demonstrate that removal of these residues from the single A1 domain enhances platelet pause times on immobilized A1 under rheological shear. A rigorous comparison between the truncated A1‐1261 and full length A1‐1238 domains demonstrates a kinetic stabilization of the A1 domain induced by these N‐terminal residues as evident in the enthalpy of the unfolding transition. This stabilization occurs through site and sequence‐specific binding of the N‐terminal peptide to A1. Binding of free N‐terminal peptide to A1‐1261 has an affinity KD=46±6μM and this binding although free to dissociate is sufficient to suppress the platelet pause times to levels comparable to A1‐1238 under shear stress. Our results support a dual‐structure/function role for this linker region involving a conformational equilibria that maintains quaternary A domain associations in the inactive state of vWF at low shear and an intra‐A1‐domain conformation that regulates the strength of platelet GP1bα‐vWF A1 domain associations in the active state of vWF at high shear.

Misfolding of vWF to Pathologically Disordered Conformations Impacts the Severity of von Willebrand Disease

The primary hemostatic von Willebrand factor (vWF) functions to sequester platelets from rheological blood flow and mediates their adhesion to damaged subendothelium at sites of vascular injury. We have surveyed the effect of 16 disease-causing mutations identified in patients diagnosed with the bleeding diathesis disorder, von Willebrand disease (vWD), on the structure and rheology of vWF A1 domain adhesiveness to the platelet GPIbα receptor. These mutations have a dynamic phenotypical range of bleeding from lack of platelet adhesion to severe thrombocytopenia. Using new rheological tools in combination with classical thermodynamic, biophysical, and spectroscopic metrics, we establish a high propensity of the A1 domain to misfold to pathological molten globule conformations that differentially alter the strength of platelet adhesion under shear flow. Rheodynamic analysis establishes a quantitative rank order between shear-rate-dependent platelet-translocation pause times that linearly correlate with clinically reported measures of patient platelet counts and the severity of thrombocytopenia. These results suggest that specific secondary structure elements remaining in these pathological conformations of the A1 domain regulate GPIbα binding and the strength of vWF-platelet interactions, which affects the vWD functional phenotype and the severity of thrombocytopenia.