Matthew J. Ellis

The mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (M6P/IGF2R), a putative breast tumor suppressor gene

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor gene locus (M6P/IGF2R) on 6q26-27 has recently been demonstrated in approximately 30% of both invasive and in situ breast cancers. LOH was coupled with somatic point mutations in the remaining allele in several instances, leading to the proposition that M6P/IGF2R is a tumor suppressor gene [1]. Somatic mutations in M6P/IGF2R have also been described in hepatoma [2] and gastrointestinal cancers with the replication error positive (RER+) phenotype [3]. These data indicate that M6P/IGF2R loss of function mutations may be involved in the pathogenesis of a wide spectrum of malignancies. Extensive data on the normal function of the M6P/IGF2R suggest that loss of M6P/IGF2R activity may contribute to multiple aspects of tumor pathophysiology, including deregulated growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis and invasion.

Insulin-like growth factor expression in breast cancer epithelium and stroma

SummaryThe insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) are mitogens for many cancer cell types. In breast cancer cells, IGF-I and IGF-II have both been shown to stimulate cell proliferation. However, IGF-I mRNA has not been found in human breast cancer cell lines, making it unlikely that IGF-I is commonly expressed as an autocrine growth factor for breast cancer cells. Nevertheless, IGF-I mRNA can be detected in breast cancer tissue samples, and in situ hybridization studies have shown that the message originates from the stromal cells adjacent to normal lobules. IGF-II, on the other hand, has been detected in some breast cancer cell lines. In the estrogen receptor positive cell line T47-D, IGF-II mRNA was induced by estradiol. Furthermore, transfection of an IGF-II expression vector into a previously estrogen-dependent cell line resulted in hormone independent growth. Thus, IGF-II can be expressed as an autocrine growth factor in some breast cancers and its expression may, in part, result in hormone independence. Finally, stromal cells obtained from breast tissues showed that IGF-I was commonly expressed in fibroblasts derived from non-malignant biopsy specimens, while IGF-II mRNA was detected in fibroblasts adjacent to malignant tissue. These studies suggest that IGF-II expression may be important in both autocrine and paracrine regulation of breast cancer cell growth.

Insulin-like growth factors in human breast cancer

IGF1 and IGF2 are circulating peptide hormones and locally-acting growth factors with both paracrine and autocrine functions. IGF1 and IGF2 signal through a common tyrosine kinase receptor, the insulin- like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R), and have mitogenic, cell survival, and insulin-like actions that are essential for embryogenesis, post-natal growth physiology, and breast development. The activities of IGF1 and 2 are tightly-regulated by a network of binding proteins and targeted degradation mechanisms. This complex regulatory system is disrupted in breast cancer, leading to excess IGF1R signaling. Evidence for this statement includes: a) breast cancers are infiltrated with IGF2 expressing stromal cells; b) mannose 6-phosphate/IGF2 receptor (M6P/IGF2R) is mutated in breast cancer, leading to loss of IGF2 degradation; c) IGF1R is overexpressed by malignant breast epithelial cells, and in some cases IGF1R is amplified; and d) complex changes in IGF binding protein expression occur during breast cancer progression which most likely also affect IGF1 and 2 signaling. The clinical importance of these epigenetic and genetic changes has recently been stressed by the finding that IGF1R signaling alters the apoptotic response of breast cancer cells to genotoxic stress and, in addition, IGF1R activation sensitizes cells to estrogen by inducing phosphorylation of the estrogen receptor. As a consequence of these findings, we propose that IGF analysis of breast cancer samples should shift from prognostic studies to an evaluation of IGF ligands, receptors, and binding proteins as resistance/sensitivity markers for radiation, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy.

Mannose 6-Phosphate/Insulin-Like Growth Factor 2 Receptor, a Bona Fide Tumor Suppressor Gene or Just a Promising Candidate?

The mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (M6P/IGF2R)3 is considereda “candidate” tumor suppressor gene. This hypothesis has been provoked by the identificationof loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the M6P/IGF2R locus on chromosome 6q26 in breast andliver cancer, accompanied by point mutations in the remaining allele. Somatic mutations incoding region microsatellites have also been described in replication error positive (RER+)tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, endometrium and brain. These genetic data are compelling,but a tumor suppressor gene candidate has to meet functional as well as genetic criteria. Thisreview weighs the evidence and discusses the observations that are necessary to promoteM6P/IGF2R from candidate to bona fide tumor suppressor gene.

A Pilot Surrogate End Point Biomarker Trial of Perillyl Alcohol in Breast Neoplasia

Purpose: Efficient strategies to screen promising agents in early phase development are essential for rapid progress in breast cancer chemoprevention. We report our experience with the natural compound perillyl alcohol (POH) administered in a short-term surrogate end point biomarker (SEB) protocol, using the “window” between diagnostic and definitive surgery. Experimental Design: Eligible patients included those with a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ, or invasive carcinoma (<3 cm in size) that required further surgery. Thirty-seven of 267 women screened were enrolled in the study (14%). Five women received single-dose POH (1.5 g/m2) 2 days before surgery, 16 received escalating doses of POH (1.2 g/m2 to 4.8 g/m2/day) for 2 days before surgery, and 16 served as untreated controls. Exploratory SEB analysis [estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, proliferation, apoptosis, M6P/insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-2R, IGF1, IGF2 and transforming growth factor β] was conducted before and after POH. Results: Only a small portion of the population screened entered the study. Reasons for nonparticipation included protocol ineligibility, conflict of timing of surgery, miscellaneous logistical reasons, or patient’s choice. POH administration was well tolerated and did not interfere with surgical management. The power to observe changes in candidate SEB was diminished by a 44% incidence of cases in which the index lesion was not present in the definitive surgical specimen. Conclusions: Preoperative POH exposure was safe and suitable for a more definitive phase II SEB study. Further investigations must overcome logistical obstacles to accrual, and they must focus on approaches to maximize tissue collection and to incorporate genomic analysis of target lesions.

PAM50 gene signatures and breast cancer prognosis with adjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy: correlative analysis of C9741 (Alliance)

PAM50 intrinsic breast cancer subtypes are prognostic independent of standard clinicopathologic factors. CALGB 9741 demonstrated improved recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) with 2-weekly dose-dense (DD) versus 3-weekly therapy. A significant interaction between intrinsic subtypes and DD-therapy benefit was hypothesized. Suitable tumor samples were available from 1,471 (73%) of 2,005 subjects. Multiplexed gene-expression profiling generated the PAM50 subtype call, proliferation score, and risk of recurrence score (ROR-PT) for the evaluable subset of 1,311 treated patients. The interaction between DD-therapy benefit and intrinsic subtype was tested in a Cox proportional hazards model using two-sided alpha=0.05. Additional multivariable Cox models evaluated the proliferation and ROR-PT scores as continuous measures with selected clinical covariates. Improved outcomes for DD therapy in the evaluable subset mirrored results from the complete data set (RFS; hazard ratio=1.20; 95% confidence interval=0.99–1.44) with 12.3-year median follow-up. Intrinsic subtypes were prognostic of RFS (P<0.0001) irrespective of treatment assignment. No subtype-specific treatment effect on RFS was identified (interaction P=0.44). Proliferation and ROR-PT scores were prognostic for RFS (both P<0.0001), but no association with treatment benefit was seen (P=0.14 and 0.59, respectively). Results were similar for OS. The prognostic value of PAM50 intrinsic subtype was greater than estrogen receptor/HER2 immunohistochemistry classification. PAM50 gene signatures were highly prognostic but did not predict for improved outcomes with DD anthracycline- and taxane-based therapy. Clinical validation studies will assess the ability of PAM50 and other gene signatures to stratify patients and individualize treatment based on expected risks of distant recurrence.

Improving Hormonal Therapy for Breast Cancer

Abstract: Since Beatsons observation of breast cancer regression after oophorectomy one hundred years ago (1), therapies directed toward the estrogen‐estrogen receptor (ER) endocrine axis have become a cornerstone of breast cancer treatment. Surgical ablative techniques, such as oophorectomy, adrenalectomy, and hypophysectomy have been largely replaced by pharmacological approaches that inhibit estrogen‐dependent breast cancer growth, either by reducing estrogen synthesis (LHRH agonists, aromatase inhibitors, and progestins), by blocking ER function (tamoxifen) or by interfering with the cellular response to ER activation (androgens). Indeed, one could argue that hormone therapy for breast cancer represents one of the most successful areas of logical drug design in cancer treatment. Recent drug developments have led to improved side‐effect profiles for hormonal agents. In addition, the remarkable organ‐selective agonist/antagonist properties of tamoxifen‐related compounds are the basis for an effort to develop hormone replacement therapies that combine breast cancer treatment/prevention with reduced osteoporosis and heart disease risk. While the ER axis will remain a primary focus for the further development of hormonal therapies (Table 1), the value of ER as a therapeutic target will always be limited by the primary or acquired estrogen insensitivity that nearly all breast cancers ultimately display. Current hopes for circumventing this problem lie in the vast therapeutic potential afforded by recent molecular insights into growth regulatory pathways. Logical choices for novel therapeutic targets for “estrogen insensitive” breast cancer includes alternative nuclear hormone receptors, growth factor receptors, and signal transduction molecules in “ER‐independent” growth‐regulatory pathways. Inhibitors of pathophysiological processes intrinsic to tumor progression, such as angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis are also promising noncytotoxic alternatives in breast cancer therapy (Table 2). Studies of growth regulators in breast cancer are also likely to lead to new tumor markers to accurately guide choices from the increasing array of therapeutic options available.