Matthew S. Ferriter

Protective Immunization against Inhalational Anthrax: A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Delivery Platforms

A new anthrax vaccine under clinical investigation is based on recombinant Bacillus anthracis protective antigen (rPA). Here, we investigated microneedle-based cutaneous and nasal mucosal delivery of rPA in mice and rabbits. In mice, intradermal (id) delivery achieved up to 90% seroconversion after a single dose, compared with 20% after intramuscular (im) injection. Intranasal (inl) delivery of a liquid formulation required 3 doses to achieve responses that were comparable with those achieved via the id or im routes. In rabbits, id delivery provided complete protection against aerosol challenge with anthrax spores; in addition, novel powder formulations administered inl provided complete protection, whereas a liquid formulation provided only partial protection. These results demonstrate, for the first time, that cutaneous or nasal mucosal administration of rPA provides complete protection against inhalational anthrax in rabbits. The novel vaccine/device combinations described here have the potential to improve the efficacy of rPA and other biodefense vaccines.

Protective immunity in mice achieved with dry powder formulation and alternative delivery of plague F1-V vaccine.

ABSTRACT The potential use of Yersinia pestis as a bioterror agent is a great concern. Development of a stable powder vaccine against Y. pestis and administration of the vaccine by minimally invasive methods could provide an alternative to the traditional liquid formulation and intramuscular injection. We evaluated a spray-freeze-dried powder vaccine containing a recombinant F1-V fusion protein of Y. pestis for vaccination against plaque in a mouse model. Mice were immunized with reconstituted spray-freeze-dried F1-V powder via intramuscular injection, microneedle-based intradermal delivery, or noninvasive intranasal administration. By intramuscular injection, the reconstituted powder induced serum antibody responses and provided protection against lethal subcutaneous challenge with 1,000 50% lethal doses of Y. pestis at levels equivalent to those elicited by unprocessed liquid formulations (70 to 90% protection). The feasibility of intradermal and intranasal delivery of reconstituted powder F1-V vaccine was also demonstrated. Overall, microneedle-based intradermal delivery was shown to be similar in efficacy to intramuscular injection, while intranasal administration required an extra dose of vaccine to achieve similar protection. In addition, the results suggest that seroconversion against F1 may be a better predictor of protection against Y. pestis challenge than seroconversion against either F1-V or V. In summary, we demonstrate the preclinical feasibility of using a reconstituted powder F1-V formulation and microneedle-based intradermal delivery to provide protective immunity against plague in a mouse model. Intranasal delivery, while feasible, was less effective than injection in this study. The potential use of these alternative delivery methods and a powder vaccine formulation may result in substantial health and economic benefits.

Intranasal Administration of Dry Powder Anthrax Vaccine Provides Protection Against Lethal Aerosol Spore Challenge

The use of an aerosolizable form of anthrax as a biological weapon is considered to be among the most serious bioterror threats. Intranasal (IN) delivery of a dry powder anthrax vaccine could provide an effective and non-invasive administration alternative to traditional intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous (SC) injection. We evaluated a dry powder vaccine based on the recombinant Protective Antigen (rPA) of Bacillus anthracis for vaccination against anthrax via IN immunization in a rabbit model. rPA powders were formulated and administered IN using a prototype powder delivery device. We compared serum IgG and toxin neutralizing antibody (TNA) titers of rabbits immunized IN with 10 μg rPA of a powder formulation with those immunized with the same dose of liquid rPA vaccine, delivered either IN or by IM injection. In addition, each group was tested for survival after aerosol spore challenge. Our results showed that IN vaccination with rPA powders elicited serum PA-specific IgG and TNA titers that were equivalent to those raised by liquid rPA administered IN. Serum PA-specific IgG and TNA titers after IN delivery were lower than for IM injection, however, after aerosol spore challenge, rabbits immunized IN with powders displayed 100% protection versus 63% for the group immunized IN with the liquid vaccine and 86% for the group immunized by IM injection. The results suggest that an IN powder vaccine based on rPA is at least as protective as a liquid delivered by IM injection.