Matthew Spiegel

Predicting Cervical Alignment Required to Maintain Horizontal Gaze Based on Global Spinal Alignment.

Study Design. A retrospective cohort. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the cervical alignment necessary for the maintenance of horizontal gaze that depends on underlying thoracolumbar alignment. Summary of Background Data. Cervical Sagittal Curve (CC) is affected by thoracic and global alignment. Recent studies suggest large variability in normative CC ranging from lordotic to kyphotic alignment. No previous studies have assessed the effect of global spinal alignment on CC in maintenance of horizontal gaze. Methods. Patients without previous history of spinal surgery and able to maintain their horizontal gaze while undergoing full body imaging were included. Patients were stratified on the basis of thoracic kyphosis (TK) into (<30, 30–40, 40–50, and >50) and then by SRS-Schwab sagittal vertical axis (SVA) modifier into (posterior alignment SVA <0, aligned 0–50, and malaligned >50 mm). Cervical alignment was assessed among SVA grade in TK groups. Stepwise linear regression analysis was applied on random selection of 60% of the population. A simplified formula was developed and validated on the remaining 40%. Results. In each TK group (n = 118, 137, 125, 197), lower CC (C2-C7) was significantly more lordotic by increased Schwab SVA grade. T1 slope and cervical SVA significantly increased with increased thoracolumbar (C7-S1) SVA. Upper CC (C0-C2) and mismatch between T1 slope and CC (T1-CL) were similar. Regression analysis revealed LL minus TK (LL-TK) as an independent predictor (r = 0.640, r2 = 0.410) with formula: CC = 10- (LL-TK)/2. Validation revealed that the absolute difference between the predicted CC and the actual CC was 8.5°. Moreover, 64.2% of patients had their predicted C2-C7 values within 10° of the actual CC. Conclusion. Cervical kyphosis may represent normal alignment in a significant number of patients. However, in patients with SVA >50 and greater thoracic kyphosis, cervical lordosis is needed to maintain the gaze. Cervical alignment can be predicted from underlying TK and lumbar lordosis, which may be clinically relevant when considering correction for thoracolumbar or cervical deformity Level of Evidence: 3

Global sagittal axis: a step toward full-body assessment of sagittal plane deformity in the human body.

OBJECTIVE Sagittal malalignment requires higher energy expenditure to maintain an erect posture. Because the clinical impact of sagittal alignment is affected by both the severity of the deformity and recruitment of compensatory mechanisms, it is important to investigate new parameters that reflect both disability level and compensatory mechanisms for all patients. This study investigated the clinical relevance of the global sagittal axis (GSA), a novel measure to evaluate the standing axis of the human body. METHODS This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent full-body radiographs and completed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and the visual analog scale for back and leg pain. The GSA was defined as the angle formed by a line from the midpoint of the femoral condyles to the center of C-7, and a line from the midpoint between the femoral condyles to the posterior superior corner of the S-1 sacral endplate. After evaluating the correlation of GSA/HRQOL with sagittal parameters, linear regression models were generated to investigate how ODI and GSA related to radiographic parameters (T-1 pelvic angle, pelvic retroversion, knee flexion, and pelvic posterior translation). RESULTS One hundred forty-three patients (mean age 44 years) were included. The GSA correlated significantly with all HRQOL (up to r = 0.6 with EQ-5D) and radiographic parameters (up to r = 0.962 with sagittal vertical axis). Regression between ODI and sagittal radiographic parameters identified the GSA as an independent predictor (r = 0.517, r2 = 0.267; p < 0.001). Analysis of standardized coefficients revealed that when controlling for deformity, the GSA increased with a concurrent decrease in pelvic retroversion (-0.837) and increases in knee flexion (+0.287) and pelvic posterior translation (+0.193). CONCLUSIONS The GSA is a simple, novel measure to assess the standing axis of the human body in the sagittal plane. The GSA correlated highly with spinopelvic and lower-extremities sagittal parameters and exhibited remarkable correlations with HRQOL, which exceeded other commonly used parameters.

Developing the Total Disability Index Based on an Analysis of the Interrelationships and Limitations of Oswestry and Neck Disability Index.

Study Design. Retrospective. Objective. This study assessed the feasibility of combining Oswestry and Neck Disability Index (ODI and NDI) into 1 shorter “Total Disability Index” (TDI) from which reconstructed scores could be computed. Summary of Background Data. ODI and NDI are not pure assessments of disability related to back and neck, respectively. Because of similarities/redundancies of questions, ODI scores may be elevated in neck-pain patients and the converse is true for NDI in back-pain patients. Methods. Spine patients completed ODI and NDI, and complaints were recorded as back pain (BP), neck pain (NP), or both (BNP). Questionnaire scores were compared across cohorts via descriptives and Spearman (&rgr;) correlations. In exploring the feasibility of merging ODI/NDI, TDI was constructed from 9 ODI and 5 NDI items. Extracting questions from TDI, reconstructed 9-item rODI and 10-item rNDI indices were formed and compared with true ODI/NDI. Results. There were a total of 1207 patients: 741 BP, 134 NP, and 268 BNP. Mean ODI was 37 ± 21 and mean NDI was 32 ± 21. Patients with concurrent BP and NP had significantly more disability. Seventy-eight patients of 134 (58%) patients with NP only had at least “moderate disability” by ODI and 297 of 741 (40%) patients with back pain only, had at least “moderate disability” by NDI. ODI versus NDI correlation was &rgr; = 0.755; ODI versus reconstructed rODI correlated at &rgr; = 0.985, and NDI versus reconstructed rNDI correlated at &rgr; = 0.967 (P < 0.01). Conclusion. Elevated ODI/NDI scores in patients with isolated complaints show that disability in 1 region affects scores on both surveys. This study constructed a 14-item TDI that represents every domain of ODI/NDI with exception of ODI “Sex Life.” From this TDI, reconstructed scores correlated near perfectly with true scores. TDI provides a more global assessment of spinal disability and is a questionnaire that reduces the time burden to patients. The TDI allows for simultaneous assessment of back, neck, and global spinal disability. Level of Evidence: 2

Is There a Gender-Specific Full Body Sagittal Profile for Different Spinopelvic Relationships? A Study on Propensity-Matched Cohorts

DESIGN Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE To evaluate gender-related differences in compensatory recruitment to progressive sagittal malalignment. Recent research has elucidated compensatory mechanisms recruited in response to sagittal malalignment, but gender-specific differences in compensatory recruitment patterns is unknown. METHODS Single-center study of patients with full body x-rays. A female group was propensity matched by age, body mass index (BMI), and pelvic incidence (PI) to a male group. Patients were then stratified into five groups of progressive PI-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch (<0°, 0°-10°, 10°-20°, 20°-30°, >30°). Differences between PI-LL groups were assessed with analysis of variance, and between genders by unpaired t test. Knee flexion to pelvic tilt (PT) ratio was computed and compared between genders. Multivariate regression to develop predictive models for PT was performed for each gender, first with spinopelvic parameters and subsequently with inclusion of lower limb parameters. RESULTS A total of 942 patient visits were included: 471 females (mean age 54 years, BMI 27, PI 51°) and 471 males (mean age 52 years, BMI 27, PI 51°). At the lowest level of malalignment, females had greater PT and less knee flexion. With progressive malalignment, females continued to exhibit a pattern of greater pelvic retroversion and less knee flexion compared to males. Hip extension was higher in females with progressive PI-LL mismatch groups. Both genders progressively recruited knee flexion and pelvic retroversion with increased PI-LL mismatch, except that at the higher PI-LL mismatch groups, only males continued to recruit knee flexion (all p < .05). Inclusion of lower limbs in the regression for PT markedly improved correlation coefficients for females but not for males. CONCLUSIONS With progressive sagittal malalignment, men recruit more knee flexion and women recruit more pelvic tilt and hip extension. Knee flexion is a possible mechanism to gain pelvic tilt for females whereas for males, knee flexion is an independent compensatory mechanism.DESIGN Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE To evaluate gender-related differences in compensatory recruitment to progressive sagittal malalignment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Recent research has elucidated compensatory mechanisms recruited in response to sagittal malalignment, but gender-specific differences in compensatory recruitment patterns is unknown. METHODS Single-center study of patients with full body x-rays. A female group was propensity matched by age, body mass index (BMI), and pelvic incidence (PI) to a male group. Patients were then stratified into five groups of progressive PI-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch (<0°, 0°-10°, 10°-20°, 20°-30°, >30°). Differences between PI-LL groups were assessed with analysis of variance, and between genders by unpaired t test. Knee flexion to pelvic tilt (PT) ratio was computed and compared between genders. Multivariate regression to develop predictive models for PT was performed for each gender, first with spinopelvic parameters and subsequently with inclusion of lower limb parameters. RESULTS A total of 942 patient visits were included: 471 females (mean age 54 years, BMI 27, PI 51°) and 471 males (mean age 52 years, BMI 27, PI 51°). At the lowest level of malalignment, females had greater PT and less knee flexion. With progressive malalignment, females continued to exhibit a pattern of greater pelvic retroversion and less knee flexion compared to males. Hip extension was higher in females with progressive PI-LL mismatch groups. Both genders progressively recruited knee flexion and pelvic retroversion with increased PI-LL mismatch, except that at the higher PI-LL mismatch groups, only males continued to recruit knee flexion (all p < .05). Inclusion of lower limbs in the regression for PT markedly improved correlation coefficients for females but not for males. CONCLUSIONS With progressive sagittal malalignment, men recruit more knee flexion and women recruit more pelvic tilt and hip extension. Knee flexion is a possible mechanism to gain pelvic tilt for females whereas for males, knee flexion is an independent compensatory mechanism.

Variability Over Time of Preoperative Sagittal Alignment Parameters: Radiographic and Clinical Considerations.

Study Design. Retrospective review. Objective. To evaluate preoperative variability in radiographic sagittal parameters in adult spinal deformity (ASD). Summary of Background Data. In ASD surgical planning, deformity magnitude is determined from preoperative radiographs. There are no studies evaluating the clinical relevance and timing to repeat radiographs during interval clinic visits and timing to repeat radiograph for preoperative planning. Methods. A total of 139 patients with ASD with minimum two preoperative full-body spine x-rays were included. Cervical, thoracic, lumbar, pelvic, and hip/knee sagittal alignment parameters were analyzed using dedicated spine measurement software. Patients were grouped by time intervals between x-rays: A: 8 weeks or lesser, B: 10 to 20 weeks, and C: 21 weeks or more. Changes in sagittal parameters were correlated to age and deformity magnitude (T1 pelvic angle or pelvic tilt [PT] >20°). Results. The cohort had mean age 59 years, mean body mass index 27, 30% men, 95 patients with no prior spine surgery, and 44 patients at minimum 9 months since prior spine surgery. There were 25 patients in group A, 38 in B, and 71 in C. All radiographic measures showed good time-based consistency at intervals less than 21 weeks (groups A and B). Group C had significant increases in PT (1.5°) and hip extension (2.1°) (P < 0.05). These changes were greater in group C patients with previous surgery (PT 3.7°; P < 0.006, hip extension 3.2°; P < 0.025). Greater interval changes in parameters were also associated with higher magnitudes of deformity and younger patient ages. Conclusion. All sagittal radiographic parameters were statistically consistent at intervals of less than 21 weeks. In patients with more than 21 weeks between interval x-rays, change in PT was greater than the standard error of measurement for patients with prior surgery or severe deformity. Consideration should be made to obtain new x-rays for patients with ASD when the interval between clinical visits exceeds 5 months. Level of Evidence: 4