Maura Kennedy

Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults: Best Practice Statement from the American Geriatrics Society

Disclosure Information: Disclosures for the members of t Geriatrics Society Postoperative Delirium Panel are listed in Support: Supported by a grant from the John A Hartford Fou to the Geriatrics-for-Specialists Initiative of the American Geri (grant 2009-0079). This article is a supplement to the American Geriatrics Soci Practice Guidelines for Postoperative Delirium in Older Adu at the American College of Surgeons 100 Annual Clinic San Francisco, CA, October 2014.

American Geriatrics Society abstracted clinical practice guideline for postoperative delirium in older adults

The abstracted set of recommendations presented here provides essential guidance both on the prevention of postoperative delirium in older patients at risk of delirium and on the treatment of older surgical patients with delirium, and is based on the 2014 American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Guideline. The full version of the guideline, American Geriatrics Society Clinical Practice Guideline for Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults is available at the website of the AGS. The overall aims of the study were twofold: first, to present nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions that should be implemented perioperatively for the prevention of postoperative delirium in older adults; and second, to present nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions that should be implemented perioperatively for the treatment of postoperative delirium in older adults. Prevention recommendations focused on primary prevention (i.e., preventing delirium before it occurs) in patients who are at risk for postoperative delirium (e.g., those identified as moderate‐to‐high risk based on previous risk stratification models such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, Delirium: Diagnosis, Prevention and Management. Clinical Guideline 103; London (UK): 2010 July 29). For management of delirium, the goals of this guideline are to decrease delirium severity and duration, ensure patient safety and improve outcomes.

Frailty for Surgeons: Review of a National Institute on Aging Conference on Frailty for Specialists

Frailty represents one of the most critical issues facing health care due to its inherent relationship with poor health care outcomes. Frailty is present in 10% to 20% of individuals 65 years and older1,2 and increases with advancing age. Currently, 15% of the United States population is 65 years and older; a number that is forecast to increase to 21% by the year 2030.3

Delirium Risk Prediction, Healthcare Use and Mortality of Elderly Adults in the Emergency Department

To create a risk prediction rule for delirium in elderly adults in the emergency department (ED) and to compare mortality and resource use of elderly adults in the ED with and without delirium.

Identifying Infected Emergency Department Patients Admitted to the Hospital Ward at Risk of Clinical Deterioration and Intensive Care Unit Transfer

OBJECTIVES An important challenge faced by emergency physicians (EPs) is determining which patients should be admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and which can be safely admitted to a regular ward. Understanding risk factors leading to undertriage would be useful, but these factors are not well characterized. METHODS The authors performed a secondary analysis of two prospective, observational studies of patients admitted to the hospital with clinically suspected infection from an urban university emergency department (ED). Inclusion criteria were as follows: adult ED patient (age 18 years or older), ward admission, and suspected infection. The primary outcome was transfer to an ICU within 48 hours of admission. Using multiple logistic regression, independent predictors of early ICU transfer were identified, and the area under the curve for the model was calculated. RESULTS Of 5,365 subjects, 93 (1.7%) were transferred to an ICU within 48 hours. Independent predictors of ICU transfer included respiratory compromise (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4 to 4.3), congestive heart failure (CHF; OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.4 to 3.6), peripheral vascular disease (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.1 to 3.7), systolic blood pressure (sBP) < 100 mm Hg (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.2 to 2.9), heart rate > 90 beats/min (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1 to 2.8), and creatinine > 2.0 (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1 to 2.8). Cellulitis was associated with a lower likelihood of ICU transfer (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.72). The area under the curve for the model was 0.73, showing moderate discriminatory ability. CONCLUSIONS   In this preliminary study, independent predictors of ICU transfer within 48 hours of admission were identified. While somewhat intuitive, physicians should consider these factors when determining patient disposition.

Communication during handover in the pre-hospital/hospital interface in Italy: from evaluation to implementation of multidisciplinary training through high-fidelity simulation

Communication failures in the pre-hospital/hospital interface have been identified as a major preventable cause of patient harm. This interface has not adequately been studied in Italy. In this study, we: (1) evaluated the communication of pre-hospital and hospital providers during handover through the analysis of simulation sessions; (2) identified the critical information that should be routinely communicated during handover with a survey administered to emergency triage nurses; (3) measured communication within this interface through the adaptation of an existing tool from a multidisciplinary focus group; (4) validated the adapted tool with the inter-rater agreement of physicians who reviewed video recordings from multidisciplinary simulations sessions; and (5) developed a handover training for pre-hospital providers and evaluated the communication improvement between pre- and post-training. In our simulations we found an absence of standardization of the handover communication process, marked variability in information communicated, and a lack of formal transfer of responsibility of patient care. We adapted existing handover communication tools for local use and developed a checklist for the evaluation of handover communication that had good inter-rater reliability. Lectures coupled with high-fidelity simulation exercises on handover did result in a statistically significant improvement in handover communication.

Reconsidering orthostatic vital signs in older emergency department patients: ACUTE GERIATRICS

A 75-year-old woman with a past medical history of dementia, coronary artery disease, and diabetes presents to your ED after a fall. The patient does not know why she fell and states she is unsure of whether she lost consciousness before or after. She has normal vital signs and her physical exam is normal with no evidence of traumatic injury. An electrocardiogram, chest X-ray and basic blood tests are normal. She is treated with intravenous fluids and admitted to the hospital for a syncope and fall work-up. The admitting general physician asks you whether orthostatic vital signs were obtained. You answer ‘no’ but should the answer be ‘yes’?

The Tuscan Mobile Simulation Program: a description of a program for the delivery of in situ simulation training

Simulation has become a critical aspect of medical education. It allows health care providers the opportunity to focus on safety and high-risk situations in a protected environment. Recently, in situ simulation, which is performed in the actual clinical setting, has been used to recreate a more realistic work environment. This form of simulation allows for better team evaluation as the workers are in their traditional roles, and can reveal latent safety errors that often are not seen in typical simulation scenarios. We discuss the creation and implementation of a mobile in situ simulation program in emergency departments of three hospitals in Tuscany, Italy, including equipment, staffing, and start-up costs for this program. We also describe latent safety threats identified in the pilot in situ simulations. This novel approach has the potential to both reduce the costs of simulation compared to traditional simulation centers, and to expand medical simulation experiences to providers and healthcare organizations that do not have access to a large simulation center.