Maurizio Marangolo

Phase II Study of Pemetrexed Plus Carboplatin in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

PURPOSE This multicenter, phase II clinical study was conducted to evaluate the activity of the combination of pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable disease and adequate organ function, who were not eligible for curative surgery, received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve of 5 mg/mL/min, administered intravenously every 21 days. All patients received folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation. Pemetrexed was provided within the Expanded Access Program. RESULTS A total of 102 patients were enrolled. An objective response was achieved in 19 patients (two complete and 17 partial responses), for a response rate of 18.6% (95% CI, 11.6% to 27.5%). Forty-eight patients (47.0%; 95% CI, 37.1% to 57.2%) had stable disease after treatment. Overall, 67 patients (65.7%) achieved disease control (95% CI, 55.6% to 74.8%). Median time to progression was 6.5 months; median overall survival time was 12.7 months. Compliance to treatment was excellent, with a relative dose-intensity of 97% for pemetrexed and 98% for carboplatin. Toxicity was mild, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 9.7% of total cycles and grade 3 or 4 anemia occurring in 3.5% of total cycles. Nonhematologic toxicity was negligible. CONCLUSION Treatment with pemetrexed and carboplatin was active and well tolerated in patients with MPM. Disease control rate, time to disease progression, and overall survival were similar to the results achieved with the standard regimen of pemetrexed and cisplatin, suggesting that the carboplatin combination could be an alternative option for these patients.

Effect of Once-Weekly Epoetin Beta on Survival in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Anthracycline- and/or Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: Results of the Breast Cancer—Anemia and the Value of Erythropoietin (BRAVE) Study

PURPOSE The Breast Cancer-Anemia and the Value of Erythropoietin (BRAVE) study evaluated whether epoetin beta would improve survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS BRAVE was an open-label, randomized, multicenter study in patients with MBC treated with anthracycline- and/or taxane-based chemotherapy. Patients (hemoglobin [Hb] < 12.9 g/dL) were randomly assigned (1:1) to epoetin beta 30,000 U subcutaneously once weekly or control for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was overall survival. Secondary efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival, transfusion- and severe anemia-free survival, Hb response, safety, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS After 18 months of follow-up, 62 (27%) of 231 patients survived with epoetin beta therapy and 63 (27%) of 232 with control. No difference was detected in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.33, P = .522) or progression-free survival (HR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.30, P = .448). There was a statistically significant benefit on transfusion- and severe anemia-free survival compared with control (HR = 0.59; P = .0097). Median Hb level increased with epoetin beta (11.7 g/dL at baseline to 13.3 g/dL at 24 weeks) but did not change with control (11.5 v 11.4 g/dL). Patients receiving epoetin beta experienced more thromboembolic events (TEEs) compared with controls (13% v 6%; P = .012) with no difference in serious TEEs (4% v 3%). Epoetin beta did not significantly improve QoL in this study where patients had a high baseline Hb value. CONCLUSION In patients with MBC receiving chemotherapy and initial Hb less than 12.9 g/dL, epoetin beta increased Hb. No difference was detected in overall survival. Because of its superiority design, this study cannot, however, exclude clinically important differences in survival with absolute certainty.

Pemetrexed plus carboplatin in elderly patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: combined analysis of two phase II trials.

The incidence of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in elderly patients is increasing. In this study, pooled data from two phase II trials of pemetrexed and carboplatin (PC) as first-line therapy were retrospectively analysed for comparisons between age groups. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg m−2 and carboplatin AUC 5 mg ml−1 min−1 intravenously every 21 days with standard vitamin supplementation. Elderly patients were defined as those ⩾70 years old. A total of 178 patients with an ECOG performance status of ⩽2 were included. Median age was 65 years (range 38–79), with 48 patients ⩾70 years (27%). Grade 3–4 haematological toxicity was slightly worse in ⩾70 vs <70-year-old patients, with neutropenia observed in 25.0 vs 13.8% (P=0.11), anaemia in 20.8 vs 6.9% (P=0.01) and thrombocytopenia in 14.6 vs 8.5% (P=0.26). Non-haematological toxicity was mild and similar in the two groups. No significant difference was observed in terms of overall disease control (60.4 vs 66.9%, P=0.47), time to progression (7.2 vs 7.5 months, P=0.42) and survival (10.7 vs 13.9 months, P=0.12). Apart from slightly worse haematological toxicity, there was no significant difference in outcome or toxicity between age groups. The PC regimen is effective and well tolerated in selected elderly patients with MPM.

Disease-Free Survival Advantage of Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil in Patients With Node-Negative, Rapidly Proliferating Breast Cancer: A Randomized Multicenter Study

PURPOSE According to one of the most recent key scientific questions concerning the use of biomarkers in clinical trials, we investigated whether node-negative breast cancer patients, defined as high-risk cases on the basis of tumor cell proliferation, could benefit from cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred eighty-one patients with negative nodes and rapidly proliferating tumors, defined according to thymidine labeling index (TLI), were randomized to receive six cycles of CMF or no further treatment after surgery +/- radiotherapy. RESULTS The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 83% for patients treated with CMF compared with 72% in the control group (P: =.028). Adjuvant treatment reduced both locoregional and distant metastases. When clinical outcome was analyzed in cell kinetic subgroups characterized according to tertile criteria, compared with patients in the control arm, 5-year DFS was significantly higher after adjuvant CMF in patients with TLI values in the second (78% v 88%, respectively; P: =.037) and third tertiles (58% v 78%, respectively; P: =.024). CONCLUSION The results from this randomized clinical study indicate that patients with node-negative, rapidly proliferating tumors significantly benefit from adjuvant CMF.

Is There Any Difference in PBPC Mobilization Between Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF and G-CSF Alone in Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma?

We attempted to analyze whether the use of high-dose cyclophosphamide (CTX 7g/m2, group A) plus hematopoietic growth factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone (10 μmlg/Kg, group B) as a mobilizing regimen, could result in harvesting different numbers of CD34+ cells, committed progenitors and CD34+ cells subsets. The number of CD34+ cells considered as the target for each high-dose chemotherapy was ≥ 2 × 106/Kg/bw. Fifteen leukaphereses procedures were necessary in group A, while 16 procedures were performed in group B. We did not observe any difference between the two groups in terms of CD34+ cells/μmll in the peripheral blood (117 vs 78: p=NS), whereas in the aphereses product we found a significant difference between the two groups of patients in terms of CD34+ cells (6.41 vs 2.89 × 106/Kg/bw: p=.009), CFU-GM(82.5 VS 52.3 × 104/Kg/bw: p=.04). Interestingly, we noted a different distribution of CD34+/33-cells between the 2 groups (mean value 39% vs 65%: p<.05), whereas we did not find any differences regarding CD34+/38-, CD34+/Thy1+, CD34+/HLADR-. The higher number of CFU-GM/Kg/bw collected in the former group did not translate into a superior plating efficiency (27.75 vs 30.29). Furthermore, we observed a strong correlation between CD34+ cells/μml1 in the peripheral blood and the total number of CD34+ cells in the leukaphereses product (r=0.97), whereas this correlation was not found in group B (r=0.15). In both groups of patients the number of CD34+ cell collected correlated well with CFU-GM (r=0.93; r=0.94), but definitely we did not observe any correlation between CD34+ cells/μmls and CFU-GM in patients mobilized with G-CSF alone and this did not allow us to predict the harvest accurately. Finally, we evaluated the engraftment kinetics and we did not observe my statistically significant difference between the two groups of patients.

Prognostic and predictive value of intratumoral microvessels density in operable non-small-cell lung cancer

Experimental evidence suggests that tumor growth and progression depend on angiogenesis. In a retrospective study we evaluated the relationship between tumor angiogenesis and survival in patients with NSCLC treated with potentially curative surgery between 1992 and 1997. The study population consisted of 76 patients. An anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody was used to measure angiogenesis in tumor samples. Angiogenesis was quantified in terms of microvessel count (MVC): in each sample the three most intense regions of neovascularization were identified under low microscopic power. A x250 field in each of the three areas was then counted and the highest count of the three fields was recorded. Disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) during follow up were evaluated. Gender, age, stage, histologic type and KI-67 were the other factors considered for analysis. The median MVC in our series was 41.5. Among the clinicopathologic parameters examined the microvessel count was the only one to show a significant association with disease free survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.04). MVC value is a new indicator of tumor aggressiveness in patients with NSCLC who underwent potentially curative surgery and should be taken into consideration in selecting patients for adjuvant treatment.

Incidence and clinical implications of venous thromboembolism in advanced colorectal cancer patients: the 'GISCAD-alternating schedule' study findings.

AIM OF THE STUDY To investigate the incidence and clinical implications of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) patients treated and followed-up through a prospective randomised trial, comparing FOLFIRI chemotherapy given as an intermittent or as a continuous schedule. PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 266 patients were randomised by 15 experimental centres: 168 (63.2%) were males, median age: 64.6 years, age range: 37-76 years. Almost all (95.5%) patients had metastatic disease, while the remainder were classified with locally advanced irresectable disease. For 138 (51.9%) of the patients, the chemotherapy treatment was intermittent FOLFIRI and the remaining patients received continuous treatment. All toxicities, including VTE, were prospectively collected. RESULTS During the study protocol, the central data management gathered two cases of VTE. Our analysis retrieved 27 (10.2%) patients who developed a VTE, almost all (89%) during the course of chemotherapy treatment: 20 out of 27 during FOLFIRI, the remaining 7 during following lines or follow-up. VTE was the most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity. The incidence of VTE was significantly increased in the patients receiving continuous rather than intermittent treatment (HR 2.67, 95% CI 1.17-6.10; p<0.02). CONCLUSION VTE is a common complication among advanced colorectal cancer patients and yet this type of toxicity is widely underestimated. In this randomised trial, VTE was the most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity. Use of an intermittent schedule is associated with a reduced risk of developing VTE.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for breast cancer in Europe: critical evaluation of data from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Registry 1990–1999

Summary:The aim of this study was to identify trends in high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and to assess survival in a large cohort of breast cancer (BC) patients receiving this therapy in Europe from 1990 to 1999. A total of 7471 patients who received HDC with ASCT between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1999 were reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry. Data required for demographics and survival analysis were available for 2679 patients with high-risk primary BC; 921 patients with inflammatory BC (IBC), and 2295 patients with metastatic disease. The main evaluation parameters were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Between 1990 and 1998, autotransplants for BC increased 30-fold. Significant trends included use of blood-derived rather than marrow-derived stem cells, increment of reporting centers and decrease of mortality within 100 days from transplantation. The 5-year PFS and OS probabilities were 53 and 68% for high-risk disease and 42 and 53% for IBC, respectively. For metastatic disease 5-year PFS and OS probabilities in the whole cohort were 18 and 27%, respectively, while for women transplanted in complete remission the 5-year PFS was 29%. In conclusion, HDC with ASCT has been increasingly used until 1998 and the 100-day mortality rate has been constantly less than 2% from 1995 to date. The 5-year survival of high-risk BC is related to the number of axillary nodes involved at surgery. Outcome of patients with IBC is encouraging, suggesting the need for randomized trials. Patients with metastatic disease responding to pretransplant chemotherapy and harboring ER+ tumors have a better outcome.

A randomized study comparing filgrastim versus lenograstim versus molgramostim plus chemotherapy for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to assess the mobilizing efficacy of filgrastim, lenograstim and molgramostim following a disease-specific chemotherapy regimen. Mobilization consisted of high-dose cyclophosphamide in 45 cases (44%), and cisplatin/ifosfamide/etoposide or vinblastine in 22 (21%), followed by randomization to either filgrastim or lenograstim or molgramostim at 5 μg/kg/day. One hundred and three patients were randomized, and 82 (79%) performed apheresis. Forty-four (43%) patients were chemonaive, whereas 59 (57%) were pretreated. A median number of one apheresis per patient (range, 1–3) was performed. The median number of CD34+ cells obtained after mobilization was 8.4 × 106/kg in the filgrastim arm versus 5.8 × 106/kg in the lenograstim arm versus 4.0 × 106/kg in the molgramostim arm (P=0.1). A statistically significant difference was observed for the median number of days of growth factor administration in favor of lenograstim (12 days) versus filgrastim (13 days) and molgramostim (14 days) (P<0.0001) and for the subgroup of chemonaive patients (12 days) versus pretreated patients (14 days) (P<0.001). In conclusion, all three growth factors were efficacious in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells with no statistically significant difference between CD34+ cell yield and the different regimens, and the time to apheresis is likely confounded by the different mobilization regimens.

Bolus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin With Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE A phase II trial investigated the activity and toxicity of a bolus administration schedule of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) therapy in patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-five patients in this multicenter, open, nonrandomized study received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on the first day of each course and 5-FU and LV 350 mg/m(2) and 20 mg/m(2), respectively, as a daily bolus for 5 days, every 21 days, for a maximum of six courses. RESULTS Partial responses occurred in 18 patients, giving an intent-to-treat response rate of 40.0%. Median time to response was 12.7 weeks; median duration of response was 18.4 weeks. Median progression-free survival was 5.9 months; median survival was 14 months. The independent prognostic factors for improved overall survival were good performance status and negative carcino-embryonic antigen blood level. Incidences of adverse effects were reduced after the 5-FU dose was reduced to 300 mg/m(2). Reversible neurologic toxicity occurred in 44.4% of patients. CONCLUSION Bolus administration of oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and LV as first-line therapy for untreated advanced colorectal cancer is efficacious and safe. In addition to a more favorable safety profile, the 300 mg/m(2) dosage offered improved dose-intensity compared with the initial dosage.