McKenna Wg
University of Pennsylvania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by McKenna Wg.
Radiation Research | 1991
McKenna Wg; George Iliakis; Weiss Mc; Eric J. Bernhard; Ruth J. Muschel
Cell cycle perturbation after irradiation was studied in five cell lines transfected with oncogenes. Two immortalized, radio-sensitive cell lines with D0s of 1.06 and 1.08 Gy were compared to three radioresistant cell lines with D0s of 1.68-2.17 Gy. The sensitive cell lines were transfected with the v-myc or c-myc oncogenes, the resistant cell lines with the v-myc plus H-ras oncogenes. Exponentially growing populations were exposed to 5, 10, or 15 Gy of orthovoltage radiation. The percentage of cells in each phase of the cell cycle was determined at various times after irradiation using flow cytometry. All cell lines underwent a dose-dependent arrest in G2 phase after irradiation, but the resistant cell lines underwent a significantly longer arrest in G2 phase after irradiation than did the sensitive cell lines. In conjunction with other results from our laboratories, we suggest that this difference in G2 arrest may be the basis for the increased resistance of cells transfected with oncogenes to irradiation.
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics | 1995
Eric J. Bernhard; Amit Maity; Ruth J. Muschel; McKenna Wg
Irradiation of normal eukaryotic cells results in delayed progression through the G1, S, and G2 phases of the cell cycle. The G1 arrest is regulated by the p53 tumor suppressor gene product. Irradiation results in increased expression of p53, which in turn induces a 21 kDa protein, WAF 1/Cip 1, that inhibits cyclin CDK kinases. S-phase delay is observed after relatively high doses of radiation. This delay has both radiosensitive and radioresistant components, corresponding to inhibition of DNA replicon initiation and DNA chain elongation, respectively. The mechanism for this delay is as yet undefined, but the extent of the delay appears to be under genetic control and is sensitive to the kinase inhibitor staurosporine. A delay in G2 has been demonstrated in virtually all eukaryotic cells examined in response to irradiation. Our studies have focused on the mechanisms responsible for this delay. Cyclin B1 and p34cdc2 are cell cycle control proteins that together form a kinase complex required for passage through G2 and mitosis [22]. Control of radiation-induced G2 delay is likely therefore to involve modulation of cyclin B1/p34cdc2 activity. We have shown in HeLa cells that cyclin B1 expression is decreased in a dose-dependent manner following irradiation. This decrease is controlled at both the level of mRNA and protein accumulation. We have also shown that radiation-sensitive rat embryo fibroblast lines (REF) immortalized with v- or c-myc display a minimal G2 delay when compared to radiation resistant cells transformed with v-myc + H-ras. These REF lines respond to irradiation with a decrease in cyclin B mRNA, which parallels the extent of their respective G2 delays. The duration of the G2 delay in radiation-resistant REF can be shortened by treatment with low doses of the kinase inhibitor staurosporine. We have also been able to markedly reduce the radiation-induced G2 delay in HeLa cells using either staurosporine or caffeine. Attenuation of the G2 delay is accompanied by reversal of the radiation-induced inhibition of cyclin B mRNA accumulation. The results of these studies are consistent with the hypothesis that reduced expression of cyclin B in response to radiation is in part responsible for the G2 delay. The duration of the G2 delay may also be influenced by the activation state of the cyclin B/p34cdc2 complex.
Cancer Research | 2008
Prevo R; Eric Deutsch; Sampson O; Diplexcito J; Keith A. Cengel; Harper J; O'Neill P; McKenna Wg; Patel S; Eric J. Bernhard
Cell signaling initiated at the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), RAS oncoproteins, or PI3K contributes to a common pathway that promotes tumor survival after radiation-induced DNA damage. Inhibition of signaling at the level of EGFR, RAS, and PI3K has been tested, but clinical applicability has been shown only at the level of the EGFR or by inhibiting RAS indirectly with prenyltransferase inhibitors. Inhibition of PI3K with LY294002 or wortmannin lacks specificity and has shown unacceptable toxicity in preclinical studies. We previously showed that inhibiting class I PI3K expression with siRNA resulted in enhanced radiation killing of tumor cells. Here, we tested the possibility of achieving specific tumor cell radiosensitization with a pharmacologic inhibitor of class I PI3K, the pyridinylfuranopyrimidine inhibitor PI-103. Our results show that inhibiting PI3K activity reduces phosphorylation of AKT at serine 473. Reduced survival is seen in cells with AKT activation and seems preferential for tumor cells over cells in which AKT activity is not elevated. Reduced survival is accompanied by persistence of DNA damage as evidenced by persistence of gamma H2AX and Rad 51 foci after irradiation in the presence of the inhibitor. Reduced survival does not result from cell cycle redistribution during the PI-103 treatment intervals tested, although combining PI-103 treatment with radiation enhances the G(2)-M delay observed after irradiation. These results indicate that pharmacologic inhibitors with enhanced specificity for class I PI3K may be of benefit when combined with radiotherapy.
International Journal of Radiation Biology | 1996
Eric J. Bernhard; Ruth J. Muschel; Bakanauskas Vj; McKenna Wg
Cells exposed to radiation may undergo death through apoptosis or mitotic death. HeLa cells predominantly undergo mitotic death after irradiation. Treatment of these cells with caffeine has been shown to shorten the G2 delay after irradiation, and to decrease their survival. The kinase inhibitor staurosporine also decreases the radiation-induced G2 delay in HeLa cells. Here we extend these findings to show that the decrease in radiation-induced G2 delay mediated by caffeine or staurosporine is accompanied by a shift in the pathway of cell death from mitotic death to apoptotic death. The increase in apoptosis is further accompanied by decreased clonogenic survival after irradiation. Based on these findings we propose the hypothesis that one mechanism of enhancing cell killing by radiation is to trigger apoptosis by decreasing the G2 delay induced by irradiation.
International Journal of Radiation Biology | 1997
Blank Kr; Rudoltz Ms; Kao Gd; Ruth J. Muschel; McKenna Wg
One of the major goals of cancer research is to identify and understand the causes of cellular proliferation. The role of cell death, or lack thereof, in carcinogenesis, tumour growth, metastatic spread and response to treatment has been largely overlooked even though the morphology of apoptosis (programmed cell death) was clearly described over 20 years ago, and its importance in cancer speculated on at that time. Over the last 5 years, however, an explosion of research has focused on delineating the molecular components of the apoptotic pathways and examining the role of apoptosis in a tumours growth and response to treatment. This review highlights the aspects of apoptosis most relevant to radiation oncologists and radiobiologists. The apoptotic pathways will be described, with attention to the stimuli that initiate apoptosis, the oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes that mediate apoptosis, and the effector enzymes (proteases and endonucleases) responsible for the execution of apoptosis. In addition, we review the effect of classically described radiobiology cell survival parameters-cell cycle stage, dose rate, linear energy transfer, oxygen, total dose, and fractionation-on radiation induced apoptosis.
Radiation Research | 1994
Eric J. Bernhard; Maity A; Ruth J. Muschel; McKenna Wg
The irradiation of cells results in delayed progression through the G2 phase of the cell cycle. Treatment of irradiated HeLa cells with caffeine greatly reduces the G2-phase delay, while caffeine does not alter progression of cells through the cell cycle in unirradiated cells. In this report we demonstrate that treatment of HeLa cells with the kinase inhibitor staurosporine, but not with the inhibitor H7, also results in a reduction of the G2-phase arrest after irradiation. Cell cycle progression in unirradiated cells is unaffected by 4.4 nM (2 ng/ml) staurosporine, which releases the radiation-induced G2-phase arrest. In HeLa cells, the G2-phase delay after irradiation in S phase is accompanied by decreased expression of cyclin B1 mRNA. Coincident with the reduction in G2-phase delay, we observed an increase in cyclin B1 mRNA accumulation in irradiated, staurosporine-treated cells compared to cells treated with irradiation alone. Caffeine treatment of irradiated HeLa cells also resulted in an elevation in the levels of cyclin B1 message. These results support the hypothesis that diminished cyclin B1 mRNA levels influence G2-phase arrest to some degree. The findings that both staurosporine and caffeine treatments reverse the depression in cyclin B1 expression suggest that these two compounds may act on a common pathway of cell cycle control in response to radiation injury.
Radiation Research | 1992
Ruth J. Muschel; Hong Bing Zhang; George Iliakis; McKenna Wg
The levels of cyclin B mRNA and protein rise rapidly in G2 + M phase, and fall at the end of mitosis. The studies described here were initiated to determine the effects of ionizing radiation on the level of cyclin B bearing in mind that the division delay induced by ionizing radiation might be influenced by the expression of cyclin B. After irradiation in S phase, the cyclin B mRNA in HeLa cells was measured as the cells proceeded through the cell cycle. Instead of the usual rise, after irradiation cyclin B mRNA levels remained low during the G2 delay. After irradiation in G2 phase, cyclin B mRNA was readily detectable although at slightly lower levels than in the controls. However, cyclin B protein was markedly decreased in amount.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 1998
Hwang A; McKenna Wg; Ruth J. Muschel
Cyclin B1 mRNA is expressed temporally throughout the cell cycle with peak expression in G2and M phase. Both transcriptional and posttranscriptional controls are important for this cell cycle-dependent regulation of cyclin B1 mRNA. In this study, we observed that cyclin B1 has two major transcripts: (a) a constitutively expressed transcript, and (b) a cell cycle-regulated transcript expressed predominantly during G2-M phase. These different transcripts are due to alternative start sites. The constitutively expressed transcript starts 65 bases upstream from the cell cycle-regulated message. Changes in mRNA stability did not appear to control the expression of the cell cycle-specific transcript, but we were able to identify a 24-base pair region of the cyclin B1 promoter spanning the start site of the cell cycle-regulated transcript that was critical for its cell cycle-regulated promoter activity. This suggests that transcriptional regulation is responsible for controlling the presence of each message. The 24-base pair sequence required for cell cycle regulation was notable for containing the nucleotides GGCT repeated three times. The possibility that these two transcripts might be physiologically distinct was raised when the cell cycle-specific transcript was found to be translated more efficientlyin vitro than the constitutively expressed transcript. These results characterize a novel mechanism for the regulation of cyclin B1 throughout the cell cycle that is dependent upon the use of different transcriptional start sites.
International Journal of Radiation Biology | 2003
Thomas Brunner; Anjali K. Gupta; Y. Shi; Stephen M. Hahn; Ruth J. Muschel; McKenna Wg; Eric J. Bernhard
Purpose: The inhibition of activated Ras combined with radiotherapy was identified as a potential method for radiosensitization. Materials and methods: Immunoblotting was used to control for prenylation inhibition of the respective Ras isoforms and for changes in activity of downstream proteins. Clonogenic assays with human and rodent tumour cell lines and transfected cell lines served for the testing of radiosensitivity. Xenograft tumours were treated with farnesyl transferase inhibitors and radiation and assayed for ex vivo plating efficiency, regrowth of tumours and EF5 staining for detection of hypoxia. Concurrent treatment with L‐778,123 and radiotherapy was performed in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Results: Blocking the prenylation of Ras proteins in cell lines with Ras activated by mutations or receptor signalling resulted in radiation sensitization in vitro and in vivo. The PI3 kinase downstream pathway was identified as a contributor to Ras‐mediated radiation resistance. Additionally, increased oxygenation of xenograft tumours was observed after FTI treatment. Combined treatment in a phase I study was safe and effective in NSCLC and HNC. Conclusions: Tumour cells with activated Ras were sensitized to radiation. Unravelling the underlying mechanisms promises to lead to even more specific drugs with higher potency and safety.
Radiation Research | 1994
Eric J. Bernhard; McKenna Wg; Ruth J. Muschel
Many studies have demonstrated the effect of oncogene transfection on the radiation sensitivity of primary rat embryo fibroblasts. Our results indicate that transformation by H-ras plus v-myc oncogenes confers radiation resistance to a much greater extent than transformation by either gene alone. We have further shown that the radioresistant phenotype is accompanied by a prolonged G2-phase delay. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the extent of this delay is an important determinant of radiation sensitivity. The study of cyclin expression during the progression of cells through G2 and M phase after irradiation has also revealed several possible mechanisms for induction of G2-phase arrest. Control of cyclin B levels was seen both at the mRNA level as evidenced by decreased cyclin B mRNA expression after irradiation in the S phase, and at the protein level as demonstrated after irradiation in G2 phase. It remains to be determined how these mechanisms might be differentially regulated in radioresistant and sensitive cells.