Mehmet Arhan

Left-Sided Portal Hypertension

Left-sided portal hypertension is a rare clinical syndrome which may lead to bleeding from isolated gastric varices. Pancreatic disease is the most common etiology. Left-sided portal hypertension should be considered in the presence of gastrointestinal bleeding with normal liver function and unexplained splenomegaly. It may be difficult to diagnose this entity both endoscopically and radiologically. While splenectomy is the treatment of choice for cases complicated by variceal bleeding, there is no consensus on the treatment of asymptomatic patients. The prognosis of left-sided portal hypertension mainly depends on the underlying etiology.

Endoscopic topical application of Ankaferd Blood Stopper for neoplastic gastrointestinal bleeding: A retrospective analysis

AIM The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the haemostatic efficacy of the endoscopic topical use of Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) in the setting of neoplastic GI bleeding. METHODS The records of 10 patients with neoplastic GI bleeding (7 gastric, 3 rectal) were evaluated retrospectively. Written informed consent regarding the off-label use of ABS as a means of attaining haemostasis had been obtained from all of the patients prior to the procedure. In all patients, ABS was applied topically. Rates of bleeding control and post-procedural complications were documented. RESULTS Haemostasis was achieved in all patients within seconds of endoscopic application of ABS, with no immediate complications. Seven patients underwent subsequent cancer surgery after a bleeding-free post-procedural period. CONCLUSIONS ABS as a novel haemostatic agent could have a potential benefit in controlling bleeding from GI tumours. Prospective controlled studies are needed to help establish its efficacy, and perhaps offer a comparison to conventional haemostatic interventions.

Mucocutaneous manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and features of the major cutaneous manifestations (erythema nodosum [EN] and pyoderma gangrenosum [PG]) and to determine the associations between cutaneous manifestations and other extraintestinal manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: The mucocutaneous manifestations of patients with IBD were studied between December 2002 and June 2007. All patients underwent a detailed whole body examination by a gastroenterologist and dermatologist. Results: In all, 352 patients were included in this study; 34 patients (9.3%) presented with at least 1 major cutaneous manifestation. The prevalence of EN (26 patients) and PG (8 patients) in IBD was 7.4% and 2.3%, respectively. EN was more common in Crohns disease (16/118) than ulcerative colitis (10/234) (P = 0.002). EN was found to be related to disease activity of the bowel (P = 0.026). The prevalence of arthritis was significantly higher in the IBD patients with EN (11/26) than in IBD patients without EN (53/326) (P = 0.006). Arthritis was more common in IBD patients with PG (7/8) than in IBD patients without PG (57/344) (P = 0.00). IBD patients with PG were significantly more likely to have uveitis (1/8) compared with IBD patients without PG (5/344) (P = 0.017). Conclusions: We found the prevalence of 2 important cutaneous manifestations to be 9.3% in IBD in Turkish patients. EN was found to be more common in Crohns disease and is associated with an active episode of bowel disease and peripheral arthritis. In addition, PG was connected with uveitis and peripheral arthritis. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009)

Ankaferd Blood Stopper for controlling gastrointestinal bleeding due to distinct benign lesions refractory to conventional antihemorrhagic measures.

OBJECTIVE To assess the hemostatic efficacy of the Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS, Ankaferd Health Products Ltd, Turkey) hemostatic agent for controlling gastrointestinal bleeding associated with various benign lesions refractory to conventional antihemorrhagic measures. METHODS The records of all patients who underwent upper and lower endoscopy procedures at the Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Teaching and Research Hospital (Ankara, Turkey) between April 2008 and June 2009 were reviewed. Patients in whom ABS was used as a primary or adjuvant hemostatic agent were included in the study. Rates of bleeding control and postprocedural complications were documented. RESULTS Hemostasis with no immediate complications was achieved in all patients within seconds of endoscopic application of ABS. CONCLUSIONS ABS may have a role as a primary treatment or as an adjuvant to conventional modalities used to control gastrointestinal bleeding. Prospective controlled studies are needed to help establish its efficacy and, perhaps, offer a comparison with conventional hemostatic interventions.

Report of 24 left-sided portal hypertension cases: a single-center prospective cohort study.

Our aim was to analyze patients diagnosed with left-sided portal hypertension prospectively and to document the complications at follow-up. Twenty-four patients with isolated splenic vein thrombosis (diagnosed by ultrasonography or angiography or intraoperatively) and/or isolated fundal varices (diagnosed by endoscopy or endosonography) were involved in this study. Demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and morbidity and mortality were recorded in their follow-up. There were 11 and 13 left-sided portal hypertension cases associated with pancreatic diseases and nonpancreatic disorders, respectively. Chronic abdominal pain and gastrointestinal bleeding were the two most common complaints. All patients except one had isolated esophageal (2 cases) or fundal (21 cases) varices. Thirteen patients had splenomegaly on ultrasonography. On Doppler sonography, the splenic vein could be evaluated in 21 of the 24 patients (9 and 6 had complete and partial occlusion, respectively, and 6 had patent blood flow). Urgent intervention with therapeutic endoscopy and splenectomy was performed for two patients each. Medical therapy was begun for three patients according to the underlying diseases. Three patients underwent elective surgery. Two patients were lost to follow-up after the first visit and the mean follow-up of the remaining 22 patients after diagnosis of left-sided portal hypertension was 20 months. Only one patient (with pancreas cancer) had gastrointestinal bleeding at follow-up. All patients with pancreas and gastric cancer died within 2–12 months. Left-sided portal hypertension has various etiologies. It may be difficult to diagnose this entity both endoscopically and radiologically. Treatment should be directed at the underlying diseases. Recurrent hemorrhage due to left-sided portal hypertension is not usual and the prognosis depends mainly on the underlying etiology.

Effects of esophageal varice eradication on portal hypertensive gastropathy and fundal varices: a retrospective and comparative study.

Esophageal varice eradication results in gastric hemodynamic changes. The aim of this study was to detect the influence of variceal eradication on portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) and fundal varices and to compare the results of two therapeutic methods (endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic sclerotherapy). A total of 114 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension who underwent elective endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) (85 patients) or endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) (29 patients) for obliteration of esophageal varices were selected for this study. Both groups were compared for PHG and fundal varice formation before and after eradication. Fifty-eight (68.2%) patients in the EVL and 18 (62.1%) patients in the EST group had PHG before esophageal varice eradication (P > 0.05). PHG grade after eradication of esophageal varices by both EVL and EST was significantly higher compared to pre-eradication. PHG grade and aggregation were similar in both groups. Thirty-seven patients (34 F1, 3 F2) in the EVL group and 13 patients (10 F1, 3 F2) in the EST group had fundal varices before variceal eradication (P > 0.05). Fundal varices were detected in 46 (35 F1, 11F2) and 19 (11F1, 8F2) patients in the EVL and EST groups after eradication, respectively. There was a statistically significant increment in occurrence of fundal varices after eradication with EVL and EST groups. There was no significant difference regarding fundal varice development after esophageal variceal eradication in both groups. After varical eradication, PHG was found in 57 (87.7%) and 39 (79.6%) patients with and without fundal varices, respectively (P > 0.05). Esophageal eradication with EVL and EST increases both the incidence and the severity of PHG and fundal varice formation. Both methods have comparable influences on PHG and fundal varices.

Probable Sulbactam/Ampicillin–Associated Prolonged Cholestasis

OBJECTIVE To present a single case of sulbactam/ampicillin–induced chronic cholestasis and a literature review of antibiotic-associated chronic cholestasis. CASE SUMMARY A 74-year-old man with Hodgkins disease in remission developed severe and prolonged cholestasis after treatment with sulbactam/ampicillin 750 mg twice daily for 7 days. All other etiologies, including Hodgkins disease, were appropriately ruled out and the cholestasis was ascribed to sulbactam/ampicillin treatment. The patient improved gradually and became asymptomatic 7 months after the last dose of sulbactam/ampicillin. According to the Naranjo probability scale, sulbactam/ampicillin was the probable cause of the cholestasis. DISCUSSION Ampicillin, a semisynthetic penicillin, has rarely been associated with hepatic injury when used alone. Hepatocellular and acute cholestatic injury due to ampicillin have been described. Cholestasis secondary to sulbactam/ampicillin use has not been previously reported. CONCLUSIONS Sulbactam/ampicillin, one of the most widely used antibiotics, may cause chronic cholestatic hepatitis. Clinicians should be aware of this adverse affect and consider it during diagnostic workup of liver injury.

Thrombosis of the portal venous system: a prospective study.

Background Thrombosis in the portal system causes a wide spectrum of clinical pictures. There are few published studies describing the clinical features and consequences of portal venous system thrombosis. We aimed to document presentations and outcomes in patients with thrombosis in the portal and/or splenic veins. Patients and Methods The study included 95 patients who were diagnosed with portal venous system thrombosis in the period September 2001 to April 2006. Demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic investigation, management, morbidity, and mortality were recorded in their follow-up. Results Of the 95 patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), 35 had isolated PVT (IPVT), 27 had isolated splenic vein thrombosis (ISVT), and 33 had thrombosis in both the portal and splenic veins (PSVT). The mean follow-up periods after diagnosis of IPVT, ISVT, and PSVT were 36, 31, and 32 months, respectively. Abdominal pain and gastrointestinal bleeding were the most common symptoms at presentation in the IPVT and PSVT groups, whereas abdominal pain was the dominant symptom in the ISVT group. During the follow-up period, no bleeding was seen in 26 of the 35 (74%) patients with IPVT, in 23 of the 33 (70%) patients with PSVT, and in 24 of the 27 (89%) patients with ISVT. Biliopathy developed during follow-up in 11 of 35 patients with IPVT, in 1 of 27 with ISVT, and in 5 of 33 with PSVT. In the ISVT group, there were 11 deaths, and one each in the IPVT and PSVT groups. Conclusions The etiology of PVT varies in portal and splenic veins. IPVT has a higher morbidity (bleeding and portal biliopathy), whereas ISVT that is not associated with an underlying malignancy has a favorable prognosis.

Diagnostic value of terminal ileum biopsy in chronic diarrhea with normal endoscopic appearance.

OBJECTIVE:  To investigate the diagnostic value of a terminal ileum biopsy in chronic non‐bloody diarrhea with normal endoscopic appearance.

Colonoscopy-Induced Ischemic Colitis in a Young Patient With no Risk Factor

To the Editor: Ischemic colitis is the most common form of intestinal ischemia. Although frequent in the elderly, younger patients may also be affected (1). Very few cases have been reported following endoscopic examinations thus far (2,3). Here we present a case of ischemic colitis following colonoscopy in a young patient with no risk factor.